I started this post a while ago (been returning to it, and adding to it)... it's helped me to turn my doldrums into something a bit more (cautiously) optimistic. You see I'd been feeling that: yes, Trump won, only
now what?
I wasn't sure I even wanted to vote at all given so many concerning things regarding Trump, including his supporting Digital ID and biometrics (which will be blamed on the border situation), and his surrounding himself with those who are constructing the digital control grid (see Catherine Austin Fitts and Whitney Webb for a very detailed delineation of this), as well as the continued destruction of Gaza, which remains the elephant in the room amid all the gushing Trump support.
However, there is also the idea that giving up on our government entirely by not voting at all suggests a void that globalist factions wish to fill, and so my deciding to vote had more to do with working with what we have, as opposed to scrapping everything and by doing so perhaps allowing the country to become even more vulnerable to globalist forces.
On the New York ballot there was also a LaRouche Party candidate, Diane Sare, running for Senate against Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand. Voting for her was a way to register my deep concerns regarding Gaza, among other things.
My husband and I also had the feeling as we approached the election, that the PTB had already decided on a Trump victory. This is obviously disturbing, if true, given it indicates Trump will fall in line with key parts of their program, including those areas I just mentioned. As Fitts and her colleagues indicate, even with a "Bitcoin dollar" seemingly set to replace the petrodollar (with StableCoin and Tether also in the mix) and even with a lot of new so called "decentralized" tech entities emerging, it will all (stealthily) be tied to the Bank of International Settlements or the like -- meaning that globalist centralization will only be disguised, and not impeded, in the new digital landscape. (I link to an article below if you'd like to learn more on all this.)
It's also likely that Robert F. Kennedy Junior isn't as anti-pharma as many perceive. He does endorse vaccines, but, he claims, in a well regulated form. And while he has singled out mercury and aluminum as deleterious, he's left the field wide open for further mRNA technology, which, we all know, spells big money -- especially concerning cancer, which is spiking thanks to the Covid vaccine. Recently, I've even heard of something called self replicating mRNA, which only amplifies the danger.
Oh, and also, as we've seen, Kennedy, along with Trump, is also single-mindedly pro-Israel.
Returning to Fitts, she claims it's time to hold the Republicans' feet to fire starting with digital ID.
According to Fitts, with Digital ID in place, the door of the new digitized prison system will shut behind us before we even realize what has happened. She also urges us to use cash as much as possible, which makes it far more difficult for our money in hand (and our individual sovereignty) to be done away with. As Fitts, Whitney Webb and others have pointed out, the type of digital currency that Trump's associates are developing is just as onerous as CBDC's relative to surveillance and control. Interesting, then, that Trump had publicly come out against CBDC's, not owning the (hidden) similarities to its planned replacement.
So, I suggest we read up on all of this (and the articles Whitney Webb and her colleague Mark Goodwin have done are extensive), and, as Fitts puts it, hold their feet to the fire. Here's a link to the last article of their series titled The Chain:
The Chain Of Command: How Facebook's Libra, Bank Regulators, and PayPal Built A New World Currency
On the brighter side of Trump & Co. (should he actually make it to the White House), Joe Rogan mentioned his doing away with income tax, and Trump, while not giving a resounding yes to the idea, didn't dismiss it either. Martin Armstrong discusses the feasibility of just such a move in this recent interview (below). If you think about it, one of the best ways to shrink federal government spending, while supporting the livelihoods of all working Americans in a way that boosts the economy would include this move. And how would Trump-hating liberals suddenly feel if they find themselves earning a third more of their salary? (That would be interesting to see.)
Anyway, here's Armstrong on doing away with the federal income tax. He himself has worked out a plan for how this might be done in a way that transfers the US debt via vouchers to private industry. I'd have to listen again to get my terminology correct but it's fascinating to hear discussed.
Real News from Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog: Economic News and Breaking News Reports
(press "read more" button and scroll down to video)
Oh--I have one last note on Catherine Austin Fitts:
don't get rid of the Federal Reserve, she says, before getting back the 21 trillion stolen from US. taxpayers starting in 1998 (I believe it was). If you get rid of the Fed first, she explains, you'll never see that money. And it can easily be traced, she says. (The thought of banksters forced to dissolve their worldly assets comes to mind. Now
that's justice.) She and her colleague Mark Skidmore have documented this inconceivable theft -- actually, I'm sure I've made mention of it here in the past. Anyway, here's her very brief history on this:
The Missing Money – The Missing Money
Obviously we don't know what the future holds in this precarious time, but, as always in these parts, knowledge protects, and may even forge some new beginnings. Remember, Trump is not likely to recall the missing trillions without persistently being reminded of its existence by his constituents. As Fitts touches on in this brief history above, Trump, like Pelosi, and Schumer and other Democrats and Republicans signed FASAB 56 into law in 2018, which officially allows for secret government spending -- meaning, the federal government cannot be properly audited thanks to this measure. So, it's up to the populace to get educated on these things, and bring such information forward. One can even talk to Trump directly (right on X), and start a hashtag, etc. It can be done with a constructive spirit, as opposed to a destructive or divisive one. Politicians -- and Trump is a politician (even if those who worship him seem to avoid the term) -- respond to constant pressure, and that's what Fitts means by keeping their feet to the fire.
No digital ID, and get those trillions back! And, by the way, who needs income tax?!
Anyway, it's a start. Let's hope we see this presidency actually commence so we can get to work.
(Now I need to go see Trump's acceptance speech...)