Music today

katak

Jedi
Many questions arise within me. Certainly, they have been stirred by the recent session with C’s, where music and AI were mentioned. I am not sure where exactly to begin, so I will let it flow naturally. I am someone who came to music only in the last decade of my life. To music that has become an inseparable part of my existence, something that fills my inner world and gives my life deeper meaning. Beautiful classical music that should fill us with beauty, joy, and gentle feelings.

We know that classical music is uplifting and healing. People like Mozart, Beethoven, and Bach composed their magnificent works. Mozart, who had genetic predispositions that likely enabled him to hear melodies of higher densities and transcribe them onto paper. Why are we no longer able today to create music that is equally uplifting as they once did? What has changed? Is there no one left with such invisible antennas as Mozart, Beethoven, or Bach once had?

Today, in almost every country, there is an orchestra—a philharmonic—that should represent the very best and most skilled musicians. Musicians who, before arriving there, usually studied their instrument for 15 to 20 years. Musicians, many of whom dreamed of becoming the “queen bee” on stage. Today, at best, they sit in a philharmonic orchestra, become worker bees, and silently look at the “queen bee.” Who becomes that “queen bee” on stage? Is it truly the person who can play their instrument so beautifully that their classical, healing music is truly healing? Unfortunately, even in this world, there is struggle as everywhere else—perhaps even harsher. Because how many people can become the “queen bee” on stage? Maybe one in a thousand. Maybe even fewer. And those thousand are a thousand immensely talented young people who have practiced tirelessly on their instruments.

Another parameter enters the game: the Jewish parameter. Have you noticed that the “queen bee” on stage is often of Jewish origin? Is it a coincidence that children of Jewish origin are endowed with greater talent? Or does the community help them reach the position of “queen bee” on stage? And what about truly talented young people who do not have such origins and do not have a community behind them to help them?

Another parameter is obedience. I have seen several young people—very talented and playing their instruments beautifully. Those who obeyed without question, without thinking and without their own opinion, and did what they were told, rose to the top of the ranking. It did not matter whether their playing was healing or not. What mattered was that they did what they were told. Worse off were those who had their own opinions. They were often punished, because it is very easy to punish from the position of a teacher who holds the power to do so.

As if that were not enough, another parameter appears—one that shocked me the most. Imagine entering a room where a young, talented artist is crying heart-rendingly, and your inner world is immediately flooded with pain and compassion. After she/he leaved, you hear some “so-called explanation,” and five minutes later, the teacher begins to cry as well. But suddenly, you feel nothing. The first time, you think it is strange that you feel nothing at all. Over time, this situation repeats itself two more times, and you begin to feel that you are facing manipulation and a person who is very likely only acting out their emotions. For you, this is a great life lesson. But what about the people who come to a concert and listen to a classical, healing piece performed by this person—will it truly be healing?

And finally, AI enters the game, when the ordinary person can hardly distinguish whether the music they are listening to was created by AI or is truly played by a living human being. This closes the circle of chaos, where everything becomes unclear and confusing.

I deeply wish that music would be healing in the true sense of the word, as it is meant to be. That the music we listen to would be healing not only through its content, as we find in classical compositions, but also through the people who perform it. Through people who are able to play with their whole inner being, with their heart and soul. I wish for them to shine like little lights, like true “queen bees.” Have a nice day to all :violin:🎹🎷
 
Mozart and the Glass Harmonica

Mozart composed two works for the glass harmonica in the last year of his life, thanks to his admiration for the blind german virtuoso M. Kirchgessner, his admiration for the sound of this instrument, as an artistic experiment, and the opportunity to create something unique and beautiful. The glass harmonica was invented in 1761 by B. Franklin in London. In 1773, Mozart played this instrument in Vienna at the home of F. A. Mesmer (the famous hypnotist). Franz Mesmer used it in hypnosis. K. 617 is his last chamber work (and one of the most beautiful) – Alfred Einstein called it a “heavenly work with unearthly beauty.”

It gradually fell out of use, likely due to its fragility. The glass harmonica strikes me as a fascinating and wonderful rarity, about which various eerie stories circulated in the past—perhaps thanks to Mesmer’s magnetic hypnotism treatments. Today it is rather perceived for its unique sound.

 
What has changed? Is there no one left with such invisible antennas as Mozart, Beethoven, or Bach once had?
Well, looking back over the past several hundred years, I'd say a lot has changed that probably created the conditions for musical composition not to be the same as it was then.

In practical terms, diet and contamination for instance. But also, mental contamination if you will, the times changed and what was once a "quieter" world so to speak, became loud and full of lies at a larger scale as time went on.

Maybe back then music was aspirational for some, now.. most kids want to be influencers, just to draw attention to the direction events in societies in the west took. The focus is less on touching others with our creations, and more about grabbing something from as many people as possible into ourselves.
 
yes the creative transmission(sto) is blocked and aquisition(sts) takes its place - sharing /giving v taking
I was thinking about taking vs. giving. Once, on a trip with a group of people I had never met before, there was an older lady. It turned out that this lady was the mother of a boy who was in the next class in my primary school. I knew him. He was a good boy at heart. But he was not doing well at school at all. No matter how hard he worked and tried, he had the worst results in their class. We had the same teacher who taught me math, and in their class, in addition to math, she was also their homeroom teacher.

What came to my mind when I talked to his mother was this: This teacher seated us in the classroom and divided us according to how smart and good we were at math. The best ones in the front row, the weaker ones in the middle, and the weakest ones in the back row. That's how she treated us for the whole year. Those who were smart were encouraged and praised. On the other hand, those who were not doing well were trampled on and constantly pointed out that they were stupid.

If there is only 1 glass filled with water for 2 thirsty people. They are standing next to the glass and one of them drinks the entire glass, the other will have nothing left. Even though the original intention was for it to be water for both of them. Surely the one who drank the whole glass of water will be satisfied and will not be thirsty. But what about the other one?

If we exchange water for anything, for example energy, does anyone have the right to decide who gets it? Does anyone have the right to take something that belongs to you? The answer is obvious. And there is still the parameter of the person who has received everything, even what was intended for others. Is he even aware of this? Most likely not.This brought me back to what the C's repeat very often - that there is a need to be vigilant.

I look forward to creative transmission being unlocked in 4D. Thank you very much and I wish a nice day :-)
 
Back
Top Bottom