Stories of Covid vaccination side effects or worse

More people to go

A colleague at my subway work in Stockholm, who just recently went into early pension, died shortly after from pneumonia which lead to that her heart suddenly stopped. I remember her as vivid and youthful e.g. a very healthy lady.

Apparently she was jabbed and the fast illness pattern went down exactly the same way like another metro driver who died suddenly at an age of just 54. (after he was jabbed just months before)

Another colleague, age 45-50 (?) just got a diagnosis of pancreatic and bile bladder cancer and is now given chemotherapy. A pal made him aware of that there is a connection between modRNA injections and e.g. cancer, including rare ones and fast growing types. He now starts for the first time to get a hunch that there is more buried behind to the official covid story…

As the two were talking in the lunchroom, a nearby younger guard had listened… adding that his mother too, just got a cancer diagnosis.

At work i am often unaware of many underpinnings and stories in people’s lives - especially now that i am working/driving trains only at night, rarely meeting my other colleagues.

However, I am sure many more got injection related illnesses than i know of. Yet from time to time i do get to know some background information.

It is saddening to see the still dominating ignorance in people, ruling their minds, while the false covid narrative sits safe in the saddle. Like a mask that is glued to their faces.
 
Just learned that my niece (32) in Denver has a brain tumor. Surgery and diagnosis in a few weeks. Fully vaccinated, and probably this year too.
This is the sister of my niece (an RN, and daughter of a pediatrician) I mentioned earlier that wound up in ICU for quick getting the shot when she found out she had Covid (and also mentioned here as being in that Corbin, KY tornado). After all that, her father/my brother still calls to nag me about getting the shot every year.
Anyway, I hope this tumor is benign and her surgical outcome is good. I don't really talk to them much because they think I'm nuts. I keep up mainly through one of my children who can appear to be sympathetic to both viewpoints. I'm not aware that they are asking for prayers.
 
Be aware that the article is from slay news, which is not very reliable and often makes headlines which overstates things. In the 2 German studies, they were concerned about safety levels far exceeding the allowed limits:
The researchers hypothesized that residual DNA contaminants in multiple batches of Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” significantly exceed regulatory safety thresholds.
So nowhere were they trying to say anything about cancer. Their findings:

The researchers confirm that their findings reveal that DNA contamination exceeded safe levels by approximately 300 to 500 times.
So, what they found is a far cry from the headline and no need to bring out the champagne yet. Slay news then brings comments from someone in the US and a study he did but again nothing to do with Germany confirming this or that. Slay news just like The People's Voice are known for quickly spinning a story from scraps which doesn't do a service to those who critically evaluate the Covid vaccines.

The story apart from being misleading also doesn't belong in this thread if it belongs in any thread at all. This thread is about stories of people we know or have heard of who have died or had side-effects from it. Yes, there have been many stories from other people such as athletes or public figures etc, who have died or had side-effects and that is also okay for this thread. There is a dedicated Covid thread which deals with all about covid and vaccines etc. , so check where an article fits best. And watch out for known clickbait sites.
 
Last edited:
Vaccinosis, or clusters of diseases created by vaccines, was a subject of study in dogs years ago. One of the points that come to light from that, from what I recall, was that diseases and symptoms got worse for progressive generations if each generation was vaccinated. Since dogs have shorter life spans and reproduce comparatively quickly, the trends were noticed by some long term breeders. If covid vaccinations follow the same pattern, then we haven't seen the worst of it yet in those segments of the population that continue with this vaccination.

There is a vax compliant family that I know with 3 children under 10yo. The eldest has already battled leukaemia, more recently a cancerous mass has been discovered in the digestive tract of the 2nd child. It's just so damned sad that the parents cannot question vaccines and these beautiful kids are suffering so much.
 
At work i am often unaware of many underpinnings and stories in people’s lives - especially now that i am working/driving trains only at night, rarely meeting my other colleagues.

Although, in the same way this applies to stories of people getting sick from the shots, I’ve found that it also applies to people coming to the realisation of their deleterious effects.

The problem is that people are afraid to talk to each other about it and share their realisations. But once they do, there’s visible relief in having shared what they think, and the knowledge that they’re not just crazy or conspiracy theorists.
 
The story apart from being misleading also doesn't belong in this thread if it belongs in any thread at all. This thread is about stories of people we know or have heard of who have died or had side-effects from it. Yes, there have been many stories from other people such as athletes or public figures etc, who have died or had side-effects and that is also okay for this thread. There is a dedicated Covid thread which deals with all about covid and vaccines etc. , so check where an article fits best. And watch out for known clickbait sites.
Good point about Slaynews, however I think that this has been the general covid vaccines thread (including stories, news and studies) while the covid thread was about the virus and the "pandemic" measures. At least that is how most here have been using these threads.
 
Be aware that the article is from slay news, which is not very reliable and often makes headlines which overstates things. In the 2 German studies, they were concerned about safety levels far exceeding the allowed limits:

So nowhere were they trying to say anything about cancer.
OK - adding Slay News to other unreliable sites that have been named by this forum. Otherwise, there's this, dated yesterday, on the Gateway Pundit:

First Population-Wide Peer-Reviewed Study Finds COVID-19 “Vaccines” Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers — CONFIRMS Fears of “Turbo Cancer” Epidemic

A bombshell peer-reviewed study out of Italy has just shattered the narrative peddled by Big Pharma, corporate media, and government health bureaucrats.

For the first time, a population-wide cohort of nearly 300,000 people tracked over 30 months has revealed that the so-called “safe and effective” COVID-19 shots are linked to alarming spikes in multiple forms of cancer.

Researchers followed every resident aged 11 and older in Italy’s Pescara province from June 2021 through December 2023, examining hospital records and adjusting for age, sex, prior health conditions, and even prior COVID infection.

The researchers allegedly found that those who received at least one vaccine dose had a much lower risk of dying from any cause compared to the unvaccinated, and this protective effect was even stronger in people who had three or more doses.
When looking at cancer, the picture was less clear. People who had been vaccinated appeared somewhat more likely to be hospitalized with a new cancer diagnosis than those who were unvaccinated, particularly for cancers of the breast, bladder, and colon.

However, this increased risk was only evident in people who had never been infected with COVID-19, and it disappeared—or even reversed—when the analysis required at least twelve months to pass between vaccination and a hospital admission for cancer.
  • Hospitalizations for cancer were 35% higher in vaccinated individuals versus the unvaccinated (HR 1.23).
  • The link was strongest in men and in those with no prior COVID infection.
  • Overall Cancer Risk: +23% after just one dose
  • Breast Cancer: +54% risk after vaccination
  • Bladder Cancer: +62% increased risk
  • Colorectal Cancer: +35% increased risk
Even after multiple doses, the risks remained elevated across the board.

The authors noted that vaccinated individuals are usually healthier, wealthier, and more likely to get preventative care, a phenomenon called the “healthy vaccinee bias.”

If anything, the numbers should have shown lower cancer rates. Instead, cancers surged. That means the real danger could be far worse than what the data shows.

Doctors and whistleblowers have been warning for years about sudden, aggressive cancers appearing in otherwise healthy people after the jab.

This study, alongside more than 100 other peer-reviewed papers, confirms the link between mRNA injections and deadly cancer pathways. A new medical term has even been coined: COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced “Turbo Cancer.”
Additional data in article.

No longer speculative about causation:
So, considering the above, are we there yet or merely close enough for horseshoes? Interesting that "healthy vaccinee bias" may account for the findings of paragraph four. Also, it should be noted from the additional data:

Anecdotal reports suggested an association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and some
cancers, but no formal assessment has been published. This population-wide cohort
analysis was aimed at evaluating the risk of all-cause death and cancer hospitalization
by SARS-CoV-2 immunization status. Using National Health System official data, the
entire population of the Pescara province, Italy was followed from June 2021 (six
months after the first vaccination) to December 2023. Cox models were adjusted for
age, gender, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and selected comorbidities. Of the 296,015
residents aged ≥11 years, 16.6% were unvaccinated, 83.3% received ≥1 dose, and
62.2% ≥3 doses. Compared with the unvaccinated, those receiving ≥1 dose showed a
significantly lower likelihood of all-cause death, and a slightly higher likelihood of
hospitalization for cancer (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.11-1.37). The latter association was
significant only among the subjects with no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and was
reversed when the minimum time between vaccination and cancer hospitalization was
set to 12 months. The subjects who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed a
substantial reduction in all-cause mortality, and a risk of cancer hospitalization that
varied by infection status, cancer site, and the minimum lag-time after vaccination.
Given that it was not possible to quantify the potential impact of the healthy vaccinee
bias and unmeasured confounders, these findings are inevitably preliminary.

Should it be concerning that the reference is to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rather than mRNA genetic therapy? That these injections are being identified as vaccines in these studies somehow negate the validity of the results? Just more of the wordplay being utilized to coverup the reality of the bioweapon that was unleashed upon the world?

As ever - the comments! 1277 as of this writing. Very astute readers dig into the findings and question the obvious contradictions - or covert bias? Figures don't lie, but liars can figure?
What does everyone make of the above? It makes it sound like it is a good thing to get the covid vaccine, right? I'm not saying it is a good thing, but that's what that paragraph is indicating, correct?

Also, what about the part where it says that those who received at least one vaccine dose had a much lower risk of dying from "any cause" compared to the unvaccinated? Wasn't the covid vaccine specifically designed to fight covid? How can it lower the risk of dying from "ANY CAUSE"? Are they saying the covid vaccine should be taken for ANY disease or sickness? After all, the study did say "those who received at least one vaccine dose had a much lower risk of dying from any cause". How did the covid shot all of a sudden become a miracle drug that can be used for "any cause"?
"The researchers allegedly found that those who received at least one vaccine dose had a much lower risk of dying from any cause* compared to the unvaccinated, and this protective effect was even stronger in people who had three or more doses."

* Except for cancer.
Well the chart of cancers shows that the more doses the less chance of cancer. How could one dose cause cancer and three doses reduce it? That makes no sense.
Yes I noticed that and I also noticed that the chart on cancers showed your risk of cancer went dramatically down with additional doses. The more doses the less cancer. Does anyone think the left will not just point to that and say “see? It works”. I don’t understand this study at all and it doesn’t come across as being an anti vax bombshell at all.

And so, round and round we go . . . more good points and insights made in addition to the above that continue to delve into the contradictions with plausible explanations. That so many are thinking critically is heartening.

Should the Gateway Pundit be added to the highly questionable sources? Are they just so desperate for validation that the shots cause cancer that they grasp at any factoid that indicates it? I'm rather disappointed that there was no editorial disclaimer concerning the studies - or was it purposely left up to the readers? 🤔
 
Back
Top Bottom