Could be, though ADDD always sounded like it referred to many people dying - either due to a real plague (some say it is planned for next year), serious food shortages or maybe an impact or several.
The weak relationship could be that the TBD refers specifically to the cabal, while ADDD seems to refer to normal people.
I worked for years in the City of London and became used to the term "drop dead date" in the context of a final date by which a deal (negotiations) had to be completed or else the deal collapsed and was dead in the water with no chance of revival. This could be for a variety of reasons. For example, a deal was reliant on financing which was only available at a certain advantageous rate for a specific period of time. If that period was exceeded, the new finance rate might be much higher thus making the deal uneconomic. Deals are also struck on the basis of accounting data, which are snap shots of a company or business at a specific time, where the further away from that time you get, the accounting data becomes increasingly unreliable from the point of view of pricing the deal. Believe me, a "drop dead date" can help focus the minds wonderfully of all those involved in the deal, often inducing frantic hurrying around and late night negotiating sessions with lots of black coffee.
So, the term "drop dead date" suggests to me something very final, something by which a certain result must be achieved or else everything will fall apart.
Hence, I think there is a lot of merit in what Gaby has just said in her last post:
So, the term "drop dead date" suggests to me something very final, something by which a certain result must be achieved or else everything will fall apart.
Hence, I think there is a lot of merit in what Gaby has just said in her last post:
Since I wrote the above on March 29th, I think this is the year of April Drop Date and it's the war against Iran. A deadline that must be met because of cosmic changes, earth changes, total control agenda (2030), etc. "Drop dead" is on quotes. This war could mark the beginning of the end of the Anglio-Zionist empire.
Speaking of the PTB's "total control agenda", this excerpt from the session dated 13 May 2017 may expand upon this agenda
Q: (Pierre) Well, so it's that. People got scared. That's a documented thing. The first leaks from Macron's servers was those documents from a NATO/CIA-sponsored foundation in France that was pushing for a lot of migration and a lot of mosques and stuff. I was wondering if his main mission is to bring in migrants and stir things up to lead towards a civil war?
A: US wishes to destabilize EU similar to Syria so that they can come in and "fix" things. i.e. rule and control resources and trade the "American way". Everyone will speak English!
Q: [laughter] (Pierre) They sure have a sense of humor, but I'm not sure that will be the only consequence...
(L) So basically, some kind of cabal in the deep state of the US is at the bottom of some kind of One World Order plan to really basically bit by bit take the entire planet under its control. Is that it either overtly or covertly?
A: Covertly at present, but overtly eventually.
The truth of this statement was first glimpsed in the Covid 19 faux pandemic but now we are seeing overt military pressure being brought to bear by the cabal on one of the main resistors to the NWO agenda, i.e., Iran and its ME allies (which can be extended to include China, Russia and North Korea - the last two of which you will note were countries on that list of nations that did not have an Illuminati controlled central bank).
And let us not forget that the Rockefellers have been main players in advancing the 'One World Order' plan with David Rockefeller once stating openly that there was going to be a One World Order whether people liked it or not. He was the long time chairman of the One World orientated Bilderberger group that brought the European Union into being as well as being chairman of the ultra secretive Le Cercle group.
Quoting from something I posted on an earlier thread (see: Session 24 June 2023):
And let us not forget that the Rockefellers have been main players in advancing the 'One World Order' plan with David Rockefeller once stating openly that there was going to be a One World Order whether people liked it or not. He was the long time chairman of the One World orientated Bilderberger group that brought the European Union into being as well as being chairman of the ultra secretive Le Cercle group.
Quoting from something I posted on an earlier thread (see: Session 24 June 2023):
Also quoting Charade in that same post:Le Cercle
When looking at secret groups linked with the concept of circles, there is a classic example to be found in an organisation called Le Cercle (English ‘The Circle’), a highly secretive, invitation-only, foreign policy forum established in 1952-53 by then French prime minister Antoine Pinay and French intelligence agent Jean Violet (who had been an extreme right wing activist before the Second World War) under the name Cercle Pinay. Konrad Adenauer (a post war Chancellor of Germany and a Catholic) and Franz Josef Strauss (a right-wing Bavarian politician) were its German co-founders and reconciliation between France and Germany was an important goal. Historian Adrian Hänni wrote that "The Cercle's founding vision encompassed the integration of a Christian-Catholic Europe, an aspiration reflected in the Cercle's personal membership and the countries represented in its early years." The other members of the original Cercle were from the Governments of Belgium, Italy, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands including a number of members of the Catholic Opus Dei and the Knights of Malta (the modern-day successors to the medieval chivalric order of the Knights Hospitaller of St John). With the participation of members from these two secretive Catholic societies, we can again see the concept of circles operating within circles or the interpenetration of circles. However, it must be said that in comparison to the Freemasons and the Rosicrucians, La Cercle is not a secret society organised in a hierarchy of degrees or grades with special rituals. It is more of a thinktank or talk shop from which emerges actions on the world stage.
In later years it delved into policy discussions in promoting reforms in post-Communist countries, and in June 2004 convened in the Royal Palace in Belgrade under the auspices of Alexander, Crown Prince of Yugoslavia. Political changes in 1969 led to the addition of Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States with meetings held twice a year rather than three times a year as before. This led to a shift in objectives, which became an emphasis on forming a strong anti-Communist alliance between the United States and Europe. Hänni stated that "The leaders of the group increasingly considered strategies to target public opinion and, to this end, formed a "Cercle network" of associated organisations, institutes and think tanks, which attacked both the Soviet Union and the perceived "leftist" governments or opposition movements in Europe and the Third World". Again, we see the concept of circles operating within circles through the creation of a network of associated organisations.
Alan Clarke, the British Conservative MP, government minister and historian stated in his diaries that Le Cercle was funded by the CIA. [MJF: let us recall here what the C’s said about the CIA: “Now, some history... as you know, the CIA and NSA and other agencies are the children of Nazi Gestapo... the SS, which was an experiment influenced by Antareans”.]
Le Cercle was mentioned in the early 1980s by Der Spiegel in Germany as a result of the controversy surrounding Franz Josef Strauss (the long-time chairman of the Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU)), one of the regular attendees of Le Cercle.
Ecuadorian Foreign Minister, Guillaume Long, wrote that the group has "strong links to the intelligence community in Europe and the United States".
It has been described as smaller, spookier, more secretive, and far less exposed group than the Bilderbergers, who are of a similar vintage. Leaked documents indicate that Le Cercle’s activities have included political subversion, the arrangement of arms deals and fraud.
The group currently meets biannually, in Washington DC every Autumn and in Spring across the Atlantic, usually in Europe, although David Rockefeller's autobiography states that it used to meet "thrice yearly"[MJF: David Rockefeller was also a Chairman of the Bilderbergers, and was, as a member of the Illuminati, a leading advocate of ‘one world’ government who once said: “You will have one world government whether you like it or not”]. Meetings usually last 3-4 days and nowadays there are "about 70" guests, although meetings used to be smaller, perhaps just 35 participants. Guests are almost all male, and sometimes they bring their wives, though it is unknown to what extent (if any) they are involved in the meetings. Compared to a milieu such as the Bilderberg (with a first-time invitee rate of about 50%) membership of Le Cercle is much less fluid. VIP Attendees in the 1970’s included then U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger (another senior Bilderberger) and U.S. President Richard Nixon.
Attendance lists would include politicians, spooks (spies), bankers, diplomats, deep political actors, senior military officers, editors, and publishers who may or may not have officially retired. The participants, which include some ‘deep politicians’ (aka Éminences Grises* who are the hidden political decision-makers, whose machinations generally evade scrutiny by the commercial media), come almost exclusively from western or western-oriented countries. Many important members tend to be affiliated with aristocratic circles in London or obscure elements within the Vatican, and accusations of links to fascism and synarchism are anything but uncommon in this milieu.
*A: Usually 4D STS using a group of people to feed and plant ideas into 3D. Note that often the eminence grise in such groups is a psychopath and you can read current studies to see how the morphing works.
Q: (L) So I think that might be referring to Lobaczewski when he describes how psychopaths within a group can shift the direction, the ideas, and then change the ideology and all that?
A: Yes.
Le Cercle (like the Bilderberg Group, to which it is often compared) is strongly focused on European integration, going back to the efforts of its early members to bring about a Franco-German rapprochement. The significant presence of Pan-Europa affiliated Opus Dei members and Knights of Malta, together with statements of the Vatican and Otto von Habsburg [MJF: who was the main Habsburg claimant to the vacant title of Holy Roman Emperor and President of the International Paneuropean Union from 1973 to 2004 as well as being a Member of the European Parliament between 1979-1999], suggest an agenda of creating a new "Holy Roman Empire" with borders from the Atlantic to the Black Sea and from the Baltic Sea to North Africa. However, these aims seem to have matched those of an older Rosicrucian (Catholic/Martinist) secret society we have previously encountered on this thread and that is the Hiéron du Val d'Or.
For more see: Le Cercle - Wikipedia and Le Cercle - Wikispooks
On the same day, I happened to pick my copy of “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” as Laura had made mention of it in her recent interview. The first chapter brings up Carroll Quigley’s description that network’s aim is “nothing less to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.” The overarching theme is to control by any and all means possible.
So, could the current war with Iran, that could yet turn into the Third World War if either Israel or the USA uses nuclear weapons, spell the end of the Anglo-Zionist New World Order - the New Atlantis - as Gaby suggests?
Let us not forget that the C's said long ago that we are seeing an exact re-run of the end of the Atlantean Empire, which was at war with the Athenians, yet was eventually destroyed by a worldwide cataclysm (cosmic cleansing!). If so, perhaps the Russians (the Athenians) may yet have a say in current matters. Indeed, could they or the Iranians prove to be Magog to the Israelis:
Gog and Magog appear in the Hebrew Bible, the New Testament, and the Quran, though their roles differ across texts. In Ezekiel 38–39, Gog is described as a leader from the land of Magog, ruling over regions such as Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, who will lead a coalition of nations against Israel in the "end times"
In Ezekiel, the prophecy describes Israel as peaceful and unsuspecting when Gog attacks, but God intervenes supernaturally, using earthquakes, torrential rains, hail, fire, and sulfur to destroy Gog’s forces.
Perhaps these supernatural events will play out the other way around and it will be Israel and its supporters that are destroyed by cosmic forces just as the old Atlantis was.
Gog and Magog appear in the Hebrew Bible, the New Testament, and the Quran, though their roles differ across texts. In Ezekiel 38–39, Gog is described as a leader from the land of Magog, ruling over regions such as Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, who will lead a coalition of nations against Israel in the "end times"
In Ezekiel, the prophecy describes Israel as peaceful and unsuspecting when Gog attacks, but God intervenes supernaturally, using earthquakes, torrential rains, hail, fire, and sulfur to destroy Gog’s forces.
Perhaps these supernatural events will play out the other way around and it will be Israel and its supporters that are destroyed by cosmic forces just as the old Atlantis was.