Session 1 November 2025

[MJF]

I would classify the video as suspect, as the archeologist that they quoted is actually Dr. Luiz Moura, a medical doctor. No one would ever know him, except for extremely very few people, who happen to include me. At some point, I dug up everything ever published or available on autohemotherapy, including Dr Moura's interview relating his case studies on autohemotherapy. Fascinating interview!

Caption from your video:

View attachment 113881

Dr Luiz Moura, talking about autohemotherapy:

Well I would admit that I did have some suspicions myself, so that is why I was looking for feedback. I have not had time to look into the backgrounds of the other archaeologists mentioned, so thank you for bringing the identity of Dr Luiz Moura to our attention.

This revelation raises certain questions though. Why has Dr Moura not complained about his identity being used in a video that suggests he is an archaeologist rather than a medical doctor? I think it was posted very recently, so it is possible that he may not be aware yet.

Secondly, why go to the trouble of creating a false story around what would be a truly ground breaking discovery? It takes time and effort to produce a slick video like this. Is it just a matter of clickbait so as to earn money on YouTube or is there a more sinister agenda involved? Is it just coincidence that it was posted so soon after the C's told us that the purses were power devices? I note that the video's makers go under the name of 'Unbelievable Tales'. If you are right, which I don't doubt you are, the clue I guess may be in the name. It certainly was not my intention to mislead anyone. Hence. I am very grateful that you spotted him and made us aware.

If time permits, I will do a bit more digging into the claims made in the video to see if there is any substance to them.​

 

[MJF]

I'm with Gaby on this one. Personally, I think that it would be a good description of finding an actual 'purse' but I think it's just a later stone carving and not an actual device. And when the narrator mentioned 'data storage device containing knowledge, at the molecular level, from the dawn of civilization' and that quantum imaging was used, I got the feeling someone made an AI story from AI research to the extent that it sounded like the plot to the next Indiana Jones movie.

View attachment 113885

Yes, I would see this movie.
I love the fish!

Love the poster. I would go and watch the movie too, as I am a big Indiana Jones fan. Even if it is just a stone carving, as you suggest, it would still be an important discovery in its own right - if genuine of course.

 

[Benjamin]

Even if it is just a stone carving, as you suggest, it would still be an important discovery in its own right - if genuine of course.

I have no doubt that it's genuine 'cause there are many of them. I'm not trying to be critical when I ask if all of these have crystals inside them too? Were any found in broken ones?

 

[axj]

I have no doubt that it's genuine 'cause there are many of them. I'm not trying to be critical when I ask if all of these have crystals inside them too? Were any found in broken ones?

View attachment 113887

One possibility is that these are "cargo cult" replicas created after the "gods" left with their real devices.

 

[thorbiorn]

One day this week I was on my break at work. I was sat in my car watching Alexander Mercouris. At one point I went to grab my cup out of the cup holder and I accidentally knocked the cup against the centre console area of the car interior, just under the radio. It made a small bang as I hit it. Immediately, Alexander Mercouris’ dog started barking in what sounded like another room in the background of the video.

If not unimaginable, it is a funny coincidence, and if unimaginable, is it beyond coincidence? If you listened to a recording, did your hand make that movement because a part of you got spooked by the sudden bark that was about to come? Or if it was direct, were you spooked by what spooked the dog that began to bark? Or did something happen outside the car, or even in your mind, that you did not notice much because you were distracted by the cup and the dog? Or did the cup and the dog point to something that was not related to either? Maybe Alexander spoke, you listened, there was a disturbance, Alexander spoke, you continued listening. Much will depend on the perspective.

Do you know the book Beyond Coincidence: by Martin Plimmer and Brian King. I once found an older version by coincidence. My impression was that they offer to rationalize it as much as possible in the first part, while the second part has all the anecdotes where the interpretation is more up to you. Some of the stories are rather incredible, many are entertaining and some are tragic. If more people began to take notice and record such occurrences, there might be many more stories to tell.

Regarding the unimaginable, large numbers are not easy to imagine if it is as single units. We can imagine a billion as a 1000 million, and a million as a 1000 times thousand, but on its own even a thousand units is not that easy to take in when it is jumbled as in a jigzaw puzzle still scrambled in its box.

Staying with numbers, there are imaginary numbers,

An imaginary number is the product of a real number and the imaginary unit i, which is defined by its property i^2 = −1

but few people have learned to relate to the square root of a negative figure. There are also complex numbers that combine imaginary numbers and real numbers. Maybe that can serve as an analogy for an emerging new reality, where a part will be similar and a part will be different and together they will still be largely different.

The unimaginable in relation to the Overton window
When it is in politics and public discourse there is the concept of the Overton window. The Wiki has a simple but effective illustration of what is meant:

Perhaps the unthinkable is not yet unimaginable, but close. Say it is unthinkable that the retirement age in European countries will be lifted to 80 years of age, though in fact it is not, since there was a time when there was no retirement age at all, but then none of the radical groups left or right are likely to have that as part of their main points, and so, in the public discourse, lifting the retirement age to 80 is unthinkable.

Remaining in politics if a "Russian revolution" with civil conflict came to parts that have not seen something like that for centuries, that would be unimaginable in a certain sense.

Another area could be crime, few in Europe, I think, can imagine moving to a situation where the homicide rate competes with South African levels, about 45/100,000, or 10 times more murders per 100,000 than in most places. High crime rates can be unthinkable, similarly sharp changes in finances, and living standards in places used to gradual and fairly small adjustments.

In nature, instead of a visible comet every 10 years it could be ten every year. Instead of local storm it could be a much more extensive storm. Instead of more snow than seen in a life time, it became more snow than in 500 years? Instead of a bit of volcanic ash in a small area, really large blasts can happen too.

And of course there can be reality shifts and paranormal events, as large changes on the outside might also be mirrored by substantial changes within the minds of many people.

The ideas of the unimaginable and the unthinkable could clash with the understandings of what is real, and what is realistic. Someone might try to convince another by saying that such and such will never happen because it is not realisti, end of story. Maybe it isn't, but is the unimaginable contained entirely within the boundaries of what is currently considered realistic? Maybe one approach to explore the unimaginable is to map what people consider realistic and then ask what it could look like if one moved beyond that just a bit, and then a bit more.