Chinese actor murdered sparks nationwide online outrage - CCP goes full censorship

[Niall]

Answer from the Cs when we recently asked about this 'accidental death' of Chinese actor Yu Menglong:

(meadow_wind) Has Yu MengLong been murdered?

A: Yes

Q: (meadow_wind) What were the motives for his murder?

A: Ritual sacrifice.

Q: (meadow_wind) Is there a connection between Charlie Kirk's murder and Yu MengLong's?

A: Very indirect, but yes.

Q: (L) And when you say 'very indirect, but yes', What exactly was the connection?

A: Time was right for sacrifices.

Q: (L) So you mean that there is some kind of... a sacrifice calendar?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Well, she points out here, odd coincidence:


- Charlie Kirk, time of fatal injury 12:23 PM September 10th

- Yu MengLong, alleged time of fallen death, but most likely died earlier, 5:00 AM September 11th, 2025

And then there were a bunch of chaotic energy, rare natural events that struck China around that period. September 10th, September 13, 15 and 21. Okay, what's up with that?

A: The sacrificial energy was active at the time. Think of "Eyes Wide Shut" type of activities.

Q: (L) So what is that? I never saw that. I didn't want to see it.

(Joe) It's a movie about the classic kind of secret society, masks, masonic kind of ritual sacrifice. Was Yu MengLong in some way involved in that or was he abducted by those people before that sacrifice?

A: He was the chosen sacrifice.

Q: (Niall) Is this like a Chinese elite version of their Western counterparts?

A: Yes

Q: (Niall) Chinese Freemasonry?

(Chu) Are the responsible people part of the government or just private individuals?

A: Above the government.

Here's a 30-minute summary of the facts of the case - both those officially acknowledged and those since uncovered by Chinese netizens - and the immediate red flags they raised in online discourse, and on which the Chinese govt has indeed cracked down hard:

Here's another good, longer, podcast on the Menglong mystery, which goes into greater detail about the Chinese public's 'crowd-sourced investigations' over the past two months:

I've only had time, for now, to watch the first 30 mins of the second podcast, but her presentation on it so far is well-reasoned.

I wondered on the above session thread, how - that is, through what public interfaces - a potential 'dark network', one 'ritually sacrificing actors', would operate 'above and through' the Chinese government.

The first connection made by Chinese netizens when news of Menlong's death broke was the fact that the actor shared the same manager as another young actor/singer known as Kimi, who 'died by accident' 9 years ago, also in the month of September. Both actors were contracted with the same talent agency, and their manager is long rumored to be part of an organized crime syndicate. From there, the connections with other 'death by misadventure' actors were linked with these two deaths, and dozens of questions began being asked of those 'partying with' Menglong on his last night.

It's remarkable that, simultaneously, in both the US and China, 'ritual murders' spurred the populations of both countries to 'ask lots of questions' and force their respective authorities to expend huge efforts covering up both cases.

 

[Niall]

So, what's the conclusion, the ChiComs are satanists?

I'm sorry, meadow_wind, for being snide in the above post.

Clearly, at least some in the Chinese govt are involved in the exact same sick stuff as 'elites' everywhere else.

 

[palestine]

Answer from the Cs when we recently asked about this 'accidental death' of Chinese actor Yu Menglong:



Here's a 30-minute summary of the facts of the case - both those officially acknowledged and those since uncovered by Chinese netizens - and the immediate red flags they raised in online discourse, and on which the Chinese govt has indeed cracked down hard:

Here's another good, longer, podcast on the Menglong mystery, which goes into greater detail about the Chinese public's 'crowd-sourced investigations' over the past two months:

I've only had time, for now, to watch the first 30 mins of the second podcast, but her presentation on it so far is well-reasoned.

I wondered on the above session thread, how - that is, through what public interfaces - a potential 'dark network', one 'ritually sacrificing actors', would operate 'above and through' the Chinese government.

The first connection made by Chinese netizens when news of Menlong's death broke was the fact that the actor shared the same manager as another young actor/singer known as Kimi, who 'died by accident' 9 years ago, also in the month of September. Both actors were contracted with the same talent agency, and their manager is long rumored to be part of an organized crime syndicate. From there, the connections with other 'death by misadventure' actors were linked with these two deaths, and dozens of questions began being asked of those 'partying with' Menglong on his last night.

It's remarkable that, simultaneously, in both the US and China, 'ritual murders' spurred the populations of both countries to 'ask lots of questions' and force their respective authorities to expend huge efforts covering up both cases.

You have been raising quite a lot of interesting angles, both here and in the session's thread. Thank you!

The Triad idea is interesting. Only thing is that the mob has always been a relatively stable protagonist, and a recurring one in the West, too. Those, it seems, have "principles". Unless their structure has been hijacked by a foreign interest, I wouldn't look at them. Still, they are themselves versed in human trafficking, and if it provides them money than to feed a network with children, they would do it. But if this network would put the country in peril, I believe that the Triads would preserve the country first. So, a Triad whistleblower would be of help, to tell us about the reality of "the ritual network". They surely know about all criminals around.

That's unless we would have to consider the "Triad" as part of the "cabal".

I don't feel able to form a stable scenario, so I will list variables of interest:

• The Yu Menlong features "kids", abducting him, going to a party, etc etc. A "party", "getting drunk". I feel that we may discard all this background. No kids, perhaps, in the case of a Dutroux-like affair.
• The Dutroux affair has the ability to show a very different picture. NATO, GLADIO. Political interests motivate the operations of ritual murders.
• Another thread (Eyes wide shut) mentions that Stanley Kubrick has been abducted by a CIA agent, that this agent took him in London, in a club of ritual murder criminals, that the CIA had prior infiltrated (and that he was killed there).
• I appreciate the idea of "Interface" (Israel, Rosicrucians) between 3D and 4D.
• Private individuals, gathering, summoning spirits and sacrificing people to if: interfaces, bridges, straight to 4D
• Laura's statement: "then we must consider a hyperdimensional layer, with demons" [if we are to get the big picture]; so the existence of this "layer" as "perennial" and stable
• An article stating that the CIA did some covert ops in China: Exclusive: Trump launched CIA covert influence operation against China
  (The article is a "Trump did it", but I feel that we may discard that part)
  Since the Bondi beach AI news phenomenon, I am starting to distrust more and more. I am suspicious about this article.
• Mao's legacy: characteropathy's inheritance, potentially unsolved, and triggering a pathocracy inside. Unsolved trauma among the population. "Communism, again?": there you are, the very least thing to do. Some say: "it's a very mild form of Communism, things are very laxist". I don't know if this is sufficient. People may want to literally escape the traumatism. Mao seems to have been the worse of all genocide during the last century. I find it quite risky than to come back with Communism.

Some ideas that came to mind! I prefer to try to list, rather than to try to conclude. Joe once said "the matrix is a hyperdimensional system whose goal is to make you confirm whatever conclusion that you reach". Studying those things 'round, gathering data, may be the best thing to do.

My concern has been about China. Some heat, suddenly, there, while China is in a fresh BRICS & growth trajectory. It does not match.

 

[palestine]

Too: the plastination of movie stars, a process allegedly in motion for a good while now - hints at:

labo, NSA-ish, scientific, immortality

Not that much "killing a guy with a knife during a ritual".

 

[palestine]

Session 18 January 2003

Q: (A) There is this Pentagon, then there is another superpower - Russia - and still another - China...

A: There is only one. The U.S. just happens to be the center.

Did the center export its influence, more, in a concealed way, to China? Left "un-noticed".

 

[meadow_wind]

Here's a 30-minute summary of the facts of the case - both those officially acknowledged and those since uncovered by Chinese netizens - and the immediate red flags they raised in online discourse, and on which the Chinese govt has indeed cracked down hard:

Yes, both documentaries are good. I had published this "Dark Asia with Megan" 30 min video in my 1st post. Rotten Mango made 2 in-depth documentaries on the topic, the one you just published, and one that Tomiro published on post #18. I find she's a good investigative journalist. I postponed finishing her 2 videos because they are much longer. I will do it soon enough and produce a transcript summary with the help of Grok. This whole thing is quite a spider web...

Here's her 2nd video:

Actor Yu Menglong "Falls" From 5th Floor - Entire Nation SILENCED Until Torture Video Is Leaked

I'm sorry, meadow_wind, for being snide in the above post.

No worries; I did not take it personal. I swear I was not even looking in that direction myself when I started investigating, even though many netizens were. The session's answers really caught me by surprise...



Out of curiosity, I asked Grok 2 questions, but I did not have much time to verify the info or investigate further. So it might be all crap, or there might be genuine leads that could help uncover some stuff.

What people/family would be above the Chinese government in terms of money possession and power?

Understanding the Chinese Government's Wealth and Power
The Chinese government, primarily through the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and state-owned enterprises (SOEs), controls an immense share of the nation's resources. As of recent estimates (around 2024-2025), public ownership accounts for roughly 30-60% of China's total national wealth, including major stakes in banking, energy, real estate, and infrastructure. This translates to trillions of USD in assets—far exceeding the combined wealth of China's private sector, which totals about $1.35 trillion among the top 100 richest individuals and families (per Forbes 2025). No single private family or individual possesses comparable liquid wealth or assets.In terms of power, the CCP's centralized authority under Xi Jinping is unchallenged domestically. It wields control over policy, military, media, and the economy, with anti-corruption campaigns since 2012 curbing overt elite influence. However, informal networks of princelings (descendants of revolutionary leaders) and political families exert subtle sway through patronage, business ties, and appointments. These groups don't "rule above" the government but operate within its framework, often aligning with or influencing CCP factions

Wealth: No Private Family Comes Close
China's wealthiest families derive fortunes from tech, manufacturing, and consumer goods, but their net worth pales against state holdings. Here's a snapshot of the top families/individuals from the 2025 Hurun and Forbes China Rich Lists (cutoff ~$700 million USD per person):

Rank	Family/Individual	Primary Source	Net Worth (USD, approx.)	Notes
1	Zhong Shanshan (solo, no major family dynasty)	Nongfu Spring (bottled water), pharmaceuticals	$72 billion	"Lone wolf" billionaire; wealth surged with consumer demand.
2	Zhang Yiming	ByteDance (TikTok)	~$50 billion	Tech-driven; family influence limited.
3	Ma Huateng (Pony Ma)	Tencent	~$40 billion	Gaming/social media; part of "new economy" boom.
4	Zhang Bo	Manufacturing/construction (cement, steel)	$41 billion	Tied to infrastructure; represents industrial old guard.
5	Zhou Qunfei (family)	Lens Technology (smartphone screens)	$10 billion	One of few prominent female-led fortunes.

• Collective private wealth: The top 100 richest in China hold $1.35 trillion (up 31% from 2024 due to stock rallies), but this is fragmented and dwarfed by SOEs like China National Petroleum ($400 billion revenue annually alone).
• Key insight: Even the richest family controls <1% of national wealth. Government regulations (e.g., tech crackdowns) can erode fortunes overnight, as seen with Jack Ma's Alibaba (once $60+ billion, now diminished).

No family "possesses more money" than the state—private wealth is a byproduct of CCP-enabled growth, not a rival.

Power: Influential Networks, Not Overt Rulers
While no family surpasses the CCP in raw power, several elite clans (often princelings) hold disproportionate sway via intergenerational ties. These stem from CCP founders and are divided into loose factions like the "Shanghai Clique" (reformist, market-oriented) and "Beijing Clique" (more conservative). Influence manifests in board seats, policy access, and regional control, but Xi's consolidation has sidelined many.

Key groups based on historical and contemporary analyses:

1. Xi Family (Princelings of the "Beijing Clique")
   • Head: Xi Jinping (son of Xi Zhongxun, revolutionary veteran).
   • Influence: Direct control over CCP, military, and foreign policy. Family members (e.g., sister Qi Qiaoqiao) have offshore business ties (~$1 billion in assets per leaks), but wealth is secondary to political dominance.
   • Power edge: Unrivaled; Xi's anti-corruption purges targeted rivals, centralizing authority.
2. Deng Family
   • Head: Descendants of Deng Xiaoping (architect of reforms).
   • Influence: Key in economic liberalization; relatives like Deng Lin (artist) and Deng Pufang (philanthropist) hold cultural/soft power. Business arms in energy/tech.
   • Power edge: Symbolic "reformist" legacy; still consulted on policy but diminished under Xi.
3. Jiang Zemin Faction (Shanghai Clique)
   • Head: Descendants of Jiang Zemin (former president); includes Zeng Qinghong's family.
   • Influence: Controls media, finance, and SOEs (e.g., ties to CITIC Group). Zeng's son has stakes in nuclear energy funds.
   • Power edge: Market-oriented; once dominant but weakened by Xi's campaigns.
4. Chen Family (Historical CC Clique Remnant)
   • Head: Descendants of Chen Lifu/Guofu (KMT-era, but CCP-integrated post-1949).
   • Influence: Party organization and anti-corruption roles; lower-profile but embedded in bureaucracy.
   • Power edge: Ideological (anti-communist roots adapted to CCP loyalty).
5. Other Notables:
   • Hu Jintao Family: Ties to Tsinghua Holdings (tech/security firm, ~90% market share in scanners); son Hu Haifeng accused of monopolies.
   • Wen Jiabao Family: Former PM; relatives linked to ~$2.7 billion in assets (NYT 2012 exposé), but low current visibility.
   • Li Peng Family: "Nuclear" clan; daughter in power holdings.

• Broader context: At grassroots levels, "political families" (shijia) dominate local posts (e.g., counties), fostering nepotism and corruption risks. Nationally, nine major CCP clans (e.g., Liu Shaoqi, Yang Shangkun lines) vie for influence, but none overrides the Politburo. Historical "Four Big Families" (Chiang, Soong, Kong, Chen from Republic era) amassed ~$20 billion pre-1949 but fled to Taiwan/U.S., irrelevant today.

Conclusion
No people or family truly stands "above" the Chinese government in money or power—the CCP's structure ensures state supremacy, with private wealth as a controlled variable. The closest are princeling networks like Xi's, which are the government. This dynamic maintains stability but risks entrenching inequality, as noted in Hurun reports on widening elite gaps. For deeper dives, sources like Forbes or academic analyses (e.g., Stanford's FSI) highlight how privatization has grown private fortunes without challenging state dominance.




There are powerful and rich people allowed to be so because they control the CCP behind the curtain. These people are part of dark secret societies, performing dark blood and sex rituals. Think Illuminati style. Can you look for any informal sources for this information, whistleblowers, survivor claims, psychics, etc

1. Illuminati Bloodlines and Links to Communism/CCP Theories claim the Illuminati (or similar generational Satanic families) infiltrated or founded communist structures, including the CCP, to enact global control via rituals. Proponents argue Karl Marx was an Illuminati agent, and modern Chinese elites continue this through hidden societies.

• Fritz Springmeier's "Bloodlines of the Illuminati" (1995 book, declassified CIA-hosted PDF): This text describes 13 elite bloodlines (e.g., Rothschild, Rockefeller) as Satanic, controlling world governments via secret societies. It alleges Illuminati influence on communism, with rituals involving blood sacrifices and sex to bind loyalty. Springmeier, a self-described whistleblower on mind control, claims these families puppeteer entities like the CCP through economic and occult means.
  
  
• Christopher Story's "The New Underworld Order" (book PDF): Expands on Illuminati funding of communist revolutions, including Mao's era, with references to secret rituals in Soviet/Chinese literature from the 1930s. Story, a British intelligence analyst turned conspiracy author, posits a "dark" elite using blood oaths and sex rituals to enforce control over parties like the CCP.
  
  
• Henry Makow's Writings: In books like "Illuminati 2: Deceit and Seduction," Makow (a Canadian conspiracy theorist) claims Illuminati cliques (including Communists and Freemasons) run secret societies that influence the CCP via bribery, murder, and Satanic rituals. He references U.S. communist infiltrations extending to China.
  

2. Whistleblower and Defector Claims on CCP Infiltration and Rituals Alleged insiders or defectors describe CCP elites as tied to global cabals, with rituals used for power extension or control.

• Benjamin Fulford's Accounts: A former Forbes journalist turned conspiracy blogger, Fulford has claimed in interviews and posts that a "Chinese Secret Society" (e.g., White Dragon Society) challenges Illuminati control over the CCP, which he says is enforced through murder, bribery, and occult practices. He alleges Japanese/Chinese elites are manipulated via Satanic rituals.
  
  
• YouTube Videos on CCP Infiltration: Channels discuss "2 million CCP cadres" infiltrating global organizations, linking it to Illuminati-style control. One video claims law enforcement and the CCP are run by "Illuminati & Reptilians," implying ritualistic oversight.
  
  Another ties this to blood rituals in elite circles.
  
  
• Falun Gong-Related Whistleblowers: Former practitioners and defectors (e.g., via Epoch Times reports) allege CCP organ harvesting from prisoners as part of ritualistic abuse. A 2025 X post from Jan Jekielek shares a survivor's story of escaping forced organ removal, claiming it's systematic and tied to "dark" state practices.
  
  Similar claims from 2006 whistleblowers describe secret facilities for live extractions, framed by some as blood rituals.
  

3. Survivor Testimonies of Rituals and Trafficking Self-identified survivors often describe trauma-based mind control (MK-ULTRA style) linked to Chinese elites or global societies influencing the CCP.

• Shen Yun/Falun Gong Exposés: A former Shen Yun dancer accused the group (tied to anti-CCP Falun Gong) of cult-like abuse and trafficking in 2024, with some conspiracy circles flipping this to claim CCP countermeasures involve sex rituals and organ farms.
  
  X posts allege CCP "farming baby organs" and child blood collection as part of a "global catastrophe" with Satanic elements.
  
  
• MK-ULTRA/MONARCH Survivors: Grey (@GreyAreaMonarch on X) claims childhood brainwashing in modern MK-ULTRA, linking it to Nazi/Chinese trauma tech, cults, and secret armies using sex, drugs, and rituals for control. They tie this to global elites influencing governments like the CCP.
  
  Another thread by Hidden AmuraKa discusses "occult blueprint for trauma-based mind control" involving sexual trauma and cults.
  
  
• General Ritual Survivor Claims: X user @PreDevoNatoR (self-described child trafficking survivor) mentions "energy harvesting, destiny swapping, loosh drinking" as ancient vampirism tied to U.S./Israeli/Chinese entities.
  
  Posts about "humiliation rituals" and spells on survivors imply elite covens connected to judicial systems, potentially including CCP networks.
  

4. Psychic and Medium Claims Fringe psychic readings often "reveal" CCP ties to dark rituals.

• Candice's Psychic Readings (via X and YouTube): In a 2025 X post, a medium claims CCP leaders use "life-prolonging secret techniques" involving rituals like boiling/eating organs, tied to art zones and celebrity kidnappings sold on the dark web.
  
  Similar claims from @kenzsinterlude describe psychic visions of chakra shutdowns, energetic rape, and spells by secret groups.
  
  
• Blood Ritual Necromancy: X user Lisa Lu shares videos alleging blood rituals in tunnels with stained mattresses, framed as elite mysteries potentially linked to Chinese or global societies.
  

 

[Cosmos]

I think what the C‘s pointed out about this could basically refer back to the idea that some really powerful circles and forces have been and continue to be „a global government“ that operates behind the official facades and figure heads pretty much in every country on earth.

That doesn’t necessarily mean that countries can escape that or really change that even if they have all the best intentions and abilities to do so. IMO even in countries like Russia those circles might just be so powerful and untouchable that consciously or not even good official governments and people like Putin can’t quite go there or completely eliminate it and/or control it. It could even be that good people like Putin made a “pact“ or “deal“ (unconsciously or not) “with“ them and/or forced them to agree to some parameters, and in turn he doesn’t interfere too much and openly with them while he tries his best to change things despite that as best as he can do, to the better.

 

[palestine]

There has been much info saying that this poor fellow was implicated in a weapon trafficking operation, registered under his name.

Thinking of this... I don't believe that the CCP (even less President Xi) would need to use a random obscure guy to get weapons. This weapon business may be part of something else, then. Some people needed to get weapons, or at least outside of the official channels?

This poor fellow must have been completely controlled, by some group, I believe. They seem to have made him a "platform" for weapon trade.

 

[Niall]

I think what the C‘s pointed out about this could basically refer back to the idea that some really powerful circles and forces have been and continue to be „a global government“ that operates behind the official facades and figure heads pretty much in every country on earth.

That doesn’t necessarily mean that countries can escape that or really change that even if they have all the best intentions and abilities to do so. IMO even in countries like Russia those circles might just be so powerful and untouchable that consciously or not even good official governments and people like Putin can’t quite go there or completely eliminate it and/or control it. It could even be that good people like Putin made a “pact“ or “deal“ (unconsciously or not) “with“ them and/or forced them to agree to some parameters, and in turn he doesn’t interfere too much and openly with them while he tries his best to change things despite that as best as he can do, to the better.

What might that mean for unipolarity vs multipolarity?

What appears to be a titanic ideological battle is really just a 'global government cabinet shake-up'? The 'Great Game' of geopolitics doesn't really impinge on the 'Ultimate Game' (in which Earth is a 'farm' and is completely - that is, the whole world over, including in 'rebel countries' like RU and CN - managed as such), also at 3D level?

 

[Cosmos]

What might that mean for unipolarity vs multipolarity?

What appears to be a titanic ideological battle is really just a 'global government cabinet shake-up'? The 'Great Game' of geopolitics doesn't really impinge on the 'Ultimate Game' (in which Earth is a 'farm' and is completely - that is, the whole world over, including in 'rebel countries' like RU and CN - managed as such), also at 3D level?

I dunno. Perhaps it is quite a bit more complicated at some levels but at the same time I would think that it isn’t an all or nothing thing as well but probably nuanced. In a 3D STS world we maybe shouldn’t be surprised that “the main“ and/or strongest forces have been and continue to be one shade of dark or the other.

I‘m also reminded of the hints from the C‘s that at some levels STS and STO “negotiate“ (“conspire“?) together on what happens on this earth. They called it “the consortium“ or something similar to that. Most recently that seems to have happened for example in the assassination attempt on Trump in Butler.

In connection to that I also wonder about what has become more obvious now, namely, background deals behind official statements. For example, we have seen that with the Iran attack and counter attack. Is that actually what the C‘s mean with STO and STS forces deciding/negotiating in the background? Same as in Ukraine etc.? There for example, despite them officially being enemies they can still negotiate in the shadows/background what to target and what not to target and in which way and how much of it can escalate etc. Putin and company in this case are representing the STO part of the equation of “the consortium“ while some if not many in “the empire“ are representing the STS part of the equation?

 

[fifty_five]

One basic thing to consider, ihmo, is that this 3D STS is highly polarized, physically polarized, starting with man/woman and extending to geopolitical connotations. If capitalism exists, it is obvious that communism exists, and so on. The biggest mistake we humans make is to identify with a salvific part of polarity, without understanding the dynamics that occur within ourselves in the first place, and cause and effect in general. But the fact that we don't understand a damn thing is part of the game, otherwise it wouldn't work, both from an evolutionary point of view and from the point of view of maintaining the farm .

 

[Beau]

What might that mean for unipolarity vs multipolarity?

What appears to be a titanic ideological battle is really just a 'global government cabinet shake-up'? The 'Great Game' of geopolitics doesn't really impinge on the 'Ultimate Game' (in which Earth is a 'farm' and is completely - that is, the whole world over, including in 'rebel countries' like RU and CN - managed as such), also at 3D level?

China being no different than Western countries shouldn't be a surprise to anyone who keeps up with the Cassiopaean cosmology.

Session 20 August 2011

Q: (Bubbles) Which country on the whole planet has the best "essence"? (Perceval) From our perspective? (Bubbles) The least bad?

A: None at present. As we have said, there is already a one world government.

 

[Niall]

Quite.

Not all things appear to be 'set in stone', however. Free will, and all that.

Session 29 July 2023

(Ze Germans) What is the nature of the power center in Russia, which is symbolized by a bear as described previously?

A: Partly dismantled. Now in opposition to NWO.

Q: (Joe) Do Putin and the members of the Russian government know the extent of the depravity of their Western "partners", as we were just talking about?

A: They can hardly believe it.

Q: (L) Alright. Yeah, because when we asked that question, it seems to me that they were saying that there was something in Russia that was part of this beast empire thing, and that would be, I think, the Westerners who were... Maybe the oligarchs who were Western leaning and so forth, and they were very powerful at the time.

(Niall) So, I guess it's Putin who has partly dismantled it...

(L) Yeah. And, and Putin has dismantled that structure?

A: Yes

Q: (L) At least partly, I'm sure.

 

[Beau]

Quite.

Not all things appear to be 'set in stone', however. Free will, and all that.

You're right. Sorry about my post, I could have worded things better. It's not so black and white.

 

[iamthatis]

What might that mean for unipolarity vs multipolarity?

What appears to be a titanic ideological battle is really just a 'global government cabinet shake-up'? The 'Great Game' of geopolitics doesn't really impinge on the 'Ultimate Game' (in which Earth is a 'farm' and is completely - that is, the whole world over, including in 'rebel countries' like RU and CN - managed as such), also at 3D level?

I don't really know. Both Russia and China went through their own cycles of hell not so long ago. We know that hard times make strong men, so it's reasonable to say that they're in the upswing of somewhat objective hysteroidal cycle.

In Russia's case, this suffering probably forged the Souls necessary to take out some certain significant amount of the PTB power structure there.

In China's case, it also has appeared that way to me, with what looks to be crackdowns on financial parasites, lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty, education, safe streets, technological development, care for nature, etc.

Commentators like Escobar can barely contain their glee about the ascendancy of multipolarity and the powers of creative reason being unleashed, the end of the rules-based order and all that. I admit that trade, development, and sovereignty sure looks to be a much better approach than Team America World Police.

We might say that even if multipolarity does look better objectively, though, the PTB/STS forces have a history of intentionally allowing countries to follow the trajectory of this objective hysteroidal cycle - they allow 'strong men' to appear. They may directly support them and provide resources to build up the country in question. The main example I have in mind is the case of Germany's transformation between WW1 and WW2, funded by international bankers.

At the same time, we might also say that the PTB are not as omnipotent as we tend to think, and that higher STO forces can also give to those who ask, perhaps inspiring other 'strong men' at the same time.

Maybe it can look simple from the outside - a country rising into greatness - but the added layer of hyperdimensional complexity suggests that both STS and STO forces vie for influence over the outcome of the objective process of the hysteroidal cycle and what the 'strong men' do. Or which group of 'strong men' succeeds amongst all the factions. In other words, it's a spiritual battle, pretty much like everything here.

My general sense is that the build-up of China has a purpose - to set the stage for the next conflict, which is exactly what we're seeing. We could say that capitalism and communism were set against each other, in order to provide the overarching structure of the global lesson plan, in which individual lessons are learned. Same thing now, but with unipolarity/multipolarity.

Specifically about Chinese satanists - in farming, you get the animals to grow to weight before you harvest. This could mean that Satanists or psychopaths in China are not given free rein like in the US, because the time ain't right. Maybe they're being strategically kept down, or going unsupported by higher STS forces, so that the more STO 'strong men' of China can get the country to 'grow to weight' through reasonable policies? Or are the dark forces already in charge somewhat, and actively stimulating China's growth, while giving China a 'Mask of Sanity'? There's really no way to tell aside from asking the C's for clarification.

Commentators like Webb and Davies would say that the unipolar/multipolar distinction is unimportant (not sure wwhere Fitts or Corbett stand on the issue) It's a cover for a more insidious process of the global transition to a dehumanizing Technocratic control system, displacing capitalism in the same way capitalism displaced agrarian economies before. In other words, mass transformation of every facet of life - even more than we're already seeing. If we take this idea seriously, it would be a possible explanation for the PTB allowing China's rise - to generate the conflict necessary for harvest while the proposed digital gulag rolls out.