I know we have this 470 years gap thing and C's said 'it needs some work'.
Consider as a rant, if you please. But the whole dating thing looks to me can of worms. That is why I never wanted to go into Cass Cosmology or Indian history thing. I never thought that overlapping Clube and Napier Giant comet calculations over what C's dates giving will go any where. I went into it because Indian history for my curiosity became so confusing. If every thing is wrong, we drop it. But, some looks correct and other looks too outlandish ( or layers of mental gymnastics mixed with 'historicization of myth and mythicization of history over long time like in layers), then we get very confusing situation. That's why I told myself i needed reference point ( or 'Source of Truth') to even to have a opinion what is right or wrong,
But It did produced some very interesting results for my surprise.
My line of thought is this. C's said many times that cataclysms change metrics ( or units) that our so called scientific instruments measure. We have cataclysm all the time - 540 AD ( final decline of Giants) , 1100 BCE ( last time megalithic technology) , Venus settling period ( 3000 to 2000 BCE) and so on. some times C's say our timings doesn't make sense for them (ex: Nephilim bringing in one reference is 12,000 BCE and another reference point is 9000 BCE). Then What is the point of getting hung up on dates/times? Fine, We are helpless linear time creatures, then why C's outside this constraints giving dates? I went with the assumption that We may not know what we are doing and they know what they are doing.
It becomes much more complicated when we look at how these consensual units of measure became acceptable to every body across the world during the last 400 years, It is directly overlaps with colonialism. It is not altruistic for sure. How does it reflected? The main accusation from right wing Indian Historians is that all the history is written in such a way that all the data points has to be after biblical start 4500 BCE ( Vedas - 1500 BCE etc. piling of things later).
Does no body asked about reality before 400 years? Every child asks 'where did I come from' by the time he starts talking and thinking. So it is highly unlikely.
One way to reconcile is - we need to measure things by 'Event' , instead of "Time" alone. Ex: Last Atlantean battle, C's put it 10.9K BCE, then Younger Dryas then Noah's flood ( 40 after YD). Western civilization knows from Plato's date 9000 years before his time ( 9600 BCE). Event is same, date is different, Then give more weightage to C's based on Event and see how it goes.
But artifacts survive by sheer luck. So we are limited by what is survived ( leaving aside Smithsonian stuff that is hidden under "political" pressure). Events are (or has to be) "recreated" by some body and most probably influenced by the circumstances of his time.
Leaving aside my about rant, How to reconcile 470 years. Best way to reconcile partially, Take one Event ( specific social or natural dynamic ) or Entity (Person, place and so on) and try to dig through by reading, it will open some avenues. For example
1600 BCE:
- Eruption of Thera.
- Exodus from Crete.
- Comets, Akhenaten
* Bronze Age destruction (Giant comet remnants)
* End of "sound wave focusing" (Megalithic) technology
* End of Mohenjo-Daro
* Angkor Wat(built by Lizards
* Troy (in Britain) destroyed (Iliad)
The question is 1600 or 1100 BCE in this context? - What insight we are missing from this ( being different or same)?
May be we should start using Ian Caroll's WEBB application , dump all the books ( Laura's books, C's session, Mary Settegast, all the dendrochronology, Ice core data etc. ). Only consider little more authentic and start creating Events and time. and see how it works.
I came across something recently I was hoping that someone will do for a while. An AI tool that has many of the advantages of the mainstream AI's like Grok have while deliberately circumventing lies, propaganda and "Hallucinations" that are obviously deliberately build into such mainstream tools.
It is called WEBB and can be found here:
www.thewebb.io
It is supposed to go live soon and could revolutionize how ordinary people can use AI without getting fed a bunch of lies that things like Grok will present and reinforce. Furthermore, it is also deliberately...
It is called WEBB and can be found here:
Webb - Research Tool for Local Files
Process local files, discover hidden connections, and research faster than ever before.
It is supposed to go live soon and could revolutionize how ordinary people can use AI without getting fed a bunch of lies that things like Grok will present and reinforce. Furthermore, it is also deliberately...
Laura already did w.r.t cometary events (portents, comet/meteorite observation) from old Roman/Greek books. That data also can be added. some critical data points came later ( ex: Vedas). At least we can reconcile Events with dates. It will become confusing ( and we have to make some choices as a hypothesis) before it becomes clearer.
