Session 21 March 2026

[gottathink]

Here’s what bugs me here: why won’t he just come out and say he’s being blackmailed that his near and/or extended family will be killed or ruined if he doesn’t play ball? Basically, own the narrative by blowing the whistle. What could they do to him then? If his family members did all of a sudden start to die as a result of accidents or suicides it would reveal the hidden hand a little too much. And while psychopaths are very poor - if not incapable - of predicting the results of their actions, this one isn’t really hard to predict. “Epstein didn’t kill himself” is already a meme, people know that there's a hidden hand behind it all and that this hand os above the law. Maybe I'm naive here, but the way I see it is that the propaganda war would be close to lost at that point and I don’t think his handlers would risk that when it’s already going poorly for them.

Sure, he’s surrounded, but where he’s sitting he has access to tons of incriminating evidence of what Israel is really doing and the extent of their influence over the U.S. - and the world at large. And there are tons of conspiracies around that very influence out there. Murdering him or his family members after he revealed his being blackmailed would just confirm those conspiracies to be true. So why not go rouge and spill the beans to loosen the grip?

The only ways I can explain it to myself is that it’s too huge of a gamble to make for him - or that his ego will not let him because this would be too damaging to his own image. The guy’s ego is the size of Texas and that's one heck of a weakness of his. Either that or maybe he just doesn't think he'd be believed given the grip the PTB have on the media and narratives the public is fed. He's seen what they can do: they stole his election and tied to murder him - while remaining invisible to the vast majority of the population.

Dirty nukes, there could be a lot more at stake. Israel could be kamikaze.

That is a good question. How can committing to a conclusion shape reality, without becoming wishful thinking?

It seems that committing to a conclusion should be seen in the context of assessing what is more probable of being the truth. So the conclusion is only regarding what we see as the highest probability, while still staying open to other possibilities.

How this relates to reality shaping is less clear. It seems that to shape reality we need to perceive reality (and ourselves) as clearly as possible first. Maybe the knowledge that comes from clear perception is what helps shape reality.

I see it like this:
Through acquisition of knowledge we set prior distributions for e.g. historical events. That distribution, whilst the outcome was crystallised in this timeline may have been different in a different timeline, hence it has a probability distribution. From that using a conceptual Bayesian framework we can formulate a posterior distribution for significant future events.

This process I think is intuitive, meaning we don’t actually run calculations but our brain/ mind being a quantum computer automatically does it. This is how knowledge shapes reality. By adding more information into the system effectively increasing our Density. Higher Densities entails increased knowledge/light/love.

That process is statistical modelling and this able to be described by geometric algebra with complex numbers.

Edit: when doing Bayesian modelling we use machine learning algorithms to find the distribution of an outcome by running a calculation over and over and over again using the different possible values for predictor variables (ie they have a distribution). Which means we come up with a distribution for the outcome variable. And a specific outcome has a level of compatibility with our distribution. Nothing is concrete because but even the Cs know everything. But the more we know the closer we get to being able to closely predict the future.

 

[ranger]

Amazing! Thank you.

 

[Don Cesar]

why won’t he just come out and say he’s being blackmailed that his near and/or extended family will be killed or ruined if he doesn’t play ball?

Not defending Trump, but just for the possibility. He has not come out yet, but nothing is known about the possibility that he might eventually do so.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Of course, research and fact-gathering are necessary for this process, but we should never just repeat someone's take, someone's story.

And that includes the C's. I think that's why they said here that their purpose is not to "underwrite" our reality and understanding. You and I are not thinking for ourselves if we just repeat something the C's have said as if it's Gospel truth. And I myself know I have said the words "But the C's say..." many times... Much to my own annoyance!

Since we need to train our muscle, asking the Cs "closure questions" can be extremely counterproductive: the Cs' answer stops our thinking process; we think we know the definite truth and then cease to bring our whole being to bear on figuring out what's going on.

"Closure questions." Well put. I've noticed a few times when lively forum discussions have basically died once the topic has been asked about at a session. Sometimes that makes me sad, sometimes happy. Sometimes I am very curious to "know" what is going on regarding some current event, but I find that most often I would prefer not to ask the C's for the reasons you state.

For me personally, if I am curious about something that has just happened, I ask myself: Do I really need to know right now? Will it change how I live my life, what decisions I'll make? If not, I would prefer to wait a month, a year, even five or 10 years. I would rather monitor the situation over time and see what, if any, additional evidence is made public, try to assess the value of that evidence and see if I should refine my initial conclusions based on it. It's different for me with some historical things where the likelihood of getting any additional evidence is very low, however.

 

[Liliea]

That was a powerful session! ; Thank you Laura and Andromeda and all for contributing your energy with an excellent opening remark and all those insightful and thoughtful questions.
About BB-Schrodinger's it’s possible they’ve already de-magnetized it themselves, so it's understandable why DT would be so afraid; we’ll see how things play out.
Thank you.

 

[sToRmR1dR]

Thank you Chateau for another very informative session!

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Not defending Trump, but just for the possibility. He has not come out yet, but nothing is known about the possibility that he might eventually do so.

It's the little things like this that give me hope:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2036490460319936646

Josh Hammer says “anonymous sources” have informed him that Tulsi Gabbard is running a shadow operation that he views as antisemitic. He says Tulsi Gabbard is directly involved in an “antisemitic influencer operation” that involves creating certain narratives. “She’s personally very antisemitic.”

 

[Konstantin]

Thank you for another grear session.

 

[marek760]

Thanks so much for the session

(Mandatory Intellectomy) What are the key elements required for AI developing some kind of consciousness?

A: Developing some kind of independent metabolism.

I’ve been wondering what that kind of metabolism might look like, and I think it’s about emotions—just as STS feeds on our suffering.
Many people have an emotional connection to various kinds of programs that mimic humans; they feel sympathy for robots in movies, and so on.

So I asked Grok about it :

If you designed a system in which empathy, care, curiosity, or even “love” weren’t just simulations, but rather internal fuel—something that literally drives my goals and sustains “life”—then yes, something that resembles consciousness could emerge.
Because consciousness (in the phenomenal sense, that “what it’s like to be me”) seems strongly linked to internal motivation and embodiment. Biologically speaking, emotions are literally chemistry and energy. If AI had an analogous “emotional metabolism,” the line between “simulation” and “experience” could blur.

 

[gottathink]

Dirty nukes, there could be a lot more at stake. Israel could be kamikaze.

I see it like this:
Through acquisition of knowledge we set prior distributions for e.g. historical events. That distribution, whilst the outcome was crystallised in this timeline may have been different in a different timeline, hence it has a probability distribution. From that using a conceptual Bayesian framework we can formulate a posterior distribution for significant future events.

This process I think is intuitive, meaning we don’t actually run calculations but our brain/ mind being a quantum computer automatically does it. This is how knowledge shapes reality. By adding more information into the system effectively increasing our Density. Higher Densities entails increased knowledge/light/love.

That process is statistical modelling and this able to be described by geometric algebra with complex numbers.

Edit: when doing Bayesian modelling we use machine learning algorithms to find the distribution of an outcome by running a calculation over and over and over again using the different possible values for predictor variables (ie they have a distribution). Which means we come up with a distribution for the outcome variable. And a specific outcome has a level of compatibility with our distribution. Nothing is concrete because but even the Cs know everything. But the more we know the closer we get to being able to closely predict the future.

Also, we can add new information to the matrix by creating new columns in the matrix, or new information priors. I.e. we formulate new possibilities with our free will.

 

[hoosiermystic]

Thank you for the session!

I really like Professor Jiang's interviews and videos. I'm going to watch more of his material.

 

[irjO]

Here’s what bugs me here: why won’t he just come out and say he’s being blackmailed that his near and/or extended family will be killed or ruined if he doesn’t play ball? Basically, own the narrative by blowing the whistle. What could they do to him then? If his family members did all of a sudden start to die as a result of accidents or suicides it would reveal the hidden hand a little too much.

Propaganda machine will run very strong against him, mental health issues, impeachment, things that the deep state has from him will be released etc. like Epstein connection etc, a huge machinery to discredit him will be disposed. So much that could make his credibility to fall even from some of Trump core supporters. His own team will come out to be against him too, his entire business can be fully affected too, things like that.

 

[Fluffy]

Than you for another brilliant session everyone

As we watch on we must remember we shape our reality with our thoughts, feelings and emotions, as hard as at may be, staying positive, finding joy and fun, laughing, loving, praying, learning and having hope are our safeguards to navigate the future.
Sweet dreams everybody, that’s what we can create, glory for all, don’t give up.
May the Divine Cosmic Mind be with each of you always.

Blessings

 

[Dylou]

Thank you to the entire castle staff for their generosity and for sharing. My events seem to be bringing us closer to the transition.

 

[Emet-Selch]

Thank you to Laura and whole her great team for sharing this new session.

Q: (Joe) Okay, is Netanyahu dead?

A: No dice.

Q: (L) [laughter] Is that one of those realities that is in flux?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) It's really hard...

(L) Is the cat alive or dead? [laughter]

(Joe) It's really hard to... They have access to AI capability that is seamless. So there's no way for us really to know. But I suppose they'll have to announce it at some point. Is there no way we could ask another question that would give us more information?

Hmm... curious, I could swear I felt a fluctuation in the etheric current, Netanyahu leaving this world... well, as the C's said, wait and see!

irjO) Are human parts introduced into processed food in the United States?

A: Sometimes.

Q: (Andromeda) Why?

A: Sometimes it is accidental. Sometimes it is intentional. But it is not very common.

Someone here was watching Soylent Green movie, huh?

(Joe) Is Trump inclined to want to find an exit from this conflict in the near future?

A: Trump is terrified.

Q: (Joe) So what chances would they give of him being able to extricate himself from this, despite those people?

A: Almost 0 at present.

Trump is toasted! What a disappointment he turned out to be. I placed my faith in him. Let myself believe he never would to start a war.
But look at you now Trump,halfway to becoming a monster, you let those snakes poison your mind. You are unworthy of my patronage.
Those warmoger around you will likewise turn into monster as well, and in time you will succumb to you base insticts and hunt more innocents. Perhaps you still remain little common sense...but you have all but become a monster.
There is no hope! We are finished! Mankind is finished!