Candace Owens: From TPUSA Conservative Activist to Powerful Voice for Truth

[Cosmos]

Watched the latest Candace episode now. All I can say is, holy moly, Candace might still be on the right track’s and it is getting hotter by the day!

If I would have to bet, I would bet that Mitch is telling the truth, and that he likely really saw Brian Harpole, Congressman Mark Amodei and Erika Kirk at Fort Huachuca on Sept 8-9! Now we can only hope that people will ask those 3 people some crucial questions like the ones described above.

Notice, while Mitch says that he saw Erika only in that hotel lobby on Sept. 8, that he testified that the man she was meeting there was present at the suspicious high level meeting on the next day Sept. 9 where he saw the other two. So, there would seem to be a more or less “direct“ connection between Erika being there the day before to that high level meeting the next day through that man she met at the lobby.

And yes, it is also perfectly reasonable to at least ask the question if Kash Patel (FBI head) was there too.

 

[Beau]

How to reconcile these data points

I think they are reconcilable. She can be unaware of the plot to kill Charlie and still be at Fort Huachuca if she is an intelligence asset.

 

[Windmill knight]

Will try to watch the whole thing later after work but from skimming over those portions in the video there might be quite some context to how those additional 2 names might have appeared now. I know that Candace when she first disclosed what Mitch had to say told us that there was a woman in the hotel lobby that later left and that she had blond hair (if I remember correctly).

Yeah, when Candace first mentioned the girl and the other guy at the hotel lobby I wondered what that was about, since she didn't go back to it nor connect it with anything else. Now with the interview of 'Mich' we know why that was significant. So my impression is that 'Mich' did mention this to Candace, but at the time she decided not to mention Erika. In the interview with Mich, when he mentions Erika, Candace says something along the lines of that info being very explosive, that she had doubts about releasing it to the public, and that she preferred to let people hear directly from Mich.

It does sound like Mich told the same story from the start to Candace, except she didn't tell the whole thing to the public. She does do that by her own admission - get info and release it bit by bit 'strategically' or after she's decided it's trustworthy. 'Keep her cards close to the chest'.

My impression of the Mich guy is that he is telling the truth. On the other hand, what he's saying is 'too good to be true', so I think we should be cautious anyways.

As for Erika, my impression is that she could have been involved on several 'shady' levels without being aware that Charlie was to be murdered. She could have been tasked with being Charlie's handler, or maybe she was sincere in her relationship with him while at the same time being very much invested in the financial success of TPUSA and therefore acquiescing to all sorts of shady agendas. There's a number of possibilities there.

 

[WhiteMountain]

She mentioned the name of that Captain that Mitch spoke to. I wonder if Candace has already spoken to him to confirm what Mitch said, and might have even done so before the private meeting with Erika. Then let Ericka dig her own grave coming up with an alibi for where she was the day before. If that Captain backed up the claim of mitch and then told who the other people were...TPUSA etc are really cooked!

 

[WhiteMountain]

I think they are reconcilable. She can be unaware of the plot to kill Charlie and still be at Fort Huachuca if she is an intelligence asset.

Or the C's just got that wrong. They themselves said what they say is not always 100%. That has been my perception as well as they have said things in the past I 100% don't believe is true.

 

[Cosmos]

The latest revelations (no matter if true or not) also sort of proof that Candace is quite strategic and takes quite some risks, because she had all of that in her head (including of course many possibilities) before she agreed to the meeting with Erika and then did the meeting. Just great. She’s obviously a fighting spirit.

 

[Cosmos]

I think they are reconcilable. She can be unaware of the plot to kill Charlie and still be at Fort Huachuca if she is an intelligence asset.

Indeed.

 

[Cosmos]

I would suspect if any such meeting really took place that even within such a setting it can very well be that only very few people actually know what will happen and/or what they are there for.

 

[gottathink]

Is this time alteration happened here too? I can't help except to speculate about it given the enormity of the context.

This may be noise, but had wondered about another timeline switch because there is a house a few doors down from us that when we moved in (17 years ago) had red enamel window frames. They stood out because I had never seen red frames before and it looked weird. Then a number of years ago I noticed they were yellow, and for several years since I have kept looking at them to check the colour because I was sure they were red and concluded I must have been mistaken and they were always yellow. I checked Google earth photos which were from 2006 and sure enough they were yellow.

Two weeks ago, when I was checking their colour, I noticed they are red again! The google earth photo from 2006 also shows them as being red. I asked my husband, who notices everything, at the dinner table what colour window frames does the brown house down the road have. He said yellow. I asked a friend who lives down the road nearly opposite the house what colour she thought they were. She said yellow.

It is super weird, as I thought it must have been a glitch in my brain when they went from red to yellow and were yellow for years. Now red again? Was this because of a timeline switch related to CK assasination?

Has anyone else noticed something weird like that?

 

[Cosmos]

I‘m of the opinion that we shouldn’t dismiss the idea that what Candace was uncovering in regards to Brigitte/Macron was at least partly why they send a message by killing Kirk. IMO it could very well be that Candace started to pull on very powerful and dangerous threads there. Maybe she was even onto some of the most deeply held secrets of powerful elites (families/clan/organizations) in the background who have controlled what is going on all over the entire world for quite a long time behind the scenes.

And I‘m not so sure that you can neatly separate such forces from “Mossad“ because that dark web is so interwoven globally. So it could also be a mixture of that and the discoveries/ revelations about CIA/ISRAEL that caused them to panic and send such a message. A message that has so far accomplished the exact opposite though. Wishful thinking. And I would say they keep panicking even more.

I would reckon that in officially known history there was probably never a more threatening thing happening to those extremely powerful forces behind the scenes and Candace is IMO probably spearheading that awakening of quite big numbers of people to that shocking reality.

 

[Cosmos]

So it appears that Congressman Mark Amodei sort of addressed the question if he was at the Fort by giving off the impression that he wasn’t there, but then people checked and it seems like despite him insinuating such a thing he has in fact no Alibi through what he claimed there (and if so, he might have used a deliberate form of lying to make it appear otherwise with what he said):

https://twitter.com/x/status/2002129596360331334

 

[Cosmos]

I‘m of the opinion that we shouldn’t dismiss the idea that what Candace was uncovering in regards to Brigitte/Macron was at least partly why they send a message by killing Kirk. IMO it could very well be that Candace started to pull on very powerful and dangerous threads there. Maybe she was even onto some of the most deeply held secrets of powerful elites (families/clan/organizations) in the background who have controlled what is going on all over the entire world for quite a long time behind the scenes.

And I‘m not so sure that you can neatly separate such forces from “Mossad“ because that dark web is so interwoven globally. So it could also be a mixture of that and the discoveries/ revelations about CIA/ISRAEL that caused them to panic and send such a message. A message that has so far accomplished the exact opposite though. Wishful thinking. And I would say they keep panicking even more.

I would reckon that in officially known history there was probably never a more threatening thing happening to those extremely powerful forces behind the scenes and Candace is IMO probably spearheading that awakening of quite big numbers of people to that shocking reality.

And we also shouldn’t forget that Candace was also about to really start digging into the Epstein case shortly before Kirk was killed.

 

[anartist]

Watched the latest Candace episode now. All I can say is, holy moly, Candace might still be on the right track’s and it is getting hotter by the day!

If I would have to bet, I would bet that Mitch is telling the truth, and that he likely really saw Brian Harpole, Congressman Mark Amodei and Erika Kirk at Fort Huachuca on Sept 8-9! Now we can only hope that people will ask those 3 people some crucial questions like the ones described above.

Notice, while Mitch says that he saw Erika only in that hotel lobby on Sept. 8, that he testified that the man she was meeting there was present at the suspicious high level meeting on the next day Sept. 9 where he saw the other two. So, there would seem to be a more or less “direct“ connection between Erika being there the day before to that high level meeting the next day through that man she met at the lobby.

And yes, it is also perfectly reasonable to at least ask the question if Kash Patel (FBI head) was there too.

Mitch as also identified Erika's ex-boyfriend as being at the Fort at that meeting, and apparently he works for aly Wire AND is also doing gigs with Turning Point? If true very weird and fishy.

 

[anartist]

I think they are reconcilable. She can be unaware of the plot to kill Charlie and still be at Fort Huachuca if she is an intelligence asset

With regard to that, Candace has also mentionned that there was/is traing at that Fort for military (and civilians?) to infiltrate Christain organizations That ties into the Christian Calvary church organization also and their links to the military, eg McCoy

 

[Cosmos]

Two things to keep in mind that should be expected I think:

- “Mossad“ will probably set things up (especially in high profile and big assassinations like Kirk) in a way that there is at least one layer where another party that could even have nothing to do with the deed itself can be blamed in case the official story becomes too untenable. In this case that could for example mean that they planned it beforehand that “just Erika“ and/or that Congressman etc can be used as “they did it“ if needed.

- It wouldn’t surprise me at all that “Mossad“ is so sneaky and powerful that they could arrange a pretty devilishly brilliant honeypot type of situation:

They lure (even high profile and famous) people into certain situations before, during and after the assassination while those people are innocent of anything that caused the death of the assassinated person.

In that way they do accomplish several objectives at once: they not only implicate those innocent people “in the deed“ BUT it also causes the innocent people themselves to be forced to lie and cover up the deed because at the end they have little to no way to proof that they were not implicated! They are literally set up so badly that they realize as soon as the assassination has happened that for all intents and purposes, even though they are innocent, they very much look like the ones “who did it“!

Let’s speculate in this case for example that some of those innocent people might be figures like Kash Patel, Erika or that Congressman. Then it wouldn’t take much to suspect that innocent figures with such powers feel the imminent personal need to not go to jail or be killed by becoming some of the main drivers of the coverup themselves, even though they are innocent!

Now add on top of that, that some of those innocent people might be blackmailed by Mossad at the same time for other things they are NOT that innocent of, like financial frauds, sexual depravity or human trafficking, and you start to see how much leverage Mossad might really have over such people and situations! In other words: A lot of framing might be going on. Mossad motto “by deception“ is probably key to a lot of things.