Sometimes I can understand why the general population keeps going along seemingly oblivious to all that's transpiring around them. When even someone who is clued in encounters the latest shocking revelation of actual truth, it's just so over the top that's it's hard to process mentally/emotionally. A recent revelation that still makes me dizzy - from
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/09/14/virus-fakery-my-conversation-with-a-virologist/ :
There are a number of cases in which a virus is said to be the cause of a disease—but the evidence doesn’t stand up.
I first realized this in 1987. I was writing my book, AIDS INC., Scandal of the Century.
Robert Gallo, who claimed he had found the cause of AIDS, hadn’t done proper work. From everything I read, he had discovered HIV in 35 to 60 percent of AIDS patients he had studied.
He should have been able to isolate HIV in virtually every patient.
Then there was the fact that the most popular tests for HIV, the Elisa and Western Blot, were fatally flawed. They could register positive for a whole host of reasons that had nothing to do with HIV.
And no one had found sufficient quantities of HIV in humans to justify claiming it caused any kind of illness.
My own research into the so-called high-risk groups revealed that the immune suppression in those groups could be explained by factors other than a virus.
(Note: All my research at that time assumed HIV existed. Since then,
several researchers, including the Perth Group, have made compelling arguments that the existence of HIV was never demonstrated.)
And the following article fleshes this all out in great detail -
Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis -- Sott.net :
This article is taken from a talk I gave on HIV/AIDS at the 33rd annual meeting of the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness in Ontario, California last week (some of the slides that I used for this talk are put in here). It is based on a commentary I wrote titled "A Fallacy of Modern Medicine: the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis." [1] As I will show, this fallacy has done a great injustice to people who happen to test positive for HIV, to gay men in particular. It has caused the deaths of many thousands of these young men, becoming what one might call a homosexual holocaust.
In July 1982, the name "Gay-Related Immune Deficiency" (GRID) went down the Orwellian memory hole, to be replaced with "AIDS," acquired immune deficiency syndrome. The CDC published a list of 12 AIDS-defining diseases, shown here, consisting of various opportunistic infections and cancer. It is now known that Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia is caused by a fungus, and Kaposi's Sarcoma is not a cancer.
A particular herpes virus causes it.
These are all old diseases affecting people that have become immunocompromised. Moritz Kaposi described the supposed sarcoma named after him in 1872, and two Dutch investigators first described Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, also now called Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, in 1942, documented in 2 infants and a 21 year old adult.
At a press conference on April 23, 1984, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), Margaret Heckler, announced that a virus "is the probable cause of AIDS"—a retrovirus, which came to be named HIV (human immunodeficiency virus); along with 2 more things: that a "new process has been developed to mass produce the virus"; and we now have a blood test that "can identify AIDS victims with essentially 100% certainty."
HIV/AIDS came into existence by government fiat. The secretary of HHS announced this germ cause of AIDS before any studies had been published about it.
Also that day, virologist Robert Gallo, who some call the father of science by press release, submitted a patent for his HIV "antibody blood test," bringing him millions of dollars in royalties.
Gay leaders abandoned the multifactorial risk hypothesis of AIDS. If caused by a sexually transmitted virus, then AIDS is "everybody's disease," also affecting heterosexual men and women. AIDS is not prejudiced, it can kill anyone.
In this current era of gay liberation, pointing a finger at the lifestyle of homosexual men raises sensitivities. Better to go with the "no blame, virus from hell" cause of AIDS.
AIDS investigator Joan Shenton puts it this way:
"Once HIV was accepted as the cause of AIDS by the majority of gay men, a certain sense of relief entered their lives. They had seen many of their lovers and closest friends waste away before their eyes. Now they could grieve for them, knowing that HIV, this strange, novel virus, said to have come from Africa, had caused the death of their loved one... Anyone challenging the accepted viral cause of death was deeply resented, and quickly labelled homophobic. That was sacrilege."
The human immunodeficiency virus was no longer called just HIV, it became "HIV, the virus that causes AIDS," and today, simply, "HIV/AIDS."
In 1987 the CDC revised its list of AIDS diseases, now totaling 25.
The CDC added four more AIDS-indicator diseases to its list in 1992. Now you could be perfectly healthy and still have AIDS if you were found to be HIV+ and your T-cell lymphocyte count was below a certain level. Pulmonary tuberculosis was added. If you have tuberculosis and are HIV- you have tuberculosis, if you have tuberculosis and are HIV+, then you have AIDS. The CDC added cervical cancer to the list, perhaps as a way to increase the number of women having AIDS, since men continued to comprise 90 percent of all AIDS victims.
With the addition of a low T-cell count, 61 percent of all new cases of AIDS are now healthy people with no disease.
AZT (zidovudine, azidothymidine, Retrovir) was the first drug the FDA approved, in 1987, for treating people who are HIV+.
Critics now know that its approval was based on fraudulent research, on trials that became unblinded and were terminated prematurely. This drug was first employed for cancer chemotherapy but proved to be too toxic and oncologists stopped using it.
The patient cited on this slide, although healthy, took AZT after he was found to be HIV +. Intolerable side-effects made him stop taking it two years later. He then developed a lymphoma and died.
It turns out that people who take AZT for 3 years have a 46.4 percent probability of developing lymphoma.
In the period 1988 through 1996, there were 235,000 recorded AIDS deaths.
AZT caused more than 96 percent of these deaths, with 140,000 deaths occurring in HIV+ young gay men, 20-44 years old.
I had what one might call an elite education at Dartmouth and Harvard and then surgical residency training at three hospitals affiliated with Columbia University. Then I moved to Seattle and joined the surgical faculty at the University of Washington School of Medicine. But like my colleagues there, and is the case with most doctors, I lived in a knowledge cocoon, mine wrapped around adult heart surgery; and I did not question the received wisdom that a virus causes AIDS. I read little about it and accepted what our infectious disease specialists told us to do if you should get pricked by a needle or cut by a knife operating on an HIV+ patient. When I performed heart surgery on an HIV+ patient, I'd put on two pairs of gloves and the surgical team would be extra careful handling needles and knives.
This changed in 1996 when my wife and I went to our favorite bookstore in Seattle and heard Peter Duesberg, Professor of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California, Berkley, talk about his new book Inventing the AIDS Virus. I bought a copy and read it. It was a real eye-opener.
Dr. Duesberg shows that the germ theory AIDS fails a key test. That is Koch's four postulates for identifying the causative agent of a particular disease. First, the germ causing the disease must be found
in all cases of the disease. But not with HIV.
Second, as regards isolating the virus, with HIV it can't be done. Dr. Etienne de Harven, who published the first electron microscopy picture of a retrovirus (in 1960), notes,
"no one has ever observed by electron microscopy one single retroviral particle in the blood of HIV/AIDS patients."
8 percent of the human genome is composed of Human Endogenous Retroviruses (HERV),
which can be mistaken for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus.
With regard to the third and fourth postulates, blood from AIDS patients injected into chimpanzees do not give them AIDS or make them become HIV+. As for injecting drugs using dirty needles, some studies show that using clean needles is associated, not with a decreased, but with an increased likelihood of becoming HIV+.
This virus lives happily incorporated in the DNA of cultured human T cells.
It infects less than 1 in 10,000 T cells in the body and doesn't kill them.
The next stage in my education on HIV/AIDS occurred in 2003 at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness (DDP) in Phoenix, where Willie Soon gave a presentation on climate change; Howard Idso, on CO2; and David Rasnick, on the causes of AIDS.
I wrote an article for LewRockwell.com about this meeting, titled "Finding Truth in Phoenix." [5] Its conclusion reads: "The three truths discussed here, on climate change, carbon dioxide, and AIDS, share one thing in common, as do other truths found at this meeting.
They all correct flawed hypotheses and models that have resulted from government involvement in science and medicine."
Dr. Rasnick presented the findings of a key paper he wrote with Drs. Duesberg and Koehnlein published in the Journal of Biosciences titled "The Chemical Bases of the Various AIDS Epidemics: Recreational Drugs, Anti-viral Chemotherapy and Malnutrition."
These investigators show that HIV is an innocuous, passenger virus; that AIDS is not contagious and therefore is not treatable by antiviral drugs or vaccines.
At this point, 20 years into the alleged AIDS epidemic,
spreading psychological terror and toxic treatment, the "scientific truth as opposed to the politically perceived truth," as DDP's Dr. Arthur Robinson would put it, is that
a virus does not cause AIDS. Other things cause acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
Well, I think you can figure out how the rest of this article went. Just a bit more regarding the $ angle of this contrived epidemic:
"The book reminds us that although over $100 billion has been spent on AIDS research, not a single AIDS patient has been cured—a colossal failure with tragic consequences.
In 2006, Dr. Duesberg and I gave talks at a Lew Rockwell conference (titled "Be Healthy, Wealthy, and Wise") held at the Center for Libertarian Studies in Foster City, California. I didn't know it at the time, but Foster City, in the Bay Area, is the home of the politically connected pharmaceutical company Gilead,
the worldwide revenue leader in sales of HIV antiretroviral drugs, with more than $9 billion in sales in 2013. Donald Rumsfeld was chairman of Gilead when he resigned to become Secretary of Defense in 2001.
The U.S. government so far has spent $420 billion on HIV/AIDS programs and research. Even adjusted for inflation,
this is more than it spent sending a man to the moon. It is ten times more than the $40 billion the U.S. government has spent on climate science since 1992.
With HIV care, antiretroviral drugs cost between 17,000 and 21,000 dollars per patient per year. The CEO of Gilead, John Martin, is paid $50 M a year, which makes him one of the top ten highest compensated CEOs in America.
This is a classic case of Crony Corporatism meets Bureaucratic Junk Science. Regarding pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV, investigative reporter Terry Michaels writes:
"Tens of millions of mostly taxpayer dollars were squandered in behalf of Gilead, so the drug company could reap potential billions in new revenues, by exposing untold number of HIV negatives [people] to toxic chemotherapy."
Plus, let's not forget the horrific toll AIDS took in Africa - NOT!
In 2009, Peter Duesberg and coauthors submitted a paper titled "HIV-AIDS Hypothesis Out of Touch With S. African AIDS - A New Perspective" to the journal Medical Hypotheses.
It critiques a Harvard study which estimated 330,000 S. African AIDS deaths occurred each year in the period 2000-2005 (no actual count took place) that could have been prevented by antiretroviral drugs. Duesberg etal. show that rather than decrease, the Sub-Saharan African population has markedly increased,
from 400 million in 1980 to 800 million in 2007, and up to 1.1 billion in 2013.
In Uganda, where 15 percent of Ugandan men are HIV+, overpopulation has become a central concern.
The population there has tripled during the AIDS era, increasing from 12 million in 1980 to 37 million in 2013.
Geez, no wonder Bill Gates is in such a tizzy! Quick - roll out the 'life saving' vaccines w/ covert birth control pronto!
I don't know your age, but being a baby boomer, the HIV/AIDS threat was a significant occurence in my life and the source of a lot of hysteria. It remains to be seen if the fear of unvaccinated kids mingling w/ those who have been will reach the same level of crazy that the HIV/AIDS fear of contagion engendered.
I also was exposed to the whole polio fear threat as well. Those pictures of children in the iron lungs scared the crap out of me! And scared a lot of parents as well I'm sure. And that's why we all showed up in total compliance - on two separate occasions - to get our dose of the oral polio vaccine on the sugar cube. Imagine my shock on learning that I and millions of others could have gotten a little add on - Simian Virus 40!
From
Cancer risk associated with simian virus 40 contaminated polio vaccine. - PubMed - NCBI :
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there may be
an increased incidence of certain cancers among the 98 million persons exposed to contaminated polio vaccine in the U.S.
It's been speculated that Lyme disease was let loose on the public from a military facility in Conneticut. Could all that anthrax/plague virus mistakenly shipped to labs also end up as components of mandatory vaccines or just simply let loose upon the population?
Based on the above, it wouldn't be that hard to imagine.
