The title is "The Idea of History" and it's by R. G. Collingwood. It is essentially about "the philosophy of history", but it is so much more than that. In order to formulate and present his "idea of history", Collingwood has to examine quite breath-takingly, the processes of the MIND and how thought actually works and so forth. There are startling passages where he is obviously describing what Gurdjieff called "self-remembering" (not a surprise in a book about history) and the clarity it gives to the topic is really amazing.
The first half of the book is a history of the idea of history and this is important too because it shows how history is pretty much the story of the development of mind and thinking. It is needed background, every step of the way, to finally get to the big exposition in the second half of the book.
Collingwood writes clearly and simply though he does sprinkle in some short quotes in Greek here and there. Not much and can be skimmed over. He uses very simple examples and analogies even including Agatha Christie stories and characters. Some of his arguments certainly sail pretty close to the wind of esoterica.
I would say that this is one of the most important books I've read in quite awhile. Definitely a must get and read!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._G._Collingwood ... where there is a rather weak-sauce description of his ideas:
The first half of the book is a history of the idea of history and this is important too because it shows how history is pretty much the story of the development of mind and thinking. It is needed background, every step of the way, to finally get to the big exposition in the second half of the book.
Collingwood writes clearly and simply though he does sprinkle in some short quotes in Greek here and there. Not much and can be skimmed over. He uses very simple examples and analogies even including Agatha Christie stories and characters. Some of his arguments certainly sail pretty close to the wind of esoterica.
I would say that this is one of the most important books I've read in quite awhile. Definitely a must get and read!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._G._Collingwood ... where there is a rather weak-sauce description of his ideas:
Collingwood is widely noted for The Idea of History (1946), a work collated from various sources soon after his death by his pupil T. M. Knox. It came to be a major inspiration for philosophy of history in the English-speaking world and is extensively cited, leading commentator Louis Mink to ironically remark that Collingwood is coming to be "the best known neglected thinker of our time".[6]
Collingwood held that history could not be studied in the same way as natural science because the internal thought processes of historical persons could not be perceived with the physical senses, and past historical events could not be directly observed. He suggested that a historian must "reconstruct" history by using "historical imagination" to "re-enact" the thought processes of historical persons based on information and evidence from historical sources.
Collingwood pointed out a fundamental difference between knowing things in the present (or in the natural sciences) and knowing history. To come to know things in the present or about things in the natural sciences, “real” things can be observed, as they are in existence or that have substance right now.
The problem with coming to know things about history is that while past human actions actually or really happened, they took place in the past. The actions, then, have no real existence or substance at the point in time that the historian is studying them. Based on the understanding that the events and actions that historians study have already happened, they are finished and so cannot actually be observed. Collingwood maintained that historians must use their imaginations to reconstruct and understand the past. Because human events that have already taken place cannot be observed, he argued that they must be imagined.