Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

Dmitry Medvedev has weighed in on the spat between Poland and Ukraine, which was sparked by insults from a Ukrainian journalist directed at the republic's president.

Earlier, Vitaliy Mazurenko compared Karol Nawrocki to a criminal authority figure in a prison, calling him a "pakhan" (crime boss). Following this, the portal Obserwator Międzynarodowy fired him, and Kyiv was demanded to issue an apology.

When the clinical Russophobes are at each other's throats – the Lyakhs and the Bandera followers – it's a good thing.

The proud Poliaks are locking horns with the neo-Nazis from Kyiv over the mass murder of Poles during the Volyn massacre. The new President Navrotsky, though a certified Russophobe, has grabbed this issue by the balls and is nailing the Bandera scum to the wall on Bankova Street. And they are retorting in the spirit of: "Well, yeah, we don't deny we're the heirs of Stepan Bandera, but that's precisely why we hate everything Russian and are, by right, your younger brothers, dear Polish pans." And they've been going at it hammer and tongs for weeks now, spewing shit from firehoses at each other. Threats are flying to deprive the Ukro-Nazis of their most sacred things – their ration of salo and a shot of Polish vodka, or even to kick the unwashed serfs out of the Rzeczpospolita altogether. And the Bandera mob, in response, opened their stinking gobs and are screeching about European values and the need to unite tighter against the cursed orcs.

A fine mess, in short. Well done.

Now we're just waiting for the newly-appointed Taras Bulba to show up on Bankova and say: "So, my son, did your Lyakhs help you?"

And then there's only one way this ends. Well, you know the one: "I gave you life…"

And this is a former president of Russia, folks. :lol:
 
After all that the NATO side has done and is doing, their present cries sound pretty hollow. Also, especially after the nuclear facility bombing, there has been quite a bit of Scuttlebutt about Putin getting pressure from the Russian people about taking off the gloves.

EU, UK Diplomatic Missions Hit In Russia's 2nd Largest Assault On Kiev Of War​


"EU mission in Kyiv charges Russia with having targeted diplomats "in direct breach of the Vienna convention."

"Crucially the European Union's diplomatic mission in the capital was also damaged"

"in apparent retaliation for Ukraine's increasingly brazen cross-border drone attacks on Russian energy sites and factories."

"British Foreign Secretary David Lammy posted on X: "Putin's strikes last night killed civilians, destroyed homes and damaged buildings, including the British Council and EU Delegation in Kyiv."

"We have summoned the Russian Ambassador. The killing and destruction must stop," he added. President Trump or the White House is also likely to chime in later in the day to condemn the attack. Peace still seems very far away at this point."

Video and X posts in the article below:

 
And this is a former president of Russia, folks. :lol:
I would still add some to Iron Dimon and finish the quote he gave in the finale to reveal the meaning. I think that not everyone here is familiar with the work of Nikolai Gogol, and what is obvious to almost every Russian is not the case in this audience.
"I begot you, and I'm going to kill you!"
Just in case, I also want to quote from the same author, from the same work and belonging to the same hero.
"– Goodbye, comrades! He shouted at them from above. – Remember me and come here again next spring and have a good walk! What? Caught me, damn Poles ? Do you think there is anything in the world that a Cossack would be afraid of? Wait, the time will come, the time will come, you will find out what the Orthodox Russian faith is! Even now, distant and close peoples can sense that tsar is rising from the Russian land, and there will be no power in the world that would not submit to him!.."

This is probably why Gogol is considered a foreign writer in modern Ukraine.

I can't find the link now, but some telegram channels say that after the conflict ends, former members of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be banned from entering the EU. Wow! This should be reported to literally every AFU servicemen as soon as possible. After all, they are fighting for "European values," but they will not be allowed into Borrel's "blooming garden."
For some reason, this doesn't surprise me. At all times, those who agree to be used are used without sentiment, so to speak, and then they are also disposed of without sentiment.

Я бы все же несколько дополнил Железного Димона и закончил цитату, которую он привел в финале, для раскрытия смысла. Здесь, мне думается, далеко не все знакомы с творчеством Н.В. Гоголя и то, что для практически поголовно каждого русского очевидно, в данной аудитории таковым не является.
На всякий случай еще хочу привести цитату того же автора, из того же произведения и принадлежашую тому же герою.
Видимо поэтому на современной украине Гоголя считают иностранным писателем.
Сейчас я не найду ссылку, но некоторые телегамм каналы пишут о том, что после завершения конфликта бывшим членам ВСУ будет запрещен въезд в ЕС. Ого! Об этом надо как можно быстрее сообщить буквально каждому ВСУшнику. Они ведь воюют за "европейские ценности", но в "цветущий сад" Борреля их не пустят.
Почему то меня это не удивляет. Во все времена, тех кто соглашается быть использованными, используют так сказать без сантиментов, а потом так же без сантиментов от них избавляются.
 
And this is a former president of Russia, folks. :lol:
I began to analyze his text, and has finally finished, but can see you already did some explaining:
I would still add some to Iron Dimon and finish the quote he gave in the finale to reveal the meaning. I think that not everyone here is familiar with the work of Nikolai Gogol, and what is obvious to almost every Russian is not the case in this audience.

Anyway, here is what I have:

The translation is good enough, but perhaps Medvedev has decided to up the game of using allusions. Without knowing history, politics, and literature, some of the meaning is lost. Below are words and expressions I looked up.

the Lyakhs and the Bandera followers
While it is clear enough what is referred to, I did not know that Lyakhs was a word for Poles. The Wiki has an entry for Lach
Lach (Polish pronunciation: pronounced [ˈlax]), Lyakh or Ljach is a surname. It was used by East Slavs to refer to Poles.[1] Ethnic Poles in Nowy Sącz (south-eastern Poland) also used the name, referring to themselves as Lachy Sądeckie. According to Paweł Jasienica, it derives from the name of an ancient Polish tribe, the Lendians.[2]
Under Lendians: there is a map which calls them Lędzianie, it is in the lower right in the border area of present day southeastern Poland and the most western parts of Ukraine, which seems to have been and area of conflict for more than thousand years.
Plemiona_polskie.png
It is suggested that the name "Lędzianie" (*lęd-jan-inъ) derives from the word "lęda" of Proto-Slavic and Old Polish origin, meaning "slash-and-burn field".[1][2]. Therefore it is suggested that the name of the tribe comes from their use of slash-and-burn agriculture, which involved cutting and burning of forests or woodlands to create fields.[2] Accordingly, in this meaning Lendians were woodland-burning farmers,[3] or "inhabitants of fields".[4] Several European nations source their ethnonym for Poles, and hence Poland, from the name of Lendians: Lithuanians (lenkai, Lenkija) and Hungarians (Lengyelország).[5][6]
The Polish Wiki
Ledzianie (*Ledo + It is derived from the Proto-Slavic and Old Polish word "Leda", which means an area, a plain, an unfinished field intended or suitable for agriculture. [2][3] The tribe's name comes directly from burning and burning wood, which involves cutting down and burning forests to prepare land for farmland. [3] In accordance with this meaning, Ledyanin meant a farmer, "logger"[4].
From the Eng Wiki again:
Gerard Labuda notes that the Rus' originally called a specific tribal group settled around the Vistula river as the Lendians and only later in the 11th and 12th century started to apply the name of the tribe to the entire populace of the "Piast realm" because of their common language.[7]
About their history:
The West Slavs (Lendians and Vistulans) moved into the area of present-day south-eastern Poland, during the early 6th century AD. Around 833, the region inhabited by the Lendians was incorporated into the Great Moravian state. Upon the invasion of the Hungarian tribes into the heart of Central Europe around 899, the Lendians submitted to their authority (Masudi). In the first half of the 10th century, they alongside Krivichs and other Slavic people paid tribute to Igor I of Kiev (DAI).[6]
Here is another map from Polish historians which show the Lendians inhabit the border area between the early Polish state and the Early Kievan Rus.
Polska_960_-_992.png The description is
Cherven Cities, partly inhabited by the Lendians, as part of Poland under the rule of Mieszko I until 981 AD according to the Polish historiography.


nailing the Bandera scum to the wall on Bankova Street
Bankova Street
[...] houses the Presidential Office of Ukraine and various official residences, notably the House with Chimaeras.
House with Chimaeras
Situated across the street from the President of Ukraine's office at No. 10, Bankova Street, the building has been used as a presidential residence for official and diplomatic ceremonies since 2005.
The Russian Wiki gives the understanding that Bankova, especially in the Ukraine press is used as the Kremlin, the White House

Polish pans
Pan is a form of polite address used in some Slavic languages: Polish, Czech, Slovak, Ukrainian and Belarusian.

Salo is depicted below, Polish vodka needs no explanation
Sało.JPG
The next part is quite long, and is a comment on the above lard
What might Medvedev allude to by mentioning Salo?
The current UA administration is also described as Saloreich (Салорейх/lit: lard regime, or lard realm)
It is possible the word actually developed among discontented and reflecting Ukrainians. The first person, I heard was Tetiana Montian, a Ukrainian lawyer, journalist and blogger, who was involved with the Orange Revolution:
During the 2004 presidential election, Montyan was responsible for countering election fraud in the Mykolaiv region. Together with other lawyers, she coordinated the work of about 600 members of election commissions and observers[16].
But she was against the Maidan show. In fact, she might be a good reason why Saloreich has become popular. One VK post from April 2022 has a dictionary of terms she uses or has coined including saloreich:
‘Saloreich was raised by the West to be slaughtered.

‘The viewers and listeners of Zeleobus are people without critical thinking. And in his speeches, everyone hears what they want to hear and filters out what does not fit into their distorted picture of the world.’
👏👍 @Montyan

Tatyana's dictionary:
* Saloreich - the Ukrainian authorities and their followers;
* Zelebobus - Zelensky;
* Saucepan-headed (кастрюлеголовый) - Maidan supporters and other jumping evil spirits.
Translating the meaning given under кастрюлеголовый
tj. substantiir., polit. jarg., contemptible. very stupid, poorly thinking (usually about Ukrainians who participated in Euromaidan or supported it and the post-Maidan government)
DeepL translates it as potheads, but it is not in the sense usually understood in English, it can be quite literal:
Spoilt.exile_19.01.2014_(12038537144).jpg
Saloreich layed out by Tatiana Montian
The short translation above was - "the Ukrainian authorities and their followers" It is more nuanced and Tatiana Montyan explains what she means in the following two Russian videos, to which there is a summary of some points.
Montyan is on the air. What is Saloreich? Монтян в эфире. Что такое Салорейх?
Ukraine is a country, which was taken into colonial serfdom on the Maidan, and on the territory of Ukraine was created a a quasi-state colonial education under direct management of the Pentagon and NATO, because all public resources, as you can see for yourself, were thrown to military purposes. Education, medicine, science, culture, all went for military enlistment, militarization, training and ideological brainwashing in the Nazi direction of the fighting comrades. And this included Russians, referring to a Russian nationalist who said that they had won over the Azov, but he was astonished to learn that among them, 4 out of 5 were natural Russians. (This talk as you can hear is from the 2022). She sums it up and moves forward saying that SaloReich is a quasi-state education consisting of two words, salo and reich ... This education was intentionally created with one goal, to destroy the image of Russia, causing maximum damage and flooding the brotherly peoples with blood, one part of this people had been brainwashed by Nazism to a mirror-like shine.​
In another:
Who are SALO REICHS? Montyan Tatyana Nikolaevna answers. Кто такие САЛО РЕЙХИ. Отвечает Монтян Татьяна Николаевна. She begins by saying she has already explained it a million times! (Do a search of the term in Russian on t.me/montyan2 if you wish to verify) In the video Motyan says something similar to the previous one and adds that this system of education took its beginnings in 1993 and was intensified after Maidan. It was preintended for slaughter/(war). She talks about the two words, salo and reich, and gives the understanding, if paraphrased, that salo (Salo/Сало (UA Wiki) litererally lard), represents pigs and by extension in this context brainwashed people who like pigs are raised for the slaughterhouse/war.​

Maybe Medvedev did not mean it that complicated when using Salo, but diving into the word led to new perspectives. Next is:

kick the unwashed serfs out of the Rzeczpospolita altogether
Rzeczpospolita
Rzeczpospolita (pronounced [ʐɛt͡ʂpɔsˈpɔlita] is a traditional Polish term for a political community founded for the common good. The noun "rzeczpospolita", meaning "public welfare, general good or advantage" rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", is analogous to the Latin rēs pūblica (rēs "thing" + pūblica "public, common"), i.e. republic, in English also rendered as commonwealth (historic) and republic (current).

In modern Polish, the word rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland

Taras Bulba
Now we're just waiting for the newly-appointed Taras Bulba to show up on Bankova and say: "So, my son, did your Lyakhs help you?"
Taras Bulba (Russian: «Тарас Бульба», romanized: Tarás Búl'ba) is a romanticized historical novella set in the first half of the 17th century, written by Nikolai Gogol (1809–1852). It features the elderly Zaporozhian Cossack Taras Bulba and his sons Andriy and Ostap. The sons study at the Kiev Academy and then return home, whereupon the three men set out on a journey to the Zaporizhian Sich (the Zaporizhian Cossack headquarters, located in southern Ukraine) where they join other Cossacks and go to war against Poland.

The story was initially published in 1835 as part of the Mirgorod collection of short stories, but a much expanded version appeared in 1842 with some differences in the storyline. The twentieth-century critic Victor Erlich [ru] described the 1842 text as a "paragon of civic virtue and a force of patriotic edification", contrasting it with the rhetoric of the 1835 version with its "distinctly Cossack jingoism".[1]
Of the two sons, Ostrap ended up with the Poles and was eventually shot by his father. It is quite a harrowing story, really.

In the message from Medvedev, Bankova appears twice
The new President Navrotsky, though a certified Russophobe, has grabbed this issue by the balls and is nailing the Bandera scum to the wall on Bankova Street.
This indicates a threat to the Bandera followers from the west and Poland in particular.
Now we're just waiting for the newly-appointed Taras Bulba to show up on Bankova and say: "So, my son, did your Lyakhs help you?"
Medvedev plays with the idea that a person or a group from within the area of Ukraine opposes what the current group in power is doing. So far, there has not been any serious threat to Zelensky and co, and that is why we're just waiting because judging from the story and history of the area, it is a possibility that such will arise.

Whereas Medvedev looks at the situations with sparks flying between Poland and Ukraine as a spectator, if one was a president supporting Pole or Ukrainian there would be less to laugh about. Maybe more carrots or sticks from the US or the EU will do, but I have questions for such people?

Is it true as Montyan says that Western powers have set Ukrainians up to be slaughtered in a front against Russia for their own purposes?
Does what Montyan says about the educational system in Ukraine also have a degree of validity for Poland?
To what extend did Poland help to turn Ukraine into a Saloreich?

A part of the modern version of the European values is to not ask too many questions, especially not of the above kind. If both Poles and Ukrainians can agree on that much, then what do they think about Taras Bulba? I already hear the answer, "the author was Gogol and he wrote in Russian". To which I will say, "Fair enough!" and walk away.
 
Of the two sons, Ostrap ended up with the Poles and was eventually shot by his father. It is quite a harrowing story, really.
First of all, thank you for the good research work.
However, I want to correct a mistake in this story:
In Gogol's story "Taras Bulba," two brothers, Ostap and Andrii, return home from school and go to war against Poland with their Cossack father.

  • Ostap is the true warrior. He chooses the path of honor, loyalty to his father, and his comrades. He becomes a brave Cossack and dies a hero after being captured by the enemy. His execution is a scene of immense courage, where before death, he only seeks support from his father in the crowd.
  • Andrii is a romantic and an individualist. For the sake of his passionate love for a beautiful Polish noblewoman, he betrays his family, faith, and homeland by switching to the enemy's side. His personal choice clashes with his father's ruthless code of honor. In the end, Taras Bulba personally kills Andrii for treason, seeing him not as a son, but as an enemy.
Thus, both sons die tragically, but their deaths are completely different: one is a heroic sacrifice, and the other is a punishment for betrayal and choosing personal feelings over duty.
For someone who hasn't read Gogol, I'd recommend watching the 2009 film "Taras Bulba"; there should definitely be an English version. It captures the core drama of the story quite well.

If we're talking about Ukraine, Poland, and Russia, their shared history since the 17th century is a dramatic and complex tapestry of alliances, rebellions, and cultural exchange. It's a history full of heroism, tragedy, and shifting borders that is indeed no less dramatic than the history of wars in Western Europe. It's a crucial context for understanding the region even today.

Is it true as Montyan says that Western powers have set Ukrainians up to be slaughtered in a front against Russia for their own purposes?
I think it has been clear to everyone for a long time that the West has been preparing Ukraine as an anti-Russia. The only thing debatable is when this process began. I subscribe to the view that after World War II, the CIA co-opted Bandera and actively fostered the development of anti-Russian sentiments in western Ukraine. And now Ukraine is being used by the West as a battering ram against Russia.
Does what Montyan says about the educational system in Ukraine also have a degree of validity for Poland?
Poland acts more as a outpost for aiding Ukraine in the tasks assigned to it by the West.
To what extend did Poland help to turn Ukraine into a Saloreich?
:lol:
 
For someone who hasn't read Gogol, I'd recommend watching the 2009 film "Taras Bulba"; there should definitely be an English version. It captures the core drama of the story quite well.
Thank you for your elucidations of the plot and suggestion.

Trying to find Taras Bulba 2009 on YouTube, there was:
Taras Bulba 2009, Ελληνικοί Υπότιτλοι c. & English subs c.
Press cc for subs and the wheel for selecting English if you prefer that to Greek. Edit: When I uploaded the English was on.
One can also switch on the EN/GR/RU auto subs while viewing the English transcript in the right column if one opens up the link in the browser.
The Wiki for the film has:
Taras Bulba (Russian: and Ukrainian: «Тарас Бульба») is a historical drama film, based on the novel Taras Bulba by Nikolai Gogol. The movie was filmed on different locations in Ukraine such as Zaporizhia, Khotyn and Kamianets-Podilsky as well as in Poland. The official release was rescheduled several times; at first for the spring of 2008 but was finally released on April 2, 2009, to coincide with Gogol's bicentennial. The author's edition of 1842, expanded and rewritten, and considered more pro-Russian, was used for the film (this also being the text that is familiar to most readers).

The film DVD was released in the United States under the alternate title The Conqueror in 2010, and in the UK in 2011 as Iron & Blood: The Legend of Taras Bulba.

In Russian only
Фильм Тарас Бульба - драма (2009)
There are several four to five hour audiobook versions, see the search link.
A Russian knowing (wokified?) lady commenting in English on the book in a little viewed video, wrote in her author comment: "I read Tara’s Bulba by Nikolai Gogol and saw it is a perfect example of toxic masculinity, let’s discuss it." A couple of commentators did not like that video at all. Watching a few minutes, I wondered if it is a case of the pot calling the kettle black? But then I did not watch or read Taras Bulba yet, nor did I watch the entire Taras Pulpa bashing video analysis, so it may be a premature suspicion.

European and American productions
Maybe less problematic for the above 21st century viewer is a German production from 1924, in black and white, without sound and with French script between scenes? :-)

Or Taras Bulba (1936) This version has French speech, but is allegedly a French-British production. An American production from 1962 is this film (Wiki). There are clips, but the full movie in good quality with English, where the sound is not delayed? Still there was this with French voices. And this has English with Russian voiceover. From the same year there is an Italien production with English speaking voices (Wiki): Taras Bulba The Cossack 1962 English version complete rare movie I might try this before the American, though the music score of the Hollywood production is supposed to be good.
 
YouTube tells me:
Video is unavailable
The owner of the video has banned it from being viewed in your country.

This is probably stupid, but what about the link:
There are English subtitles(But it works somehow glitchily...):

It's a pity, of course, that the film hasn't been translated into English. In my opinion, it's one of the best adaptations of world classics.
 
I began to write a short comment on this perspective posted on X.com from Armchair Warlord, but it became too long, and so I will simply post it below the text. Since the text may disappear I included it in a spoiler, but without the clip of the cemetery.

A dark theory for the evening. Let's talk about Russian strategy in Ukraine.

Looking at developments lately, specifically: (1) the Ukrainian casualty leak showing an astronomical 1.7M KIA/MIA; and (2) the Ukrainian collapse north of Pokrovsk - I thought should revisit a dark thought I had a while ago, namely that, "maybe the killing itself is the point of all of this.

"I've said before that the Russians have fought an extraordinarily clean war in Ukraine, but it should be understood that there is a very legalistic shade on that assessment. They've killed very few civilians, and Ukrainian propagandists are perpetually beclowning themselves trying to pretend that the usual single-digit handful of injured civilians that accompany the latest attack using hundreds of standoff weapons fired into city centers (producing secondary explosions visible from outer space as military targets hidden among civilian infrastructure are destroyed with surgical precision) somehow constitute gEnOCiDe rather than some of the most well-controlled warfighting in the history of the business. There is another and far darker side to Russia's "clean" war, however.

Let us consider the fate of the Armed Forces of Ukraine - legal combatants all, whom the Russians can and do target and kill without limit. I mentioned the casualty leak earlier, but I feel this needs to have a line drawn under it - one point seven million personnel killed or missing in action in the AFU, over the course of the war. 1.7 MILLION. Seven or eight percent of Ukraine's prewar population, probably something like a quarter of the entire national cohort of military-aged males, dead or missing. Casualties on the scale of a genocide, sufficient to permanently cripple any postwar Ukrainian nation. Casualties multiple times that which I assessed two years ago as sufficient to shatter the AFU based on the experience of Nazi Germany.

This brings me to the Ukrainian collapse north of Pokrovsk two weeks ago, in which a run-of-the-mill Russian attack walked through twenty kilometers of Ukrainian defensive belts and into open country. The Ukrainian propagandists coped by whining about how the single most important front sector for the AFU had somehow "run out of infantry." But did the Russians throw in a mobile reserve to collapse the front and chase the AFU back to the Dniper, despite doubtless knowing full well what was going on? No, they did not - they consolidated in the breach and awaited the inevitable, panicked Ukrainian counterattack, in which they would have the opportunity to destroy Ukraine's remaining elite troops.

Which brings me to my conclusion. The Russians have had countless opportunities to make large advances in this war, especially recently - the Ukrainian front line is an absolute shambles and their "drone wall" tactic will falter against any serious attack. So ineffectual is the AFU that very few Russian moves at the front even face serious opposition these days, with most geolocations of Russian advances showing them already established in place and dealing with harassment by kill drones after having seized positions bloodlessly. The Russians have in fact consistently foregone breaking the front and taking swathes of ground in favor of killing the largest possible number of Ukrainian soldiers on the existing front line under the existing attritional combat dynamic.

This "tactical directive" held true even during the Battle of Sudzha-Korenevo, fought in prewar Russia. Rather than counterattacking aggressively to evict the AFU, the Russians saw the opportunity to kill gigantic numbers of Ukrainians in a trap the enemy wouldn't be able to extract themselves from for ideological reasons, and they took it. That battle ended up being nine months of hideously lopsided butchery that broke the back of the AFU.

All of this makes observing the war more than a little maddening, but it's a consistent pattern of behavior that begs for explanation. So here's my theory.

The Russian government has consistently sought to end the war via peace treaty with the existing Ukrainian government, not via regime change, outright conquest, or even killing enough of that government to find a more flexible interlocutor among the Maidanites. Putin apparently wants a treaty with Zelensky.

The Russians have also consistently made demands of the Ukrainian government - and its NATO sponsors - that are absolute political nonstarters for the Maidan-era regime and which that regime, by its very nature, simply cannot accept. Russian language rights, Orthodox religious rights, demilitarization, large territorial concessions which would see the AFU surrender vast urban areas without a shot fired. And yet the Russians insist, and they're going to continue killing Ukrainian soldiers at ever-more lopsided ratios until they get their way.

Which leads me to the brutal conclusion: Putin doesn't want to see Ukraine conquered. He's never publicly expressed any desire for that. The consistent Russian policy is instead to see Ukraine - a "free" and "independent" Ukraine, having come to this impasse of its own sovereign will - utterly humiliated. Putin wants to make Zelensky put on a suit, come groveling to the Kremlin, and sign a treaty that will see the Maidanite government surrender its arms, disgorge huge amounts of territory, and reverse every single anti-Russian policy position it ever had. Ukrainian nationalism will be discredited overnight by the hands of those very nationalists, and the economically irrelevant, demographically shattered rump state will be sucked back into Russia's political orbit in a matter of days.

So of course the Russians are only advancing in the most leisurely way possible. Their goal is to place the Ukrainian government into a militarily untenable situation so as to force a flamboyantly humiliating peace treaty upon them that includes large territorial concessions beyond the line of control - the ultimate Ukrainian taboo - so as to discredit Ukrainian nationalism by the hands of the very ultranationalists who took their nation to war in the first place.

Some reflections on this perspective:

Russia is probably fighting NATO as much, or even more than Ukraine. After all without NATO influencing ever since its creation after WWII and more so after the USSR breakup and steadily intensified until now, Ukraine would not be where it is.

Russia has a lot of experience fighting in Ukraine accumulated over centuries, and probably takes into account the lessons from WWII where a problem was that the Red Army advanced quickly but also suffered from resistance in the rear, and this continued after the war. In this regard one my FB contacts, a Ukrainian originally from Kiev before moving out even before Maidan, wrote recently that her grandfather working for law enforcement in post WWII Ukraine was killed by leftover Banderites. Anecdotal, yes, but from having followed over the years what else she posts, credible.

Besides Ukraine and NATO, there is also the internal makeup. Syrski, the commander of the UAF is from the town of Vladimir east of Moscow and his parents and relatives are still there, though he himself became a Ukrainian in the 90s. And allegedly, according to Tatiana Montyan in a video from 2022, Russian fighters were surprised to learn that among the Azovs four out of five were natural Russiasn (or so claimed.). If there is a purification going on it is on more than one side.

While Russia could make quick gains, to hold a quick gain is not always easy. If one comes to an area full of people and has to look after them in so many ways, it takes resources. At the pace the front has developed, many towns taken are basically ruins with few civilians. I looked up one town recently and there were 1700 out of previously 60,000. From this perspective a town is not taken as much as a conglomeration of ruins that served as a fortress for the opponent, has the potential to serve as a fortress for the newcomer and from which defense lines can be taken over or build.

A problem with gains is also that the technology has advanced a lot during this conflict, and many new strategies and tactics both for defense and offence have come, gone and some reappeared in a new format. The front line has variations both in the layout of the landscape as well as, probably, how well it is organized and supported. As an example, last year there was an incursion in Kursk but the local admin had eaten up the funds they had been given to reinforce their section of the border. Once in it was a hard battle, since there are many rivers, forests and places to hide. The Ukrainians saw it as an opportunity, with justification, the Russians saw it as as nuisance, but also trapped a lot of UA fighters in the gradual retaking. Another example is Kherson, where the country is quite flat in some places, but there are swamps to no end, as the Dnepre meets the Black Sea. To be a good drone operator or soldier in either setting is different.

One aspect is the outside influence from 4D STS which probably is on both sides, even if more on one than on the other. As long as that is not acknowledged what kind of progress can be made in the long run? Does the West need to stop the war before it looses this asset? And if Kiev and its NATO partners maintains control over the STS downloading area can they keep sending their delinquent experts and heads of state over for upgrades? Would anything change if Russia knew of THAT danger?

From a crowded cemetery to practical evaluations of the mass of dead people in the Ukraine conflict

Watching the video with the extensive areas of new burials, I wondered how much space 1.7 million spots on the cemetery would take up. Estimating 12,5 m2 per lot including roads for easy calculation, there will be 8 burials per 100m2, or 800 per ha of 10,000 m2 which then gives 80,000 per 100 ha/1km2 and therefore more or less 1.6 million burials for 20 km2. In other words it should be a plot of 4.5 by 4.5 km2.

If everyone deserved a minute of silence, then in one year of 31556952 seconds, there are 525,949.2 minutes. To cover all, and just on the Ukrainian side, it would require more than three years of 24/7 silence.

If it is the golden billon that supports Ukraine, then it is almost two dead Ukrainians, and certainly two if we count in also every Russian, for every 1000 people. In other words, every small settlement of just 500 is good for one life! The western supporters of Ukraine do not look at it that way, busy as they are blaming the other side and finding more funds to continue what they initiated and provoked.
 
I began to write a short comment on this perspective posted on X.com from Armchair Warlord, but it became too long, and so I will simply post it below the text. Since the text may disappear I included it in a spoiler, but without the clip of the cemetery.
I'm leaning toward the opinion that the number 1.7M KIA/MIA is false. Firstly, simply because it comes from Ukrainians, and at the time when their big supporter, the US, is turning its eyes away. Big number would work on Trump, or so they think. Secondly, because SBU had to account for deserters, emigrants, those poor souls sold for sex and organs, and likely also for future losses. It's sick, but what is not sick about them?

I think it has been clear to everyone for a long time that the West has been preparing Ukraine as an anti-Russia. The only thing debatable is when this process began. I subscribe to the view that after World War II, the CIA co-opted Bandera and actively fostered the development of anti-Russian sentiments in western Ukraine.
It started in early 19th century in Galicia under Austro-Hungarian rule. The first ideologists were:

Franciszek Duchiński (Франтишек Духинский, 1816 – 1893) - Polish Ukrainophilic ideolog
Mykhailo Hrushevsky (Михайло Грушевський, 1866 – 1934)
Mykola Mikhnovsky (Микола Міхновський, 1873-1924) and
Dmytro Dontsov (Дмитро Донцов, 1883-1973)

The CIA took over what was already fully developed.

Excellent articles on Ukrainian nationalism history:

The History of Fascism in Ukraine Part I: The Origins of the OUN 1917-1941 (in 3 parts, in Eng.)
Ukrainism: Who constructed it and why. Part I

The second one is in English too, but coming from a Russian portal. I couldn't find the exact equivalent there in Russian, but you can find a lot of related material, starting for example here or straight here. The whole book is available online, links provided by the authors here.

A quote from the 2nd "here", going ever further in the past, translated:

Kortum's assertions about the nobility's lack of rights to Galicia sounded somewhat unfounded. A comprehensive historical concept was needed to justify the Habsburgs' rights to these lands and refute the existence of such rights among the Poles.

Johann Christian von Engel took on the task of creating such a concept, publishing two works in the 1790s: History of Halych and Volhynia (1792) and History of Ukraine and the Ukrainian Cossacks (1796). ...

In the preface to the second edition of “The History of Halych and Vladimir,” Engel clearly explained the reasons for his historical research: "Who would not be alarmed when Russian General Tutomlin explains in his universal letter of July 18, 1795, regarding the occupation of Kholm, Belz, and Lutsk that they are parts of the ancient Russian state? <...> And what would happen if the Russian cabinet decided to claim that Galicia is actually a Russian province because it was once ruled by relatives and descendants of the Grand Dukes of Kiev?"....

Engel's works began to reveal the contours of the future construct of “Ukraine as anti-Russia.”
 
I began to write a short comment on this perspective posted on X.com from Armchair Warlord, but it became too long, and so I will simply post it below the text. Since the text may disappear I included it in a spoiler, but without the clip of the cemetery.
Given the wars are manufactured on the behalf of 4D STS, I suspect some portion of these missing 1.7 million (a large number) might have taken by them. What purposes for which they use them, we may not know. May reintroduce them during transition or later or already reintroduced. It reminds me 'Containers' comment though the scope of comment is 95% humans.
 
"– Goodbye, comrades! He shouted at them from above. – Remember me and come here again next spring and have a good walk! What? Caught me, damn Poles ? Do you think there is anything in the world that a Cossack would be afraid of? Wait, the time will come, the time will come, you will find out what the Orthodox Russian faith is! Even now, distant and close peoples can sense that tsar is rising from the Russian land, and there will be no power in the world that would not submit to him!.."

Complicated were relations between Poland and the Cossacks. For almost a century, until the Khmienytsky Uprising, the Zaporozhian Cossacks fought on the Polish side, including in the Polish-Russian war of early 17th century (50.000 registered Cossacks took part) with the capture of Moscow's Kremlin. And again later on, for example in the war with Sweden and even in Polish-Bolshevik war in 1920. Thus, the siege of Dubno Castle described in Gogol's novel took place during one of those periods when they changed sides. Not uncommon for Cossacks. Those who have read "The Silent Don" (also known as "Quiet Flows the Don") know how changing sides and at what cost during the Russian Civil War, and how horribly barbaric it was.



This is probably why Gogol is considered a foreign writer in modern Ukraine.
He wrote in Russian. That is enough to become outcast in Ukraine nowadays.

I can't find the link now, but some telegram channels say that after the conflict ends, former members of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be banned from entering the EU. Wow! This should be reported to literally every AFU servicemen as soon as possible. After all, they are fighting for "European values," but they will not be allowed into Borrel's "blooming garden."

Is it possible that someone confused sides or deliberately twisted it?

Soldiers fighting against Ukraine will be banned from Storskog entry
20 June 2025

At a meeting in Tallinn on Thursday, ministers and state secretaries from the Nordic countries, Baltic states and Poland came with a joint statement to block entry to the Schengen zone of all Russian citizens who have participated in the aggression against Ukraine.

"The threat to democratic Europe posed by the regimes of Russia and Belarus is systematic and long term, which is underlined by the fourth year of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and Belarus' support for this war," the joint statement reads.

It continues:

"Even in case of cessation of full-scale military aggression against Ukraine, the threats to the European Union's internal security posed by Russia will remain. Member States should take all necessary measures to ensure that individuals who are or have been contracted by the Russian armed forces or other armed groups acting on behalf of the regime are not allowed to undermine our security or move freely within the Schengen Area. In particular, it is important to avoid granting residence permits or visas to those who have participated in the war of aggression against Ukraine."

As for the "Borrel's blooming garden", it's been overgrown with weeds, don't you know? ;-) Funny thing is, in the video (in Russian) the message is directed to Russian 'democrats' who between 2005 and 2017 were lobbing for the necessity for Russia to join the EU:

«Цветущий сад Борреля» зарос бурьяном

--
Edit: double paragraph
 
Last edited:
For someone who hasn't read Gogol, I'd recommend watching the 2009 film "Taras Bulba"; there should definitely be an English version. It captures the core drama of the story quite well.
Спасибо за рекомендацию. Я смотрел это вчера вечером, и мне очень понравилось.

Thus, both sons die tragically, but their deaths are completely different: one is a heroic sacrifice, and the other is a punishment for betrayal and choosing personal feelings over duty.
Когда я прочитал это, я подумал, не неправильно ли я истолковал историю, но после просмотра фильма я остался доволен заключением. Было бы интересно прочитать роман в оригинале на русском языке, чтобы лучше понять образ мыслей Гоголя. Великие русские писатели демонстрируют глубокое понимание человеческого бытия.

Кстати, для тех, кто смотрел Сибирского цирюльника (1998), мне интересно, не было ли имя главного героя Андреем в честь Гоголя? У его персонажа много общего с гоголевским Андреем.

though the music score of the Hollywood production is supposed to be good.
Спасибо за ссылку на YT, Тор. Я уже видел голливудскую экранизацию 1962 года, прежде чем посмотреть фильм 2009 года, и это действительно совсем другое дело! В голливудской версии пропущена значительная часть истории после осады Дубно и больше внимания уделяется персонажу Андрея. В конце концов, жители Запада любят хорошие романы! Производственные ценности характерны для той эпохи Голливуда, так что это еще и приятное зрелище, возможно, более 'семейное', с гораздо меньшим количеством грязи и крови!

Complicated were relations between Poland and the Cossacks. For almost a century, until the Khmienytsky Uprising, the Zaporozhian Cossacks fought on the Polish side, including in the Polish-Russian war of early 17th century (50.000 registered Cossacks took part) with the capture of Moscow's Kremlin. And again later on, for example in the war with Sweden and even in Polish-Bolshevik war in 1920. Thus, the siege of Dubno Castle described in Gogol's novel took place during one of those periods when they changed sides. Not uncommon for Cossacks. Those who have read "The Silent Don" (also known as "Quiet Flows the Don") know how changing sides and at what cost during the Russian Civil War, and how horribly barbaric it was.
Действительно, для меня одним из самых трагичных моментов этой истории стало противостояние двух народов, которые, несмотря на культурные различия, по сути своей были гораздо более похожи. Как отражение нынешнего конфликта на Украине, это кажется очень уместным. Как отражение того, как гиперпространственные силы тысячелетиями контролировали человеческую расу посредством религиозной обусловленности, даже в большей степени. Спасибо, что написали это! ❤️:hug2:

For someone who hasn't read Gogol, I'd recommend watching the 2009 film "Taras Bulba"; there should definitely be an English version. It captures the core drama of the story quite well.
Thank you for the recommendation. I watched this last night and very much enjoyed it.

Thus, both sons die tragically, but their deaths are completely different: one is a heroic sacrifice, and the other is a punishment for betrayal and choosing personal feelings over duty.
When I read this, I was wondering if I had misinterpreted the story, but after watching the film, I was satisfied with the conclusion. It would be interesting to read the original novel in Russian to gain further insight into Gogol's mind. The great Russian writers show profound understanding of the human condition.

As an aside, for those who have seen The Barber of Siberia (1998), I'm wondering if the naming of the main character Andrey was a nod to Gogol? His character arc has many similarities with Gogol's Andrii.

though the music score of the Hollywood production is supposed to be good.
Thanks for providing the YT link, Thor. I'd already seen the 1962 Hollywood adaptation before watching the 2009 film, and it is indeed quite different! The Hollywood version omits a significant part of the story after the siege of Dubno, and focuses more on Andrii's character. Westerners do love a good romance, after all! The production values are characteristic of that era of Hollywood, so it is also an enjoyable watch, perhaps a little more 'family friendly' with much less mud and blood!

Complicated were relations between Poland and the Cossacks. For almost a century, until the Khmienytsky Uprising, the Zaporozhian Cossacks fought on the Polish side, including in the Polish-Russian war of early 17th century (50.000 registered Cossacks took part) with the capture of Moscow's Kremlin. And again later on, for example in the war with Sweden and even in Polish-Bolshevik war in 1920. Thus, the siege of Dubno Castle described in Gogol's novel took place during one of those periods when they changed sides. Not uncommon for Cossacks. Those who have read "The Silent Don" (also known as "Quiet Flows the Don") know how changing sides and at what cost during the Russian Civil War, and how horribly barbaric it was.
Indeed, one of the most tragic elements of the story, for me, was the pitting against each other of two peoples who, despite their cultural differences, were much more alike in essence. As a reflection on the current Ukraine conflict, it seems very apt. As a reflection of the way that hyperdimensional forces have controlled the human race for millennia through religious conditioning, even more so. Thanks for writing this! ❤️:hug2:
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom