Trump's setting up the dream team! I don't want to get my hopes for his new presidency, but maybe he learned a thing or two in office last time around about finding the right people he can trust.
2024 US election: A Kennedy presidency? Trump again? Will it be rigged?
- Thread starter Mike
- Start date
Harris to speak at 4:00 pm (in 70 min.)
Only if she is judge sober enough and can read, evidently.
Only if she is judge sober enough and can read, evidently.
I think he's probably exhausted. I doubt he slept at all the last 3 days. Tucker was talking with different Trump team members on the election livestream last night who brought up his incredible stamina and endurance.
I’m pretty sure Trump has learned quite a bit in that regard since then. Still, I think probably one of his biggest blind spots revolves around trusting people too naively/easily especially when they say nice things about him and/or what he is doing. But this time around he seems to be building quite a strong team of at least a number of loyal/good people around him who hopefully can help him somewhat in regards to that.
lilies
The Living Force
Our Prayers the Free Will of The People will be his life shield, Kennedy's life shield and the entire Team Trump's Life Shield alongside an army of bodyguards and sheets of bulletproof glass.
Yeah I thought how tired he must be and also how resilient he is. He is a people person, an extrovert that is reenergised by people contact. So the people are his strength.
I
IT....
IT....
We don't know what exactly will happen next. But this is the translation of a French article I find up to the point:
Mr Trump: respect!
Donald Trump has just been re-elected President of the United States, clean and clear. Apart from himself, who would have believed in such a comeback on 20 January 2021, when the outgoing president left the White House without attending Joseph Biden's inauguration? American democracy had reached a low point in its history, with suspicions of massive fraud hanging over the 2020 results to this day. Despite the sad outcome of his first term in office, the former president managed to hold the Republican Party together. He even strengthened his hold on it! He resisted all attempts to use the courts against him. And he has run an election campaign in which he is not far from winning the popular vote - at the time of writing; and in which it is possible that the Republicans will win a majority in the House of Representatives, in addition to the Senate, which has already been confirmed. In the Courrier des Stratèges, we have sufficiently highlighted the weaknesses of Trump's programme and the dangers it poses for France and Europe; but that should not prevent us from recognising the stature of a politician who could ultimately be as important for his country as Franklin Delano Roosevelt was in the twentieth century. There is a time to criticise and fight, and a time to appreciate the achievement: on this night of 6 November 2024, one word comes spontaneously to mind: Mr Trump, respect!
The provisional result of the US presidential elections, at 1.40 am on the east coast of the United States, showing Donald Trump's victory after the vote count was completed in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin
It's the story of an astonishing revenge!
I'm one of those people who believe that Donald Trump had won the 2020 presidential election and was robbed of it by fraud. But in reality, the sinister unfolding of the post-scrutinium, in 2020, reminded us that the United States is a Republic, before it is a democracy.
The establishment had banded together to deprive Trump of his victory and they would have done it again in 2024; but the former president proved too strong for them.
Hats off to the artist!
Donald Trump's achievement in modern politics cannot be overstated:
+ the former president was suspected of fomenting an insurrection on 6 January 2021, by encouraging his supporters to head for the Capitol, where Mike Pence could not bring himself to question the dubious results of the vote count in the ‘undecided states’.
+ He should have been rejected by his party, whose notables have always been hostile to him. Instead, Trump held the party together despite the defeat. And he has strengthened his hold over it.
+ Donald Trump has withstood all the legal attacks against him.
+ He has escaped two attempted assassinations in recent months.
+ And at the time of writing, it seems that Donald Trump has enabled his party to win an historic treble:
The votes will have to be counted, but it is also possible that the former president, now re-elected, has achieved a ‘grand slam’ by also winning the popular vote.
As important as Roosevelt in the twentieth century?
Trump's achievement will be measured more seriously by an awareness of the tipping point that is taking place in the USA: we are witnessing the end of globalist progressivism and wokism, as they had coalesced since the terms of Barack Obama.
One name springs to mind, that of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. If God grants him life, Donald Trump, when he leaves the White House in early 2029, will have dominated American political life for a period roughly equivalent to Roosevelt's hold on his country. And, like his illustrious predecessor, he will have had to fight against the establishment and crony capitalism.
The comparison with Roosevelt is also justified from the French point of view: the great reformers of the USA care little whether their policies go against the interests of Europe in general and France in particular. But more on that in due course.
Tonight, there is only one thing to write: respect, Mister President!
Source : Monsieur Trump: respect!
The German government is scared stiff. All day long you see our politicians with a look of utter despair on their faces. You get the feeling that they have lost their leader, nobody expected Trump. And now comes the news: our Chancellor Scholz is sacking Finance Minister Lindner, will call a vote of confidence in January and there will be new elections in March.
Anyone who had observed this scenario in recent weeks could see that it was a prearranged affair. Germany is officially broke, 280 - 600 billion is missing for the infrastructure. The preferred candidate of Black Rock's dark elite, Merz, will not expropriate us in September, but in March.
Anyone who had observed this scenario in recent weeks could see that it was a prearranged affair. Germany is officially broke, 280 - 600 billion is missing for the infrastructure. The preferred candidate of Black Rock's dark elite, Merz, will not expropriate us in September, but in March.
Heather
Dagobah Resident
I started this post a while ago (been returning to it, and adding to it)... it's helped me to turn my doldrums into something a bit more (cautiously) optimistic. You see I'd been feeling that: yes, Trump won, only now what?
I wasn't sure I even wanted to vote at all given so many concerning things regarding Trump, including his supporting Digital ID and biometrics (which will be blamed on the border situation), and his surrounding himself with those who are constructing the digital control grid (see Catherine Austin Fitts and Whitney Webb for a very detailed delineation of this), as well as the continued destruction of Gaza, which remains the elephant in the room amid all the gushing Trump support.
However, there is also the idea that giving up on our government entirely by not voting at all suggests a void that globalist factions wish to fill, and so my deciding to vote had more to do with working with what we have, as opposed to scrapping everything and by doing so perhaps allowing the country to become even more vulnerable to globalist forces.
On the New York ballot there was also a LaRouche Party candidate, Diane Sare, running for Senate against Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand. Voting for her was a way to register my deep concerns regarding Gaza, among other things.
My husband and I also had the feeling as we approached the election, that the PTB had already decided on a Trump victory. This is obviously disturbing, if true, given it indicates Trump will fall in line with key parts of their program, including those areas I just mentioned. As Fitts and her colleagues indicate, even with a "Bitcoin dollar" seemingly set to replace the petrodollar (with StableCoin and Tether also in the mix) and even with a lot of new so called "decentralized" tech entities emerging, it will all (stealthily) be tied to the Bank of International Settlements or the like -- meaning that globalist centralization will only be disguised, and not impeded, in the new digital landscape. (I link to an article below if you'd like to learn more on all this.)
It's also likely that Robert F. Kennedy Junior isn't as anti-pharma as many perceive. He does endorse vaccines, but, he claims, in a well regulated form. And while he has singled out mercury and aluminum as deleterious, he's left the field wide open for further mRNA technology, which, we all know, spells big money -- especially concerning cancer, which is spiking thanks to the Covid vaccine. Recently, I've even heard of something called self replicating mRNA, which only amplifies the danger.
Oh, and also, as we've seen, Kennedy, along with Trump, is also single-mindedly pro-Israel.
Returning to Fitts, she claims it's time to hold the Republicans' feet to fire starting with digital ID. According to Fitts, with Digital ID in place, the door of the new digitized prison system will shut behind us before we even realize what has happened. She also urges us to use cash as much as possible, which makes it far more difficult for our money in hand (and our individual sovereignty) to be done away with. As Fitts, Whitney Webb and others have pointed out, the type of digital currency that Trump's associates are developing is just as onerous as CBDC's relative to surveillance and control. Interesting, then, that Trump had publicly come out against CBDC's, not owning the (hidden) similarities to its planned replacement.
So, I suggest we read up on all of this (and the articles Whitney Webb and her colleague Mark Goodwin have done are extensive), and, as Fitts puts it, hold their feet to the fire. Here's a link to the last article of their series titled The Chain: The Chain Of Command: How Facebook's Libra, Bank Regulators, and PayPal Built A New World Currency
On the brighter side of Trump & Co. (should he actually make it to the White House), Joe Rogan mentioned his doing away with income tax, and Trump, while not giving a resounding yes to the idea, didn't dismiss it either. Martin Armstrong discusses the feasibility of just such a move in this recent interview (below). If you think about it, one of the best ways to shrink federal government spending, while supporting the livelihoods of all working Americans in a way that boosts the economy would include this move. And how would Trump-hating liberals suddenly feel if they find themselves earning a third more of their salary? (That would be interesting to see.)
Anyway, here's Armstrong on doing away with the federal income tax. He himself has worked out a plan for how this might be done in a way that transfers the US debt via vouchers to private industry. I'd have to listen again to get my terminology correct but it's fascinating to hear discussed.
Real News from Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog: Economic News and Breaking News Reports
(press "read more" button and scroll down to video)
Oh--I have one last note on Catherine Austin Fitts: don't get rid of the Federal Reserve, she says, before getting back the 21 trillion stolen from US. taxpayers starting in 1998 (I believe it was). If you get rid of the Fed first, she explains, you'll never see that money. And it can easily be traced, she says. (The thought of banksters forced to dissolve their worldly assets comes to mind. Now that's justice.) She and her colleague Mark Skidmore have documented this inconceivable theft -- actually, I'm sure I've made mention of it here in the past. Anyway, here's her very brief history on this: The Missing Money – The Missing Money
Obviously we don't know what the future holds in this precarious time, but, as always in these parts, knowledge protects, and may even forge some new beginnings. Remember, Trump is not likely to recall the missing trillions without persistently being reminded of its existence by his constituents. As Fitts touches on in this brief history above, Trump, like Pelosi, and Schumer and other Democrats and Republicans signed FASAB 56 into law in 2018, which officially allows for secret government spending -- meaning, the federal government cannot be properly audited thanks to this measure. So, it's up to the populace to get educated on these things, and bring such information forward. One can even talk to Trump directly (right on X), and start a hashtag, etc. It can be done with a constructive spirit, as opposed to a destructive or divisive one. Politicians -- and Trump is a politician (even if those who worship him seem to avoid the term) -- respond to constant pressure, and that's what Fitts means by keeping their feet to the fire.
No digital ID, and get those trillions back! And, by the way, who needs income tax?!
Anyway, it's a start. Let's hope we see this presidency actually commence so we can get to work.
(Now I need to go see Trump's acceptance speech...)
I wasn't sure I even wanted to vote at all given so many concerning things regarding Trump, including his supporting Digital ID and biometrics (which will be blamed on the border situation), and his surrounding himself with those who are constructing the digital control grid (see Catherine Austin Fitts and Whitney Webb for a very detailed delineation of this), as well as the continued destruction of Gaza, which remains the elephant in the room amid all the gushing Trump support.
However, there is also the idea that giving up on our government entirely by not voting at all suggests a void that globalist factions wish to fill, and so my deciding to vote had more to do with working with what we have, as opposed to scrapping everything and by doing so perhaps allowing the country to become even more vulnerable to globalist forces.
On the New York ballot there was also a LaRouche Party candidate, Diane Sare, running for Senate against Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand. Voting for her was a way to register my deep concerns regarding Gaza, among other things.
My husband and I also had the feeling as we approached the election, that the PTB had already decided on a Trump victory. This is obviously disturbing, if true, given it indicates Trump will fall in line with key parts of their program, including those areas I just mentioned. As Fitts and her colleagues indicate, even with a "Bitcoin dollar" seemingly set to replace the petrodollar (with StableCoin and Tether also in the mix) and even with a lot of new so called "decentralized" tech entities emerging, it will all (stealthily) be tied to the Bank of International Settlements or the like -- meaning that globalist centralization will only be disguised, and not impeded, in the new digital landscape. (I link to an article below if you'd like to learn more on all this.)
It's also likely that Robert F. Kennedy Junior isn't as anti-pharma as many perceive. He does endorse vaccines, but, he claims, in a well regulated form. And while he has singled out mercury and aluminum as deleterious, he's left the field wide open for further mRNA technology, which, we all know, spells big money -- especially concerning cancer, which is spiking thanks to the Covid vaccine. Recently, I've even heard of something called self replicating mRNA, which only amplifies the danger.
Oh, and also, as we've seen, Kennedy, along with Trump, is also single-mindedly pro-Israel.
Returning to Fitts, she claims it's time to hold the Republicans' feet to fire starting with digital ID. According to Fitts, with Digital ID in place, the door of the new digitized prison system will shut behind us before we even realize what has happened. She also urges us to use cash as much as possible, which makes it far more difficult for our money in hand (and our individual sovereignty) to be done away with. As Fitts, Whitney Webb and others have pointed out, the type of digital currency that Trump's associates are developing is just as onerous as CBDC's relative to surveillance and control. Interesting, then, that Trump had publicly come out against CBDC's, not owning the (hidden) similarities to its planned replacement.
So, I suggest we read up on all of this (and the articles Whitney Webb and her colleague Mark Goodwin have done are extensive), and, as Fitts puts it, hold their feet to the fire. Here's a link to the last article of their series titled The Chain: The Chain Of Command: How Facebook's Libra, Bank Regulators, and PayPal Built A New World Currency
On the brighter side of Trump & Co. (should he actually make it to the White House), Joe Rogan mentioned his doing away with income tax, and Trump, while not giving a resounding yes to the idea, didn't dismiss it either. Martin Armstrong discusses the feasibility of just such a move in this recent interview (below). If you think about it, one of the best ways to shrink federal government spending, while supporting the livelihoods of all working Americans in a way that boosts the economy would include this move. And how would Trump-hating liberals suddenly feel if they find themselves earning a third more of their salary? (That would be interesting to see.)
Anyway, here's Armstrong on doing away with the federal income tax. He himself has worked out a plan for how this might be done in a way that transfers the US debt via vouchers to private industry. I'd have to listen again to get my terminology correct but it's fascinating to hear discussed.
Real News from Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog: Economic News and Breaking News Reports
(press "read more" button and scroll down to video)
Oh--I have one last note on Catherine Austin Fitts: don't get rid of the Federal Reserve, she says, before getting back the 21 trillion stolen from US. taxpayers starting in 1998 (I believe it was). If you get rid of the Fed first, she explains, you'll never see that money. And it can easily be traced, she says. (The thought of banksters forced to dissolve their worldly assets comes to mind. Now that's justice.) She and her colleague Mark Skidmore have documented this inconceivable theft -- actually, I'm sure I've made mention of it here in the past. Anyway, here's her very brief history on this: The Missing Money – The Missing Money
Obviously we don't know what the future holds in this precarious time, but, as always in these parts, knowledge protects, and may even forge some new beginnings. Remember, Trump is not likely to recall the missing trillions without persistently being reminded of its existence by his constituents. As Fitts touches on in this brief history above, Trump, like Pelosi, and Schumer and other Democrats and Republicans signed FASAB 56 into law in 2018, which officially allows for secret government spending -- meaning, the federal government cannot be properly audited thanks to this measure. So, it's up to the populace to get educated on these things, and bring such information forward. One can even talk to Trump directly (right on X), and start a hashtag, etc. It can be done with a constructive spirit, as opposed to a destructive or divisive one. Politicians -- and Trump is a politician (even if those who worship him seem to avoid the term) -- respond to constant pressure, and that's what Fitts means by keeping their feet to the fire.
No digital ID, and get those trillions back! And, by the way, who needs income tax?!
Anyway, it's a start. Let's hope we see this presidency actually commence so we can get to work.
(Now I need to go see Trump's acceptance speech...)
I have seen the same with some lib contacts. Part of it seems to be that the Deep State expected this outcome at least for a few weeks, so they weren't surprised and the media sort of eased people in somewhat. Different energy. Also, die-hard TDS seems to be just a bit out of fashion except for a certain small contingent. He wasn't Hitler last time, so muh, just ignore it and don't think about it.
Guys, I literally posted the Bannon clip in my post
