2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

[D69]

Regarding communist gov and its placement.

 

[SlipNet]

Sometimes with all the 'homework' I feel I need to catch up on, I get overwhelmed by what to read or Work on in myself. What to do? What to do! The C's have said many times not to move too fast down the freeway of Knowledge - you may miss the stunning details of all the leaves on the trees that are whizzing by.

Thanks for this; I'm trying too hard to catch up on things, I think I need to speak/write less and contemplate more. This year, for many reasons, has really knocked me, but I'm still working through things. I'll gain nothing from rushing through the subject matter.

It looks like you're taking on some big mind-blowing texts, which is awesome. I haven't read those yet. Have you taken a look at the Romantic Fiction thread, or any of the recommended books there? It may be a good pick-me-up for your emotional centre amongst all this uncertainty.

It's on my to do list, have bookmarked the thread too. Thanks again. The Guyenot texts are particularly dense, but they have been well translated. I don't pretend to understand all of what's in there, but I'm picking up threads gradually. After a chapter or so, I think it's best to put a book down and let my being catch up with the new information. This is painstaking 'cos I'm a slow reader, but I find it works out better in the long run.

I've got to admit I'm struggling to appreciate the beauty in life at the moment, so perhaps I need to tackle my emotional areas of work now. Definitely food for thought.

 

[SlipNet]

Maybe I can start to give an answer to as to why one needs to have ties with Zionists. You simply don't have a choice. You can't afford not to, especially in the West. At this point in history, I don't think a single person gets to the top if they are not "approved" by the Zionists in their country. These people are the closest you can get from being all powerful. If you want to aim high, to have a career, may it be as a writer, journalist, politician, actor... You have to sworn allegiance to them. Don't wanna do it? You'll be discarded, you'll be smeared, accused of anti-semitism, and 100 people behind you will try to take your place, and THEY will be willing to support them, in exchange for a bit of fame. All the political circus we see is just different factions of the same power trying to get the upper hand.

I've never read it laid out in such stark terms. Thanks, I needed to read that. They've pulled off a mighty manouver because the fear of being labelled an anti-semite is so all pervasive.

Will their influence be beneficial for the US or any other country? No, but apart from celestial intervention (comets, solar flares), at this point, I don't believe anybody can stop them. They are class A predators. They are richer and more powerful than most government on this planet. And the US population has been empoverished, dummed-down, brainwashed, divided and hysterized, It's unlikely that they will be able to regroup, identify the threat that Zionists represent (without falling for racism) and chase them away. Even if they could, they would pay an hefty price for such a freedom.

Class A predators, hmm, well put. The picture you paint looks very bleak, but then again it's been like this for ages, I just didn't comprehend things. You can only live in a bubble for so long however, reality seeps in.

If you are interested in Zionism, you can read the book "the controversy of Sion" from Douglas Reed, his biography is interesting too, as he paid the price for telling the truth.

Thanks, I've actually got the book, but I'm only about 2 thirds through it. It's been a fair while since I was reading it and I could feel my anger rising as I did so. That's why I put it down for a while. The Levitical priesthood stood out as essential psychopaths. No redeeming characteristics. I think I read a C's session where they stated that the population of Israel had nearly 50% psychpaths!!! My god, can you imagine living in a place like that if you're a normal person? I was staggered by that.

I'll return to the book once I've finished my current reading, thanks again for your well thought out reply.

 

[Ocean]

Smartmatic software and Dominion machines.

Mark Malloch Brown - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Baron Mark Malloch-Brown
British Parliamentarian.

Up to his eyes in Smartmatic and Dominion.
Venezuelans still vent their anger at this person who rigged their elections.
Lots of Twitter info on him.

 

[Heather]

Right now I'm curious to see who Trump will be appointing for his second term which will help us to see what his plans are. Whats happening in the Pentagon is especially interesting. I've never been interested in war strategies, but at the moment it has caught my attention mainly because I've started following Thomas Wicktor who is knowledgeable on the subject. He compares past battles and strategies to what is happening now with Tump who he considers an exceptional strategist as well. Here's a look at one appointment made in May who Thomas speaks of as well as Miller. I'm impressed that he was recommended by Gen. Flynn.

Cohen-Watnick Returns to Pentagon as Senior Counternarcotics Official

Ezra Cohen-Watnick, a defense intelligence veteran and former Trump National Security Council aide, is headed back to the Pentagon.

www.breitbart.com

Ezra Cohen-Watnick a defense intelligence veteran and former Trump National Security Council aide, is headed back to the Pentagon to serve as deputy assistant secretary of defense for counternarcotics and global threats.. In his new capacity, he will focus on the fight against drug cartels and transnational criminal networks (TCNs) — a big priority of President Donald Trump’s. Trump recently directed the Pentagon to launch a counternarcotics operation to stop the flow of drugs across the U.S.’s southern border.

Cohen-Watnick will not only be focusing on drug cartels in Latin America but also on the larger TCNs that span the globe, including those used by Hezbollah and state-sponsors of terrorism such as Iran.

The position is a return to defense policy for Cohen-Watnick, who was detailed at the Pentagon before being brought into the National Security Council by former National Security Adviser Army Lt. Gen. (Ret.) Michael Flynn in 2017 as senior director for intelligence programs at the NSC, where he oversaw intelligence activities targeting TCNs.

While at the NSC, Cohen-Watnick discovered — as part of an unrelated intelligence community oversight review — evidence that the Trump campaign had been incidentally spied on by American spy agencies surveilling foreign officials in the U.S.

I've already posted a few videos from Thomas. He's been making one per day lately, back to his mission to help explain who Trump is and what he's up to. I enjoy watching him in the evening while relaxing. Maybe you will enjoy him as well.

Now I have a question. In the past some people here have questioned how reliable Mike Adams of Natural News is. I followed him for a few years and thought he was legitimate but after this was mentioned I wondered. It did seem like some of his articles where overly sensational. Does anyone have information on this? Thanks. We're seeing many articles from him now.

I believe Adams wrote the piece I had questions about a few pages back (I haven't found that post yet). But, if I'm correct, his was the piece that was saying Trump and his intelligence people (I'm assuming DOD, as opposed to CIA) were watching ALL the election fraud happening live the night/morning of the election so they would have the evidence. No mention of how this was done. No explanation of the mess we're seeing now. It was a very "off" piece that raised a lot of red flags.

 

[Heather]

While I have no doubt that there was fraud, cheating and what not to get Biden's votes up (just enough to provide 'victory'), something doesn't smell right with these revelations about the Smartmatic software and Dominion machines. Sideny Powell was just talking on Loud Dobbs (Fox), and the thing that caught my attention was what the 'Smartmatic whistleblower' had said in his/her testimony. It went something like this: the software has been used in Venezuela and Cuba during the elections to produce landslide victories for Maduro and Chavez. The whistleblower alledgedly was involved in the process of designing the software, and saw the manipulation of votes in real time. Powell also said that "the CIA was fully aware of this happening":

This prompts the question: if the US has been for decades so vehemently opposed to Maduro and Chavez, seeking a regime change in those countries, why would e.g. the CIA allow these election frauds to take place?

Powell says that the software company is/was foreign owned, but I didn't catch what exactly she meant by that.

If it's true that the elections of Chavez and Maduro (maybe others) a few possible explanations come to mind:

1) There was a lot of money involved; the Chavez/Maduro groups paid enough money to the software company. And maybe the company wasn't interested in any political outcome, just money. And the CIA and US players could not stop this, or, they allowed this to happen (why, I don't know – maybe they had a deal and made a lot of money). However, knowing that Chavez and Maduro were very popular, why would they need to manipulate the elections?

2) We got it all wrong regarding these communist countries. Maybe the 'deep state' actually wanted communism to spread, because it fits perfectly with their NWO agenda? We knwo that the Marxist and communist ideologies fit well in their plans, so maybe that's why they have been wanting to spread these ideas for decades. So, maybe the more conservative, but still ruthless, politicians and 'big players' in the US wanted to overthrow Chavez and Maduro, but the 'deep state' was secretly working against these plans behind the scene – they actually helped to rig the elections. As a bonus, they could see how well the software and manipulation worked, and hone the details for their own use.

3) The software was used to rig and manipulate the 2020 US elections (little doubt about that), but as they're exposing this they (Conservatives) are also 'piggybacking' the idea that also the Cuban and Venezuelan elections during the last two decades were rigged. To inforce the idea that these countries have illegitimate leaders and governments – which would make a soft in the future coup easier. Maybe to inforce also the idea that communism is infested with fraud and cheating, which it of course is (like any other political system with psychopaths in power).

Okay, just some 'thinking aloud' that I wanted to share. Any thoughts/theories?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1328467142791061509

That's something I was wondering about too. I don't think Chavez and Maduro would have needed to "cheat" to win the popular vote given how popular they were/are.

This brings up something else that's been on my mind related to Trump's foreign policy, and also related to his rhetoric concerning the "socialist" takeover on the left. I find it highly problematic to equate this synthetic "socialist" insurgency headed by Big Tech/Soros/Gates backed BLM-Antifa with "on the ground" socialist revolutions in countries that would have envied the once burgeoning middle class found here in the United States. Even now, to see these upper middle class, highly indoctrinated, largely white "social justice warriors" spouting Marxist talking points in support of their highly inorganic, top down "revolution" -- to have that compared with countries like Venezuela where there was great need for a leader who would nationalize oil, for example, to the benefit of "the people" (yes, in a move that I believe failed when the West manipulated oil prices before Chavez could diversify).. but, my point is, Trump has a great deal in common with Chavez and Maduro from a populist standpoint. So, this "one size fits all" type of socialism he and those supporting him are condemning seems misplaced. Also: isn't Powell muddying the waters with this? If you stick with this election and the obvious rampant election fraud, that's one thing. But to add in these highly questionable foreign policy "equivalencies" -- well, it's to leave the truth behind, in my opinion. Trump, in this "stolen" election scenario, has the truth on his side. The truth should be its own mandate. Don't muddy the waters here.

 

[Ocean]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1328001413998374912

 

[Ocean]

To translate, click on the link.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1327630175308275712

https://twitter.com/x/status/1326732023386529801

Welcome

archive.triblive.com

 

[Windmill knight]

He only mentions the Dominion story for the first time tonight because it's been coming out all over the place in the alternative press -- and even on some Fox shows -- to the degree that he and his producers would look remiss if he didn't at least touch on it. Instead of interviewing Sidney Powell, as Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo did yesterday morning, he states that because her legal team won't hand over their evidence (i.e., their case materials), that's it. He won't go any further with it. Yes, unless he is shown the very evidence they are using in their court cases (something Tucker knows they can't do) Tucker will do nothing. And yet, as is evident in the alternative press, there is a great deal he could be reporting on without having Powell give away their whole case.

I watched that segment and I thought Tucker was just being cautious, and I sympathize because I feel the same. I would LOVE to see Sideny Powell 'release the Kraken' as she says, but I've been disappointed of amazing things NOT happening in the end in the field of politics or the global scene way too many times. If she does have the evidence, then let her present it and we can all enjoy that show. Until that happens, we can comment on the fact that she says she has it, without committing to evidence we haven't seen yet, which is what Tucker did. Also, Tucker has a show every night of the week, so he may still interview Powell one of these days.

I also watched his segment on 'dead voters' and I thought it was quite good. He didn't focus on a single example, but on several. It doesn't seem to me that he is minimizing the fraud issue - just being cautious, as I said, based on what we know so far.

 

[Windmill knight]

While I have no doubt that there was fraud, cheating and what not to get Biden's votes up (just enough to provide 'victory'), something doesn't smell right with these revelations about the Smartmatic software and Dominion machines. Sideny Powell was just talking on Loud Dobbs (Fox), and the thing that caught my attention was what the 'Smartmatic whistleblower' had said in his/her testimony. It went something like this: the software has been used in Venezuela and Cuba during the elections to produce landslide victories for Maduro and Chavez. The whistleblower alledgedly was involved in the process of designing the software, and saw the manipulation of votes in real time. Powell also said that "the CIA was fully aware of this happening":

I noticed that as well and I've been wondering. Normally, when anyone in the US says 'it was China! it was the Commies!' I automatically feel very skeptical. However, I've been wrong many times so maybe there is something to it? Maybe at some upper level of the elite it doesn't really matter what color of government you have, and benefits like election-rigging are open to all governments as long as they follow certain guidelines from above? Perhaps Cuba, Venezuela and China were involved with such software marginally, but their role was emphasized by Powell because it fits quite nicely with the pro-Trump narrative? Also, that would stress the point that there was FOREIGN intervention in the elections, which would make the matter even more serious.

I have a personal anecdote that tells me there may be some truth to what she says. I have a friend from childhood who has become quite successful in the technology industry in Mexico, so much so that during a previous presidency (before left-leaning AMLO came to power) he was hired as a consultant on techie matters for the government. He told me that government officials were considering the use of election software that was used and/or made in Venezuela, or some alternative software. Since my friend doesn't like Maduro, he quite vehemently told them that it was a very bad idea, that he didn't think anyone should trust anything coming from Venezuela or 'that idiot' (Maduro) who surely rigged his elections, etc. No one said anything when he voiced his concerns, but later, with no apparent reason, two gentlemen approached him and introduced themeselves as CISEN (the equivalent of the CIA) agents, and said something that made my friend feel that they were quite clearly letting him know that he was being watched and he better keep his mouth shut, which he did. In other words, according to my friend, the Mexican government of the time, which was NOT left-leaning, wanted to purchase the election software from Venezuela before any other alternative, which is rather strange. Of course this is just anecdotal and hearsay, so lets not take it too seriously.

 

[Gwelan (too)]

Throughout history, the majority of governments did not have a constitution and the people were the state's property. This is the true meaning of American exceptionalism.

I am afraid that your patriotic enthusiasm may lead you to utter historical untruths. It cannot be said that throughout history, the majority of governments did not have constitutions and that people were the property of the state. Civilization was not born in 1787, and the constitution of the United States, like that of France, is based on more than 2000 years of texts which, although they were not systematically called "constitution", were nonetheless founding texts that established the rules of the state and the rights and duties of each individual. People were therefore not the property of the state.

Athens already had a constitution in the 6th century B.C. And this greatly inspired Roman law, from which the Salic law was inspired as early as the 4th century in France and subsequently in most European monarchies. So I'm afraid there's not really any American exceptionalism in the sense that you mean.

 

[Heather]

I watched that segment and I thought Tucker was just being cautious, and I sympathize because I feel the same. I would LOVE to see Sideny Powell 'release the Kraken' as she says, but I've been disappointed of amazing things NOT happening in the end in the field of politics or the global scene way too many times. If she does have the evidence, then let her present her and we can all enjoy that show. Until that happens, we can comment on the fact that she says she has it without committing to evidence we haven't seen yet, which is what Tucker did. Also, Tucker has a show every night of the week, so he may still interview Powell one of these days.

I also watched his segment on 'dead voters' and I thought it was quite good. He didn't focus on a single example, but on several. It doesn't seem to me that he is minimizing the fraud issue - just being cautious, as I said, based on what we know so far.

My problem, though, is that he has brought no sense of "scale" to the issue. He covers other topics like Big Tech with far more "connecting the dots" ingenuity. I don't believe it's just that he's being cautious.

And he doesn't do any reporting on the various court cases now in play. Nothing on that. At all.

Dan Bongino, for example, brings a great deal of detail to his analysis. He has a daily show, and has been going over the situation layer by layer. The stats playing out defy just all probability, to begin with. And with some due diligence as a reporter, all that can be laid out factually. But you see nothing on that front on Tucker's show.

Every time I saw Tucker do the "sampling" of dead people voting scenarios (which is nothing new, by the way) it just made me more and more pissed off since in doing so he's indicating that this is just the same kind of voter fraud that we've always seen and known about. Nothing to really see here, in other words. Go back to sleep. And certainly the paltry numbers he's discussing with this line item doesn't come close to explaining the enormity of the voter fraud at issue.

Without information disclosing the "massive" scope and multi-state complexity of the problem, his reporting on this is just a repeat of what the MSM is doing, which is to state that there is no real evidence of wrongdoing.

Trump, by the way, given his executive order of 2018 re: foreign interference in elections may be in the position to bring that bear in this situation given the Dominion server is allegedly housed in Germany. So, there is just so much that's brewing here, and you would never have that understanding if you were relying on Tucker for the story.

 

[Heather]

My problem, though, is that he has brought no sense of "scale" to the issue. He covers other topics like Big Tech with far more "connecting the dots" ingenuity. I don't believe it's just that he's being cautious.

And he doesn't do any reporting on the various court cases now in play. Nothing on that. At all.

Dan Bongino, for example, brings a great deal of detail to his analysis. He has a daily show, and has been going over the situation layer by layer. The stats playing out defy just all probability, to begin with. And with some due diligence as a reporter, all that can be laid out factually. But you see nothing on that front on Tucker's show.

Every time I saw Tucker do the "sampling" of dead people voting scenarios (which is nothing new, by the way) it just made me more and more pissed off since in doing so he's indicating that this is just the same kind of voter fraud that we've always seen and known about. Nothing to really see here, in other words. Go back to sleep. And certainly the paltry numbers he's discussing with this line item doesn't come close to explaining the enormity of the voter fraud at issue.

Without information disclosing the "massive" scope and multi-state complexity of the problem, his reporting on this is just a repeat of what the MSM is doing, which is to state that there is no real evidence of wrongdoing.

Trump, by the way, given his executive order of 2018 re: foreign interference in elections may be in the position to bring that bear in this situation given the Dominion server is allegedly housed in Germany. So, there is just so much that's brewing here, and you would never have that understanding if you were relying on Tucker for the story.

The thing is, I've been watching Tucker's show diligently, night after night, for months now. Not that I like everything he does. I even find him naive, or at least acting as if he's naive, which maybe helps him duck certain complexities that the MSM wouldn't want him to look at. But all that pales when compared with the fact that now -- when everything is riding on it -- he is backing away from covering, in all its largess and complexity, "the" crucial story of the biggest voter fraud in our nation's history.

Oh, and then he states that Fox is expanding his show. My God.

 

[mabar]

Live, quite interesting

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=3680550498663988&id=326683984410

 

[Ocean]

​

Yes, those 'glitches' are from the same software that made Venezuela's elections so free and fair​

Yes, those 'glitches' are from the same software that made Venezuela's elections so free and fair

We received a lengthy letter from Dominion's defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements. Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their reques...

www.americanthinker.com

Recommend reading the whole article at the link.

That Venezuela smell was back in U.S. election news when the press reported that a voting machine 'glitch' flipped some 6,000 votes cast for President Trump to Joe Biden in Michigan.

Hadn't we heard that story before? Flipped votes in computer systems? The last time we heard about that was in Venezuela's 2004 fraud-plagued recall referendum on then-President Hugo Chavez. Millions and millions of Venezuelans marched in the streets against him , and then when the recall referendum was held, it failed hugely, something that seemed very strange given the size of the crowds. That was the fiasco that official election observer Jimmy Carter praised so highly as free and fair "despite what went on in the totalization room" according to the Carter Center report. After that, computer scientists from Amherst, Stanford, U.C. Santa Cruz, Johns Hopkins, and Harvard all found evidence of vote flipping statistically speaking. Besides their conclusions that it was a statistical impossibility, a well-known pollster, Penn, Schoen & Berland, taking exit polls at the same referendum found that 60% were in favor of throwing Chavez out, and 40% favored keeping him. Much to his surprise, the scorecard came out in almost the exact reverse, 58-42. Flipped.

And there are machines that flip votes. It's one reason why many, such as Instapundit's Glenn Reynolds, thinks only a return to paper ballots and in-person voting will restore confidence in flawed electoral systems.

According to this fascinating thread of apparently conservative coders and engineers, the sense is that the fraud wasn't directly written into the code, which would have been easy to detect. More likely, it was embedded into the compiler, deep into the back-end of the computer program. They wrote:

EastBlocSurplus 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0

I think it’s unlikely to be hidden in a human-readable language like Java, C, Perl, C++, etc. almost anybody could read that and point it out. I think it’s much more likely that any incipiencies would be hidden in a compiler (perhaps to reassign addition operations to adjust by some fraction), assembly/machine code, or the chip itself. Very few people in industry would want to open Pandora’s box to inspect those elements, even fewer would be qualified/able to inspect.

and this too:

–zerofoo 1 point 5 hours ago +1 / -0
Easy to test. Feed the counting software various known quantities of votes and check against the computed counts.

Same way weights and measures departments test gas pumps for tampering. They pull random amounts of fuel from the pumps, weigh them and check against the pump meter.

This should be easy to discover. We need to secure the counting machines now.

parent permalink save report block reply
–EastBlocSurplus 1 point 3 hours ago +1 / -0
If I were in the business of creating fraudulent election machines, I’d make the fraud dependent on the date. You could see months in advance that counts on November 3rd or 4th would be the ones to be falsified. So if you’re a fraudster designing a counting system, and someone is counting ballots a week later, then it’s probably a test or recount and the machine should give the true number while Biden relies on the media to shutdown or ignore recount. Assigning this omnipotence and foresight to developers and engineers is 100% a slippery slope, but if we could see it coming then the chances are that they could too. That’s why Trump is so devastating to the career politicians: corruption works best when people do what you expect them to. At the moment, the media expects right wing violence to cover up an honest investigation so we cannot give them the distraction they need.

parent permalink save report block reply
–Deeprasmith 3 points 1 day ago +3 / -0
Probably the instructions are embedded at chip level like opcodes inside CPU. It gets activated via Internet. They have found router with Internet access attached to those machines.

parent permalink save report block reply
–RegularAmerican 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0
The machines worked just as intended.

parent permalink save report block reply
–publ1us 1 point 1 day ago +1 / -0
There are bugs but they definitely don't look like this and they get their contracts cancelled rather than used by 30/50 states.

As Andrea Widburg noted in her excellent piece here, the company name for these vote-flipping machines, is named Dominion.

And guess what: They're using the same technology as Smartmatic, the mysterious Venezuelan company that blew in from nowhere with a gargantuan contract to count the Venezuelan votes, starting with that flawed recall referendum. In fact, the companies, via the intermediary subsidiary Sequoia, used to be the same. According to Wikipedia:

After losing money for several years, on March 8, 2005, Sequoia was acquired by Smartmatic, a multi-national technology company which had developed advanced election systems, voting machines included. Thereafter Smartmatic assigned a major portion of its development and managerial teams, dedicated to revamping some of Sequoia's old-fashioned, legacy voting machines, and replacing their technology with avant-garde proprietary features and developments, which resulted in new, high-tech products. As a result, Sequoia sold many new-generation election products and experienced a healthy financial resurrection during the fiscal years of 2006 and 2007. However, in November 2007, following a verdict by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), Smartmatic was ordered to sell Sequoia, which it did to its Sequoia managers having U.S. citizenship.[11]

And here, from the same Wikipedia entry, is the rest of the story:

Sequoia Voting Systems was a California-based company that is one of the largest providers of electronic voting systems in the U.S., having offices in Oakland, Denver and New York City. Some of its major competitors were Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold Election Systems) and Election Systems & Software.
It was acquired by the Canadian company Dominion Voting Systems on June 4, 2010. At the time it had contracts for 300 jurisdictions in 16 states through its BPS, WinEDS, Edge, Edge2, Advantage, Insight, InsightPlus and 400C systems.[1]

So in short, Venezuelan-led Smartmatic bought U.S.-based Sequoia, put its technology into Sequoia, and then sold it to Dominion. Dominion denies having anything to do with Smartmatic now, though at one point it allowed Smartmatic to market its same technology abroad in places where Dominion didn't do business (they got into a lawsuit over Puerto Rico), but the bottom line is that the technology is all the same because it was all the same company.