Israel (read Mossad) are to help investigate the Bondi shooting:
Best people for the job, since they probably had a hand in it. They'll get to the bottom of it super quick! Oh, look, they already have!
Israel (read Mossad) are to help investigate the Bondi shooting:
I was surprised to see that a drone footage existed and that it could provide clues; but it is cut, and I don't see any reason for that. Starting from the above location, the drone footage skips and we see it hovering the bridge. This is unfortunate! Why would they leave out pictures of a crime scene? Is there an unedited version somewhere?I had a look at a number of the uploaded videos from a variety of vantage points. What's odd for me is no one captured where the incoming fire came from or whom did it (so far I've seen). This footage shows near the start of the attack (shooters moving to position on the footbridge) and continues past the point both are gunned down (5:55s mark). The incoming fire starts at about 3:45s and comes from the left of the bridge (from footage vantage point).
If less than 10 mins was the full span of this attack, its more than likely someone was positioned to take them down and already waiting ahead of time. Given footage of the incoming fire is absent; but every other possible angle was captured, this "sniper" (at least one) was likely hidden from view.
My guess is the back of this pickup truck / ute is where this incoming came from. We see the shots come from left of the bridge and most other spots - just seem less likely to me.
It's also worth noting the range of fire from the bridge (red lines) is over 80m or more. I've heard reports up to about 40-50 people were shot. Even for the most trained, 40-50 people shot in less than 10 minutes from more than 80 metres away is a feat. So I'm guessing someone was at close range doing most of the damage... Possibly was the same individual from the back of that pickup truck / ute.
View attachment 114257
Drone footage:
Fast-forward 24 hours, and this article has been universally fact-checked, in multiple languages, and exposed as being (actual) fake news.When Edward Crabtree left his Bondi apartment on Saturday afternoon for his usual weekend walk along the beachfront, he had no idea he would soon be facing down an armed terrorist. Within minutes, the 43-year-old IT professional would make a split-second decision that authorities say prevented what could have been one of Australia's deadliest attacks.
"I didn't think about it. I just acted," Crabtree told The Daily in an exclusive interview from his hospital bed, where he is being treated for gunshot wounds to his left shoulder and arm. "I saw people running, I heard the shots, and I saw him reloading. I knew if someone didn't do something right then, more people were going to die."
The attack began at approximately 2:47pm on Saturday when a lone gunman opened fire on the crowded Bondi Beach promenade. In the chaos that followed, Crabtree—a born and bred Sydneysider who moved to Bondi just two years ago—sprinted towards the danger while others fled.
There is possibly more to this mass shooting business than people think, but I do think you might be conflating Tyler Robinson (as a patsy) to Martin Bryant. The patsy (I think) seems to me to be a relatively recent thing (with the exception of JFK?). Perhaps, then, it can be limited to high profile singular targets? Well, no, I've just thought of an exception to that: Stephen Paddock, Las Vegas, 2017!Port Authur was most certainly an act of terrorism, but if they say that publicly people might start digging below the surface, joining the dots and find out there were multiple active shooters there and the poor patsy wasn’t even on the scene.
Sounds to me like they’re trying to dissuade people from thinking outside the box, using emotional hook words like terrorism as opposed to massacre. We don’t know the motive behind Bondi, who knows, it could have just been random (of course I don’t think this but let’s sway the public to believe whatever suits the narrative)
I read an investigative journalist report 10 years ago, unfortunately I don’t have it, it was an excellent breakdown of events explaining why Martin Bryant could not have been the gunman. Multiple witness reports citing at least two gunmen and gunfire from a further distance, plus a whole host of other information that didn’t fit the narrative.There is possibly more to this mass shooting business than people think, but I do think you might be conflating Tyler Robinson (as a patsy) to Martin Bryant. The patsy (I think) seems to me to be a relatively recent thing (with the exception of JFK?). Perhaps, then, it can be limited to high profile singular targets? Well, no, I've just thought of an exception to that: Stephen Paddock, Las Vegas, 2017!
Martin Bryant was schizophrenic and maybe even a paranoid type.
The number of people a single gunman kills doesn't seem related to skill or training (or maybe even mental illness?), but does however, relate to having a large number of people gathered in a very isolated place (Port Arthur).
To do this in a central location, you need more gunmen. It is unclear if mental illness is a common factor in either gunmen or patsys.... but it might be.
Here is an example of a lone gunman who managed to kill more people than Martin Bryant did. I'm not sure if mental illness was a factor, but what he did have was a large amount of people gathered in an isolated space:
This guy is also saying the same. The shooter served in IDF and Israeli search results.James Li suspects Israel too:
Note how close the local police station is to the beach.
Is this Arson Ostrovsky "on set"?
When he was interviewed I was struck by the normal Aussie accent of someone who claimed that he'd lived in Israel for the past 13 years, and had only "come to Australia 2 weeks ago" to "fight anti-semitism".
In my opinion, if someone has been living in Israel for the past 13 years, then they don't sound like they've never left Australia! I believe this photo was from a facebook post.
Australians are far too deferential to authority...
Australia is authority follower central. It was on display during Covid. There were people in the vicinity of the incident from our office and they have nothing organic to share about the event and just parading whatever MSM is throwing at them.Holy Smoke! I wish they'd get their stories straight! Name changes, "actors", Israel saying Iran was involved. This is crazy! In the end, Australians are far too deferential to authority and whatever it says.... They really need to start asking questions as well as asking for receipts (for everything!).