This is the short version from Northern Perspective. It's helpful because some clarification is given. (34:34) (speed up the video)
It is indeed a big racket, with old legs in new times. Carney may be at the pinnacle crest with his Brookfield ship, but that ship trails a long wake that includes the likes of Bechtel (Shultz), but more so, Brascan (think Brazil and Chilean coups), with the big stakeholder, Bronfman, who founded the ship back in the day, who as some say (see Ehret
here) that that family even might eclipsed Meyer Lansky (for non Canadians, the Bronfman clan made its money off alcohol supply during prohibition - very connected).
Snakes in Suites?
Carney is in good asset making company. And while they might use softball words to describe 'blind trusts,' and that perhaps it is a conflict of interest, this PM appears to be Mr. Conflict writ large. One might as well call a spade a spade and say that he is grossly an inside trader in the public so-called trust. As said back in time, he was not elected (C;s well confirm), he was coronated.
Does Mark (2013) look like a man who is only a very casual acquaintance of Ghislaine Maxwell? Maybe. Could be photoshopped, some surly are FACT CHECKED. In this case, his wife is (or was) chummy with Ghislaine, and they did hang out.
..........
Had picked up on Bruce Pardy the other day asking questions, while imagining what a constitution in Alberta might look like. How might it be written and managed if it even could be a reality (not that it would ever be allowed to do so).
Pardy starts by asking the question that "Many Albertans want to be free.
What do they mean?"
What do they mean in terms of the individual that also must include the whole of society that all want to be free. Free of what? It is a good question, and dozens of answers might be given in just how that might be so. How it might be so, likely comes with plenty of trip wires, too.
It was interesting to see how he would present it, on account that he is adept at constitutional law. One might already know that the concept of a political Canada, though his eyes, is a failure, and that may be reason enough to think on it. So, he tries to draft hypothetical laws in legal point form, to see if he can close the gab of what it might be to be free. To be free under a social package of a new state of being that works for all is not so easy. No, it is tricky.
He brings up constitutional law (U.S./Canada or whatever) being a collection of words that a Judge interprets and provides meaning, or they completely neuter the meaning. That is a problem. It is a problem in terms of the pathocratic infiltration of institutions; health, law, enforcement et cetera. He has an answer, or it could be reasonable, which limits anyone's hold of public office for a specified length of time. That is good and bad, because sometimes someone might emerge as being super competent, and it could be a great loss if their term was up, yet the concept is there.
Bruce readably admits there are many problems without answers.
Alberta separatism is often dismissed – even within the province itself – as the domain of a few deluded rural hardliners. But the sentiment and the movement have only grown since the federal election brought another Liberal government to power. And Bruce Pardy, one of the country’s senior legal...
c2cjournal.ca
Snip:
This Constitution does not include “constitutional rights” like a charter of rights. There is no need. Rights like “freedom of expression” and “freedom of religion” would undermine the new default. In a state that is powerless except for the powers expressly granted in the Constitution, including a list of things the state cannot do would be redundant, long and incomplete. We cannot today imagine some of the things that technocracies will acquire the capacity to do in future.
This Constitution will grant the state jurisdiction to do three main jobs:
- Keep the peace – police enforcing the prohibition on force.
- Resolve disputes about the use of force – courts.
- Protect the country from outside threats – military, borders, international relations and visitors.
I wonder if many people have even thought about what it means in a society to be free, not that it has ever been a true reality. Unlike the utopians, a free society would not be immune to suffering.
globalnews.ca
pilulerouge.ca
