Greenland - a geopolitical space on the global chess board?

T.C. said:
1) While I’m not going to dispute off hand the claims about how Greenlanders were treated over the years by the Danes, this piece is obviously designed to help demonise the Danes before any transition takes place.

2) Just because Greenlanders might not want to be under Danish rule doesn’t mean they should have to be under US, or anyone else’s rule either.
Click to expand...
I don't doubt this is what has occurred and I'm glad its come to light. It's good to know the history of things for an accurate understanding of things. The intension could be to smear the Danes obviously. To me the truth of the matter is more important then the political tactic thats being used. This is a very serious and dark accusation here and should be acknowledged. These people must have serious issues with the Danish, its hideous! It's my hope that whatever happens with these people their lives will be improved in some way. Everything doesn't need to be framed in this political warfare stance.. I'm not promoting anything here but looking at and for the facts.
 
SummerLite said:
I don't doubt this is what has occurred and I'm glad its come to light. It's good to know the history of things for an accurate understanding of things. The intension could be to smear the Danes obviously. To me the truth of the matter is more important then the political tactic thats being used. This is a very serious and dark accusation here and should be acknowledged. These people must have serious issues with the Danish, its hideous! It's my hope that whatever happens with these people their lives will be improved in some way. Everything doesn't need to be framed in this political warfare stance.. I'm not promoting anything here but looking at and for the facts.
Click to expand...
And of course, USA, Canada, have a very dark history for what they did to the native populations.
Any empire project brings with it a lot of death and suffering as it expands and colonizes.
We should all get familiar with our dark history for understanding and knowledge of the nature of the forces of darkness/STS we face, while the rest of the world picks and chooses bits of history to serve their agenda of the moment.
So it seems to me anyways.
 
Breton said:
And of course, USA, Canada, have a very dark history for what they did to the native populations.
Any empire project brings with it a lot of death and suffering as it expands and colonizes.
We should all get familiar with our dark history for understanding and knowledge of the nature of the forces of darkness/STS we face, while the rest of the world picks and chooses bits of history to serve their agenda of the moment.
So it seems to me anyways.
Click to expand...
Yes, it's true. We are tasked with looking at ALL the darkness. To fall into picking and choosing brings us into their Matrix game of mind control.
 
SummerLite said:
I don't doubt this is what has occurred and I'm glad its come to light. It's good to know the history of things for an accurate understanding of things. The intension could be to smear the Danes obviously. To me the truth of the matter is more important then the political tactic thats being used. This is a very serious and dark accusation here and should be acknowledged. These people must have serious issues with the Danish, its hideous! It's my hope that whatever happens with these people their lives will be improved in some way. Everything doesn't need to be framed in this political warfare stance.. I'm not promoting anything here but looking at and for the facts.
Click to expand...

If the Danish government hadn’t made any efforts to acknowledge what they’d done to Greenlanders, then that would be its own issue.

But it said in the information you quoted that they had in fact acknowledged it, and apologised for it. So the only reason it’s being rehashed is political warfare. And in that sense, it’s actually an insult to the people of Greenland because they are just being used as pawns in a manipulative scheme to weaponise the emotions of people who are learning about it for the first time to sour their opinion of Denmark.
 
Well, apparently the US regime panicked on the bond markets (or maybe they were impressed by the 15 French soldiers) and surrendered on Greenland. The Europeans tasted blood, and Israel will have no real use for the US after the coming war on Iran. Trump will be discarded as the fall guy, maybe with something in his food, especially with the deplorable circus at Davos. What a show.
 
UKColumn mentioned that the US signed a treaty with Denmark in 1916 (3.5 minutes before end of video) which included the Lansing Declaration which gave Denmark sovereignty over Greenland. “The Government of the United States will not object to the Danish Government extending their political and economic interests to the whole of Greenland.”

UKColumn states "This is problematic for Trump because a declaration, although it would not normally have the force of law, in this case the declaration was added as an addendum to a treaty, and the treaty was used for the sale of the Danish West Indies (now the Virgin Islands) to the US. The declaration went through the full ratification process.....So, although under normal circumstances, a unilateral declaration by the US would not be binding, in this case it is binding because it was part of that treaty that was ratified.....and is therefore constitutional. It is domestic law we are talking about here, not international law, and it is much much harder for Trump to breach that."
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Well, whatever the outcome with this the Davos, EU crowd is absolutely in meltdown mode with Trump after his speech and the whole Greenland thing. Totally deserved for that crowd :lol:.
 
Was this posted somewhere already? Apologies if it has. I took a look at the Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) on Greenland. This base is part of a group known as Space Base Delta 1 (SBD 1). It's headquarters are at Peterson Space Force Base (formerly Peterson Air Force Base) in Colorado Springs. There are five other installations making six in total. The other five are:

SBD 1 is responsible for Peterson Space Force Base, Schriever Space Force Base, and Cheyenne Mountain Space Force Station in Colorado; Pituffik Space Base in Greenland; New Boston Space Force Station in New Hampshire; and Kaena Point Space Force Station in Hawaii.
Click to expand...

The emblem of SBD 1 features a six headed dragon, a "six" formed out of two necks, and a six sided emblem = 666. Is this their idea of a joke, trying to be badass, or are they serious?

Space Base Delta 1.jpg
 
Wow, I'm surprised to see so many of you hating on Pres Trump. I think Acquiring Greenland is a brilliant move for a lot of reasons.
There are only 50k people there, who are about to make a windfall.
Greenland is an ice ball, very little infrastructure. The US would develop and improve, and likely start tapping resources. I cant see anyone living there not wanting that to happen. Its like using an outhouse, then someone gives you a million dollars and builds you a bathroom inside your house.
Denmark is giving them crumbs to survive. Becoming a US territory will bring them into the 21st century. We arent going to invade, we are buying it. Things are heating up, I wonder what the Cs will say about it.
 
FM258 said:
Wow, I'm surprised to see so many of you hating on Pres Trump. I think Acquiring Greenland is a brilliant move for a lot of reasons.
There are only 50k people there, who are about to make a windfall.
Greenland is an ice ball, very little infrastructure. The US would develop and improve, and likely start tapping resources. I cant see anyone living there not wanting that to happen. Its like using an outhouse, then someone gives you a million dollars and builds you a bathroom inside your house.
Denmark is giving them crumbs to survive. Becoming a US territory will bring them into the 21st century. We arent going to invade, we are buying it. Things are heating up, I wonder what the Cs will say about it.
Click to expand...

As far as I know Greenlanders are not enthusiastic. The deal Rutte(NATO) & Trump is for more American bases and extraction of rare minerals, to which I am not that sure that that will improve Greenlander's life.

They buying part it isn't either, Trump said he won't pay anything for the... taking, using, the parts of the land that will become US territory like a consulate of some sort.

With an American flag for all to see as Medvedev described it well.

The meaningless event in Davos promises to be interesting. Instead of the clichéd, doomed Ukraine, they will discuss the frozen Greenland.

The overall situation here is clear. The timid European peacocks, having swallowed tranquilizers from fear, will try to persuade the assertive uncle to take full custody of the island, but leave it in the formal ownership of the Danish kingdom. Do as you please, they'll say, uncle: take the island for indefinite free use, extract useful minerals there for free, build military bases, airfields, missile silos, and any other facilities for total control.

However, Trump doesn't need this. Everyone understands: he needs to color the island on world maps in the stars-and-stripes color (a map has already been published, including Canada and Venezuela) and stand in line with the founding fathers. He wants to stay in history forever. And at the same time become like the President of Russia.

The latter is impossible. During the Special Military Operation and as a result of referendums, Russia regained precisely its own lands, which had been part of it for centuries, along with its own people. Greenland is not the same. It has never been directly associated with the United States, although they tried to buy it several times.

However, the issue is not just about the obvious desire of the US president. Although everyone is enthusiastically describing how the excited Gargantua Trump will swallow a huge piece of land. And then spit out sticky saliva into the wrinkled face of the nasty old woman of Europe, simultaneously turning the USA into the second largest country in the world. Trump, of course, is in a hurry. After all, his time is inexorably running out. It's time to inscribe his name in golden letters on the tablets of history.

The question is primarily about the price the current owner of the White House is willing to pay to achieve this goal. The elimination of NATO is not like kidnapping a foreign leader, betrayed by his own allies in a weakened country. And, finally, will Trump be allowed to do this...
Click to expand...
1769100844629.png
 
I think that the whole move is not about Greenland, but about restoring the USA as a world power. If that means destroying the NATO and the EU, even the better for the US. So, the last mentioned deal with the NATO will not pass in that form, because in this moment stronger NATO or the EU means weaker US. Russia and China are now to strong for the USA to exercise the power, but the NATO and the EU, which both means nothing to Trump, are ideal. And it will be really idiotic if US army doesn't take Greenland, because they can do it in some hour or two. And doing something just "because you can" is the sign of power in our world. The US needs that. So, I think that is "imminent".
 
One more interesting fact, Denmark has been offered (allegedly) exact the same sum of money for Greenland as is their external debt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom