Steven Crowders synopsis on what's going on with Tucker Carlson:
Crowder offers here a good history and critique of "all things Tucker Carlson," especially how Carlson has changed, at times dramatically, depending on what network he is on. It's not that he dislikes Carlson, either; he's even worked with him at Fox, and so knows him personally. At the same time, he's not shy about airing his criticisms. As to Tucker's changing identities, Crowder even distinguishes between Fox's Trump era Tucker Carlson, and the now "Post-Trump" Tucker Carlson. Regarding the latter, he mentions Tucker Carlson's uncalled for attack of Sidney Powell, and does a very good assessment of that. However, he doesn't mention Carlson's refusal to cover anything further on Election Fraud 2020. But then he's already conceding that we're in a "Post-Trump" era, so I guess that would make sense.
But back on the topic of Election Fraud 2020: I've been consistently checking in with the Tucker Carlson show to see if the tide is changing at all given the various events that have been taking place -- the two press conferences on voter fraud, for example (most recently the one in Gettysburg), and now the Arizona hearing on Monday, and the Michigan Senate hearing of yesterday, both on election irregularities, and both airing substantial "evidence" of egregious election and voter fraud having taken place.
You know, when you're looking for a specific type of coverage in one news show, as I have been doing with the Tucker Carlson show regarding election fraud, you start to notice how
the suppression of such an important story is downright deafening. I mean, do he and his producers honestly think no one's noticing?
One wonders too, if Trump were to upset all mainstream media expectations and somehow prevail in this, what a Tucker Carlson would do in response. It's their surety that such a turn of events could "never" happen that one finds rather curious. After all, the MSM should still be wiping the egg off their faces from Trump's "miraculous" victory of four years ago given how it stupefyingly caught them unawares. Of course, it is true that things are different now. Where the Clinton team mistakenly thought that the fix they had in would suffice for victory, this time Biden & Co. obviously understood the need to expand such operation considerably. What was it the demented presidential candidate let slip out by accident?
In Biden's own words, he noted how his campaign had assembled
"the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics." [Breitbart]
So, okay. Biden slip-ups aside, the MSM maybe has more reason to be confident in their collusive deception this time around. And yet you would still think that a supposed supporter/constructive critic of Trump, as Tucker Carlson has shown himself to be, might at the very least venture to discuss the very real "newsworthy" legal battle the sitting president of the United States is currently waging.
What does Carlson do instead?
On Monday night, not only does he not say anything about the Arizona hearing on voting irregularities of that very day, he colludes with the Stanly Kubrick inspired disinfo re: the "monoliths" appearing/disappearing first in Utah, then in Romania (as is already being commented on on its own thread at this forum). But the point is, THAT obvious bit of UFO related fraud Carlson just gobbles up whole, with no evidence at all of its legitimacy, whereas Election Fraud 2020? Not as compelling, apparently, "evidence" wise. No, just hours and hours of statisticians and computer experts, and sworn-in testimony of hundreds of eye witnesses. But since there were no monoliths magically appearing in the polling places: nothing from Tucker Carlson.
Oh, something Carlson did "sneak in" Monday night regarding the subject of election fraud: a guest commentator, independent journalist Glen Greenwald, in his scathing critique of what sounds like Biden's least qualified, and dangerously erratic (personal behavior wise) appointments -- Neera Tandem, whom Biden nominated to head the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), one of the heftier White House positions -- Greenwald describes one of Tandem's craziest assertions: that Hillary lost the 2016 election due to Russian hackers hacking into the U.S. electoral system's voting machines, and
transferring votes from Hillary to Trump. The highly animated Greenwald described this as just the most outrageous conspiracy theory ever. And yet, in his extremely derisive condemnation of Tandem and her theory, what stands out in the context I have been describing in this post -- the context of Carlson ignoring entirely the factual evidence pointing to this VERY SAME type of computer-related election fraud --
Carlson is indirectly condemning, once again (given his treatment of Powell) even the possibility that this type of election fraud is even remotely possible.
That's what crossed my mind the moment Greenwald made his sneering condemnation of Tandem's "conspiracy theory." In that moment, it seemed abundantly clear to me that this is how Tucker can have his cake and eat it too: without even having to bring up the subject of Dominion, and Smartmatic related voter fraud in this election, he is able to deride even its feasibility -- since Greenwald's blanket condemnation didn't bother parsing out the fact that such technology does exist; and even if it's preposterous to suggest that this is why Hillary lost the 2016 election, we now know that the transferring of votes from one candidate to the other via such computer software is not just a very real possibility, but is one of the most viable explanations of how the Biden crew was able to reverse the vote in the course of the night after Trump's substantial win just hours before.
[sigh]
Meanwhile, Tucker's Tuesday night show didn't even have an
indirect mention of Election Fraud 2020. No, no mention of the Senate hearing in Michigan on voting irregularities of just that day. So, he seems to be confidently moving on from all that, uh, "noise," I guess he'd call it.
I have to say, though, that listening to Michigan's line-up of personal testimony yesterday was rather stunning. What struck me most was the now familiar, insidious mindset at work among the Democrats and their operatives. I mean, how many times have we seen in the last half year BLM/Antifa activists brazenly treating people inhumanely and viciously? Similarly, as came out in most of the testimonials yesterday, what was happening in Michigan was that the whole "process" was embedded with professional agitators whose hostile and aggressive, sometimes personal attacks were intended to intimidate GOP poll observers into submission. In one person's testimony, the person described how these "professional agitators" made an appearance the moment a GOP observer attempted to do his/her job in contesting a ballot. It was at those moments that the agitators would move in and start in with the intimidation tactics. Such aggressive tactics were being employed by Democrat lawyers, supervisors and election workers, many of whom had been flown in from California, interestingly enough.
I had this hearing playing for hours yesterday, and so I witnessed in real time the hours and hours of testimony that very consistently portrayed this hostile environment -- most of it related to the TCF Center, the convention center in downtown Detroit where Wayne County votes were being counted. And while the factual evidence of voter fraud being presented was extremely helpful to hear in trying to understand just how this election was stolen in both substantial (numbers wise), and seemingly minor ways (although not minor when you realize that each minor detail was part of a thoroughly systematized operation that was itself massive in scale), what made the strongest impression on me was this hostile, even vicious behavior/mindset being described, again and again, by these eye witnesses.
It saddens me to think that in creating this "Trump monster" the MSM and its insidious puppet masters were able to socially engineer a populace so deadened to the truth -- the truth about themselves, even, given their immoral behavior -- that they would be willing to throw away any measure of human decency and honesty and just plain courtesy. It's an ugly thing to have to witness. It's also the type of behavior that Tucker Carlson compellingly condemns in so many of his segments... only, not this time. No, this time, "mum's the word."
