2024 US election: A Kennedy presidency? Trump again? Will it be rigged?

Sounds more like sorting the wheat from the chaff than divide and conquer.
Earlier today my brother had a taxi driver from Georgia (the country) (we're in Massachusetts). He is here with his wife and 6 year old son. They were talking and the taxi driver said one day the kid came home from school and asked the parents to buy him a dress because the teachers said that boys can wear dresses. The guy sent his wife and kid back to Georgia immediately, no hesitation. He's not having this trash culture ruin his son's mind and future. He took action early to avoid having to eventually distance himself from his own child because the system would've ruined him. He said the teachers spend more time with his kid than he does (because they both work a lot), and he doesn't have time to undo the damage. Smart guy, decisive, and a good dad in my book. He'd rather be temporarily away from his family to make money for them from here than to watch the Western mind virus infect his child.

Those with young kids in the US school system should at least consider moving to Russia or something, unless you can home-school. Moving to another country isn't easy, but you may be saving your kids from brainwashing. My parents broughs us to the US from Ukraine because it was the land of opportunity, and in the 90's Russia was not a good alternative. Nowadays it's no longer the struggling post-Soviet shitshow that it used to be, and Putin is doing a good job keeping the Western influences out as much as possible.

Also T.C. in your live election video - did you notice the poll there for who will win? 75% Trump with 100k+ votes. Isn't that a left-leaning news channel? It's not even close. The fact that official polls make it seem like it's 50/50 doesn't seem believable at all.
 
Last edited:
So they said "not exactly" in terms of there being a presidential election, but later they said there's a good chance of it taking place. My thought on that is that it depends on how one defines "presidential election". Can we even call it that given that no one voted for Kamala in the primaries or that there is likely to be massive cheating? I mean technically on the surface it's an election, but not really either.
If understand correctly that exchange, the C's said "Not exactly." to the question,
"Q: (Joe) Does that mean there won't be a presidential election in 2024?",
meaning "not exactly" that there won't be elections today, i.e. "not exactly" in terms of there not being a presidential election, which seems to be in accordance with their later statement that there were good chances that the presidential elections would actually take place. FWIW.

Edit: Clarity.
 
Last edited:
So they said "not exactly" in terms of there being a presidential election, but later they said there's a good chance of it taking place. My thought on that is that it depends on how one defines "presidential election". Can we even call it that given that no one voted for Kamala in the primaries or that there is likely to be massive cheating? I mean technically on the surface it's an election, but not really either.

To be more precise, when I asked "does that mean there won't be a presidential election in 2024", the answer was "not exactly", which in the context I took to mean there will be an election, i.e. what's happening right now, but what happens afterwards, i.e. between now and Jan 6th when the results are to be ratified and then the inauguration on Jan. 20th, is still "open".

One thing I was thinking about is why the deep state stopped Trump from being elected for a 2nd term in 2020 but may not be so motivated to stop him now. After all, if he had a 2nd term in 2020, that would have been it and they would be free of him now. Seems to me that stopping him in 2020 was vital to get the Ukraine war rolling, and given the developments there and in Israel (and other places), things are so bad and prepped for global chaos that a Trump presidency now is not much of a problem for them because they know that he won't be able to do anything to stop the rot that they have initiated.

Basically, I think Trump's gonna win by a decent margin and it will be at least partly due to the fact that the deep state took its foot off the vote rigging pedal, because they have plans to beset his 2nd term with serious problems.
 
Last edited:
I think that the PTB are gonna have to do a whole lot of cheating if they want to steal the election. Trump has a lot of great allies/endorsements and he has X/Twitter on his side which I think is bringing in many votes. I even think the latest Squirrel/Raccoon story pushed some people to go out and vote for Trump. I'll be hoping for the best outcome.
Agreed. There are a few factors this time around that make 2020-type cheating much more difficult. Several states have purged their voter rolls, which in 2020 provided a pool of phantom voters to associate with fraudulent mail-in ballots. There are also much fewer mail-in ballots this time around. Republican registrations are way up in most states, and Dem registrations are down. All this means that the pool of potential fake votes is much smaller than it was in 2020. They would have to resort to much more obvious cheating, e.g. switching ballots, to get the margins they had in 2020 with way fewer Democrats voting. If this happens it should be blatantly obvious.

Basically, I think this election is something of a repeat of 2016. The Dems will cheat, but Trump will get so many votes in the places that are needed that they won't be able to make up the difference. That's my prediction at least.
 
things are so bad and prepped for global chaos that a Trump presidency now is not much of a problem for them because they know that he won't be able to do anything to stop the rot that they have initiated.
At the same time, they also tried to get rid of him (unless that was a different party's intention). Maybe if the assassination was successful, it would've made things easier for them, but now that he's alive, they might just roll with it because they think he won't be able to do much anyway?
 
Seems to me that stopping him in 2020 was vital to get the Ukraine war rolling, and given the developments there and in Israel (and other places), things are so bad and prepped for global chaos that a Trump presidency now is not much of a problem for them because they know that he won't be able to do anything to stop the rot that they have initiated.
I think that they need someone to take the fall for the imminent defeat in Ukraine and transferring the economy onto a war footing.

The US is not in a position to prosecute hot wars with Russia, China or Iran at the moment. They need to keep the temperature just high enough to convince Americans to increase military spending. And to be able to increase spending, they need to revive the economy.

Trump is the man for all of those jobs. He's anti war and think skinned, so he'll be able to take the heat for leaving Ukraine out to dry. He's also all about the economy and progress. They'll probably keep the conflicts simmering but I don't think there will be more chaos than there was in the past 4 years.
 
Kamala was a weird candidate from the beginning to me, she seems like the worst candidate ever, she is bad at public speaking, always repeating the same things, she doesn't seem knowledgeable about anything. I mean she looks like a good puppet president, but it was weird to me she was selected to be the candidate. But this is my view of her, so idk.
 
Back
Top Bottom