Candace Owens: From TPUSA Conservative Activist to Powerful Voice for Truth

Interesting candace episode to day. Nothing sensational. Many were expecting worst. But, it looks like she had a civilized conversation with Erika. Each expressed their views, tried to clarify and validate each others information. It looks this meeting was arranged by Megan Kelly to reduce the temperature in the "room". That temperature seems to be reduced. The difference seems to be like saying 'Liar' vs 'Not entirely correct'. That is for now. I suspect these Zionist 'influencers' will inevitably keep on scratching until the temperatures rise again so that masters can do whatever they want under that cover.

 
"The toponyms Gara, Gaire also appear in old texts cited by Lucien Musset, where the word ga(i)ra means gore."

Just a weird coincidence that I found while browsing the Du Pont name.

Besides making the coolant Freon, I saw that the company created polymers which were named: Vespel, neoprene, nylon, Corian, Teflon, Mylar, Kapton, Kevlar, Zemdrain, M5 fiber, Nomex, Tyvek, Sorona, viton, Corfam and Lycra. When I saw the name "Nomex" I instantly thought they had missed a well known fabric named Gortex. However, I found that Gore-Tex was created by W. L. Gore & Associates founded by Bill Gore who worked at Du Pont in his early life, leaving in 1957. He started his business with his wife Genevieve (Vieve) in the basement of their house in Newark, Delaware. It's hilarious! Oh, I can't find any connection to Al Gore, btw.
 
Last edited:
However, I found that Gore-Tex was created by W. L. Gore & Associates founded by Bill Gore who worked at Du Pont in his early life, leaving in 1957. He started his business with his wife Genevieve (Vieve) in the basement of their house in Newark, Delaware.

I should have dug a bit deeper before posting. Here is a part of Genevieve Gore's obituary.

Gore founded the closely held company in 1958 with her husband, Wilbert “Bill” Gore, a former Du Pont Co. executive [a senior research chemist (link)]. The firm made its first product, insulated computer cable, in the basement of the Gores’ Newark home. In 1969, W.L. Gore’s temperature-resistant cable [MULTI-TET™] was used on the first moon landing, connecting seismic equipment with the spacecraft. Waterproof fabric made by Gore-Tex was first used in clothing in 1976.

Born Genevieve Walton in Salt Lake City, she studied education at the University of Utah and graduated from Henniger Business College. She married Gore in 1935, and the couple settled in Delaware in 1945.

The address for the company listed on the patent for Multi-tet cable is Papermill Road, R.D.2 Newark, Delaware. W. L. Gore & Associates is in the top 200 privately held companies in the States generating $5.3 Billion/year.
 
Interesting candace episode to day. Nothing sensational. Many were expecting worst. But, it looks like she had a civilized conversation with Erika. Each expressed their views, tried to clarify and validate each others information. It looks this meeting was arranged by Megan Kelly to reduce the temperature in the "room". That temperature seems to be reduced. The difference seems to be like saying 'Liar' vs 'Not entirely correct'. That is for now. I suspect these Zionist 'influencers' will inevitably keep on scratching until the temperatures rise again so that masters can do whatever they want under that cover.
Yeah, apparently a lot of people online took her absence yesterday as to mean that she had given in! and had betrayed her own cause. One of the best examples of "pattern recognition run amok"
 
People are just desperate to make content on her and about her, the grift continues..

Alex Jones contines to challenge her., (keeping in mind he was butthurt that Candace didn't give him the evidence she had back when, and that he hangs out with Fuentes.)

The claim in summary is that Candace's patter recognition is running amok, and that 60sum% of the flight logs are wrong, overlaps or in different continents even.

One user in that thread pointed out that the transponders on the planes were switched off, which still if correct, 40% and all those anomalies are weird.
Plus Israel DOES have a direct interest on CK and EK

If I remember correctly Erika misspoke and hinted she was aware of the planes in a recent interview


I do belive Candace is onto something. How much of it is solid? Can't say.
And this Alex "expose" is probably the "bombshell" Fuentes was gonna release, which is just the AmericaFirst crowd grifting in lockstep. The same crowd who believes bullets bounce off of skin, and that CK's views never morphed. Smh.
 
Here is how she started it (ignore the triggered commentator):
IMHO, The intro is brilliant ( in diffusing the suspicions) :lol: in the context of heat of the battle and she was one of the gladiator that took on the beast and what beast did or can do is people are waking up to. Lot were worried about her ( aka what she represents in the battle) warned her not to eat or drink there etc. It means it is the information in action.

Until she said ' calm down guys' on that monologue, I was on the edge. i.e. she mocked all those phrases of allegiance. I think that is some thing. Imagine if comedians start picking up and spread that mockery the entire facade of cover under which post WW2 control system built ( so-called anti-semitism) under the pretext of victimhood comes under scrutiny. Well, We know nothing changes so quickly in human affairs.

Snowflakes, agenda folks will make what ever they want to from that intro monologue of the episode. Nothing new w.r.t agenda folks
 
If you read the comments, people aren't happy. I'm not quite sure what to think of it all. What did Erika say about the magic bullet? Did she see a wound on his chest? What did she think of McCoy's odd behavior? What about the planes, the pouring of concrete, the dodgy finances, and security? People are still left with questions.

There seems to be some chaos at TPUSA and maybe Erika is kind of in the middle of it being pulled into different directions not really knowing what's going on, I dunno. I hope Candace keeps asking questions and doesn't back down.
 
IMHO, The intro is brilliant ( in diffusing the suspicions) :lol: in the context of heat of the battle and she was one of the gladiator that took on the beast and what beast did or can do is people are waking up to.

I would think the intro alone is meant to make it clear to all decent people in a pretty funny/comedian way that you can poke fun at forces trying to bend people away from very obvious truths and realities.


If you read the comments, people aren't happy. I'm not quite sure what to think of it all. What did Erika say about the magic bullet? Did she see a wound on his chest? What did she think of McCoy's odd behavior? What about the planes, the pouring of concrete, the dodgy finances, and security? People are still left with questions.

There seems to be some chaos at TPUSA and maybe Erika is kind of in the middle of it being pulled into different directions not really knowing what's going on, I dunno. I hope Candace keeps asking questions and doesn't back down.

It is a bit hard to understand what is going on perhaps. But I think what the C‘s said about Erika could maybe help? When she is “a bit shady“ that might mean that she is basically more or less like many ordinary people: perhaps not equipped with the strongest backbones and thus easy to manipulate and/or to be forced to be convinced to just go along and bend by the power of “very shady“ and/or extreme STS people acting on them?

I haven’t watched all of Candace latest show yet but it sounds to me like she is not going to back down and that she is probably quite a bit smarter and “strategic“ than many other people with such reach and tendencies of “not bending“ in the “alternative“ community.
 
Last edited:
When she is “a bit shady“ that might mean that she is basically more or less like many ordinary people
I don't think her behavior is normal, though (compared to the average ordinary person). She strikes me as a celebrity who likes the spotlight and her behavior comes across as performative.

thus easy to manipulate and/or to be forced to be convinced to just go along
That's possible.

If she wants to be taken seriously (and TPUSA to thrive) she needs to be more transparent. People see through acts. Did she say anything about Charlie's text messages about wanting to leave the Israeli cause? Not as far as I know, and here she's Shabbat Shaloming interviews and telling people how much they loved Israel. It's upsetting.
 
Candace went live on Instagram last night for about 30 minutes, basically doing a Reddit AMA-style Q&A with 30k+ live viewers. I was able to watch it all. Nothing crazy or mind-blowing. She did say that today's show is going to go back into the Brian Harpole/Camp Huachuca story. She said that she thinks that is the key to the whole conspiracy. It appears he indeed had enough time after returning from Japan to be at the meeting and that him and TPUSA still haven't revealed his whereabouts that day. That would easily put an end to this speculation, so the fact that they haven't done that should speak volumes.
 
Candace went live on Instagram last night for about 30 minutes, basically doing a Reddit AMA-style Q&A with 30k+ live viewers. I was able to watch it all. Nothing crazy or mind-blowing. She did say that today's show is going to go back into the Brian Harpole/Camp Huachuca story. She said that she thinks that is the key to the whole conspiracy. It appears he indeed had enough time after returning from Japan to be at the meeting and that him and TPUSA still haven't revealed his whereabouts that day. That would easily put an end to this speculation, so the fact that they haven't done that should speak volumes.

Here seems to be a part of it. Makes sense to me:


I find the way she is going on about things quite clever and reasonable: One of the things she is focusing on is LIES, and she explains quite well I think in the above in the case of Erika for example that noticing/exposing a lie is one thing but assigning motives for why this or that lie might have happened is something that can get quite complicated and not that straight forward.

There are many motives that can lead to a lie, from the most innocent ones to the most extreme ones. One might be better able to assign motives/reasons for lies with a lot of data or something very concrete and/or time passing in retrospective.
 
Back
Top Bottom