12,000 year old annunaki king that was discovered in 2008 completely in tact?

goyacobol said:
iam,

If you noticed the reading list and were able to absorb some of the concepts in that material, that would give you more of an idea of why some of us think the way we do. I am not trying to pressure you or discourage you from asking questions or being interested in anything that you find interesting.

Honestly, for some it might no be so easy to find the video that you described. That is the main reason I mentioned providing a little more detail so others can get on the same page as you are.

It is a simple concept of trying to put yourself in the other persons shoes so to speak. It is not that I found your question inappropriate or irrelevant. There is no particular rule in exactly how to post a question. It just helps all of us to give as much detail as we can when others may not be familiar with the subject we are asking about. Actually the "moon woman" video is one that I had seen in various videos and found kind of haunting in the way it described the apparatus connected to her brain.

But, as Aeneas mentioned there is not much solid evidence to go on for that video so far. That doesn't mean you can't keep researching it and share what you find.

Searching, finding and sharing is a lot of what this forum is about I think.


i totally understand and agree with your suggestion and will move forward in the fashion that you suggested. it seems to make more sense to do that :-[ . I didn't know it was a requirement to add a link with a question which I thought you were implying. i'm so sorry for the misunderstanding and lack of etiquette.

i admit i did not research it, i had a simple conversation with my friend about it and thought i'd share the topic on the forum to get somebody else's perspective on it to see if it moved me enough to further my research.

thank you for making me aware of this and taking the time out to share your thoughts about it :)
 
iam said:
i admit i did not research it, i had a simple conversation with my friend about it and thought i'd share the topic on the forum to get somebody else's perspective on it to see if it moved me enough to further my research.

thank you for making me aware of this and taking the time out to share your thoughts about it :)

So, you were going to save YOUR time and not be concerned about the time of others? And those others should spend their time because you were mildly curious?
 
Laura said:
iam said:
i admit i did not research it, i had a simple conversation with my friend about it and thought i'd share the topic on the forum to get somebody else's perspective on it to see if it moved me enough to further my research.

thank you for making me aware of this and taking the time out to share your thoughts about it :)

So, you were going to save YOUR time and not be concerned about the time of others? And those others should spend their time because you were mildly curious?


that is ONE way to perceive it ....
 
iam said:
Laura said:
iam said:
i admit i did not research it, i had a simple conversation with my friend about it and thought i'd share the topic on the forum to get somebody else's perspective on it to see if it moved me enough to further my research.

thank you for making me aware of this and taking the time out to share your thoughts about it :)

So, you were going to save YOUR time and not be concerned about the time of others? And those others should spend their time because you were mildly curious?


that is ONE way to perceive it ....
This is the main way to see it and I highlighted that part which conveyed that message.

If you didn't mean it to be perceived that way, then you might have to rethink and reread what you write before posting.
 
iam said:
i admit i did not research it, i had a simple conversation with my friend about it and thought i'd share the topic on the forum to get somebody else's perspective on it to see if it moved me enough to further my research.

thank you for making me aware of this and taking the time out to share your thoughts about it :)

So, you were going to save YOUR time and not be concerned about the time of others? And those others should spend their time because you were mildly curious?
[/quote]


that is ONE way to perceive it ....
[/quote]
This is the main way to see it and I highlighted that part which conveyed that message.

If you didn't mean it to be perceived that way, then you might have to rethink and reread what you write before posting.

[/quote]



information can be perceived different ways based on ones conditioning or knowledge base. i'm not sure how you are perceiving what i wrote, but i wrote it in a way that would allow many perceptions to answer it... that's why it was posed as a question. usually on forums where people SHARE knowledge (no matter how minute or grand it is), you occasionally have people who come on board that don't have all of the answers or who are lost. so they come to NETWORK and get answers from people who may know more about a topic that they don't have the answers too. i didn't know i had to have all of the answers when I ask questions.

but maybe you are right, i should rethink and reread what questions i ask about topics that i don't have any knowledge on.. (which i thought i did) ...
I had curiosity about a topic and thought i could come on here where the "experts" are to get some guidance on it. and to which i actually did get help.


but i appreciate your insightful advice and it is duly noted .... :) :)
 
Back
Top Bottom