Session 21 March 2026

[Ca.]

(L) And, you know, he made the remark at some point that he gets up and cries nearly every morning because humanity is not doing what they need to be doing and we're starting to - not his exact words - but basically escape the fate that is awaiting us because of what these various whistleblowers are saying. And I keep thinking to myself, as more and more stuff comes out that matches everything the C's have been saying for years and years and years...

And, you know, I kind of, you know, he talked about the problem of ontological shock, that people would, you know, once they understood what was really going on, it would just, you know, would just completely take their reality away from them, everything they thought was real. Well, we already know that. We've already been there and done that.

I mean, maybe not in the in-your-face, here's an alien on the White House lawn kind of way, but we've done it at least kind of theoretically, mentally thought about it, considered it to be a viable possibility, even a probability based on, you know, a lot of circumstantial evidence. And I'm not going to say that makes us more prepared than anybody else, but I think it does. I think, and I, you know, and I just wish, I just wish that people would not be so instantly turned off because the material is channeled.

But that was by design, I'm sure. I mean, Yahweh came along fairly early on and said, "I'm the only one and anybody else who says anything that I'm not saying is, you know, is a demon. I am the only God and you should have no other gods" and so on and so forth.

Yeah, so if… and then there was this Chinese guy, Professor Jiang. Is that what you said his name was? And he's talking about how all of these different plots and plans are coalescing or converging at this point, you know, like the Masons, the Evangelicals, the Jews, you know, even probably the Muslims, they've got some kind of end-of-the-world scenario going on, Illuminati, etc., etc. And, you know, these people don't even stop to think about where all those people got those ideas and why they came up with those plans and what's been guiding and directing it. And it's like I said years ago, on each and every one of these individual conspiracy theories, you know, I followed so many of them back… you know, the paper trails and so forth, and always would come up against that brick wall where you can't go any further.

And then you realize that individuals that would formulate such plans - individuals as we understand them in human terms - that would formulate such plans and attempt to carry them out, are the type of individual who doesn't really care about the future. They only care about getting what they're getting right now. And, you know, it's difficult to imagine a bunch of psychopaths saying, you know, we'll form something like the Freemasons, and we'll plan to, you know, 2,000 years from now, we'll plan to bring about the end of the world along with the Jews and everybody else.

Thank you, everyone, for another captivating session!

From the Substack on The DukeReport

The Duke Report™️ (@thedukereport)

Daniel Klein @dzyk interviewed by Indie Nile - In the video Klein argues that the conflict in Gaza is driven by the strategic objective of establishing a highly valuable maritime trade corridor for the global elite. #Thalassocracy https://youtu.be/ocCZLhIoSfQ?si=VDkrAHbxcjenwmlC

substack.com

Inside Israel's Premiere Brainwashing Program for Zionism Takeover (MECHINA Bnei David)

Feb 28, 2026 #brainwashing #propaganda #indoctrination

 

[Dylou]

That's a good point — I've been thinking about the exact same thing for a long time. Trump clearly didn't learn any lessons when he decided to run for President again. He comes across more like a dumb cowboy with an ego inflated to the absolute limit. He had no idea — and still doesn't — what kind of immensely powerful opponent he's up against. He did zero reconnaissance on the battlefield he was stepping into. He thought he could just walk into the bar, kick the doors open, and everyone would quietly sit down and obey his orders

There is a very insightful article by François Martin in the French journal *Géopolitique Profonde* in which he compares Trump’s behavior to that of de Gaulle, thereby providing a logical explanation for Trump’s international geopolitical conduct.
He draws on the concept of the Thucydides Trap, which holds that the dominant global power will go to war with its rising rival to preserve its hegemony. Thus, the dominant power will eventually spend too much to maintain its empire, thereby causing its own downfall.
Just as de Gaulle was able to separate from Algeria and focus solely on France, Trump is refocusing his priorities.
Greenland: strategic rare earth minerals to end dependence on China.
Withdrawal from Ukraine: cutting off a financial black hole with no return on investment and partnering with Russia.
Tariffs: reindustrialization of the United States.
Humiliation of Europe: a signal to parasitic allies that imperial subsidies are over.
Operation Venezuela: securing the backyard, preserving “nearby possessions.”
François Martin sees the November midterms as the moment of truth for Trump, who will find out whether he has been able to quell the internal divisions within his camp caused by his foreign policy.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

 

[gottathink]

@Noctu , in your example the probability average (mean) for each country is the percentage you have listed. Then each mean has a probability distribution that goes with it. If random events determine which country is chosen then the probability distribution will be normal. The shape stays the same and the area under the curve stays the same, but the spread, how wide the distribution is can change. That is determined by the number of possible pathways that exist to the event. There are other shapes possible and that is determined by what and how the pathways to each event occur.

Probability distributions easier to grasp by first counting things/objects rather than event probabilities.

 

[gottathink]

@Noctu , in your example the probability average (mean) for each country is the percentage you have listed. Then each mean has a probability distribution that goes with it. If random events determine which country is chosen then the probability distribution will be normal. The shape stays the same and the area under the curve stays the same, but the spread, how wide the distribution is can change. That is determined by the number of possible pathways that exist to the event. There are other shapes possible and that is determined by what and how the pathways to each event occur.

Probability distributions easier to grasp by first counting things/objects rather than event probabilities.

Sorry I’m not explaining this very well, at all.
There is the actual probability of an event, which has a distribution and then the distribution of the mean is a different thing.
In the context of this session the probability of an event occurring is its probability in this timeline.
The mean of the probability and its distribution is calculated from infinite timelines. I think that is a hyper-dimensional concept, but I need to get my head around it some more.

 

[mikemotorbike]

Here is my hypothesis, stated elsewhere here, on why It is impossible for Ai to become conscious.

TL;DR: Consciousness is the result of myriad unique interactions of increasing complexity resolving through thresholds to greater simplicity.

A little background: All reality is made of consciousness units, a la Seth. They randomly agglomerate like dust bunnies. Further concatenation increases their density, hence "Density levels One through Six." The result is what we experience as our consciousness. I?BM do that?

By this definition, Consciousness implicitly is organically evolved. Can chips do that?

So the requirement for sentence is the ability to perform the wave collapse function, into particles. Or as the Cs simplistically state it, "Develop a metabolism and self replicate."

Now understand, a 4d consciousness is able to manipulate energy. A robot, or an undifferentiated soul (C's term) (aka organic portal) cannot see beyond the perturbations of its own inside shape.

We are robots. When we perceive beyond our inner shape, we are perceiving from a higher density, which Laura calls Cassiopaea, whom by attribution Jesus is a member.

That's all I'm going to say about that.

 

[Sheeba]

❤

 

[mantle]

" Some say the world will end in Fire
Some say in Ice
From what I have tasted of desire I go along
with those who favour Fire
But if I have to suffer twice
I think I know enough of hate
to say
That for destruction Ice is also great
And will suffice. " [ Robert Frost.]

I believe there is a metaphysical background to this Iranian war that forced America to sprint towards oblivion. The undeniable presence of super negative powers behind Trump's threats ." I think I can do anything I want with it. Whether I free it , take it. I think I can do anything I want with it " [ On Cuba] or " We may hit it a few more times just for fun " [ On Kharg Island ] How else am I to understand his chastisements and his fear of disobedience to barons and moguls, surveillance and slaughter. Among them cannibals and child rapists > "They are my friends" he said.
And his intentional , deliberate collapse of all commerce to bankrupt the world. For a man who prides himself on his expertise of the Art of the Deal , made famous by Marlon Brando in the The Godfather with :" Make them an offer they can't refuse", it beggars my mind that he lit the fuse for a world war.
I do not hate .I gasp at the horror of a situation where failure no longer teaches but hubris enters with open arms.

 

[birger]

Thank you for the session

 

[Tristan]

Q: (Niall) What was the reason for Netanyahu's apparent absence from meetings over the last two weeks?

A: Wait and see!

Thank you very much for the session. I'm curious to know what has happened to Netanyahu or what will happen to him.

 

[axj]

I did a while back discussion with AI about that and come to conclusion if they go to 4D STS they are at the lower end of hierarchy

It is also possible that 'crystallized psychopaths' stay in 3D in the astral realm or something like that.

• 80K or 78K BCE arrival for Kantek folks.
• 68K BCE for the major tectonic plate alignment into current configuration.

I wonder what happened around 70kya to cause the major continental reconfiguration. It was after the Kantek destruction around 79kya and way before the first Atlantis cataclysm around 50kya.

Maybe just delayed effects from the Kantek destruction over 10,000 years? The Toba supervolcano eruption that created the biggest known genetic bottleneck is usually dated in the same timeframe of somewhere between 77kya to 71kya.

Supposedly only up to 10,000 people survived in that time period, though newer studies show that at least in the southern regions of Africa the effect was much less catastrophic than expected. So the real number of survivors may have been higher in some regions.

 

[Ruth]

No, I don't think any of us could. The deep state has 4D STS on their side, to find them.

Yeah and besides, only knowledge protects and only the truth can set people free. So, Trump is complying with his "trusted friends" who are actually his enemies. If he's doing that, then they'll keep blackmailing him until they have no more use for him. It's a pity he didn't have the guts to stand up to them. Maybe it's hubris?

 

[seek10]

I wonder what happened around 70kya to cause the major continental reconfiguration. It was after the Kantek destruction around 79kya and way before the first Atlantis cataclysm around 50kya.

Maybe just delayed effects from the Kantek destruction over 10,000 years? The Toba supervolcano eruption that created the biggest known genetic bottleneck is usually dated in the same timeframe of somewhere between 77kya to 71kya.

Supposedly only up to 10,000 people survived in that time period, though newer studies show that at least in the southern regions of Africa the effect was much less catastrophic than expected. So the real number of survivors may have been higher in some regions.

Link Here Laura speculated about the connection

Now was the explosion of the planet Kantek and the Toba eruption somehow interrelated? Was there something going on in the solar system as a whole and at large at that time that contributed in some way to the destruction of Kantek? We know for a fact that, oh, beginning some 20 years ago, back when we were reporting and recording these things, that all of these new moons were being discovered on Jupiter and that there were changes in Jupiter's weather and there was global warming on Mars, and there was global warming on Venus, and there was apparently global warming on other planets so that the so-called global warming that was going on on Earth wasn't an isolated event.

Cosmic environment is different at that time. C's expressed ' transient fashion of reality' at the time of Kantek destruction. C's said 'malleability of plates' around the time of 68K BCE. C's said debries from Kantek explosion destroyed earth too ( though not to the level of blowing up the planet). Remnant rocks can have all sorts of issues on earth too.

Session Date: Oct 22, 2022

Q: (whitecoast) The 70k years ago time for the continental shift of Laurasia/Gondwana coincides with the population collapse postulated to have been caused by the Lake Toba supervolcano eruption mentioned in the book Into Africa by Bruce R. Fenton. Were these continental shifts at least in part precipitated by the destruction of Kantek…?

A: Yes

Q: (whitecoast) …or by the wider solar system’s electrical environment?

A: Both!

session-10-december-2022

Q: (whitecoast) I have a follow-up question about continental rearrangement from Kantek's destruction. Did more lands split apart to make more divergent human cultures to compensate for the loss of "real estate" caused by losing an entire planet?

A: Happened, compensated, but was natural effect.

 

[Ruth]

Thank you very much for the session. I'm curious to know what has happened to Netanyahu or what will happen to him.

My guess is he'll be 'declared dead' when it is convenient to use that announcement to get public support behind attacking the Iranians. It won't be when he really died (in a targeted attack), and maybe he wasn't alone in his demise, either? Anyone seen Mike Huckabee lately?

 

[iamthatis]

That is a good question. How can committing to a conclusion shape reality, without becoming wishful thinking?

It seems that committing to a conclusion should be seen in the context of assessing what is more probable of being the truth. So the conclusion is only regarding what we see as the highest probability, while still staying open to other possibilities.

How this relates to reality shaping is less clear. It seems that to shape reality we need to perceive reality (and ourselves) as clearly as possible first. Maybe the knowledge that comes from clear perception is what helps shape reality.

I think it has to do with what Laura wrote about EEQT. Basically, when an observer makes and effort to come closer to understanding the objective state of a system, that system responds to the observation itself - by becoming more orderly. On the converse, when an observer sees the situation more subjectively or less accurately, the flawed understanding affects the system by creating more chaos. So it is in the primacy of consciousness, made real in our act of seeing and understanding - with the importance of making a well-informed commitment to the state of whatever system we are viewing - that is our primary contribution to reality shaping.

The advice given in this session seems to be that we should invest ourselves more in theories. It's almost like an invitation to play the 3D game - 'for keeps', and not hold back. If one is observing reality, and doesn't 'invest' and just sits around and waits for the answers or stays suspended in the inherent fallibility of 'we can never know for sure' - there is no risk. Where's the burning question, the wonder, the curiousity, the gamble, the spice of life in that? recall J.G. Bennett wrote about hazard... without risk, there is nothing on the line. Choice, meaning, and virtue are drained of their significance as a result.

Thinking about it through the lens of the Parable of the Talents, if we look explore reality, gather data, and construct a cohesive narrative, then commit to that narrative - but don't stake some amount of our Being on it - perhaps our talents are not being invested? No risk and no reward? Perhaps it could be said that only in the context of losing something that anything can be meaningful be gained. So there is a line of action - observation, gathering data, thinking, struggling to formulate a theory or narrative, investment in it, which is an investment of our Being, based on our Knowledge, then networking about it, continuing to observe, correcting it, fine-tuning, or throwing it out completely, etc. All of this will ideally contribute to an orderly shift in the smaller systems we are observing, possible scaling up to the grand System itself.

The personal benefit of this, in addition to exercising the ol' brain muscle, is also the blessing of being wrong and being corrected. Maybe a strange blessing in a forum that's very highly focused on the truth and objective reality. But I think investing, assigning probability, and then being wrong, being told that one is wrong, or being proven wrong by events, and wrestling with that, trying to discern if we are actually are wrong or not, and coming to that decision after deliberation, and admitting to oneself that one was wrong, feeling the burn of it - this is maybe one of the best ways to build character that I can think of. And as such, it'll shape our personal reality, too, in a very beneficial way IMO.

 

[irjO]

If we take 8K as life span, it will be 55K + 16K = 71 K BCE , Approximation to 68K BCE.

That lifespan of 8k wasn’t the normal, I believe they said 8k was the max that a human could stay alive not that it was the regular life span.

(seek10) I was reading this book, Edgar Cayce's Atlantis. There is an example where one priestess had lived for 6,000 years. It looks like they have some temples where they can rejuvenate and live longer. Now, it is not clear whether it is a one-off case or a generic case. Maybe that's related to this. Maybe Atlanteans could live longer.

[Members didn't find the relevant quote from previous sessions.]

(Joe) Would it be true to say that any historical or mythological or whatever references to human beings living very long lifespans, kings or whoever... that that relates to either alien interaction, when aliens, or undergrounders...

(L) Well, let's try to ask it in a simpler way, that's a little convoluted. Okay. So, the basic question would be, did any ancient people, kings or otherwise, live extraordinarily long lives compared to modern man?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Were some of them kings?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And these were what we would consider to be fully humans?

A: Yes.

Q: (Chu) What factors made them live that long?

A: Genetics mainly.

Q: (L) So there were people who carried these extreme longevity genetics. Is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And where did those genetics come from?

A: Kantek mainly.

Q: (L) Do any modern people carry some of those genetics, whether in an upregulated or not condition?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) I'm assuming that for those extreme lifespans, they are not upregulated.

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Okay. So, is it possible under some circumstances for those genes to be activated in modern man?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Did changes in the Earth itself, say the atmosphere, the gravity, electromagnetism or some other factors, have anything to do with downregulating those types of genes?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Okay. Can anybody think of anything else? Yes, no, maybe?

(Joe) How long are we talking about?

(L) Oh yeah. How long are we talking about in terms of lifespans?

A: Up to 8k years maximum.

Also, it’s kinda implied in the previous exchange, that certain groups whether kings or whatever, were the ones who may have lived the most compare to other groups