Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

If it is true that there were Iranian military compounds next to the school, then it would be similar to Israel putting Israeli military compounds next to civilian buildings. The builders bear some responsibility when innocent people die in civilian buildings next to military compounds.

According to the Al Jazeera's report, the school used to be part of the military complex but was separated 10-ish years ago. A clinic was also built later but was not hit.

Even if it was still inside, that wouldn't have made it okay. On-base schools are nothing new or revolutionary. Everybody does them. The onus is on the aggressor in choosing their targets carefully. International law protects them unless they're directly involved in military operations. Israel loves to use that excuse when bombing hospitals or other other public facilities.

The aforementioned report concludes the school suffered a direct hit and not some sharpenel bouncing off.
 
According to the Al Jazeera's report, the school used to be part of the military complex but was separated 10-ish years ago. A clinic was also built later but was not hit.

Even if it was still inside, that wouldn't have made it okay. On-base schools are nothing new or revolutionary. Everybody does them. The onus is on the aggressor in choosing their targets carefully. International law protects them unless they're directly involved in military operations. Israel loves to use that excuse when bombing hospitals or other other public facilities.

The aforementioned report concludes the school suffered a direct hit and not some sharpenel bouncing off.

All that plus they could have targeted that area at any time that it wasn't full of schoolgirls. They did it when it was full of them 🤔
 
According to the Al Jazeera's report, the school used to be part of the military complex but was separated 10-ish years ago. A clinic was also built later but was not hit.

Even if it was still inside, that wouldn't have made it okay. On-base schools are nothing new or revolutionary. Everybody does them. The onus is on the aggressor in choosing their targets carefully. International law protects them unless they're directly involved in military operations. Israel loves to use that excuse when bombing hospitals or other other public facilities.

The aforementioned report concludes the school suffered a direct hit and not some sharpenel bouncing off.

All that plus they could have targeted that area at any time that it wasn't full of schoolgirls. They did it when it was full of them 🤔

And that wasn't the only school targeted so far

 
I have "full" human and hyperdimensional comprehension of the grieving process related to the perception of reality by a previously unaware MAGA faction. In any case, even and especially in the process of grieving, the thread title ihmo must be changed.
 
Last edited:
This article caught my mind today and made me think of the Asia. Are US Pacific bases just Chinese hostages?

There is no doubt that what is happening in the Middle East will be closely watched by those in the Asian region. Not just China will take note of how easy it was to deplete the air defenses in the Middle East. Japan and South Korea will also take note of how vulnerable they are by simply hosting US bases and how little the US actually cares about the safety of its allies. Taiwan ought to take note and consider whether it wouldn't be better to reconsile with mainland China knowing that the US is a paper tiger with limited options in real, especially when the opponent employs an asymmetrical response.

‌Does Japan, South Korea or Taiwan really want to sacrifice their countries if a rogue religious fanatic in the White House administration thinks it would be easy to just make a quick punitive strike?

Who knows, peace agreements and reconciliations could come out of this though that might be wishful thinking. While the leaders of those countries are just puppets, the people might get itchy and less likely to rule over. There could well be more protests in greater numbers over the military bases in Japan or South Korea, to just name two obvious countries.

The Philippines and Indonesia might also not be so pleased with the prospects of having their countries destroyed thanks to a paper security guarantee from the US. So just like paper precious metals contracts are going bust and collapsing fast, the same could happen to these military paper security contracts which aren't worth much when things get critical.
 
Link
Iran’s interim leadership council has decided that neighbouring countries will no longer be attacked unless an attack on Iran originates from them.

Either Iran has changed its strategy and wants to focus more on Israeli targets since most of the important assets have been taken out (i.e. the radars) making Iran able to operate with more ease against Israel.

Or, this decision came due to Arab countries asking Iran to do so, in exchange for getting something out of them (a concession, if you will.)
Multiple channels are reporting this. It makes sense as there no point of making enemies of every neighbour. Well, Israel can bomb them and say it is Iran who did it. But, are they in that position to fake it for ever? In any case, US is in a very bad position.
 
Multiple channels are reporting this. It makes sense as there no point of making enemies of every neighbour. Well, Israel can bomb them and say it is Iran who did it. But, are they in that position to fake it for ever? In any case, US is in a very bad position.
The Iranian armed forces have issued a statement, which slightly corrects the Iranian president.

Iran Armed Forces not targeted neighboring countries​

Iran Armed Forces not targeted neighboring countries

TEHRAN, Mar. 07 (MNA) – Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters announced that Iran’s armed forces respect the national interests and sovereignty of neighboring countries and have not carried out any attacks against them.
According to a statement released by the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, Iran’s armed forces reiterated that they respect the interests and national sovereignty of neighboring states and have not taken any hostile action against them.

The statement said the declaration follows remarks by Masoud Pezeshkian.

However, the headquarters added that in continuation of previous offensive actions, all military bases and interests belonging to the United States and the “Zionist regime” on land, at sea, and in space across the region will be considered primary targets of powerful strikes by the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

So in other words, it is business as usual more or less and the Epstein coalition is still very much a target wherever they are. At least that is how I read it. After the Iranian president's statement, the Supreme Leader,Trump was quick to say that Iran had surrendered thanks to the almighty US.

1772890389926.png


It appears likely that the Iranian army just wanted to remind the Supreme Leader of the Epstein coalition that reality is different from the Hollywood fiction.
 
If it is true that there were Iranian military compounds next to the school, then it would be similar to Israel putting Israeli military compounds next to civilian buildings. The builders bear some responsibility when innocent people die in civilian buildings next to military compounds.


I wonder of the Israelis who died, when the Israeli population is roughly 50/50 psychopaths vs non-psychopaths, how many were not psychopaths.

I wonder if we're being programmed to cheer indiscriminate death to Israelis now and maybe to Americans later. Bombs now, needles a few years ago, a worldwide assault in varying forms on the people by governments foreign and domestic.
When people rejoice when Israel is bombed and Jews die, that's hatred. And it's reminiscent of the "Hate Minute" in Orwell's 1984. A concentration of hatred. This hatred is controlled, dominated by those in power, whoever they may be, and it feeds on it. It's terrible.
 
A good analysis at RT on who might send ground forces to Iran:


Basically, the Kurds in Iraq are few in number and have no modern military hardware (so far). They could also face attacks from the Iraqi military, against which they were formed.

Azerbaijan would be very vulnerable to short-range attacks on its oil producing infrastructure with which it makes most of its income.

The article mentions that Pakistan could potentially want to grab a part of Iran, but only if the conditions are right.
 
If it is true that there were Iranian military compounds next to the school, then it would be similar to Israel putting Israeli military compounds next to civilian buildings. The builders bear some responsibility when innocent people die in civilian buildings next to military compounds.

Read the Al Jazeera article. The US/Israelis had enough up to date information to avoid hitting the clinic that was in the same complex but managed to strike the school that was further away and in use as a school much longer than the clinic. That's damning in itself.

What's more damning is that there's reports from people on the ground shared by Middle East Eye and coming from one of the girls that survived the attack that there was a double tap strike on the school like Israel has done numerous times in Gaza.

Add to all the above the 4 or 5 other schools, hospitals, and so on that have been targeted so far and it suggests the strike on the school was not an accident that can be blamed on Iranian planners but a deliberate targeting of civilian targets.

So in other words, it is business as usual more or less and the Epstein coalition is still very much a target wherever they are. At least that is how I read it. After the Iranian president's statement, the Supreme Leader,Trump was quick to say that Iran had surrendered thanks to the almighty US.

Iran has since sent more drones/missiles to Bahrain, so the message from the Iranian president seems like it was an attempt at preventing non-Gulf nations (like Azerbaijan) from getting involved in the war.

There was a video I saw recently (doesn't mean the video itself was recent though) of a US general who mentioned intercepting Iranian drones with the intention of using them against Iran. Using them against Iran could mean sending the drones to blow something up in Iran. It could also mean using them to attempt to blame Iran for attacks it didn't commit to draw others into the conflict.
 
Last edited:
After the assassination of Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Donald Trump and the CIA, in their eagerness to believe that they can create a new "Delcy" in Iran. The CIA's Plan B, which is being discussed more vigorously, is to play the card of the only candidate still alive, leader Reza Pahlavi, the Shah's eldest son, a self-proclaimed figure who is working with Senator Lindsey Graham (RSC), whom he affectionately nicknamed “Uncle Lindsey,” to present his plans to a bipartisan group in the Senate in order to propose himself as Khamenei's successor.

Although the son of the slain supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, has emerged as the favorite, Trump criticized him as “incompetent” in his interview with Politico:
Speaking to press in the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump said that he preferred to work with “somebody from within” the current regime — though he admitted that the number of options was dwindling as “most of the people we had in mind are dead.”
The president also weighed in on the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s son, who is in contention to be the new supreme leader saying, “Now they’re looking at the son. The reason the father wouldn’t give it to the son is they say he’s incompetent.”
Trump emphasized the U.S. is going to “work with them to help them make the proper choice” because he wants to avoid having a head of Iran “that’s going to lead to having to do this again in another 10 years.”
POLITICO

Trump had recognized Pahlavi as a “very good person,” but had downplayed the possibility of him assuming leadership of Iran, saying he preferred a figure within the country to take control. “Some people like him (Pahlavi), and we haven't been thinking too much about that,” Trump said, adding, “It seems to me that someone from within might be more appropriate.”
The week
In this sense, Pahlavi would be playing the role of Corina Machado. In fact, the Nobel Prize-winning opposition leader emphasized that “a free Iran and Venezuela are more than just goals; they are essential conditions for a secure and democratic world.”

Reza-israel-.webp


Whoever is appointed “will have no legitimacy and will be seen as an accomplice to the bloody history of this regime and its criminal leaders,” declared the son of the last Shah.
The Iranian people have called on me to lead the transition after the regime is gone. I have accepted that responsibility. Part of their great mandate to me is to return our nation and our foreign relations to normalcy. I will do exactly that.

My commitment is to ensure the transition is orderly, the country is stabilized, and Iranians determine their future through the ballot box. We will not repeat the mistakes of past transitions. We will avoid de-Baathification scenarios and maintain as many bureaucrats and public servants in the transition as possible.

Iranians have made their choice — at an enormous price. Now I ask our friends in the Arab world to join us. To prepare to recognize and engage our transitional government.

This connotes the way, or rather the formula, in which Israel and the United States shape their wars with lies, with continuous repetitions and different puppets, a formula with little imagination, designed specifically to show the people that there is not much choice and that this is how things are.
What can be said, It is no different from democratic political configurations or repressive judicial apparatuses that last for decades under regimes such as that of the ayatollahs. It is more than likely that with the eventual rise of the Iranian candidate to replace Khamenei, Mohnseine Ejei, the tension of war would increase exponentially, as he is a judicial executor who has strengthened the state regime based on security operations, which would leave the clerical revolutionary model in the background, that is, a hardening of the regime.

This illegal and propagandistic war, fought in the interests of a few, has an unacceptable economic, energy, and human cost for the entire planet.

The week
 

Attachments

  • Cor- Palh cop.jpg
    Cor- Palh cop.jpg
    75.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Ayatola Covid.png
    Ayatola Covid.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom