2020 US Election: Trump to be Re-elected, Surely? Let The Games Begin!

[Puma]

HERE Possibly the last message from Renee Nicole Good, whom officials and apologists insist on calling "the woman" or "the leftist" to depersonalize her, because she did not obey authority, the same authority that during the pandemic also forced others to obey the law.

"This message is for all my Latino people, all immigrants here in the United States. And I'm sorry, my Spanish isn't perfect, but I hope you receive this message with all my heart. I know there is a lot of fear in your community, but I want to tell you something: know that you are not alone. The truth is, we are fighting. I am fighting with all my might, and I know many people in every state, in every corner of this country, who are also fighting. I have had the pleasure of working alongside you, laughing with you, learning from you, and—my son goes to school with your children, and my life is better for it. You have shared your lives, your stories, your souls, your homes, even your lunchboxes with me when I have nothing to eat, and for that I will always be grateful.

The truth is, I am very ashamed of how our country's government is treating people. Honestly, it hurts me a lot. It hurts me to see a community that I know is full of joy and love and compassion, and to see you suffering so much, locked up in your homes, it really hurts me, it hurts me, it hurts me, it hurts me. And I promise, I swear, that I will never stop fighting. I can't stop, because seeing what is happening in our community, in our country, is too much for me, it's too much, but I want you to know that you are not alone. You are not alone, okay? I care about you, and many people care about you, and you are loved, you are important, and this country is also yours, and we will continue to fight for you.

 

[Elisasheva]

In my opinion there is absolutely no doubt here that this officer simply murdered this woman out of revenge because his ego had been trampled on. This is backed by the footage from his phone.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2009697759998497170

What her girlfriend said to him ("big boy"), and the fact that both of them were acting nonchalantly and not showing the proper respect to the Alpha Male in my view caused him to lose his temper and shoot her - even firing two more times for certainty - purely to vent his frustration. Or purely because she in his eyes was a "mad leftist", therefore deserve a lesson. Let’s also add the "fucking bitch" at the very end, when the car had already crashed. This guy is a psycho, and there are surely quite a few like him in the services. If he had been really afraid of the car, he wouldn’t have gotten so close to the front - police officers know better than to put themselves in that position. He did it on purpose and was just waiting for a chance to get revenge.
That's how creating and fueling division and hate of one group towards another end up - in this case left vs right in USA.

I’m not treating this incident politically; it’s not about who was politically right, but about the decision itself, the motives behind it, and whether the means used were proportionate to the act committed by the woman. And they were not. But this is America, and Americans defending ICE doesn’t really surprise me. We all know what the police are like in there - if they stopped me over there, I’d probably be too scared to get out of the car. Compared to them, our Polish patrols are like friendly, cuddly teddy bears.

 

[irjO]

Not sure if this is off topic, but a thought; It seems interesting to think that the subject of ICE it’s become relevant, and it can become more relevant in the future perhaps with more similar things happening, I say interesting because could be a funny (not that funny) way of the universe to signal something to us maybe something coming up, looking at the word ‘ice’…

 

[Elisasheva]

Randy Fine, congressman in Florida, in the news:
"The left believes they can do anything they want and we're just supposed to sit down and take it. It's time for Americans to say 'enough' and if you get in the way of a gov repelling a foreign invasion you're gonna end up just like that lady did yesterday".

https://twitter.com/x/status/2009729222508499240

So basically - if you don't obey, you end up shot in the face. I feel the tension is rising, wonder how it will eventually escalate... Riots? Left vs right clashes? Civil war?

 

[SummerLite]

It feels like we're on the brink of real chaos. Your lucky if your in a place thats calm and away from it all. Do try not to get pulled into the show overly much. We want to ride the wave and not be pulled under.

 

[JEEP]

FWIW:

Social media is crawling with self-proclaimed forensic analysts poring over footage of Wednesday’s ICE shooting in Minneapolis and insisting it shows the agent who shot Renee Nicole Good lacked justification. Some of the takes are downright embarrassing, with left-wing influencers confidently analyzing the wrong ICE agent altogether, pointing to the one at the side of the vehicle instead of the agent positioned in front of it. Some simply post the same footage we’ve all seen and merely declare the video proves the agent is a murderer.

I’ve seen it all, and let me tell you, of all the analyses out there, podcaster Tim Pool has delivered the clearest and most persuasive breakdown of the video evidence from the shooting I’ve seen yet.

After initially giving Good the benefit of the doubt, Pool says slowed-down footage forced him to reverse his position completely, and his frame-by-frame analysis is fantastic.

Pool began by acknowledging his earlier assessment and then explained why it no longer holds up. “While I initially said that I believed she wasn’t intending to hit the officer and was trying to flee, but still put the officer in fear of harm — uh, no, I’ve changed my mind,” Pool said.

What changed his view was a close examination of the video at reduced speed. And trust me, lots of people have slowed down and/or enhanced the video, but most have simply done so and claimed it only proved their original conclusion.

Pool, however, walked viewers through the footage and pointed out details that are easy to miss at full speed, details others either missed or ignored, starting with the officer’s feet.

“I’m gonna show you the slowed-down footage that I believe proves this woman was intending to kill that ICE agent. Watch the officer, who has his gun drawn,” he said.

Pool highlights the moment the vehicle makes contact. “Look at his feet right here in the back left. … Notice his feet both slide backwards,” Pool explained. “You see his foot sliding? Yeah, he’s not taking a step. He’s being hit by the vehicle.”

Anticipating the usual defenses, Pool concedes a narrow point before dismantling the broader claim. “Now, I can already hear you saying, ‘Hold on, Tim, if you’re up against a vehicle and it accelerates and it pushes you out of the way, that doesn’t warrant shooting somebody.’ Agreed,” he said.

From there, Pool reversed the sequence to show how the officer ended up directly in harm’s way, and it’s a critical detail.

“Here’s the vehicle reversing. The officer is not in front of the vehicle,” Pool said. “She reverses and now he is in front of the vehicle.” He adds critical context about timing and positioning: “He initially is to the right of the vehicle. By all means argue he should not have placed … himself in this position. We’re talking about seconds.”

The most damning detail comes next.

Pool paused the footage at the exact moment the vehicle stops. “The vehicle stops here. The wheels are pointed left. As you can see, the officer is standing right in front of the vehicle,” he said. Then comes the acceleration. “Watch the front tire right here. The wheels are pointed left, and she accelerates.”

What happens next undercuts the claim that Good was merely trying to escape. “The wheel spins out on ice,” Pool explained. “Then, with the wheels pointed at the officer, having spun out already, meaning the officer can hear the engine rev with it pointed at him, he draws his weapon.”

Pool stresses that the ice plays a crucial role in what viewers are seeing. “I wanna stress this again. Her tire, her front tire on her SUV, is spinning out on the ice,” he said. “You can see it right there. It spins on the ground. It slips.”

As the slow-motion continues, Pool describes the final seconds. “And in a second, ’cause this is slow mode, she then begins to turn right, hitting him, and he shoots,” he said.

Pool acknowledged one potential counterargument — that the turn came after the gun was drawn — but explains why it doesn’t change the outcome. “Now, of course, people have said, ‘Oh, like, she only tried to turn right after the gun was drawn-’ Maybe,” he said.

For Pool, her intent is now beside the point when you take the physical reality into account. “I don’t know what her intentions were, and it’s immaterial what her intentions were,” he said. The mechanics of the vehicle tell the story on their own. “The tire’s spinning out and slipping on the ice before stopping.”

Pool closes with what may be the most important takeaway of all. “There are two points that I think are important. Were it not for the ice, which you can see on the ground, the vehicle would have just lurched forward, run this guy over,” he said. “Seriously.”

So many left-wing influencers are taking to social media and putting out bogus video analyses that are trying to tell people what they want to see, not telling them what they are seeing. Pool’s analysis is factual, level-headed, and more accurate than anything left-wing influencers are putting out there to gaslight the public. It’s a meticulous breakdown grounded in the footage itself — and it obliterates the claim that this shooting was reckless or unjustified.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2009310786833772907

This May Be the Best Analysis of the ICE Shooting Video Yet

A detailed analysis of the ICE shooting video revealing critical insights on the incident.

pjmedia.com

Perhaps the key here is, after putting the vehicle in reverse, 1) the officer who had been to the right of the vehicle is now positioned in front of it - he did not step in front of the vehicle, and 2) the wheels were not immediately turned hard to the right in order to flee; rather, the tires are facing front as acceleration is engaged, but due to ice, merely spin at first. At this point, the vehicle is put in motion to the right which causes an impact with the officer who drew his gun upon hearing the acceleration with the vehicle directly facing him. The wife yelling "Drive, baby, drive" no doubt escalated the confrontation even to the point that Renee was fleeing without the wife being able to reenter the vehicle. All of this happened in a matter of seconds.

Awful but Lawful

Somehow it just had to happen in Minneapolis. Opponents of the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement efforts have been waiting for their martyr, and now they have one.

At about 9:40 a.m. local time, ICE officers were engaged in enforcement activity and driving south in the 3300 block of Portland Avenue in South Minneapolis. When a protester, later identified as Renee Nicole Good, pulled her Honda Pilot SUV into the path of the agents’ vehicles and prevented them moving forward, two agents stepped out of their pickup truck, which was unmarked but had its low-profile emergency lights activated.

Unfortunately, the official ICE response overstated the involved agent’s valid self-defense claim. “Today, ICE officers in Minneapolis were conducting targeted operations,” the ICE statement began, “when rioters began blocking ICE officers and one of these violent rioters weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them – an act of domestic terrorism.”

Not exactly. From videos I’ve seen of the incident, it fell far short of anything that could be called a “riot.” (By the time you read this there may be a genuine riot going on.) Yes, Good willfully obstructed the ICE vehicles, but while it’s possible she intended to hit the agent with her car, to me it appears more likely that she was merely indifferent to the possibility that she might hit him as she attempted to escape from what would have been a lawful arrest.

From the shooting officer’s perspective, was it reasonable to believe Good was assaulting him with force likely to cause death or great bodily injury? I believe it was.

But while the officer may be standing on firm legal ground, there are other factors to consider. If a similar incident were to occur involving an officer with my former employer, the Los Angeles Police Department, the likely outcome would be no criminal charges from the district attorney, but the shooting would nonetheless be found “out of policy” by department brass, with the officer facing discipline and even removal from the department. The LAPD Manual instructs that “[a]n officer threatened by an oncoming vehicle shall move out of its path instead of discharging a firearm at it or any of its occupants.”

I am unaware if ICE has a similar policy in place, but even if the agent is found to have violated such a policy, it does not necessarily make the shooting unlawful.

We in the trade have a term for incidents like this one where the results are tragic, even avoidable, but do not rise to legally prohibited conduct: “awful but lawful.” This one surely was both.

In the grand scheme of things, it's not really going to matter what we or the general public thinks about this incident. It has already accomplished what it was meant to do as has been pointed out by previous posts. Very good points about IDF training, police state tactics that will likely be used against all of the populace who dare to protest or be noncompliant. Divide and conquer - bread and circuses. We're really in it now with another George Floyd type psyop underway. Oh, and how about that attack on Venezuela to abduct their lawful President - and his wife! Charlie Kirk? Epstein? The list of other countries to invade for the good of the ole USA?

 

[JEEP]

Another "what, me worry?" development -

MINNEAPOLIS — The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) said Thursday it has been cut off from accessing case files relating to the fatal shooting of a woman by ICE agents in Minneapolis, leaving the Federal Bureau of Investigation as the sole investigating body.

In a statement sent by the BCA Thursday morning, officials said, the FBI informed the agency it would no longer be part of the joint investigation, and will lose access to case materials, scene evidence and investigative interviews.

"Without complete access to the evidence, witnesses and information collected, we cannot meet the investigative standards that Minnesota law and the public demands. As a result, the BCA has reluctantly withdrawn from the investigation," the statement said.

It continued, "We expect the FBI to conduct a thorough and complete investigation and that the full investigative file will be shared with the appropriate prosecutorial authorities at both the state and federal levels."

Gov. Tim Walz addressed the U.S. Attorney's Office's decision to remove the BCA from the case in a press conference Thursday morning, saying he feels it would be "very, very difficult that we will get a fair outcome."

"I want to make this clear to everyone: Minnesota must be part of this investigation," Walz said. "These are non-partisan, career professionals that have spent years building the trust of the community."

He continued, "So, Minnesotans, I will continue to press that we be part of the investigation, that we do the investigation, so that Minnesotans can trust what the outcome is.

"I don't have a pre-determined notion. Yes, I saw the video, yes, I saw that, but a thorough investigation will see what happened before that. It will take all factors in and it will come up with a fair and just conclusion — and we will accept that.

https://www.kare11.com/article/news/local/ice-in-minnesota/fbi-cuts-off-bca-from-shooting-investigation-bca-reluctantly-withdraws/89-a02a3c10-9a54-47ce-ae11-ac8aac5050b6

No doubt a fair and balanced investigation that the entire nation will totally accept its findings.

 

[Professor Chaos]

Lately she gets portrayed as a crazy leftist by the right-wing supporters. To me, either thinking is bullshit and mostly maniacal agenda. IMO, she got brutally killed, and Trump turned administrative to support it (along with Musk, who I lately consider to have big shortcomings in rational thinking thanks to his popularity, pride, and disorder). I just don't understand why it requires CSI-style in-depth analysis to prove the murder of a citizen who got haunted and startled in the first place was right. In the big picture, your life doesn't have to matter either. But it will never be right, and if you accept it, you might as well accept the power of the security services. That's my POV; I don't care if the so-called public opinion agrees with it or not. To me, she got murdered (whatever she was, troublemaker or not... well, for the state everyone who disagrees is one, and I'm 100% sure that outside this forum anyone who's not supporting would be considered one too. And the perpetrator reportedly claims he reacted impulsively due to previous trauma). And all that agenda bullcrap began with just simple acceptance of difference. Lol. And yeah, I get Biden being dumb and Trump trying to fix it.
The truth is that Trump can soon checkmate NATO by dismantling it through Greenland. I'm not saying he's wrong in many respects (especially regarding the UN or the excessive influx of immigrants, well, in Europe, provoked by Russia!). It will simply open the door for Russia to a Europe that isn't united militarily and certainly not culturally. At most, economically. We'll have several militarily underfunded countries, each thinking only of itself, and a major power facing it. And then there's the United States, which got out of this as quickly as it could and was an ally until it actually felt needed. For me, Trump supporting the services murdering civilians is a no-go. But as a diplomat and politician, he probably thinks highly of himself somewhere. And Musk is as much blindfolded, even more so.
And as for this whole left-wing and right-wing brain programming... for me, it's artificially created. Out of some preconceived notion, everyone is suddenly supposed to be one or the other. It's like a binary system projecting cyborgs onto people. It's funny how, in reality, if you don't have such a worldview, it'll be forced on you (even against your [free] will) or exaggerated to absurd levels based on the slightest similarity you ever had. Worldview: a forgotten word. Today, worldview is probably identified with reality or the only correct view of life. The same in Europe; of course, it stems from specific spheres of influence, but the real sources are probably hidden behind the scenes. As usual. Brussels? Not necessarily; that would be too simple, although let's not forget that the largest UFO wave occurred there during the founding of the European Union. Moreover, a similar UFO wave is taking place in the US state where there is the greatest friction between the left and right sides of this artificial conflict.
Europe experiences this almost 1:1, except that in the US, there's more access to weapons, and the services have much less restricted rights. I'm truly surprised that so many people in a world that experienced fascism and misunderstood communism support the government so strongly. But they're not only reprogrammed, they're also intimidated, and they can always justify this with actual problems. My observations suggest, though, that some support the government because they simply enjoy violence. And some feel safe with an electronic collar? Well, let's not get too philosophical. The secret services were also supposed to be Anunnaki, right? And you're either with the system or against it - and everyone will be recorded. A veritable Matrix, especially 4, in the ending.

 

[Aeneas]

It looks like Trump or those behind him have decided to go for chaos as it suits their agenda. Those behind him pulling his strings may have realised that their control is slipping from their hands and so have decided to destroy the chessboard altogether in the desperate hope that they will be on top when things settle. The US with its current trajectory is well on course to make it (and Israel) hated by all. A financial collapse might be part of what they are trying to cause or it will just be a consequence of it.

Some of the areas which where the US is using the flamethrower approach is Venezuela, Argentina, Iran, Europe, Nigeria, Gaza, Columbia and Mexico, just to mention a few. Blowback is likely to happen. 2026 looks to be a year of great upheaval and chaos.

 

[Professor Chaos]

*Nephilim not Anunnaki lol sorry my old brain doesn't remember the transcripts

 

[Liliea]

I agree that the ICE agent did not have enough, let's call it temper, to handle the situation. He simply let himself go.
The entire community is nervous, participating without knowing about a Psi-Op of confrontation and political radicalization that is now omnipresent in all areas. Yesterday it was Generation Z, today it is concerned mothers in the suburbs, tomorrow it could be elderly people in nursing homes with weapons. It is no longer an exaggeration, and any sci-fi series from the 1960s is becoming a reality.

Eugypius provides context from his substack and adds:

At the time of the shooting, both Goods were taking part in one of the most popular and widely advertised ICE watcher activities, namely blocking ICE vehicles on public roadways. This is a trend all across the United States right now. Hundreds if not thousands of freaked out suburbanites, by the looks of it mostly plump middle-aged women, now spend their afternoons stalking ICE convoys in their cars and filming the resulting encounters on their mobile phones. They believe that doing this is necessary to stop National Socialism. Some of them literally claim this, I’m not making it up.

(...)
The fruit of this strange recreation is naturally a rash of videos on platforms like Instagram and TikTok. You’ve probably seen many of these yourself, but if you haven’t, it’s worth watching just one:

If you can't see the video, I'll describe it: it shows a woman in her truck blocking ICE agents. She says:
“We can play” because “my car’s bigger than yours.”

My interpretation is: Too much television, noise, and dissonance.

Objectively speaking, these ICE-watching women engage federal law enforcement officers in repeated rounds of chicken. Their aim is to edge beyond being a mere nuisance and cause meaningful disruptions, while hoping always to stop short of becoming a serious, actionable threat. This is a very hard balance to maintain because of course threats are perceived subjectively.
Where exactly the line falls will vary from officer to officer and from situation to situation, according to a multitude of imponderables. Anyone who plays like this is trying to get shot, whether she realises it or not.

The danger, in general terms, is that people are asking for more security, more “help,” and the government (any government) is giving it to us in the form of increasingly counterproductive controls (ID-IA Palantir) where any housewife, musician, athlete, (agent) etc., could break down, become upset, and run the risk of ending up with a bullet in their head or in “Bukele”-type prisons for getting carried away, believing lies from the right or the left, and not being attentive and aware.
We must persevere with our work because, to paraphrase the Cass family, the lesson is to observe others, but especially our own reactions. And, I would add, if possible, to raise awareness among those around us so that they can protect themselves in the challenging times ahead.

Courting death to own the Nazis

Three days ago, a 37 year-old mother of three named Renée Good was killed by Jonathan Ross, a U.S.

substack.com

 

[nicklebleu]

I squarely put the blame on the authorities - a citizen does not deserve to be EXECUTED for being disorderly, not unless America has now turned to Saudi Arabia or something like that.

The cop acted unprofessionally and didn’t try to de-escalate.

The ICE activists play a very dangerous game of chicken, totally unaware what they are up to. If you threaten and taunt heavily armed and indoctrinated officers in a highly polarised environment, this is bound to eventually lead to a tragedy.

The main problem I see is the growing polarisation in society - it seems that people live virtually in different worlds, side-by-side, with very little overlap. Every side thinks they are totally right and the other side wrong.

Things like that will happen increasingly more often, and every side will try to capitalise on it as much as they can.

 

[aragorn]

The other day, I was thinking how Trump, not that long ago, was Enemy Nr. 1 of the US Deep State – at least based on how vehemently they tried to destroy him, and now he's completely 'assimilated into the Borg'. And, in a sense, he's even outperforming the 'old' Deep State by his brazen and overt actions. Maybe it was the bullets in Butler, maybe he's got dementia, maybe he's been messed with, threatened, programmed, maybe, maybe, maybe... I know we've discusse this before, but sometimes I still go "What the h*** happened to this guy?!"

 

[ApotheosisMMC.]

The agent POV cam clearly saw her execute the reverse manoeuvre, put it in drive, start turning the wheel rapidly to the right (for nearly a full second), but then somehow acts surprised and shits his pants when she accelerates? Everything about her movements signalled her intention to accelerate to the right and escape. A monkey could have read those signals and got out of the way in one step. Instead he moves TOWARDS the vehicle during this time she is changing gear, turning the wheel, showing what she was about to do. Of course she is not showing office Badass enough respect, and has the nerve to run away, so it's time to execute her. Maybe this last part is a little unfair and reaching, but it does kinda look that way.

The updated protocols in the 2023 memorandum for DHS/ICE were made to limit the use of lethal force and established that before shooting in a situation of danger of death or serious injury, priority should be given to moving out of the path of the vehicle, so yes, despite the clear turn of the steering wheel and that he had the intention of fleeing, the agent instead of moving further to the right decided to get closer to the car by taking a step forward.

As for the fact that a trigger happy cop shot a civilian in dubious circumstances, there are literally dozens of such incidents across the US going back decades. Nothing new there. Some cops are just like that. Sad for America.

Even recently there were 2 shootings in October and 1 in December related to ICE agents and vehicles that were trying to flee - they were perceived as a threat.

Trump and Vance could have said "it's a tragic incident, we will instruct the authorities to investigate and the justice system to decide". That's politics 101 taught in kindergarten, or a basic "silence is golden" rule.

Trump used more conciliatory language regarding the Capitol incident and the George Floyd case, so his sanity must lie elsewhere:

FWIW:

It was a good analysis with what they had, but what Carl revealed when the agent's camera appeared ruined it. The lesson is: don't mess with these bastards and don't put them in extreme situations, especially if there's a huge history of deaths resulting from these exchanges. Even in countries with more lax police, you can't have that attitude.


It has almost nothing to do with the thread, but a funny incident happened to me, depending on how you look at it. It's stupid, Consider it a break-candy :

I was at work reading Carl's comment on my phone. I was going to say something about how these guys don't have a freeze reflex in critical situations and many don't usually choose flight over fight, when suddenly I heard a mall security guard yell for someone to be tripped (I later learned they were chasing a thief and one of the three guards after him fell, blocking the others' path). I was a little surprised I didn't freeze.
I looked him in the eyes for a second and assessed that he was too easy a target and that I would have felt miserable if I didn't stop him. So, once he was in a suitable position, I tripped him with my leg. He fell to the ground, but with the adrenaline rush, he got up immediately, so a chase of about 400 meters began. meters, it amused me that guys bigger than me froze for various understandable reasons. Cowardice, an unfavorable cost-benefit analysis, and fear of retaliation—the guy panicked when he realized he'd run into someone fast. At the same time, I made it clear to him that today wasn't his day. I simply couldn't catch him because I had my phone in my hand, and it was sure to break if it fell to the ground, or even more likely, someone would steal it (I couldn't put it in my pocket without stopping either).
So I kept chasing him while I waited for something to change. He ran onto the highway, and I kept my distance because I was afraid the universe would play a cruel trick on me or him regarding accidents. Luckily, the cars slowed down (although some were close), and when we reached an intersection with traffic lights, the lane we took was clear. I signaled to a guard about 100 meters away while shouting at him, but he was apparently on his phone and didn't notice anything (these guys are really well-trained).


I gave up. Because he was losing speed and because the guy moved away from that location, we were finally going to reach a grassy area, so I could throw my phone more easily and squeeze out what little energy I had left to capture him, but luckily for me, guards arrived from behind on motorcycles and a couple of guys blocked his path without much effort since the guy simply gave up, already out of energy.

I was saved from having to hit him because he resisted being immobilized when the other people caught him. I had a pretty cool head and wasn't angry with him at all, nor did I have any frustration to take out on him, unlike the other guys who gave him a beating.

 

[daddycat]

1) the officer who had been to the right of the vehicle is now positioned in front of it - he did not step in front of the vehicle

It looks to me that the cop did not walk in front of the car, but instead she turned the car so that the front was facing the cop.

26:04
real quick just to clarify this point. It does not appear the officer's intention was to place himself out of
26:09
compliance with DHS. While he was walking, the vehicle reversed and aimed at him.

The video below shows she was looking for trouble. She was definitely blocking the road with her large car. I think she was trying to block the cops from doing their jobs, which is a crime.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2010037103665787019

So essentially she was another woke criminal that they are trying to raise up as a martyr, and it is no wonder a lot of Americans are not riled up for her. In that view, this psychological operations has failed. The dropping off her kids propaganda has failed. The legal observer propaganda has failed. The gay wife aspect doesn't help the propaganda either, as transgender DEI has not gone away and people are sick of it.

Y'all, you keep defending this s***t, America will continue devolving into looking more and more like Israel. And you will be the Palestinians.

We all have been Palestinians for a while now, as we all saw from the covid mandates and shutdown.