Are there more than two stars in the solar system?

[pkostov2]

Okay, but that is only about the astronomy censorship in the 1950s (seems mostly UFO related). What about sources for all your other claims? You post pictures and make claims about them that cannot be verified without more information. Where are they from exactly? Why are you sure that they are of unacknowledged brown dwarfs or unknown planets within the solar system?

Try to not just make claims, but something that can be verified by others.


And here I have no idea what you are talking about.

Astronomy censorship.Exactly.
What authority you would expect me to lean on.
I am hust answering the questions by showing direct observational data and offering a hypotesis.

The main question remains: Are there more companions?

 

[pkostov2]

As Gaby pointed out, there is only one stellar object or star in the solar system, and it's the Sun or Sol that gave our system its name.

So the question, if we ever get there, might be modified to something like:
Is Sun part of binary star system or trinary?
Or maybe in a more general form:
How many stars are there in the system that Sol is part of?

FWIW.

If we keep it simple the stars make their own light, the planets do not.
Sure even this definition would need precision since it is matter of proportions but it is good for horse shoes.

 

[axj]

Astronomy censorship.Exactly.
What authority you would expect me to lean on.
I am hust answering the questions by showing direct observational data and offering a hypotesis.

Maybe try giving logical arguments why your hypothesis about these objects is correct? A hypothesis with nothing to back it up is just a claim or a guess. Those pictures you posted could be of anything. Why do you think the pictured objects are brown dwarfs or unknown planets within the solar system?

If you cannot explain this logically, then you are just guessing. And you present your guesses as facts:

Here are screen shots from World Wide Telescope free service atlas of the traces of those trhree planets Cs are talking about.

 

[SasaM]

If we keep it simple the stars make their own light, the planets do not.
Sure even this definition would need precision since it is matter of proportions but it is good for horse shoes.

Actually, this definition is not true.

All bodies on temperatures above the absolute zero emit e-m radiation, i.e. light, it's just that the peak of that radiation is of different frequencies or wavelengths, for example inversely proportional to the temperature of the body according to the Wien's law (Wikipedia link).

In addition, if we would want to be even more precise, it should be noted in the question that it concerns only our physical 3-dim spatial realm observable with our usual scientific instruments, as in some other realms solar system situation could be very different than what we have here.