2024 US election: A Kennedy presidency? Trump again? Will it be rigged?

[dredger]

I'm now waiting to read what will be the "Felicitation !" messages to Trump from various countries in the world. Particularly from the EU countries and all the mafia, these mafiosis leaders. I suppose they'll remain formal, but just the fact that they are like obliged to send a congratulation to the new president makes my day

 

[davidfxl]

It's possible that things can be arranged so that marshal law is set in motion before Trump gets sworn in. I hope not but we shall see. The PTB are not going to give up so easily.

 

[Lyndi]

I had the thought pop up last night that the PTB decided at some point that they didn't want Kamala Harris to be President. I guess that's kind of obvious, though. Plan B.

 

[Mark7]

Two unlikely heroes.

 

[luc]

I'm now waiting to read what will be the "Felicitation !" messages to Trump from various countries in the world. Particularly from the EU countries and all the mafia, these mafiosis leaders. I suppose they'll remain formal, but just the fact that they are like obliged to send a congratulation to the new president makes my day

Indeed, and it's funny how they all emphasize "transatlantic partnership", "common security interests" etc. Translation: they are absolutely terrified that a Trump admin will stop funding NGOs, Think Tanks, NATO and the whole transatlantic apparatus that keeps them in power against the interests of the European peoples!

 

[ApotheosisMMC.]

I allow myself a moment of enthusiasm for Trump's victory, but returning to reality; despite the program changes and the possible implications of that, the latter would have to do with balance, therefore I do not believe that in general terms the deep state will "soften", it is more despite the fact that they have reluctantly allowed this victory or others with their own agendas see certain benefits in all this, there are sectors that feel the pressure of the changes that are coming and seem to have no time, Trump apparently has more allies this time so part of the deep state's agenda would be hindered, I think it is quite probable that they will try by all means to stain Trump by artificially creating difficult situations, a dangerous game in a certain sense since more people will be able to see the magician behind the curtain, but it remains to be seen once again if it is enough to prevent the United States from paying its Karma in a certain way at the end of the day.
Pray a lot for him!

 

[Beau]

Iran is the big trap for him now. You'd think they'll drive through that war knowing Trump will find it hard to talk to Iranians especially if a false flag is arranged.

Trump started zero wars his last term.

 

[ApotheosisMMC.]

Iran is the big trap for him now. You'd think they'll drive through that war knowing Trump will find it hard to talk to Iranians especially if a false flag is arranged.

Remember that it is possible that Trump made a deal with the Iranians to destroy Soleimani precisely to avoid a war as he said, he likes to speak badly of Iran in public, but the man understands more at least on that point.

 

[msasa79]

I allow myself a moment of enthusiasm for Trump's victory, but returning to reality; despite the program changes and the possible implications of that, the latter would have to do with balance, therefore I do not believe that in general terms the deep state will "soften", it is more despite the fact that they have reluctantly allowed this victory or others with their own agendas see certain benefits in all this, there are sectors that feel the pressure of the changes that are coming and seem to have no time, Trump apparently has more allies this time so part of the deep state's agenda would be hindered, I think it is quite probable that they will try by all means to stain Trump by artificially creating difficult situations, a dangerous game in a certain sense since more people will be able to see the magician behind the curtain, but it remains to be seen once again if it is enough to prevent the United States from paying its Karma in a certain way at the end of the day.

Well, the C's said that chances for Trump to become POTUS again were remote, and as he apparently just became President-elect, we're sort of left in "wait and see" mode until and if he actually gets sworn in as the President.

It could be that the C's pulled one of their 'reverse-attention' things to disrupt actual plans of the PTB by drawing the "attention to this source" if something really happens in that regard, but considering their recent 'last remarks' about insane people in position of power and explosive events, those two coupled don't seem to point to anything good being prepared in store for the next couple of months.

Also, who of the publicly known statesmen is actually in the position of power? If those who are really in power would make something explosive and maybe even nuclear at the inauguration, the whole world would be plunged into complete chaos in a second.

Just thinking out loud so maybe just ignore it...

 

[Keit]

So it looks like Trump was already busy before the election to get things rolling. My bet: Trump will work harder than ever. Basically nonstop. I think we could expect an even more daring Trump.

I read some comments on the Israeli TG channel, and Israelis are happy that Trump won, and think that it will help their cause, especially while knowing how Trump speaks about Iran. They are also very happy that Trump may stop supporting the conflict in Ukraine, because it means more money and weapons for Israel.

Here's also Netanyahu's tweet:



Supposedly Hezbollah also fired rockets toward Trump Heights on Golan Heights right after the elections. And Israelis remember how Trump threatened Hamas.

So they conveniently interpret Trump's words that he is going to end all wars as he is is going to end all wars in order to help Israel with its wars. They also say that Trump is excellent even if he won't actively help. The most important thing that he won't interfere. And knowing his opinion of Iran, they assume that he indeed won't interfere.

But thanks to the C's we know that Trump had a deal with Iral regarding Soleimani's assassination, so his "Iran bad" may be a show. So will see how exactly the things will progress.

 

[T.C.]

We were talking about Vance earlier in the thread. A few of us commented on his weird laughing at certain times, along with some other traits that were picked up.

I’m currently watching him on the Tim Dillon podcast which happened before the Rogan one. He comes across a lot better in this one.

Interestingly enough, they start talking about Kamala’s cackling witch laugh. Vance gives his take on what it is and why she does it and he explains it in terms of an experience he had where he bumped his car into someone else’s car and because he was nervous and uncomfortable about what happened, as he stepped out of the car he started inappropriately laughing.

This is obviously very good self-awareness and self-observation and although I think it misses the mark regarding Kamala’s cackling, I think it might go some way to explaining his weird laughing on the Rogan show.

I think because Tim Dillon’s show is less famous and has less exposure than Rogan, Vance was relaxed. He also has a good sense of humour in my opinion, since Dillon is a comedian who uses a very ironic, dry and sarcastic style, and Vance joins in with it in a natural and unforced way.

Having seen this I think he felt a bit of pressure in the Rogan interview and was nervous. I do also think there was still a bit of a desire to be liked or that he was a little star-struck or something of that sort.

 

[Tuatha de Danaan]

At the moment the US, to all intents and purpose, does not have a president. Bearing in mind Biden did no running for this election and evidence of his incompetence for quite a while wouldn't it be interesting if Trump(now elected president) would decide to bring forward the Inauguration date and catch everyone on the hop. Just a bit of wishful thinking on my part.

 

[lilies]

It could be that the C's pulled one of their 'reverse-attention' things to disrupt actual plans of the PTB by drawing the "attention to this source" if something really happens in that regard,

That is precisely why I posted Kamala as a winner yesterday here as a 'prophecy' - in deliberate anticipation mode for the Freaks to Walz in on the TV screens - and was preparing in full anticipation to re-post it here again that "Do not lose faith, the real 3-month election starts now, pray 2-3 times a week, etc.." I fully imagined posting here the need until Feb 2025 to visualize Team Trump smiling and waving to the crowd, regardless of when its happening. Placed my mind into Kamala-as-winner mode.

This on the personal level trying to emulate - exactly what the C's are doing with these Open-FRV-No-Anticipation / Multiple-Interpretation announcements of theirs. STS calls it DoubleThink. But yesterday I was thinking about what the STO version of Orwell's term could be and came up with: Open-FRV Declarations. Because we know the Lizzies are watching our prophecies and anticipations and 'immediately' Counter-Act / Reverse our hopes.

So now I'll continue reading this thread backward from the last post now back to yesterdays bookmark, because I want to see your posts with the video-image / tweet announcements about the results.

Still prayers are in order - I think 2x a week - for a mental image of a diligently working Trump-Vance admin in 2025 about how they congratulate to each other on any pre-planned milestone-job well done!

 

[Laura]

Just came back from the polls. Voted for my girl Kamala, a strong black* woman who will lead us to the promised land - a beautiful 5D city on a hill!

*NOTICE: The term "black" as used herein is employed for the purpose of convenience and does not necessarily denote or imply any definitive racial or ethnic classification. The individual referred to may or may not be of African descent, and the use of this term is not intended to be legally binding or enforceable in any manner. The classification of race or ethnicity is subject to personal identification and self-identification, and may vary according to individual preference, cultural context, or other factors. This document does not purport to establish, define, or limit any legal rights or obligations based on the use of the term "black." Any reliance on this term for legal purposes is strictly at the reader's own risk and is not endorsed or supported by the author or publisher of this document.

Did you really vote for Kamala??? Why?