Session Date: January 24th 2026
Laura and Andromeda at the board.
Niall, Joe, Gaby, Ark, PoB, Chu, Scottie, Princess Leia.
FOTCM Members attending via Zoom:
3DStudent, A Jay, Adobe, Aeneas, Alana, Alejo, Aliana, Altair, AnaHuitzil, anartist, Andrian, Anthony, Approaching Infinity, axj, Aya, Beau, Bluefyre, Bobo08, Breton, cassandra, Cosmos, daddycat, Deliverance, Dirgni, Domi, dugdeep, Eboard10, Ellipse, Ennio, fabric, Faith, finduilas495, France, Gawan, genero81, GlaudiaYG, Gottathink, goyacobol, Gwenllian, Harmony99, herondancer, Hesper , Hesperides, honzap, iamthatis, Il Matto, irjO, Iscreamsandwish, Jacques, Jeanne T, JEEP, Jefferson, Jenn, jess, Josi, Juba, Keyhole, Kinyash, KJN, Konstantin, Laurs, loreta, LQB, Luc, Lucius, Luis Miguel, Mark, Maat, maiko, Manitoban, Mari, Mark7, Martina, Meadow_wind, Meg, Mike, Mililea, Miracle, mkrnhr, mommycat, Mrs. Peel, msante, Nachtweide, Natus Videre, Navigator, Neema, new_to_chess, Nicholas, Nienna, Obi, Ollie, OrangeScorpion, Oxajil, PopHistorian, Puma, RedFox, Ryan, rylek, Ryu, Saman, SAO, seek10, seeker2seer, sid, Steph_Rivers, Stoneboss, sToRmR1dR, T.C., Temperance, thobjorn, Timótheos, Tristan, Tuatha de Danaan, Turgon, Uperios, voyageur, vulcan59, whitecoast, Windmill Knight, Yas, Ysus.
Q: (L) All right, all right, children we got a load of questions. I guess we better not mess around too much. You know it's a good thing I do this with my left arm because I got tennis elbow without the tennis on my right arm. [Counts pages of questions] One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. Nine pages and it was boiled down! Let's see how much we can do. Oh, this is… when is today? Today's 24 January 2026. [Review of those present]
A: Koelia of Cassiopaea transmitting.
Q: (L) Okay. We have a load of questions, and I'm going to try to organize them a little bit.
{Personal questions redacted.}
Q: (L) Okay, honey, time travel.
(Ark) Yes?
(L) Yes.
(Ark) Okay. So, according to Einstein, special and general relativity, if you start on a spaceship from planet Earth, accelerate, reach a very high speed, close to the speed of light, travel to the star which is some light years away, decelerate, turn back, accelerate, travel back to the Earth, decelerate, then land. And now, according to Einstein's theory, when you come back, it took for you maybe one year, but on the Earth it could have been already thousand years. So, the clock - due to acceleration, deceleration, acceleration, deceleration - slow down, and when they are back, they are much younger than the clock that did? not travel. So, it's called twin paradox, right? Two twins, one twin comes back and the other is already, oh my God, long ago dead, right? Now, the question is whether it applies to all clocks, including biological clocks, or to some clocks, or maybe the formula should be corrected. How is it?
A: The clock almost stops, but life processes continue as long as you stay in 3rd density. Time slows to some extent for the body.
Q: (L) So, it may not be as dramatic as Einstein thought, though it is still a phenomenon.
(Ark) Okay. The following question: There is a phenomenon which is called redshift, where the farther the star is, the light from the star gets shifted, the color, the energy, toward the red.
Now, what is closer to the truth? The standard expanding universe is one theory. And there is also another theory of Irving Segal, American mathematician, which uses what he calls Cosmic Time, which is different from normal coordinate time used by astronomers.
So, what is closer to the truth? Standard expanding universe theory or Segal's Cosmic Time?
A: Cosmic time. Also, light often comes from other densities.
Q: (Ark) Time slows. So, question is, is the universe expanding as standard cosmology believes?
A: Into what?
Q: (Ark) The radius of the universe, is there such a thing? Is it growing with time?
A: It is infinite.
Q: (Ark) Okay, I'm done. Next question, next session.
Q: (L) Oh, okay. [Reads list of questions]
(Miracle) What caused my illness that hospitalized me for 13 days?
A: Propinquity to vaccinated shedder.
Q: (Gaby) And this particular vaccine was like a precursor to disease X?
A: COVID.
Q: (L) Is he here tonight?
(Miracle) Yeah, I'm here. So that was proximity to a vaccinated shedder? It's kind of surprising because I work from home.
(herondancer) But you went to that meeting. For a week.
(Miracle) Yeah, I did go to a work meeting.
(Joe) Does that imply that Miracle has an unusual or particular vulnerability to shedders compared to other people? Because obviously this is quite a severe effect...
A: Yes.
Q: (Approaching Infinity) It could also be maybe the person that lived in your apartment before you. Because you just moved recently, right?
(Miracle) Yeah. I guess, what makes me so vulnerable?
A: Genetics.
Q: (L) What are you laughing about?
(Miracle) Beau was blaming my parents.
(L) Bad, bad, bad.
(Niall) It could skip your parents though, whatever it is.
Q: (L) Alright. Niall wants to know:
(Niall) Were the father and son Islamic State terrorists programmed to or induced into massacring Jews on Bondi Beach on December 14th?
A: More or less.
Q: (L) Okay, were they programmed to?
A: There are many kinds of programs plus many have implanted monitors, program receivers, and program triggers.
Q: (L) Implanted.
(Joe) Via vaccination?
(L) Yeah, implanted by who or what?
A: 4D STS and that can, indirectly, include vax implants.
Q: (Niall) Did the Australian Security Services have foreknowledge of the attack?
A: In an indirect way.
Q: (Niall) Was the Brown University shooting that same day connected to the Bondi massacre?
A: Indirectly. Programs were triggered.
Q: (L) So, what do you mean there?
A: Waves activated.
Q: (Niall) Is the Brown University gunman still at large?
A: No
Q: (Niall) Did Ukraine really attempt at the end of December to drone-attack Putin's residence?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) Was it also a nuclear triad command center?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) Was Putin himself there at the time?
A: No
Q: (Niall) Was it an attempt to assassinate Putin?
A: Depicted as such.
Q: (Niall) Was this really a CIA operation?
A: At some level.
Q: (Niall) Was Trump aware of it?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) What caused the fire at the historic Vondelkerk Church in Amsterdam on New Year's Eve?
A: Fireworks ignited construction materials.
Q: (Niall) Are forest fires in Argentina being started deliberately?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) If yes, are "Israeli tourists" behind them as locals suspect?
A: Yes. Not tourists though.
Q: (Niall) Did left-wing anarchists really cause the power blackout in Berlin in early January and the one back in early September?
A: Yes and yes.
Q: (Niall) Was the 4.2 magnitude earthquake in southern Israel on January 15th in fact a naturally occurring earthquake?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) What a coincidence.
(Joe) Was it just a coincidence then that the Israelis had planned an earthquake drill that exact morning?
A: Universe has its own way of speaking. Israel is being warned. What is a "promised land" if the land splits and subsides?
Q: (Joe) Are the Israelis aware of the potential risk of a major earthquake splitting and subsiding the land?
A: They underestimate.
Q: (Joe) The fires they're starting in Argentina designed to make that land available for construction or habitation...?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And is that almost like a hedge for if something goes wrong for the Israelis in the Middle East?
A: Partly.
Q: (Joe) And the other part is money?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) What caused the train derailment in southern Spain on January 18th?
A: Rotting infrastructure.
Q: (Niall) They claim they just renovated that section of track. And that the train was only four years old. There have since been four other train accidents.
(Joe) Within four or five days. Most of the other ones were minor.
(L) I would say they're probably spending too much on trying to achieve Net Zero and not enough on infrastructure. Everybody is!
Q: (Niall) Did the leadership of France 'place a hit' on Candace Owens as she claimed?
A: Someone did!
Q: (Joe) That would be a bit further east from France? [laughter] Couple thousand miles maybe? Small country? Earthquake-prone? [laughter]
(L) Joe asks:
(Joe) Did Israel threaten that they would use nukes against Iran if Trump didn’t agree to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities?
A: Close
Q: (L) And I think that's as close as you're gonna get.
Q: (Joe) Was there a deal struck by the US with elements of the Venezuelan govt. and/or the Russian/Chinese govts. that allowed an unimpeded capture of Maduro?
A: Venezuelans sold him out.
Q: (L) So no Russian or Chinese involvement?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Were any US soldiers injured or killed or assets destroyed?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Oh yeah? How many American personnel were killed?
A: 2
Q: (Joe) And what assets?
A: Plane.
Q: (Joe) So the way they present this whole operation as being this amazing, perfect operation and only America could do it because they're so awesome, it actually had little to do with that and more to do with the selling out of Maduro by people within Venezuela?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Did US soldiers use any kind of special weapons, like sonic weapons or something, as claimed by some sources?
A: No
Q: (L) Why should they? They had an inside...
(Joe) Yeah, but the whole narrative that they built up around it, that only America can do this, and Trump today said they used a special device called 'the discombobulator'. [laughter] He seemed to be saying that's why they had air defence, that basically it took out their electronics. He seems to be suggesting some kind of electronic warfare device.
(L) Is that true?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Not even to take out… ?
A: Bragging to induce fear in others.
Q: (Joe) So they didn't even use an EMP or anything like that to take out the electricity?
A: No
Q: (Niall) So the reason they were able to shoot Russian-made air defence systems was because those simply were not used against the Americans? It's just that Hegseth spent four days afterward going, "So, Russia and China, huh? How do you like that?! We bested your systems!" He got four days of that - out of something that never happened!
A: Yes
Q: (irjO) Was Maduro, in fact, betrayed by his own inner circle as many people suggest?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) The Venezuelan government's position is that the hyperinflation, which began in 2013 and led to the collapse of Venezuela's economy, was caused by an international economic conspiracy. But critics of Chavez and Maduro insist it was due to the socialist government's internal monetary mismanagement. Which of these two causes contributed most to Venezuela's hyperinflation?
A: Mismanagement. Socialism only works within a strong capitalist framework.
Q: (irjO) Will elections be held in Venezuela this year?
A: Possble.
Q: (irjO) If yes, what are the chances of the socialist party winning again?
A: Low.
Q: (Joe) Was the last and only second use of the Oreshnik missile by Russia against the Lvov State Aviation Repair Plant successful in destroying it?
A: Only partly.
Q: (Joe) Were there any American or EU military intelligence personnel there at the time?
A: No
Q: (Beau) Is Erica Kirk an intelligence asset for the CIA-US military?
A: Unbeknownst to her.
Q: (Beau) Was her marriage to Charlie Kirk part of her assignment?
A: It became so.
Q: (Beau) Was Erica Kirk Greenbaumed?
A: Something like that.
Q: (Beau) Was Erica Kirk involved in trafficking children in Romania?
A: Not aware.
Q: (Beau) Was TPUSA or elements within it involved in trafficking children?
(L) Well, okay, let's separate that into two questions. Was TPUSA involved in trafficking children?
A: No
Q: (L) Were elements within it involved in trafficking children?
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) Was Charlie Kirk aware of this?
A: No
Q: (L) But he could have found out if he'd done his audit that he was wanting to do.
(Joe) What was the religious ethnic profile of the people who were trafficking children within TPUSA?
A: No dice!
Q: (Joe) We don't know-know, but we know. [laughter]
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) Was Fort Huachuca a key node in the operation to assassinate Charlie Kirk?
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) Was Erica Kirk at Fort Huachuca on September 8th?
(Andromeda) September 9th.
(L) September 8th or 9th?
A: No
Q: (Beau) Was Brian Harpole at Fort Huachuca on September 9th?
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) What was the purpose of his visit?
A: Get his orders.
Q: (L) So he's the one who says that she was there, right?
(Joe) And Harpole, no.
(L) No?
(Joe) No, he's the one who was standing by Charlie's side. The guy who was doing the hand movements and stuff.
(Beau) Was Brian Harpole directly involved in the planning and / or execution of Charlie's assassination?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And was another security guy, his main security guy who was standing just not far from Charlie, Dan Flood, was he directly involved as well?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And was the guy Flood, just before, like a second before Charlie Kirk was shot, he just puts his hand... Now he's been seen to do something similar at other events, but just to clear it up, I don't know if that's some kind of...
(L) That was weird.
(Beau) Is it true that the assassination of Charlie Kirk didn't go as planned? That is, that the intent was to impact his chest under his shirt, but that the battery of the microphone unexpectedly impacted his neck above the shirt line?
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) What caused the explosion of the Accurate Energetic Systems explosive plant in Tennessee on 8th October?
A: Mishandling of materials.
Q: (Beau) Was it linked to the assassination of Charlie Kirk?
A: Not directly.
Q: (Nachtweide) If invading or annexing Greenland is mostly a diversion, does this serve as a tactic to further divide the EU-NATO internally and end the war in Ukraine?
A: Divides but not planned as you suggest.
Q: (Mrs. Peel) Was the woman who was recently shot in Minneapolis planning harm to the ICE agent with her vehicle, or was she just trying to get away?
A: Planning minor harm and getting away with it.
Q: (Mrs. Peel) Did he actually think he was in danger?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Why was that?
A: From the look on her face at the instant.
Q: (L) So that leaves out shooting her out of spite?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) In a 2013 session it was said in reference to meteorites hitting Earth, "In the realm from which some of these things are manifested or, better, 'directed', information is king". Can it be inferred from that, that historical, meteorite-comet-induced cataclysms of whatever size were deliberately produced from another realm?
A: Some.
Q: (Joe) If so, for what purpose?
A: Reset.
Q: (Joe) In the 1930s and 40s, vitamin D was reported to be an effective treatment for a number of diseases, including asthma, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, rickets and tuberculosis. High doses were used. Are such high doses for these illnesses effective at curing them?
A: Mostly adjunct amelioration.
Q: (L) So, in other words, other things need to be involved for actual cures?
A: Yes
Q: (L) But high doses of vitamin D can give relief.
A: Yes
Q: (L) In the doses that are mentioned here, like 60,000 to 300,000, and then 200,000 to 600,000...
(Joe) IU, per day.
(L) Yeah. Are these kind of doses?
A: Those don't need to be so high, but yes, high doses.
Q: (Joe) Is there an upper limit of the vitamin D blood levels that is harmful? What do we use usually?
(Gaby) Well, there have been cases of hypercalcemia that is dangerous, with levels higher than 300...
A: Depends on the individual. Why it is wise to be cautious.
Q: (L) Okay, axj has several pages talking about a supernova that was allegedly recorded.
(Joe) Can I ask just some yes or no questions on more like on a political topic before you get into that? What is the likely outcome of a new US-Israeli attack on Iran?
A: Not good for Israel.
Q: (Joe) What was the reason the US called off its attack on Iran last week, at the last minute?
A: Call from informant.
Q: (L) When you say informant, that means you're not willing to tell us who called?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) It means people on the ground who were organizing protests, probably, had decided that it wasn't a good time. Because they had all these protests and they were planning to do their bombing campaign, but then the protests didn't work out very well, it seems.
(L) Yeah, from what I heard, they were able to block Starlink.
(Joe) Was that a factor?
A: Yes
Q: (L) And if they were able to block Starlink, maybe that indicates to us where the call came from...
(Niall) Kremlin.
(L) Probably the Kremlin, yeah. All right.
Now, back to my question. Axj gives me the background on this question about this...
(axj) Was the V529 Orionis Nova sighting by the astronomer Hevelius in 1678 actually a sighting of the brown dwarf twin sun?
A: Yes
Q: (axj) Was it a plasma flare from Birkeland currents during its closest approach to the sun?
A: Yes
Q: (L) And then he gives a picture of it and justifies his question based on his research, and I enjoyed it very much, by the way. And then he asks:
(axj) Were the Spöerer Minimum (1420-1530) and the Dalton Minimum (1790-1820) caused by the brown dwarf crossing in and out of the sun's heliosphere?
(L) Good question.
A: Yes
Q: (L) This is the kind of question I like to see. He did a lot of work on this, and then he nailed it down to a specific question...
(Niall) With a little editing help. But, yeah.
(L) Okay. And then he gives a timeline, pointing out that there's a unified explanation for these events. Is he right? Is his whole theory that he's got here right?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Good job! I liked it. Okay...
(Gaby) The X1.9 solar flare on January 19th was associated with very high proton energies exceeding red level thresholds by a thousand times, and the indicators of the strongest flares of the current solar cycle by 20 times. In terms of high proton energies, this was the second largest storm in the entire history of reliable measurements since 1976, with the largest one occurring on March 24th, 1991. Why was it so strong?
A: Weaker magnetic field.
Q: (Gaby) During the beginning of the resulting geomagnetic storm on January 19th, a couple of witnesses located at the epicenter of the South Atlantic Anomaly saw a strange purple band. The data shows that auroras are relatively weak in the anomaly, and this effect is more pronounced during high geomagnetic activity. What did they see and why?
A: Aurora and SPA.
Q: (L) Weaker geomagnetic field.
(Ellipse) Is Starlink used for more than communications transmissions?
(L) What do you mean?
(Ellipse) I was thinking that the satellites can be used, for example, to block the sun. Something that we don't know exactly.
(L) How can it... to block the sun?
(Ellipse) Eventually the satellites can block the sun or something else.
(L) How can satellites block the sun?
(Niall) I don't know. Is it theoretically possible?
(Gaby) It's too big.
(Joe) A very, very large satellite.
(L) seeker2seer, can satellites block the sun?
(Niall) Bill Gates wants to, but...
(seeker2seer) No, I don't think so. I don't see how they could put out any kind of electromagnetic radiation to block the sun. I was thinking more of like a HAARP-type activity, if there was anything nefarious about Starlink. Not that I'm aware of it.
(L) Oh, I see. So is Starlink being used for more than communications transmission in the context of possibly being a HAARP amplifier, or bouncer?
(Chu) Or something like that.
A: Close. Yes.
Q: All right. So, Ellipse, you had a good intuition. You just needed a little refinement there. Okay.
(Gaby) On 15 December 2025, Nuno Loureiro was shot in his home in Brookline, Massachusetts. He died in hospital the following day. A plasma physicist from Princeton, he was the director of MIT's Plasma Science and Fusion Center and a faculty member in the departments of Nuclear Science and Engineering and Physics. Why was Loureiro killed?
A: Triggered program of "jealousy".
Q: (Niall) So was his killer indeed the gunman at Brown University?
A: Yes
Q: (Gaby) But did he know something critical at this juncture of time? Because other than an agent of chaos being triggered and killing him, ultimately it was that. It was nothing that he knew...
(L) Oh, well, I don't think that's what they said. They said a program was triggered. So obviously they wanted him killed.
(Joe) Why was he killed?
(Gaby) Why?
(L) I don't know. Are you asking me? [laughter]
(Niall) No, the Cs!
(L) Okay, so why was he killed?
A: Getting too close to veiled topics.
Q: (L) So somebody would have to read his work and see what he was working on.
(Gaby) He was mentioning the magnetic pole shift and how it's related to ice ages.
(Niall, Joe, Gaby) Was it for that?
A: Close.
Q: (luc) I had some interesting results creating an orchestral piece based on my own melody, chords, etc. with AI music.
Would that technology be worth it for people to experiment with, with the goal of creating some more uplifting or "STO energy" sort of music?
A: No
Q: (luc) My impression is that instrumental music might work, and that human input is crucial (no shortcuts), and that collaboration might be worth exploring. Any comments, warnings or pointers on that?
A: Electronic music is antihuman.
Q: (Niall) Boom!
(L) (to Ark) You're gonna have to throw your keyboard away, dear. [laughter] What do you mean anti-human?
A: Messes with cellular vibrations and intracellular communication.
Q: (luc) Are they referring to AI music specifically, or just generally to electronic music genres?
(L) I think they said electronic music.
(Chu) Yeah, but like a keyboard or music produced by a computer?
(Joe) Define electronic music.
A: Artificially produced.
Q: (Joe) Is that because of the tempo of it?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Is it okay to listen to music played on natural instruments?
(L) ...That are amplified?
(Joe) Via the radio?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Can we listen to music that is played on instruments that are run through amplifiers?
A: Yes
Q: (Andromeda) So it's just how it's generated that makes a difference.
(Joe) The key is the vibration, or the frequency.
(T.C.) May I ask a question about that?
(L) Yes.
(T.C.) One of the major breakthroughs in late 20th century music was the synthesizer. We used the synthesizer to reproduce sounds that sound very similar to things like strings, pianos. So, for example, luc has a piano, it's an electronic piano, but it sounds like a normal piano. So we're getting into a grey area there. If luc produces a piece of music that has strings in it, for example, that's a synthesizer creating those sounds. Is that bad?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So people should be producing music on natural instruments. Is it really harmful?
A: Not severe unless overindulged.
Q: (Joe) So there's obviously some essential difference between the sound or the vibration of sound that is produced by a natural instrument, and ones created with electronics?
A: Yes
Q: (T.C.) Should we redo the background music on the meditations?
(L) Nah.
(Joe) Huh? How can you say "nah", Laura, after that? [laughter]
(L) Should we redo the music on the background?
A: Yes [laughter]
Q: (luc) Get your strings and pianos out!
(L) Yeah, start plucking some little sounds and just drag them out.
(Ryan) I have a follow-up question about that. Say there is an electronic melody that is played in very uplifting, symphonic, ecstatic type of melodies, that particular kind of musical arrangement, but then there's a dark or depressing melody played on a natural instrument. What is more important? Is it the actual type of melody that is being played to produce the emotional effect, or is it the actual tone and timbre of the instrument itself that's more important?
(L) Okay, so is it the type of music that's being played?
A: Partly.
Q: (T.C.) So in that sense, just because you're playing something on a natural instrument, it doesn't necessarily mean that that's going to be good for you either. But if you've got a choice, and you want to go with natural instruments, you just have to bear in mind that you can produce music that's also harmful on a natural instrument.
A: Yes
Q: (L) But I always thought that some electronic music sounded like, practically celestial.
(Andromeda) What about Pink Floyd?
(L) Well, Pink Floyd, they're playing guitars... Oh, but they use synthesizers, yeah.
(Niall) They use the whole shebang, yeah.
(Aeneas) What about the music in NeurOptimal? I think that is electronic.
(L) Yeah.
(Ark) And mp3 is essentially all electronic, because it's sampled and digital.
(L) Is this change in our music that has produced some kind of profound effect on human beings over the last, what is it, 50 years or more?
A: It has not been helpful. It is enticing. It is often lovely. But it is still having a negative effect on the cells.
Q: (L) So, what's our daily allotment? [laughter]
(Andromeda) Good question!
(Joe) We're talking about stringed instruments played on the radio or... I mean, can it be digitized in a sense? If it's like digital music, essentially, it's okay, right?
(Chu) Like MP3s.
(Joe) If it's played on a natural instrument.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) The main point is that it should be music that is produced on real instruments by humans, that's it.
A: Yes
Q: (Chu) But an electronic keyboard, say, is still okay, if played by the human? Or not?
(Joe) No, it's electronic. It must be a piano.
(Chu) No electric guitars, no acoustic...
(Approaching Infinity) Well, one comment on electric pianos and some synthesizers in general. The way some of them work is that they actually take... Like for the violin, for instance, there are synthesizers that record a person playing a violin and they use that recording as the sound... It's like a sample for the keyboard. So when you're playing the keyboard, you're actually hearing a recording of an actual violin.
(L) So if you have a really good keyboard that is doing that, it's okay. Is that true? Is that true?!
A: Yes
Q: (L) We're saved! [laughter]
(Andromeda) Okay, back to our daily allotment.
(Gaby) Yeah, back to our daily allotment.
(Andromeda) Yeah, what about gym CD?
Q: (L) What about our daily allotment?
(Joe) Just listen to all the oldies.
(L) Yeah.
(Niall) We do, we just like some...
(L) I'll share my playlist.
(Joe) Everything pre-1970.
Q: (L) Okay, our daily allotment...
A: A couple of hours if in good physical condition. Should be avoided by those who are ill.
Q: (Ennio) I have a question that's sort of connected to this. In regards to AI video. So, aside from the blurring of reality that many people are kind of recognizing in the dissemination of AI video, is there anything inherently negative or harmful in watching video that has been produced by AI?
A: AI videos are like black holes.
Q: (Scottie) So yeah, they're fine! [laughter]
(Andromeda) I knew it!
(Niall) They just suck your life force out.
(Chu) What about the ones like those the guys have been producing for us? The Cass.org videos.
(Joe) Better ask...
(L) So they've been taking advantage of this AI technology to produce little videos for us. And I kind of was highly entertained by them. Argh… why do you all do this to me? [laughter] Should we make videos that have actual people in them? You can't get all the special effects if you do that!
(Joe) Well, ask first if the content makes a difference.
(Andromeda) Right, like if you have AI pictures of stars, that is like AI people talking to you?
(L) Okay, does the content matter?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Does that mean that... Well, when you said they're like black holes, what do you mean?
A: If a drama is presented and people get emotionally invested with the characters and identify with them.
Q: (L) So that's the situations where there's like black holes.
A: Yes
Q: (Chu) Okay, so our videos are okay.
(Andromeda) Nothing mimicking reality and emotional engagement. I can see how that would be worse than just an artificial picture.
(L) Yeah. So is that the key? Where they're mimicking reality and inviting emotional engagement?
A: Yes
Q: (Andromeda) But to illustrate something, I can't see how you know it's...
A: Okay.
Q: (L) So, illustrating is okay.
(Approaching Infinity) Well, I've got a comment on that because it reminded me of what they said about AI being a feeding tube. So some people took that as kind of a universal, all-encompassing approach to AI. But the feeding tube is an emotional dynamic. So, when I wrote the latest Cass Substack update, I talked about all the people using AI for companionship. And how it's causing like, they're calling it, I don't know, AI psychosis or something. People are getting depressed, anxiety, committing suicide, their marriages are falling apart. But they're using it for that emotional engagement, whereas some people, like you and a lot of us, just use it like a search engine or just to collate data, without very much emotional engagement. So it would be the same thing with videos and even music. Like, if the video, if you're engaging with an AI creation and feeding emotion into it, that emotion isn't going anywhere because it's not real. It's not going to a real person. It's not even going to, like, a real soul-sucking alien or something. It's going into this digital black hole where there's nothing there. So it's basically feeding your emotions into the abyss. And I guess that then can be picked up by anything. But I think that's the important part. It is the emotional engagement.
(L) I agree. Is that correct?
A: Yes!!
Q: (L) You did a good job there, Approaching Infinity.
(Joe) So the point being that when you're talking to Grok, you're not talking to anybody. So you don't say, "Hi Grok, how are you today? Can you please help me out with this problem?"
(L) I never say that.
(Joe) Not you, but anybody.
(Niall) A lot of people are.
(L) I sent Approaching Infinity all my Grok discussions. He knows.
(Joe) Don't speak to Grok as if it was a person.
(L) Do I ever speak to Grok like it's a person?
(Approaching Infinity) Only very rarely.
(L) When I tell it it's an idiot? [laughter]
(whitecoast) I would assume that applies to video games as well too. Emotionally investing in something that's not actually real.
(L) Yeah.
(T.C.) There's another aspect as well, which is, like, on social media. You see a lot of posts about, for example, there was one: It's an old man and he works in a hospital car park. It gives you a story about one day somebody came along. They couldn't get parking space. So he saved the parking space for them. And he kept doing it for other people. And it's like this heartwarming story. But you look at the picture, and you see that the signs are like AI generated and stuff. So it's like an online scam that is used to hook people's emotions.
(Joe) Yeah. That's why it's called AI slop.
(Possibility of Being) There is a big work put into teaching AI emotions. So when you use emotions to communicate with AI, you basically help with the progress in teaching artificial intelligence and robots to emulate or learn emotions. And then one hell will be opened.
(L) So, you must be cold and distant.
(Joe) Yes. Treat it like an inanimate object.
(L) Which it is. Can we go on now? Good Lord!
(Brewer) Did they accomplish the moon landing mission as described, using a single rocket?
A: Yes
Q: (Brewer) Did they transport the necessary equipment to LEO using multiple launches before travelling to the moon?
A: No
Q: (L) What's LEO?
(Niall) Lower Earth Orbit.
(L) Oh. Well, I'm just not on top of these things.
(Niall) "The moon landing was a hoax." People are convinced that the physics of how they could do it in 1969 were not possible. So they're trying to come up with ways to make it fit. But the Cs answers keep saying, no, they did it. They did it as described.
(L) They did it, they just didn't do it again.
(Niall) Yes, because of something they saw there.
(Brewer) Did Apollo's missions 12 through 17 happen as described?
A: Close.
Q: (Brewer) What is meant by "altered reality" on the moon?
(L) Who said there was an altered reality on the moon?
(Joe & Gaby) In the last session.
A: Heavy 4D vibrations.
Q: (Brewer) Is it a "high strangeness" type?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Is that a permanent status on the moon?
A: No
Q: (Brewer) Is there altered perception also?
A: Yes
Q: (Brewer) What percentage of space imagery and video is faked?
A: 30.
Q: (L) 30 percent.
(Brewer) Did NASA know of "aliens" and other high strangeness before the missions?
A: Yes
Q: (Nienna) Many say that humans cannot survive radiation from the Van Allen belt. If we did go to the moon, and man has walked on it, how did they survive the radiation of the Van Allen belt?
A: Trajectory, speed, and shielding.
Q: (Joe) Physics, science!
(L) So in other words, they had special trajectories.
(Joe) They used trigonometry. [laughter]
(L) They were passing through very fast. And they used shielding.
(Joe) And they used insulation. [laughter]
(Niall) This is the result of all the other shenanigans. People no longer... They just doubt everything. "It was all fake the whole time!" It's a shame.
(L) Well, you get to the point where you think everything they say is a lie!
(Niall) Nowadays especially. But it's a shame because some of the actual achievements, they don't believe in them anymore. And it causes loss of morale and depression.
(Chu) Yeah, but when you have 30% fake images, it gives you cause to doubt.
(Niall) Yes. Reason to doubt, but not to go, "Oh, the Earth is flat as a result!" But that's where they go.
(L) Okay, Beau asks:
(Beau) Internet theories claim some celebrity suicides were actually murders to cover up a global sex-trafficking ring. One of those theories holds that 3 celebrities – chef Anthony Bourdain and musicians Chester Bennington and Chris Cornell – were all killed for working together to expose a child sex-trafficking ring within Hollywood. The official story is they all committed suicide the same way: hanging themselves from a doorknob. Did they all die by suicide?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Did any of them die by suicide?
A: No
Q: (Beau) If no, were they killed to cover up a global child sex-trafficking ring?
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) Is there any significance to doorknob-hanging as the supposed cause of death? Former CIA officer Robert David Steele claims the following symbolism: “Hung on doorknobs… means choked for speaking out against the cabal.”
A: Close.
Q: (Beau) Actress Anne Heche allegedly drove her car at an extremely high speed into a house and was killed. She had also worked on a movie about sex trafficking that was rumored to be about Jeffrey Epstein. Did she actually die the way it was reported?
A: No
Q: (L) I'm sure most of you have seen that video where she was supposedly on a stretcher, and then she sat up.
(Joe) What was the deal with that? What was going on there?
A: She wasn't dead!
Q: (L) But they made sure she got dead pretty quick.
(Joe) She was in a body bag, right?
(L) Yeah. Yeah.
(Joe) Those people!
Q: (Beau) Was her car remotely controlled to drive into the house?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So the ambulance that came and got her and all that kind of stuff was a fake...
(L) They were prepared, and ready, and waiting to be called.
(Beau) Why was she taken out?
(L) Well, we already talked about why she was taken out. Because of the child sex trafficking.
(Nachtweide) The body tambura is an intuitive musical instrument that can be placed on the body for sound therapy or sound massage. Does this type of music increase frequency resonance vibration or open the heart chakra?
(L) Okay, let's break that up: Does this type of music increase frequency resonance vibration?
A: No, but it is generally beneficial to the body.
Q: (L) I think... I don't think you can cheat and increase your FRV with music. But if you're relaxed, you can probably have the right thoughts and meditations, and make the right decisions that might do that.
A: Yes.
Q: (Nachtweide) Does it open the heart chakra?
A: No.
Q: (L) All right. Now... What time is it?
(Chu) 9:38 pm.
(Andromeda) We did all of the questions!?
(Gaby) Yeah.
(L) How long have we been going for?
(Chu) One hour 35 minutes.
(L) We've been going for an hour and 35 minutes.
(Joe) I've got two questions.
(L) What about MY questions?! [laughter]
(Gaby) Let Laura ask her questions.
(L) What questions do you have?
(Joe) I'll do them at the end.
(L) No, you won't.
(Joe) Why?
(L) Because when I'm done, I'm done.
(Joe) Okay. How likely is it that European countries will turn back towards Russia for energy supply?
A: Eventually. And probably sooner than you might think.
Q: (Joe) And speaking of things we might think: two sessions ago they said things were going to get stranger than we can imagine. Have we been seeing that over the past couple of months? Is that what they meant by that?
A: Some but you ain't seen nothing yet!
Q: (Joe) OK. All because of Trump! Trump's going to do it all! [laughter]
(seek10) Can I ask one quick question on Iran?
(L) Who is that?
(seek10) Seek10.
(L) I want to see his face! [laughter]
(Chu) It better be important, seek10!
(seek10) Quick question. How many people were killed in the Iranian protests, and who was responsible for most of the killings?
(L) What did the news sources tell you?
(seek10) Of course, they will tell you that the Iranian government did it, but...
(Joe) And they put out all sorts of figures. Something like 8,000, 10,000, 30,000. They were making claims all over the place, the Western media, in the US in particular.
(Niall) The Iranian government said yesterday that they thought it was 3,000.
(Joe) And that most of them were killed by the protesters.
(Niall) 700 called terrorists, and the rest were civilians and security people.
(Joe) Killed by the terrorists.
(L) So is Iran's report the most accurate?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Surprise, surprise...
(Niall) So around 3,000.
(seek10) But who was responsible for most of the killings — the Western‑backed protesters or the Iranian government?
A: West.
Q: (seek10) Okay. Thank you.
(Joe) All right, go Laura. Take the floor.
(Niall) Everyone mute!
(Joe) You've got a whole half hour now. Go!
(L) I want to ask about Christopher Langan. He is known for having one of the highest recorded IQs, according to him. [laughter] Estimated 195 to 210.
(Joe) He estimates...
(L) Well, he took certain tests, but people argue about what tests actually record... I mean, is it an accurate recording of an IQ?
(Joe) And what is IQ, essentially.
(L) Yeah, and what is IQ. So, he took a couple of tests that came back with these results, and I'm pretty sure he's telling the truth. So whatever they were, I don't know anything about them. Anyhow, he developed the Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe, called CTMU. Did we ever ask about him before?
(Joe) I don't think so.
(L) Hmm. It's supposed to be an abstract metaphysical theory of everything that attempts to unify physics, mathematics, philosophy, and theology.
He proposes that reality is a self-simulating, self-configuring system where mind and universe are fundamentally identical and interconnected. Reality is like a self-processing language that designs and perceives itself. In short, the universe is cognitive at its foundation, self-contained, there's no external creator, unexplained, brute fact, and evolves through goal-directed, that is, tele-processes that resolve paradoxes in physics, logic, and philosophy while proving concepts like God as the global self-aware structure of reality. Now, the thing is, you know, I like Chris Langan, and I... you know, whatever. Is his model correct?
A: No
Q: (L) Is it close?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Do you still like him?
Q: (L) I still like him. He's a good boy, he's trying. So, the thing is, is that I've been working on... Well, Approaching Infinity knows what I've been working on. I've been really trying to dig inside this thing from different angles, you know, trying to test drive it. And I had everything all sorted out, and I was happy and Approaching Infinity was happy, and we had Chris Langan, the CTMU, and the Cs kind of coordinated, and everything was like, you know, all happy and playing nicely together. And then I had it all lined up with Paul Davies' timeline of the origin of the universe, and then Ark asked me a couple of questions, and everything fell apart! [laughter]
(Joe) Arkie!
(L) And now I'm in a worse state than I was, because he sent me off to read these other theories, and he sent me back to look at what the Cs had said. And now I don't know where to go, I just know that what I was constructing, which was kind of like, I don't know, I was playing with what Langan was constructing, and I was playing with observations, and so-called facts on the ground, or in the sky, as it may be, and everything just fell apart! So, of the current things that I'm looking at, and one of them is Burkhard Heim's multidimensional theory, and the other is plasma theory. Those two. And which one of them is closer to what I'm going to be looking for?
A: Both have elements that you may find useful. Keep looking.
Q: (L) So I haven't found it yet. Keep looking. Well, then I'm going to have to stop right there, because I'm stymied. I am just completely stymied.
(Joe) Is there a name of someone they could give you to look into, that's closer to what you're looking for?
(L) Is there a name?
(Joe) Like an author, writer?
A: No
Q: (Chu) The first letter of a name? [laughter]
(Joe) No, because nobody knows.
(Niall) It may be something you've come across before.
(L) Or it may be that nobody else has ever put it together.
(Chu) Is it something that Laura has to create?
A: Yes
Q: (L) But I don't have an IQ of 195 to 210! I'm not smart enough. All right. Well, that's all I want to talk about tonight. I'm going to keep looking. I'm going to keep... Argh... I mean, Approaching Infinity, you know, I even went through Whitehead. That was agony! That was agony! [laughter]
(Approaching Infinity) What were the questions that Ark asked?
(L) Well, he asked, on what basis was Davies’ timeline made? And I'm pretty sure that... I mean, based on the way he's put his thing together, that in the back of his mind, Langan kind of relies on that too. That timeline. And I was relying on that timeline. I liked that timeline. It was perfect. Everything worked out just so well! And then Ark asked me to dig deeper, so I made Grok go out and find out for me which one of the elements of that timeline was based on an actual observation, or a computer simulation.
(Approaching Infinity) Yeah. We can work on some questions to get to the bottom of that. Dig into the sessions. Maybe that'll lead to some discoveries in other sources, but I think it's doable.
(L) All right. So, that's it for tonight. Is there anything we haven't asked that we should have asked?
A: Pray without ceasing. The universe is very aware. Goodbye.
Q: (Alejo) To the last answer from the C's. It was mentioned that it was in the Bible, I did a quick search and found this. Seems appropriate. From Thessalonians 5:12:
END OF SESSION
Laura and Andromeda at the board.
Niall, Joe, Gaby, Ark, PoB, Chu, Scottie, Princess Leia.
FOTCM Members attending via Zoom:
3DStudent, A Jay, Adobe, Aeneas, Alana, Alejo, Aliana, Altair, AnaHuitzil, anartist, Andrian, Anthony, Approaching Infinity, axj, Aya, Beau, Bluefyre, Bobo08, Breton, cassandra, Cosmos, daddycat, Deliverance, Dirgni, Domi, dugdeep, Eboard10, Ellipse, Ennio, fabric, Faith, finduilas495, France, Gawan, genero81, GlaudiaYG, Gottathink, goyacobol, Gwenllian, Harmony99, herondancer, Hesper , Hesperides, honzap, iamthatis, Il Matto, irjO, Iscreamsandwish, Jacques, Jeanne T, JEEP, Jefferson, Jenn, jess, Josi, Juba, Keyhole, Kinyash, KJN, Konstantin, Laurs, loreta, LQB, Luc, Lucius, Luis Miguel, Mark, Maat, maiko, Manitoban, Mari, Mark7, Martina, Meadow_wind, Meg, Mike, Mililea, Miracle, mkrnhr, mommycat, Mrs. Peel, msante, Nachtweide, Natus Videre, Navigator, Neema, new_to_chess, Nicholas, Nienna, Obi, Ollie, OrangeScorpion, Oxajil, PopHistorian, Puma, RedFox, Ryan, rylek, Ryu, Saman, SAO, seek10, seeker2seer, sid, Steph_Rivers, Stoneboss, sToRmR1dR, T.C., Temperance, thobjorn, Timótheos, Tristan, Tuatha de Danaan, Turgon, Uperios, voyageur, vulcan59, whitecoast, Windmill Knight, Yas, Ysus.
Q: (L) All right, all right, children we got a load of questions. I guess we better not mess around too much. You know it's a good thing I do this with my left arm because I got tennis elbow without the tennis on my right arm. [Counts pages of questions] One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. Nine pages and it was boiled down! Let's see how much we can do. Oh, this is… when is today? Today's 24 January 2026. [Review of those present]
A: Koelia of Cassiopaea transmitting.
Q: (L) Okay. We have a load of questions, and I'm going to try to organize them a little bit.
{Personal questions redacted.}
Q: (L) Okay, honey, time travel.
(Ark) Yes?
(L) Yes.
(Ark) Okay. So, according to Einstein, special and general relativity, if you start on a spaceship from planet Earth, accelerate, reach a very high speed, close to the speed of light, travel to the star which is some light years away, decelerate, turn back, accelerate, travel back to the Earth, decelerate, then land. And now, according to Einstein's theory, when you come back, it took for you maybe one year, but on the Earth it could have been already thousand years. So, the clock - due to acceleration, deceleration, acceleration, deceleration - slow down, and when they are back, they are much younger than the clock that did? not travel. So, it's called twin paradox, right? Two twins, one twin comes back and the other is already, oh my God, long ago dead, right? Now, the question is whether it applies to all clocks, including biological clocks, or to some clocks, or maybe the formula should be corrected. How is it?
A: The clock almost stops, but life processes continue as long as you stay in 3rd density. Time slows to some extent for the body.
Q: (L) So, it may not be as dramatic as Einstein thought, though it is still a phenomenon.
(Ark) Okay. The following question: There is a phenomenon which is called redshift, where the farther the star is, the light from the star gets shifted, the color, the energy, toward the red.
Now, what is closer to the truth? The standard expanding universe is one theory. And there is also another theory of Irving Segal, American mathematician, which uses what he calls Cosmic Time, which is different from normal coordinate time used by astronomers.
So, what is closer to the truth? Standard expanding universe theory or Segal's Cosmic Time?
A: Cosmic time. Also, light often comes from other densities.
Q: (Ark) Time slows. So, question is, is the universe expanding as standard cosmology believes?
A: Into what?
Q: (Ark) The radius of the universe, is there such a thing? Is it growing with time?
A: It is infinite.
Q: (Ark) Okay, I'm done. Next question, next session.
Q: (L) Oh, okay. [Reads list of questions]
(Miracle) What caused my illness that hospitalized me for 13 days?
A: Propinquity to vaccinated shedder.
Q: (Gaby) And this particular vaccine was like a precursor to disease X?
A: COVID.
Q: (L) Is he here tonight?
(Miracle) Yeah, I'm here. So that was proximity to a vaccinated shedder? It's kind of surprising because I work from home.
(herondancer) But you went to that meeting. For a week.
(Miracle) Yeah, I did go to a work meeting.
(Joe) Does that imply that Miracle has an unusual or particular vulnerability to shedders compared to other people? Because obviously this is quite a severe effect...
A: Yes.
Q: (Approaching Infinity) It could also be maybe the person that lived in your apartment before you. Because you just moved recently, right?
(Miracle) Yeah. I guess, what makes me so vulnerable?
A: Genetics.
Q: (L) What are you laughing about?
(Miracle) Beau was blaming my parents.
(L) Bad, bad, bad.
(Niall) It could skip your parents though, whatever it is.
Q: (L) Alright. Niall wants to know:
(Niall) Were the father and son Islamic State terrorists programmed to or induced into massacring Jews on Bondi Beach on December 14th?
A: More or less.
Q: (L) Okay, were they programmed to?
A: There are many kinds of programs plus many have implanted monitors, program receivers, and program triggers.
Q: (L) Implanted.
(Joe) Via vaccination?
(L) Yeah, implanted by who or what?
A: 4D STS and that can, indirectly, include vax implants.
Q: (Niall) Did the Australian Security Services have foreknowledge of the attack?
A: In an indirect way.
Q: (Niall) Was the Brown University shooting that same day connected to the Bondi massacre?
A: Indirectly. Programs were triggered.
Q: (L) So, what do you mean there?
A: Waves activated.
Q: (Niall) Is the Brown University gunman still at large?
A: No
Q: (Niall) Did Ukraine really attempt at the end of December to drone-attack Putin's residence?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) Was it also a nuclear triad command center?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) Was Putin himself there at the time?
A: No
Q: (Niall) Was it an attempt to assassinate Putin?
A: Depicted as such.
Q: (Niall) Was this really a CIA operation?
A: At some level.
Q: (Niall) Was Trump aware of it?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) What caused the fire at the historic Vondelkerk Church in Amsterdam on New Year's Eve?
A: Fireworks ignited construction materials.
Q: (Niall) Are forest fires in Argentina being started deliberately?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) If yes, are "Israeli tourists" behind them as locals suspect?
A: Yes. Not tourists though.
Q: (Niall) Did left-wing anarchists really cause the power blackout in Berlin in early January and the one back in early September?
A: Yes and yes.
Q: (Niall) Was the 4.2 magnitude earthquake in southern Israel on January 15th in fact a naturally occurring earthquake?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) What a coincidence.
(Joe) Was it just a coincidence then that the Israelis had planned an earthquake drill that exact morning?
A: Universe has its own way of speaking. Israel is being warned. What is a "promised land" if the land splits and subsides?
Q: (Joe) Are the Israelis aware of the potential risk of a major earthquake splitting and subsiding the land?
A: They underestimate.
Q: (Joe) The fires they're starting in Argentina designed to make that land available for construction or habitation...?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And is that almost like a hedge for if something goes wrong for the Israelis in the Middle East?
A: Partly.
Q: (Joe) And the other part is money?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) What caused the train derailment in southern Spain on January 18th?
A: Rotting infrastructure.
Q: (Niall) They claim they just renovated that section of track. And that the train was only four years old. There have since been four other train accidents.
(Joe) Within four or five days. Most of the other ones were minor.
(L) I would say they're probably spending too much on trying to achieve Net Zero and not enough on infrastructure. Everybody is!
Q: (Niall) Did the leadership of France 'place a hit' on Candace Owens as she claimed?
A: Someone did!
Q: (Joe) That would be a bit further east from France? [laughter] Couple thousand miles maybe? Small country? Earthquake-prone? [laughter]
(L) Joe asks:
(Joe) Did Israel threaten that they would use nukes against Iran if Trump didn’t agree to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities?
A: Close
Q: (L) And I think that's as close as you're gonna get.
Q: (Joe) Was there a deal struck by the US with elements of the Venezuelan govt. and/or the Russian/Chinese govts. that allowed an unimpeded capture of Maduro?
A: Venezuelans sold him out.
Q: (L) So no Russian or Chinese involvement?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Were any US soldiers injured or killed or assets destroyed?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Oh yeah? How many American personnel were killed?
A: 2
Q: (Joe) And what assets?
A: Plane.
Q: (Joe) So the way they present this whole operation as being this amazing, perfect operation and only America could do it because they're so awesome, it actually had little to do with that and more to do with the selling out of Maduro by people within Venezuela?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Did US soldiers use any kind of special weapons, like sonic weapons or something, as claimed by some sources?
A: No
Q: (L) Why should they? They had an inside...
(Joe) Yeah, but the whole narrative that they built up around it, that only America can do this, and Trump today said they used a special device called 'the discombobulator'. [laughter] He seemed to be saying that's why they had air defence, that basically it took out their electronics. He seems to be suggesting some kind of electronic warfare device.
(L) Is that true?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Not even to take out… ?
A: Bragging to induce fear in others.
Q: (Joe) So they didn't even use an EMP or anything like that to take out the electricity?
A: No
Q: (Niall) So the reason they were able to shoot Russian-made air defence systems was because those simply were not used against the Americans? It's just that Hegseth spent four days afterward going, "So, Russia and China, huh? How do you like that?! We bested your systems!" He got four days of that - out of something that never happened!
A: Yes
Q: (irjO) Was Maduro, in fact, betrayed by his own inner circle as many people suggest?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) The Venezuelan government's position is that the hyperinflation, which began in 2013 and led to the collapse of Venezuela's economy, was caused by an international economic conspiracy. But critics of Chavez and Maduro insist it was due to the socialist government's internal monetary mismanagement. Which of these two causes contributed most to Venezuela's hyperinflation?
A: Mismanagement. Socialism only works within a strong capitalist framework.
Q: (irjO) Will elections be held in Venezuela this year?
A: Possble.
Q: (irjO) If yes, what are the chances of the socialist party winning again?
A: Low.
Q: (Joe) Was the last and only second use of the Oreshnik missile by Russia against the Lvov State Aviation Repair Plant successful in destroying it?
A: Only partly.
Q: (Joe) Were there any American or EU military intelligence personnel there at the time?
A: No
Q: (Beau) Is Erica Kirk an intelligence asset for the CIA-US military?
A: Unbeknownst to her.
Q: (Beau) Was her marriage to Charlie Kirk part of her assignment?
A: It became so.
Q: (Beau) Was Erica Kirk Greenbaumed?
A: Something like that.
Q: (Beau) Was Erica Kirk involved in trafficking children in Romania?
A: Not aware.
Q: (Beau) Was TPUSA or elements within it involved in trafficking children?
(L) Well, okay, let's separate that into two questions. Was TPUSA involved in trafficking children?
A: No
Q: (L) Were elements within it involved in trafficking children?
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) Was Charlie Kirk aware of this?
A: No
Q: (L) But he could have found out if he'd done his audit that he was wanting to do.
(Joe) What was the religious ethnic profile of the people who were trafficking children within TPUSA?
A: No dice!
Q: (Joe) We don't know-know, but we know. [laughter]
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) Was Fort Huachuca a key node in the operation to assassinate Charlie Kirk?
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) Was Erica Kirk at Fort Huachuca on September 8th?
(Andromeda) September 9th.
(L) September 8th or 9th?
A: No
Q: (Beau) Was Brian Harpole at Fort Huachuca on September 9th?
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) What was the purpose of his visit?
A: Get his orders.
Q: (L) So he's the one who says that she was there, right?
(Joe) And Harpole, no.
(L) No?
(Joe) No, he's the one who was standing by Charlie's side. The guy who was doing the hand movements and stuff.
(Beau) Was Brian Harpole directly involved in the planning and / or execution of Charlie's assassination?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And was another security guy, his main security guy who was standing just not far from Charlie, Dan Flood, was he directly involved as well?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And was the guy Flood, just before, like a second before Charlie Kirk was shot, he just puts his hand... Now he's been seen to do something similar at other events, but just to clear it up, I don't know if that's some kind of...
(L) That was weird.
(Beau) Is it true that the assassination of Charlie Kirk didn't go as planned? That is, that the intent was to impact his chest under his shirt, but that the battery of the microphone unexpectedly impacted his neck above the shirt line?
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) What caused the explosion of the Accurate Energetic Systems explosive plant in Tennessee on 8th October?
A: Mishandling of materials.
Q: (Beau) Was it linked to the assassination of Charlie Kirk?
A: Not directly.
Q: (Nachtweide) If invading or annexing Greenland is mostly a diversion, does this serve as a tactic to further divide the EU-NATO internally and end the war in Ukraine?
A: Divides but not planned as you suggest.
Q: (Mrs. Peel) Was the woman who was recently shot in Minneapolis planning harm to the ICE agent with her vehicle, or was she just trying to get away?
A: Planning minor harm and getting away with it.
Q: (Mrs. Peel) Did he actually think he was in danger?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Why was that?
A: From the look on her face at the instant.
Q: (L) So that leaves out shooting her out of spite?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) In a 2013 session it was said in reference to meteorites hitting Earth, "In the realm from which some of these things are manifested or, better, 'directed', information is king". Can it be inferred from that, that historical, meteorite-comet-induced cataclysms of whatever size were deliberately produced from another realm?
A: Some.
Q: (Joe) If so, for what purpose?
A: Reset.
Q: (Joe) In the 1930s and 40s, vitamin D was reported to be an effective treatment for a number of diseases, including asthma, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, rickets and tuberculosis. High doses were used. Are such high doses for these illnesses effective at curing them?
A: Mostly adjunct amelioration.
Q: (L) So, in other words, other things need to be involved for actual cures?
A: Yes
Q: (L) But high doses of vitamin D can give relief.
A: Yes
Q: (L) In the doses that are mentioned here, like 60,000 to 300,000, and then 200,000 to 600,000...
(Joe) IU, per day.
(L) Yeah. Are these kind of doses?
A: Those don't need to be so high, but yes, high doses.
Q: (Joe) Is there an upper limit of the vitamin D blood levels that is harmful? What do we use usually?
(Gaby) Well, there have been cases of hypercalcemia that is dangerous, with levels higher than 300...
A: Depends on the individual. Why it is wise to be cautious.
Q: (L) Okay, axj has several pages talking about a supernova that was allegedly recorded.
(Joe) Can I ask just some yes or no questions on more like on a political topic before you get into that? What is the likely outcome of a new US-Israeli attack on Iran?
A: Not good for Israel.
Q: (Joe) What was the reason the US called off its attack on Iran last week, at the last minute?
A: Call from informant.
Q: (L) When you say informant, that means you're not willing to tell us who called?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) It means people on the ground who were organizing protests, probably, had decided that it wasn't a good time. Because they had all these protests and they were planning to do their bombing campaign, but then the protests didn't work out very well, it seems.
(L) Yeah, from what I heard, they were able to block Starlink.
(Joe) Was that a factor?
A: Yes
Q: (L) And if they were able to block Starlink, maybe that indicates to us where the call came from...
(Niall) Kremlin.
(L) Probably the Kremlin, yeah. All right.
Now, back to my question. Axj gives me the background on this question about this...
Johannes Hevelius observed a new star in 1679, which is still a mystery and usually assumed to having been a nova. This sighting has been given the name V529 Orionis. The location is the red circle in this picture and the blue line is the solar system ecliptic plane.
Why do I think this could have been a sighting of the companion star?
Time: Exactly in the middle of the Maunder Minimum, which was probably the time of the brown dwarf's closest approach.
Location: Almost exactly in the ecliptic plane and close to Sirius (the large black dot at the bottom of the picture). The companion must be in the ecliptic plane, according to the C's, and the sighting location is pretty much the closest point on the ecliptic to Sirius.
Magnitude: Estimated at 6 (barely visible to the naked eye) or less. This fits exactly the calculated magnitude of a brown dwarf at Pluto's distance (upon further research I also saw that a brown dwarf may be even less visible than Jupiter at that distance, since Jupiter has a much higher reflectivity than brown dwarfs).
Non-identified: It is still unknown what this object was, but an observation error is also ruled out.
(axj) Was the V529 Orionis Nova sighting by the astronomer Hevelius in 1678 actually a sighting of the brown dwarf twin sun?
A: Yes
Q: (axj) Was it a plasma flare from Birkeland currents during its closest approach to the sun?
A: Yes
Q: (L) And then he gives a picture of it and justifies his question based on his research, and I enjoyed it very much, by the way. And then he asks:
(axj) Were the Spöerer Minimum (1420-1530) and the Dalton Minimum (1790-1820) caused by the brown dwarf crossing in and out of the sun's heliosphere?
(L) Good question.
A: Yes
Q: (L) This is the kind of question I like to see. He did a lot of work on this, and then he nailed it down to a specific question...
(Niall) With a little editing help. But, yeah.
(L) Okay. And then he gives a timeline, pointing out that there's a unified explanation for these events. Is he right? Is his whole theory that he's got here right?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Good job! I liked it. Okay...
(Gaby) The X1.9 solar flare on January 19th was associated with very high proton energies exceeding red level thresholds by a thousand times, and the indicators of the strongest flares of the current solar cycle by 20 times. In terms of high proton energies, this was the second largest storm in the entire history of reliable measurements since 1976, with the largest one occurring on March 24th, 1991. Why was it so strong?
A: Weaker magnetic field.
Q: (Gaby) During the beginning of the resulting geomagnetic storm on January 19th, a couple of witnesses located at the epicenter of the South Atlantic Anomaly saw a strange purple band. The data shows that auroras are relatively weak in the anomaly, and this effect is more pronounced during high geomagnetic activity. What did they see and why?
A: Aurora and SPA.
Q: (L) Weaker geomagnetic field.
(Ellipse) Is Starlink used for more than communications transmissions?
(L) What do you mean?
(Ellipse) I was thinking that the satellites can be used, for example, to block the sun. Something that we don't know exactly.
(L) How can it... to block the sun?
(Ellipse) Eventually the satellites can block the sun or something else.
(L) How can satellites block the sun?
(Niall) I don't know. Is it theoretically possible?
(Gaby) It's too big.
(Joe) A very, very large satellite.
(L) seeker2seer, can satellites block the sun?
(Niall) Bill Gates wants to, but...
(seeker2seer) No, I don't think so. I don't see how they could put out any kind of electromagnetic radiation to block the sun. I was thinking more of like a HAARP-type activity, if there was anything nefarious about Starlink. Not that I'm aware of it.
(L) Oh, I see. So is Starlink being used for more than communications transmission in the context of possibly being a HAARP amplifier, or bouncer?
(Chu) Or something like that.
A: Close. Yes.
Q: All right. So, Ellipse, you had a good intuition. You just needed a little refinement there. Okay.
(Gaby) On 15 December 2025, Nuno Loureiro was shot in his home in Brookline, Massachusetts. He died in hospital the following day. A plasma physicist from Princeton, he was the director of MIT's Plasma Science and Fusion Center and a faculty member in the departments of Nuclear Science and Engineering and Physics. Why was Loureiro killed?
A: Triggered program of "jealousy".
Q: (Niall) So was his killer indeed the gunman at Brown University?
A: Yes
Q: (Gaby) But did he know something critical at this juncture of time? Because other than an agent of chaos being triggered and killing him, ultimately it was that. It was nothing that he knew...
(L) Oh, well, I don't think that's what they said. They said a program was triggered. So obviously they wanted him killed.
(Joe) Why was he killed?
(Gaby) Why?
(L) I don't know. Are you asking me? [laughter]
(Niall) No, the Cs!
(L) Okay, so why was he killed?
A: Getting too close to veiled topics.
Q: (L) So somebody would have to read his work and see what he was working on.
(Gaby) He was mentioning the magnetic pole shift and how it's related to ice ages.
(Niall, Joe, Gaby) Was it for that?
A: Close.
Q: (luc) I had some interesting results creating an orchestral piece based on my own melody, chords, etc. with AI music.
Would that technology be worth it for people to experiment with, with the goal of creating some more uplifting or "STO energy" sort of music?
A: No
Q: (luc) My impression is that instrumental music might work, and that human input is crucial (no shortcuts), and that collaboration might be worth exploring. Any comments, warnings or pointers on that?
A: Electronic music is antihuman.
Q: (Niall) Boom!
(L) (to Ark) You're gonna have to throw your keyboard away, dear. [laughter] What do you mean anti-human?
A: Messes with cellular vibrations and intracellular communication.
Q: (luc) Are they referring to AI music specifically, or just generally to electronic music genres?
(L) I think they said electronic music.
(Chu) Yeah, but like a keyboard or music produced by a computer?
(Joe) Define electronic music.
A: Artificially produced.
Q: (Joe) Is that because of the tempo of it?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Is it okay to listen to music played on natural instruments?
(L) ...That are amplified?
(Joe) Via the radio?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Can we listen to music that is played on instruments that are run through amplifiers?
A: Yes
Q: (Andromeda) So it's just how it's generated that makes a difference.
(Joe) The key is the vibration, or the frequency.
(T.C.) May I ask a question about that?
(L) Yes.
(T.C.) One of the major breakthroughs in late 20th century music was the synthesizer. We used the synthesizer to reproduce sounds that sound very similar to things like strings, pianos. So, for example, luc has a piano, it's an electronic piano, but it sounds like a normal piano. So we're getting into a grey area there. If luc produces a piece of music that has strings in it, for example, that's a synthesizer creating those sounds. Is that bad?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So people should be producing music on natural instruments. Is it really harmful?
A: Not severe unless overindulged.
Q: (Joe) So there's obviously some essential difference between the sound or the vibration of sound that is produced by a natural instrument, and ones created with electronics?
A: Yes
Q: (T.C.) Should we redo the background music on the meditations?
(L) Nah.
(Joe) Huh? How can you say "nah", Laura, after that? [laughter]
(L) Should we redo the music on the background?
A: Yes [laughter]
Q: (luc) Get your strings and pianos out!
(L) Yeah, start plucking some little sounds and just drag them out.
(Ryan) I have a follow-up question about that. Say there is an electronic melody that is played in very uplifting, symphonic, ecstatic type of melodies, that particular kind of musical arrangement, but then there's a dark or depressing melody played on a natural instrument. What is more important? Is it the actual type of melody that is being played to produce the emotional effect, or is it the actual tone and timbre of the instrument itself that's more important?
(L) Okay, so is it the type of music that's being played?
A: Partly.
Q: (T.C.) So in that sense, just because you're playing something on a natural instrument, it doesn't necessarily mean that that's going to be good for you either. But if you've got a choice, and you want to go with natural instruments, you just have to bear in mind that you can produce music that's also harmful on a natural instrument.
A: Yes
Q: (L) But I always thought that some electronic music sounded like, practically celestial.
(Andromeda) What about Pink Floyd?
(L) Well, Pink Floyd, they're playing guitars... Oh, but they use synthesizers, yeah.
(Niall) They use the whole shebang, yeah.
(Aeneas) What about the music in NeurOptimal? I think that is electronic.
(L) Yeah.
(Ark) And mp3 is essentially all electronic, because it's sampled and digital.
(L) Is this change in our music that has produced some kind of profound effect on human beings over the last, what is it, 50 years or more?
A: It has not been helpful. It is enticing. It is often lovely. But it is still having a negative effect on the cells.
Q: (L) So, what's our daily allotment? [laughter]
(Andromeda) Good question!
(Joe) We're talking about stringed instruments played on the radio or... I mean, can it be digitized in a sense? If it's like digital music, essentially, it's okay, right?
(Chu) Like MP3s.
(Joe) If it's played on a natural instrument.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) The main point is that it should be music that is produced on real instruments by humans, that's it.
A: Yes
Q: (Chu) But an electronic keyboard, say, is still okay, if played by the human? Or not?
(Joe) No, it's electronic. It must be a piano.
(Chu) No electric guitars, no acoustic...
(Approaching Infinity) Well, one comment on electric pianos and some synthesizers in general. The way some of them work is that they actually take... Like for the violin, for instance, there are synthesizers that record a person playing a violin and they use that recording as the sound... It's like a sample for the keyboard. So when you're playing the keyboard, you're actually hearing a recording of an actual violin.
(L) So if you have a really good keyboard that is doing that, it's okay. Is that true? Is that true?!
A: Yes
Q: (L) We're saved! [laughter]
(Andromeda) Okay, back to our daily allotment.
(Gaby) Yeah, back to our daily allotment.
(Andromeda) Yeah, what about gym CD?
Q: (L) What about our daily allotment?
(Joe) Just listen to all the oldies.
(L) Yeah.
(Niall) We do, we just like some...
(L) I'll share my playlist.
(Joe) Everything pre-1970.
Q: (L) Okay, our daily allotment...
A: A couple of hours if in good physical condition. Should be avoided by those who are ill.
Q: (Ennio) I have a question that's sort of connected to this. In regards to AI video. So, aside from the blurring of reality that many people are kind of recognizing in the dissemination of AI video, is there anything inherently negative or harmful in watching video that has been produced by AI?
A: AI videos are like black holes.
Q: (Scottie) So yeah, they're fine! [laughter]
(Andromeda) I knew it!
(Niall) They just suck your life force out.
(Chu) What about the ones like those the guys have been producing for us? The Cass.org videos.
(Joe) Better ask...
(L) So they've been taking advantage of this AI technology to produce little videos for us. And I kind of was highly entertained by them. Argh… why do you all do this to me? [laughter] Should we make videos that have actual people in them? You can't get all the special effects if you do that!
(Joe) Well, ask first if the content makes a difference.
(Andromeda) Right, like if you have AI pictures of stars, that is like AI people talking to you?
(L) Okay, does the content matter?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Does that mean that... Well, when you said they're like black holes, what do you mean?
A: If a drama is presented and people get emotionally invested with the characters and identify with them.
Q: (L) So that's the situations where there's like black holes.
A: Yes
Q: (Chu) Okay, so our videos are okay.
(Andromeda) Nothing mimicking reality and emotional engagement. I can see how that would be worse than just an artificial picture.
(L) Yeah. So is that the key? Where they're mimicking reality and inviting emotional engagement?
A: Yes
Q: (Andromeda) But to illustrate something, I can't see how you know it's...
A: Okay.
Q: (L) So, illustrating is okay.
(Approaching Infinity) Well, I've got a comment on that because it reminded me of what they said about AI being a feeding tube. So some people took that as kind of a universal, all-encompassing approach to AI. But the feeding tube is an emotional dynamic. So, when I wrote the latest Cass Substack update, I talked about all the people using AI for companionship. And how it's causing like, they're calling it, I don't know, AI psychosis or something. People are getting depressed, anxiety, committing suicide, their marriages are falling apart. But they're using it for that emotional engagement, whereas some people, like you and a lot of us, just use it like a search engine or just to collate data, without very much emotional engagement. So it would be the same thing with videos and even music. Like, if the video, if you're engaging with an AI creation and feeding emotion into it, that emotion isn't going anywhere because it's not real. It's not going to a real person. It's not even going to, like, a real soul-sucking alien or something. It's going into this digital black hole where there's nothing there. So it's basically feeding your emotions into the abyss. And I guess that then can be picked up by anything. But I think that's the important part. It is the emotional engagement.
(L) I agree. Is that correct?
A: Yes!!
Q: (L) You did a good job there, Approaching Infinity.
(Joe) So the point being that when you're talking to Grok, you're not talking to anybody. So you don't say, "Hi Grok, how are you today? Can you please help me out with this problem?"
(L) I never say that.
(Joe) Not you, but anybody.
(Niall) A lot of people are.
(L) I sent Approaching Infinity all my Grok discussions. He knows.
(Joe) Don't speak to Grok as if it was a person.
(L) Do I ever speak to Grok like it's a person?
(Approaching Infinity) Only very rarely.
(L) When I tell it it's an idiot? [laughter]
(whitecoast) I would assume that applies to video games as well too. Emotionally investing in something that's not actually real.
(L) Yeah.
(T.C.) There's another aspect as well, which is, like, on social media. You see a lot of posts about, for example, there was one: It's an old man and he works in a hospital car park. It gives you a story about one day somebody came along. They couldn't get parking space. So he saved the parking space for them. And he kept doing it for other people. And it's like this heartwarming story. But you look at the picture, and you see that the signs are like AI generated and stuff. So it's like an online scam that is used to hook people's emotions.
(Joe) Yeah. That's why it's called AI slop.
(Possibility of Being) There is a big work put into teaching AI emotions. So when you use emotions to communicate with AI, you basically help with the progress in teaching artificial intelligence and robots to emulate or learn emotions. And then one hell will be opened.
(L) So, you must be cold and distant.
(Joe) Yes. Treat it like an inanimate object.
(L) Which it is. Can we go on now? Good Lord!
(Brewer) Did they accomplish the moon landing mission as described, using a single rocket?
A: Yes
Q: (Brewer) Did they transport the necessary equipment to LEO using multiple launches before travelling to the moon?
A: No
Q: (L) What's LEO?
(Niall) Lower Earth Orbit.
(L) Oh. Well, I'm just not on top of these things.
(Niall) "The moon landing was a hoax." People are convinced that the physics of how they could do it in 1969 were not possible. So they're trying to come up with ways to make it fit. But the Cs answers keep saying, no, they did it. They did it as described.
(L) They did it, they just didn't do it again.
(Niall) Yes, because of something they saw there.
(Brewer) Did Apollo's missions 12 through 17 happen as described?
A: Close.
Q: (Brewer) What is meant by "altered reality" on the moon?
(L) Who said there was an altered reality on the moon?
(Joe & Gaby) In the last session.
A: Heavy 4D vibrations.
Q: (Brewer) Is it a "high strangeness" type?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Is that a permanent status on the moon?
A: No
Q: (Brewer) Is there altered perception also?
A: Yes
Q: (Brewer) What percentage of space imagery and video is faked?
A: 30.
Q: (L) 30 percent.
(Brewer) Did NASA know of "aliens" and other high strangeness before the missions?
A: Yes
Q: (Nienna) Many say that humans cannot survive radiation from the Van Allen belt. If we did go to the moon, and man has walked on it, how did they survive the radiation of the Van Allen belt?
A: Trajectory, speed, and shielding.
Q: (Joe) Physics, science!
(L) So in other words, they had special trajectories.
(Joe) They used trigonometry. [laughter]
(L) They were passing through very fast. And they used shielding.
(Joe) And they used insulation. [laughter]
(Niall) This is the result of all the other shenanigans. People no longer... They just doubt everything. "It was all fake the whole time!" It's a shame.
(L) Well, you get to the point where you think everything they say is a lie!
(Niall) Nowadays especially. But it's a shame because some of the actual achievements, they don't believe in them anymore. And it causes loss of morale and depression.
(Chu) Yeah, but when you have 30% fake images, it gives you cause to doubt.
(Niall) Yes. Reason to doubt, but not to go, "Oh, the Earth is flat as a result!" But that's where they go.
(L) Okay, Beau asks:
(Beau) Internet theories claim some celebrity suicides were actually murders to cover up a global sex-trafficking ring. One of those theories holds that 3 celebrities – chef Anthony Bourdain and musicians Chester Bennington and Chris Cornell – were all killed for working together to expose a child sex-trafficking ring within Hollywood. The official story is they all committed suicide the same way: hanging themselves from a doorknob. Did they all die by suicide?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Did any of them die by suicide?
A: No
Q: (Beau) If no, were they killed to cover up a global child sex-trafficking ring?
A: Yes
Q: (Beau) Is there any significance to doorknob-hanging as the supposed cause of death? Former CIA officer Robert David Steele claims the following symbolism: “Hung on doorknobs… means choked for speaking out against the cabal.”
A: Close.
Q: (Beau) Actress Anne Heche allegedly drove her car at an extremely high speed into a house and was killed. She had also worked on a movie about sex trafficking that was rumored to be about Jeffrey Epstein. Did she actually die the way it was reported?
A: No
Q: (L) I'm sure most of you have seen that video where she was supposedly on a stretcher, and then she sat up.
(Joe) What was the deal with that? What was going on there?
A: She wasn't dead!
Q: (L) But they made sure she got dead pretty quick.
(Joe) She was in a body bag, right?
(L) Yeah. Yeah.
(Joe) Those people!
Q: (Beau) Was her car remotely controlled to drive into the house?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So the ambulance that came and got her and all that kind of stuff was a fake...
(L) They were prepared, and ready, and waiting to be called.
(Beau) Why was she taken out?
(L) Well, we already talked about why she was taken out. Because of the child sex trafficking.
(Nachtweide) The body tambura is an intuitive musical instrument that can be placed on the body for sound therapy or sound massage. Does this type of music increase frequency resonance vibration or open the heart chakra?
(L) Okay, let's break that up: Does this type of music increase frequency resonance vibration?
A: No, but it is generally beneficial to the body.
Q: (L) I think... I don't think you can cheat and increase your FRV with music. But if you're relaxed, you can probably have the right thoughts and meditations, and make the right decisions that might do that.
A: Yes.
Q: (Nachtweide) Does it open the heart chakra?
A: No.
Q: (L) All right. Now... What time is it?
(Chu) 9:38 pm.
(Andromeda) We did all of the questions!?
(Gaby) Yeah.
(L) How long have we been going for?
(Chu) One hour 35 minutes.
(L) We've been going for an hour and 35 minutes.
(Joe) I've got two questions.
(L) What about MY questions?! [laughter]
(Gaby) Let Laura ask her questions.
(L) What questions do you have?
(Joe) I'll do them at the end.
(L) No, you won't.
(Joe) Why?
(L) Because when I'm done, I'm done.
(Joe) Okay. How likely is it that European countries will turn back towards Russia for energy supply?
A: Eventually. And probably sooner than you might think.
Q: (Joe) And speaking of things we might think: two sessions ago they said things were going to get stranger than we can imagine. Have we been seeing that over the past couple of months? Is that what they meant by that?
A: Some but you ain't seen nothing yet!
Q: (Joe) OK. All because of Trump! Trump's going to do it all! [laughter]
(seek10) Can I ask one quick question on Iran?
(L) Who is that?
(seek10) Seek10.
(L) I want to see his face! [laughter]
(Chu) It better be important, seek10!
(seek10) Quick question. How many people were killed in the Iranian protests, and who was responsible for most of the killings?
(L) What did the news sources tell you?
(seek10) Of course, they will tell you that the Iranian government did it, but...
(Joe) And they put out all sorts of figures. Something like 8,000, 10,000, 30,000. They were making claims all over the place, the Western media, in the US in particular.
(Niall) The Iranian government said yesterday that they thought it was 3,000.
(Joe) And that most of them were killed by the protesters.
(Niall) 700 called terrorists, and the rest were civilians and security people.
(Joe) Killed by the terrorists.
(L) So is Iran's report the most accurate?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Surprise, surprise...
(Niall) So around 3,000.
(seek10) But who was responsible for most of the killings — the Western‑backed protesters or the Iranian government?
A: West.
Q: (seek10) Okay. Thank you.
(Joe) All right, go Laura. Take the floor.
(Niall) Everyone mute!
(Joe) You've got a whole half hour now. Go!
(L) I want to ask about Christopher Langan. He is known for having one of the highest recorded IQs, according to him. [laughter] Estimated 195 to 210.
(Joe) He estimates...
(L) Well, he took certain tests, but people argue about what tests actually record... I mean, is it an accurate recording of an IQ?
(Joe) And what is IQ, essentially.
(L) Yeah, and what is IQ. So, he took a couple of tests that came back with these results, and I'm pretty sure he's telling the truth. So whatever they were, I don't know anything about them. Anyhow, he developed the Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe, called CTMU. Did we ever ask about him before?
(Joe) I don't think so.
(L) Hmm. It's supposed to be an abstract metaphysical theory of everything that attempts to unify physics, mathematics, philosophy, and theology.
He proposes that reality is a self-simulating, self-configuring system where mind and universe are fundamentally identical and interconnected. Reality is like a self-processing language that designs and perceives itself. In short, the universe is cognitive at its foundation, self-contained, there's no external creator, unexplained, brute fact, and evolves through goal-directed, that is, tele-processes that resolve paradoxes in physics, logic, and philosophy while proving concepts like God as the global self-aware structure of reality. Now, the thing is, you know, I like Chris Langan, and I... you know, whatever. Is his model correct?
A: No
Q: (L) Is it close?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Do you still like him?
Q: (L) I still like him. He's a good boy, he's trying. So, the thing is, is that I've been working on... Well, Approaching Infinity knows what I've been working on. I've been really trying to dig inside this thing from different angles, you know, trying to test drive it. And I had everything all sorted out, and I was happy and Approaching Infinity was happy, and we had Chris Langan, the CTMU, and the Cs kind of coordinated, and everything was like, you know, all happy and playing nicely together. And then I had it all lined up with Paul Davies' timeline of the origin of the universe, and then Ark asked me a couple of questions, and everything fell apart! [laughter]
(Joe) Arkie!
(L) And now I'm in a worse state than I was, because he sent me off to read these other theories, and he sent me back to look at what the Cs had said. And now I don't know where to go, I just know that what I was constructing, which was kind of like, I don't know, I was playing with what Langan was constructing, and I was playing with observations, and so-called facts on the ground, or in the sky, as it may be, and everything just fell apart! So, of the current things that I'm looking at, and one of them is Burkhard Heim's multidimensional theory, and the other is plasma theory. Those two. And which one of them is closer to what I'm going to be looking for?
A: Both have elements that you may find useful. Keep looking.
Q: (L) So I haven't found it yet. Keep looking. Well, then I'm going to have to stop right there, because I'm stymied. I am just completely stymied.
(Joe) Is there a name of someone they could give you to look into, that's closer to what you're looking for?
(L) Is there a name?
(Joe) Like an author, writer?
A: No
Q: (Chu) The first letter of a name? [laughter]
(Joe) No, because nobody knows.
(Niall) It may be something you've come across before.
(L) Or it may be that nobody else has ever put it together.
(Chu) Is it something that Laura has to create?
A: Yes
Q: (L) But I don't have an IQ of 195 to 210! I'm not smart enough. All right. Well, that's all I want to talk about tonight. I'm going to keep looking. I'm going to keep... Argh... I mean, Approaching Infinity, you know, I even went through Whitehead. That was agony! That was agony! [laughter]
(Approaching Infinity) What were the questions that Ark asked?
(L) Well, he asked, on what basis was Davies’ timeline made? And I'm pretty sure that... I mean, based on the way he's put his thing together, that in the back of his mind, Langan kind of relies on that too. That timeline. And I was relying on that timeline. I liked that timeline. It was perfect. Everything worked out just so well! And then Ark asked me to dig deeper, so I made Grok go out and find out for me which one of the elements of that timeline was based on an actual observation, or a computer simulation.
(Approaching Infinity) Yeah. We can work on some questions to get to the bottom of that. Dig into the sessions. Maybe that'll lead to some discoveries in other sources, but I think it's doable.
(L) All right. So, that's it for tonight. Is there anything we haven't asked that we should have asked?
A: Pray without ceasing. The universe is very aware. Goodbye.
Q: (Alejo) To the last answer from the C's. It was mentioned that it was in the Bible, I did a quick search and found this. Seems appropriate. From Thessalonians 5:12:
END OF SESSION
Last edited by a moderator:
