2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

[JEEP]

You would have known if you'd done a quick check, like I did, before posting it here. By quick, I mean 2 minutes tops!

[Note: I see it's been posted he's in a rental and not his personal pictures]

When I first saw this I thought 'oh, that's photoshopped in', but as you can see from the images, the second one has the camera view moved right (away from the fireplace/Mao pic) and the space from the picture on the opposite wall appeared to be the same, so I thought it was legit.

I've now spent more than 2 minutes and I'm not finding this second view (sans creepy pic). Went to Foxnews and that interview isn't up anymore - used search and nothing recent coming up (did note he was fired for sex misconduct though). Googled and found where he was part of 4-way conversation that appears to be the above - but not seeing the wider angle that would show the far wall w/o the photoshopped pic, just this:



Only found this:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1349888392406962176

So the above does show that second angle on the right, but its cropped off. So that view must exist but I'm not finding it.

Definitely important not to post bogus stuff and I'm glad you were quickly able to determine it was fake. My internet sleuthing skills need work but I did post in good faith.

 

[Metrist]

I avoided the drama of this election since the election day, but I've been thinking about how politicians cooperate while pretending to be adversarial.
In recent times - like since the 90's - when the internet became popular, people began to recognise the two party politics as dysfunctional, and hungered for a 3rd option in politics.
And so you had popular alternatives that were dismissed by the mainstream. And people who hungered for change had their hopes dashed. And this became a growing tide every election, and the two party system increasingly suspect as it's mode of operation only escalated in both parties deflecting blame towards each other for even more dysfunction.
And so, they needed to quell this political uprising, and to do it, they needed a 3rd party who identified with popular ideals, gave it momentum, then pulled it after harnessing the hopes of people, and in a unfair fashion to further the demoralization and make people think a 3rd option only gives weight to the other side.
And, as America has a lot of Christians, it makes sense to stage a populist uprising, then as the populist leader is either in on it, or a useful idiot, this leader is 'crucified'. In modern terms, of course. And this is a continuous method based on the Christian narrative - the bad guys win, and the good guys turn the other cheek. It is ingrained in the general populace as it identifies with the Christian beliefs, or are influenced by Christianity.
So, Trump gets elected despite his mannerisms, and because Hillary was more despised. What did we get? We got Trump, but we also got 4 years of shootings, fires, riots, political extremism, covid-19, ect. It was to make example of what happens outside the 2 party control structure. And since he actually held office, his downfall, or crucifixion, was in the chaos stirred up during his term.
And covid is the final degree to which the political establishment would go to uphold their control. And this can allow for the introduction of biological warfare on its own populace, select dissenting voices and diagnose them as afflicted, ect. It has gone from taking a Christian effigy and crucifying it in ceremony, to a threat of biological warfare upon its own populace, while hiding behind a benevolent guise that most don't believe, but it scares people. And people conform - not because they believe the covid threat as it is portrayed, but know it is a veiled threat to maintain control.

 

[Jasophoria]

Based on what? I see loads of guns in all these pictures. Where is the source they're confiscating ammo?
That makes zero sense.

If this is real, their voter fraud might just bite them in the ass. If there are any votes they've changed from Trump to Biden, they think it's a Biden supporters, while they're on Trump's side, lol

 

[Yupo]

I posted this on the Qanon thread earlier, but thought this was also revelane to post on this thread, thought it was appropriate, given what is being revealed regarding the recent so called riots in washington DC.

It's from a website called Swiss Policy Research

“Q Anon” May Have Been an FBI Psyop A recent Reuters investigation may indicate that “Q Anon” was in fact an FBI cyber psyop.​

Published: January 2021

“Q Anon” May Have Been an FBI Psyop​

A man holding up a “Q” sign at a rally of Trump supporters.
Published: January 2021

A recent Reuters investigation may indicate that “Q Anon” was in fact an FBI cyber psyop.

The “Q Anon” phenomenon has generally been regarded as a hoax or prank, originated by online message board users in late October 2017, that got out of control. The “Q Anon” persona was preceded by similar personae, including “FBI anon”, “CIA anon” and “White House insider anon”.

“Q Anon” originally called himself “Q clearance patriot”. Former CIA counterintelligence operative Kevin M. Shipp explained that an actual “Q clearance leaker” – i.e. someone possessing the highest security clearance at the US Department of Energy, required to access top secret nuclear weapons information – would have been identified and removed within days.

However, in November 2020 Reuters reported that the very first social media accounts to promote the “Q Anon” persona were allegedly “linked to Russia” and even “backed by the Russian government”. For instance, the very first Twitter account to ever use the term “Q Anon” on social media had previously “retweeted obscure Russian officials”, according to Reuters.

These alleged “Russian social media accounts”, posing as accounts of American patriots, were in contact with politically conservative US YouTubers and drew their attention to the “Q Anon” persona. This is how, in early November 2017, the “Q Anon” movement took off.

But given the recent revelations by British investigator David J. Blake – who for the first time was able to conclusively show, at the technical level, that the “Russian hacking” operation was a cyber psyop run by the FBI and FBI cyber security contractor CrowdStrike – the Reuters report may in fact indicate that “Q Anon” was neither a hoax nor “Russian”, but another FBI psychological cyber operation.

Of note, US cyber intelligence firm New Knowledge, founded by former NSA and DARPA employees and tasked by the US Senate Intelligence Committee, in 2018, with investigating alleged “Russian social media operations” relating to the 2016 US presidential election, was itself caught faking a “Russian social media botnet” in order to influence the 2017 Alabama senate race.

If the “Q Anon” persona – similar to the Guccifer2.0 “Russian hacker” persona played by an FBI cyber security contractor – was indeed an FBI psychological operation, its goal may have been to take control of, discredit and ultimately derail the supporter base of US President Trump. In this case, the “Q Anon” movement may have been a modern version of the original FBI COINTELPRO program.

​

Well, let's see what happens with the True Q Believers. If they come to believe they've been duped (and I think many of them will), there's going to be a lot of righteous anger from them against the mainstream government and the deep state. I don't think a lot of people really understand just how crooked some controlling elements of the FBI and other Alphabet Soup groups actually are. Revealing the truth of how these people were duped ought to garner sympathy for Q types and some degree of outrage about the process of government working against ordinary citizens, even in other groups. Of course, other examples are sure to surface as a whole new group of 'anons' begins to dig. I hope they come to see that they are manipulated to the same degree. Perhaps wishful thinking on my part? Hard to say what it will take to get people to snap out of their slumber, and perhaps different for everyone, but I feel it coming in my bones.
Not that soaps are real life, but many of us (boomers) watched them in early childhood by force while mommy ironed. What I learned from such fictions: All malignant manipulations of others eventually came around and bit the bad actors in the patooties in the most interesting of ways at the most interesting of times. Why would "Days Inside the Beltway" be any different? If Q is disinfo, then some of it is true. Followers are reminded that they are watching a movie. I think the disinfo bit was about trusting the plan, as that to me rings loud and clear of Savior Porn. Just my $.02

 

[sbeaudry]

If this is real, their voter fraud might just bite them in the ass. If there are any votes they've changed from Trump to Biden, they think it's a Biden supporters, while they're on Trump's side, lol

I get unloaded weapons, since it's largely for show, but CONFISCATING ammo?!? How's that gonna play out? " Ahem. Excuse me soldier but I'm gonna need that ammo." Yes, nothing engenders loyalty and trust like confiscating a soldier's ammo during an apparent threat to the capitol.
Edit: "Why me Sarge?" "You voted Trump! That's why! Now drop and give me 20... Thousand!"

 

[Jasophoria]

If this is real, their voter fraud might just bite them in the ass. If there are any votes they've changed from Trump to Biden, they think it's a Biden supporters, while they're on Trump's side, lol

I have answered the wrong post. I mean if they're going to check those NG votes.
But isn't that forbidden by the way, don't you have a private vote or something like that?

 

[sbeaudry]

I have answered the wrong post. I mean if they're going to check those NG votes.
But isn't that forbidden by the way, don't you have a private vote or something like that?

You think you have private votes, corporal? Give me that ammo!

 

[Yupo]

Enlisted military largely lean Right. God and Country types. Sworn to uphold Constitution and all that. I suspect the higher one goes up the ranks, the more one becomes accustomed to lying, to political expedience, to necessity of virtue signaling to keep the job. There are filters and ethics tests in place to be sure only the desired types make it to the very top. Once in a while someone slips past the filters, but they get rid of them when they find them, or so I think. Eventually they self-identify because of their ethics. Sometimes you'll see a whole bunch of such top tier people removed, like after Benghazi, for not following orders to stand down.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

I've now spent more than 2 minutes and I'm not finding this second view (sans creepy pic). Went to Foxnews and that interview isn't up anymore - used search and nothing recent coming up (did note he was fired for sex misconduct though). Googled and found where he was part of 4-way conversation that appears to be the above - but not seeing the wider angle that would show the far wall w/o the photoshopped pic, just this:

That second one definitely looks photoshopped to me. The painting is one of the infamous 'pizzagate'-related paintings.

 

[Deleted member 4737]

Enlisted military largely lean Right. God and Country types. Sworn to uphold Constitution and all that. I suspect the higher one goes up the ranks, the more one becomes accustomed to lying, to political expedience, to necessity of virtue signaling to keep the job. There are filters and ethics tests in place to be sure only the desired types make it to the very top. Once in a while someone slips past the filters, but they get rid of them when they find them, or so I think. Eventually they self-identify because of their ethics. Sometimes you'll see a whole bunch of such top tier people removed, like after Benghazi, for not following orders to stand down.

I assure you those tests do not exist, as EVERYONE in the military is the most outstanding moral person in the world (at least that's what they tell everyone). People are chosen for promotion based on previous experience (the ability to get things done and/or brown nose your evaluator) as well as networking. It is a good ol' boys club, and while many can squeak through, anyone wishing to advance in a military career will learn to keep their mouth shut and tow the line.

You are correct with many of them leaning right, but in the obama administration the military was more concerned with complying with far left liberal idealogies. For me, this resulted in death by powerpoint classes telling me not to rape people. Other classes usually involved how to do what someone wants if they are offended, and how to report someone if you are offended.

Just what I've seen with my own two eyeballs anyways.

 

[Yupo]

I assure you those tests do not exist, as EVERYONE in the military is the most outstanding moral person in the world (at least that's what they tell everyone). People are chosen for promotion based on previous experience (the ability to get things done and/or brown nose your evaluator) as well as networking. It is a good ol' boys club, and while many can squeak through, anyone wishing to advance in a military career will learn to keep their mouth shut and tow the line.

You are correct with many of them leaning right, but in the obama administration the military was more concerned with complying with far left liberal idealogies. For me, this resulted in death by powerpoint classes telling me not to rape people. Other classes usually involved how to do what someone wants if they are offended, and how to report someone if you are offended.

Just what I've seen with my own two eyeballs anyways.

I'm talking about the very top tiers, way above ranks of Colonels, and same probably true for civil service. I could be wrong of course. I've heard this many times from what I consider to be very good sources.

 

[Deleted member 4737]

I'm talking about the very top tiers, way above ranks of Colonels, and same probably true for civil service. I could be wrong of course. I've heard this many times from what I consider to be very good sources.

Getting promoted above the rank of major or 0-4 in the US military is based solely on networking. This greatly affects where you will serve and what you will do.

Above the rank of Col you are pretty much a politician. Your moral standing and how it affects your career is still based on your willingness to go with the crowd (which could be left, middle, right, or usually chaos based on who you have to network with).

At these ranks, you have your own teams who do everything for you. This includes driving, paying your bills, laundry, cooking, PR teams, lawyers, etc.

These guys aren't allowed to look bad. That's why when a Col rapes someone they get to retire instead of going to prison.

My overall point is that the morality of individuals at these ranks is based on the individuals, not the institution. There are good ones and bad ones. I will say, though, that the US military overall favors those who are narcissistic go getters.

 

[sbeaudry]

So... No uprising or false flag today? Interesting. Thought something would happen, based on the crappy flyers. Did I miss it?

 

[Deleted member 4737]

So... No uprising or false flag today? Interesting. Thought something would happen, based on the crappy flyers. Did I miss it?

I don't think so. It looks like the government saved us from the government. Now back to your regularly scheduled programming....

 

[mbww]

Ha! That’s a good one to ponder on.

Captain Kirk’s ‘cheating’ maybe is not that simple, and his justification “I don’t believe in no-win scenarios” while true, is just a soft cover.

The story and logic lead us to believe that Kirk passed the test in a no-win scenario because he was persistent enough until he found an out-of-the-box solution.

The story does provide the clue that Kirk introduced a ‘subroutine’ - disabling enemy ships’ shielding to make the feat possible. Which wasn’t actual cheating, because otherwise he would have been disqualified, and wasn’t a small thing either, because no other candidate could figure it out before him. And that’s why he’s Captain Kirk:)

Or, by focusing on a positive outcome he produced such a tremendous effect that it altered the conditions of the challenge somehow, which made possible his winning in an impossible scenario at third attempt, when others wouldn’t even give it a second try given the obvious impossibility to win. The stuff of legend, huh?

But...The key word in the story is ‘simulation’. It wasn’t a real-life scenario, it was just a game. As such, any glory is just vanity, plus if it’s just a simulation it must be confined within a strict set of bland algorithms that never change no matter how strong your positive mind is, unless he’s Yoda. So, maybe Kirk didn’t pass the test after all...

Then, what’s the point of still giving the same test that nobody can pass to young cadets, and how did the legend about Kirk passing the test came to be?

That reminded me of the famous Google and other tech co’s crazy interview questions from the late ‘90s and 00’s era such as: How many golf balls can you fit in a bus? or You’re the captain of a pirate ship, how do you divide the bounty without getting whacked?...

Purportedly, they were not interested in the answer, but in the logic and demeanor you follow when addressing such a question. Similarly, the Kobayashi Maru test was probably just testing the reaction of candidates during the simulation - cadets’ reaction under pressure, and their coping with fear and defeat, after. As such, Kirk probably did pass the test after all. And... that’s why he’s Commander Kirk:))