You are being emotional, rude and black & white thinking.
Nothing but a plattitude adding nothing to the discussion. Besides, wrong in this context.
Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history
- Thread starter Beau
- Start date
I agree and would suggest to @daddycat next time the urge is there to put a thumbs down to a fellow member, then to go back to what @luc wrote above and ask yourself: Am I engaging in black/white thinking or being rude or emotional or thinking in absolutes? Alternatively take a deep breath and wait 24 hours and see if you still feel the same. It could be an insightful exercise for you.
We are here to learn and all members should feel welcome to post their thoughts and inputs in the spirit of getting closer to the truth.
There are rare exceptions, when some come here not in alignment with the spirit and principles, which are clearly set out in the Forum guidelines.
This is my favorite tweet of the day re unhinged leftists rejoicing over Kirk's death, then finding themselves instantly unemployed (in which I am taking a lot of satisfaction):
This is indeed what's often the most important in a crisis, policy. While people are distracted by the loonies (left and right) on the internet, the PTB advance their pieces in the real world. The US has fallen, totally conquered with not a single whisper of resistance. It's tragic but comic too. Americans who misbehave are sentenced for life in the US, what a nightmare! The big walls and Palentir surveillance system will come handy for that.
A thought that crossed my mind at 3am regarding why Israel might want Charlie gone - don’t talk about Epstein.
For more and more it’s blatantly obvious that what they’re doing in Palestine is pure evil yet Israel has Hamas as their scapegoat, they have no cover story for Epstein and if/when people start digging though that connection with a fine tooth comb and joining the dots… well, how does Israel dig itself out of that grave? Who will they blame?
For more and more it’s blatantly obvious that what they’re doing in Palestine is pure evil yet Israel has Hamas as their scapegoat, they have no cover story for Epstein and if/when people start digging though that connection with a fine tooth comb and joining the dots… well, how does Israel dig itself out of that grave? Who will they blame?
Good point. Those who publicly condoned (or worse) the murder obviously thought they were safe to express it.
I am wondering whether the PTB is using Charlie’s death to postpone or suppress attention to the 9/11 documentary.
Session 14 September 2001
Very well put. The only thing I'd emphasize is, at least for me, the equal importance to the top-down and the bottom-up. Everything organic and coming from "below" is just part of the wider, hyperdimensional trajectories and influences at play within humanity. Sometimes other humans direct these things, other times they don't, but even when they don't, it contributes to the larger mosaic. And sometimes the "direction" only comes indirectly, maybe 2 or 3 or 30 steps removed.
Like Luc wrote:
All of those are live options, because the evidence is either incomplete, ambiguous, or otherwise incapable of proving any one theory over the other. If it's just a radicalized nutjob, that nutjob might have been influenced by people who were influenced by people who were influenced by a government operative.
Their assassin has apparently not yet confessed to the crime, which would be strange for someone who was on a personal, political mission to 'snuff out my enemy'. He should be gloating and proud of it, no? Using his new-found infamy to 'go full Anders Breivik' and articulate his beliefs and political manifesto?
Here's the governor of Utah:
Here's the governor of Utah:
Very interesting:
ajrklopp.substack.com
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way from the Forum
Charlie Kirk's Assassination IS Radicalizing a Generation, and NOT in the Way the Left Wants
ajrklopp.substack.com
If, for example, there were 100 individual or mass shootings over the past 20 years in the USA, I'd say less than 10% were "organic". There's a distinction to be made between people who "go postal" as a result of personal life circumstances and societal pressures (regardless of how much any of those were created by the ptb) and those whose actions were directly provoked by the ptb. Given the result of the Kirk assassination, I'd say it falls into the 2nd category, like most other events that progressively sowed division between people.
Last edited:
More information is needed, but at the moment there are a host of inconsistencies in the official version of events, as far as I have been able to ascertain. In particular, where he carries the weapon when he flees, according to the images, the alleged change of clothes, contradictions in statements between Kash Patel and the head of the FBI in Utah, etc. “
Very interesting:
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way from the Forum
Charlie Kirk's Assassination IS Radicalizing a Generation, and NOT in the Way the Left Wants
I don't think there is a "left" as is being described by so many on SM. At least, nowhere near enough of them to constitute a threat to society or to warrant the kind of apoplectic responses by the "right". This is all social engineering 101.
Most of the time a satisfactory (rarely complete) picture only emerges years after the event, after much effort has been put into collecting evidence. That process begins in real-time and builds off of past experience, but it has to keep going because the answers are never complete. There is simply no learning (and not a lot of fun either) dealing with history as a series of cookie-cutter conclusions.
As Collingwood wrote in Speculum Mentis,
I believe normal people use the term the "left" to describe the ramified network of politicians, activists, and professionals who make a career out of race grifting, LGBTQ activism, oppression olympics, opening borders, wanting people dead for disagreeing with them, and basically ethnically replacing their citizens.
How many of these people would be required to constitute a threat? Several hundred thousands? Millions? And what if they were able to easily find their way into positions of power through DEI? I don't think that people are wrong to see this as an issue.
LGBTQ activists and those encouraging unrestrained immigration are, I'd say, very few in number among the general population. Even less are those who murder people for disagreeing with them. If you're talking about politicians etc. who encourage such, then the people should unite and direct their anger at them, rather than falling for the bait of 'right vs left' culture (and real?) wars.
See above. We need to separate out the average citizen and those in positions of power.
I think they are, or at least, they don't have a proper grasp of the issue.
Trending content
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
