How do humans change the cycle for 1D and 2D?

[axj]

Up to 7D, the more knowledge/awareness you have, the more service you can offer. What is it that you disagree with this obvious fact?

It is basically the question what 100% STO polarization means and if it is possible to be 100% STO below 7D. You have convinced yourself that it is impossible due to how you interpret what "100% STO" means.

You find no relation between "increasing service (to others)" and "increasing STO polarization", for God's dear sake???!!!!!

Sometimes, in some certain discussions, I doubt that I'm in the Cassiopaean forum.

It is actually reactions like this that do not really belong here. Why not meditate for a while and BE with the emotions and emotional charges that have come up for you?

Doing the necessary Work is infinitely more important than "winning an argument".

 

[bozadi]

Up to 7D, the more knowledge/awareness you have, the more service you can offer. What is it that you disagree with this obvious fact?

It is basically the question what 100% STO polarization means and if it is possible to be 100% STO below 7D. You have convinced yourself that it is impossible due to how you interpret what "100% STO" means.

And what is it that prevents you from answering the question?

You find no relation between "increasing service (to others)" and "increasing STO polarization", for God's dear sake???!!!!!

It is actually reactions like this that do not really belong here. Why not meditate for a while and BE with the emotions and emotional charges that have come up for you?

Doing the necessary Work is infinitely more important than "winning an argument".

And what is it that prevents you from answering the question?

You preferred to accuse me of things rather than offering your answers to the questions, which were "extremely to the point" of the discussion, because the questions and answers have "cornered" your wrong position in the discussion. That's why you've decided to change the subject by accusing me of things, rather than sticking to the discussion.

 

[Fluffy]

It always occurred to me that this is a very interesting exercise and it's useful for comprehending certain phenomena, chicken and egg. But at the same time, it's very left brained, because I was thinking... well the seed is the flower and viceversa, it just depends on when you look at it. there's really no breaking point that can be clearly demarcated, the seed is always the flower and vicecersa.

I see it like having memories. We can remember many of our experiences out of sequence and have multiple memories overlapping one another, relating to a seed and a flower, it’s both because we can remember when it was a seed and when it was a flower in exactly the same moment of our recollection. So in our mind the flower is a seed, a seedling, a flower, dead and decomposing all at the same time in that instant of memory.