5200 PENTAGON EMPLOYEES PURCHASED CHILD PORNOGRAPHY

EmeraldHope

The Living Force
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7qTBkA8X_E

This came out in Jan but I just found it. Astounding. I did a few searches and did not see it mentioned here yet. As a mother, this , to me,is worth spreading the word on.

The above clip is Anderson Cooper on CNN with Senator Charles Grassley
 
Thanks EmeraldHope. This was published on SOTT net on 8th Jan this year. :)

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/221165-5200-Pentagon-Employees-PURCHASED-Child-Pornography-
 
I'm glad you brought it back up. I put it on my FB page asking "what is being done about this?" Any follow-ups?
 
There is only one more article I found, dated Jan 20th:

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1276242

Pentagon employees who view child pornography continue to operate without the prospect of investigation, even though several of them used military e-mail address as part of their payment information.

Upon discovering that 264 Pentagon employees or contractors had downloaded child pornography, only 70 workers were investigated, including nine who had top security clearances. But the Department of Defense has failed to explain the lack of further action. So Pat Trueman, CEO of Morality in Media, tells OneNewsNow it is imperative to conduct the probe "because if someone is a collector of child pornography, they are subject to blackmail by those who want material that the Pentagon might have -- and we know various spy agencies from other countries have used tactics like this."

Trueman also points out that a credibility issue arises if Pentagon violators are not prosecuted.

"What you have is the federal government enforcing very strictly the child pornography law on others in society. But if it's the federal employees themselves [who have violated the law], the federal government [doesn't] seem to take it very seriously," he laments. "Doesn't the law apply equally to people in federal government as well as common citizens?"

Pentagon officials now claim they lack the manpower to continue the probe, but Trueman -- a former Department of Justice prosecutor -- does not buy that because resources outside the Pentagon, such as the FBI, could be called in for help
 
EmeraldHope said:
There is only one more article I found, dated Jan 20th:

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1276242

Pentagon employees who view child pornography continue to operate without the prospect of investigation, even though several of them used military e-mail address as part of their payment information.<snip>

"What you have is the federal government enforcing very strictly the child pornography law on others in society. But if it's the federal employees themselves [who have violated the law], the federal government [doesn't] seem to take it very seriously," he laments. "Doesn't the law apply equally to people in federal government as well as common citizens?"

Pentagon officials now claim they lack the manpower to continue the probe, but Trueman -- a former Department of Justice prosecutor -- does not buy that because resources outside the Pentagon, such as the FBI, could be called in for help

This is just outrageous!

One of my FB friends posted:

From Global Security site they estimate 24,000 workers there, so this figure i much higher than 6% of workers, more like one fifth...I'll continue looking to see if I can find any verification for actual numbers as opposed to guestimations. I'm guessing all Pentagon employees are afforded the same type of legal protection, immunity and exemption that their Diplomatic thugs enjoy, but only an educated guess. All they would have to do if pushed on the issue is start quoting "National Security", or the Offical Secrets Act or some such nonsense."

and:

"I grabbed the following form Wiki, which suggest that the Pentagon now has their own policing and protection force...so they have probably set things up so that the average Police and lawyers have to go through this screen of protection. Self policing means they have positioned themselves above the regular moral authorities, and they are above the norms when it comes to protecting their own employees. Sickening and very sad to see. " The Pentagon Force Protection Agency (PFPA) is a United States government agency comprising both sworn federal police officers, the United States Pentagon Police and civilian CBRN technicians, and non-sworn civilian anti-terrorism investigative and physical security personnel, and is responsible for the protection of the Pentagon. The Department of Defense created the PFPA after the September 11, 2001 attacks. The new agency absorbed the Defense Protective Service (DPS) and assumed its role of providing basic law enforcement and security for the Pentagon and Department of Defense sites in the 280 acre (1.1 km2) "Pentagon Reservation" and greater National Capital Region (NCR). PFPA was also charged with providing force protection against the full spectrum of potential threats through robust prevention, preparedness, detection, and response measures. The United States Pentagon Police is the primary federal law enforcement arm of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency""
 
Laura said:
"I grabbed the following form Wiki, which suggest that the Pentagon now has their own policing and protection force...so they have probably set things up so that the average Police and lawyers have to go through this screen of protection.

So I assume this means they intentionally purchased child pornography at the Pentagon because it provides them protective measures!?
 
The United States Pentagon Police is the primary federal law enforcement arm of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency

I'm taking that bolded part to mean that the Pentagon Police protect the pentagon psychopaths from the law.
 
Maybe these cases are interrelated? It's a proven fact that Holland is the valhalla for paedophiles.

Dutch authorities launch large-scale investigation into child sex abuse case

2010-12-13 05:33:13 GMT+7 (ICT)

AMSTERDAM (BNO NEWS) -- Dutch authorities have arrested a 27-year-old man on suspicion of sexually abusing dozens of young children while working at nurseries and providing babysitting services through the internet.

Police said during a late-night news conference on Sunday that the suspect, identified as Robert M., is believed to have abused at least 33 and up to 50 children over the past few years. He had been working at two nurseries in Amsterdam but was also offering babysitting services through the internet.

The suspect was identified after law enforcement agencies in the United States found child pornography which they believed was produced in the Netherlands. A photo of a possible victim was then aired on Dutch television, after which the boy was identified.

The husband of Robert M., a 37-year-old man, was also arrested and is accused of possessing child pornography. He is currently not accused of sexual abuse of children.

Police refused to say whether an international network of pedophiles might be involved. All victims are believed to be between the ages of 0 and 4.

Link


 
I shouldn't, but still......... :jawdrop:

EmeraldHope said:
There is only one more article I found, dated Jan 20th:

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1276242

Pentagon employees who view child pornography continue to operate without the prospect of investigation, even though several of them used military e-mail address as part of their payment information.

Upon discovering that 264 Pentagon employees or contractors had downloaded child pornography, only 70 workers were investigated, including nine who had top security clearances. But the Department of Defense has failed to explain the lack of further action. So Pat Trueman, CEO of Morality in Media, tells OneNewsNow it is imperative to conduct the probe "because if someone is a collector of child pornography, they are subject to blackmail by those who want material that the Pentagon might have -- and we know various spy agencies from other countries have used tactics like this."

Or say, their own government!? "Hey lads, you can watch all the child-porn you want, use the pentagon e-mail if you want, it's safe, and we'll just keep that 911 missile between us, yes?... {wink wink, pats on the back}".
 
Laura said:
I'm glad you brought it back up. I put it on my FB page asking "what is being done about this?" Any follow-ups?

Me too, I missed it first time around. What can we do about this? Would it do any good to contact our congressional reps? My senators are Patrick Leahy (chairman of the judiciary committee) and Bernie Sanders. I haven't heard a peep from either one of them about this..... perhaps they don't know?

I have some friends in the local newspapers, I'll contact them and see if they'll run a story.

AI said:
So, 20% of Pentagon employees are paedophiles...

Awesome. And people wonder why things are so messed up in the US.

Alana said:
Or say, their own government!? "Hey lads, you can watch all the child-porn you want, use the pentagon e-mail if you want, it's safe, and we'll just keep that 911 missile between us, yes?... {wink wink, pats on the back}".

:mad:
 
Maybe you guys can keep digging here and there and start producing a series of articles??? Even just short "connecting the dots" type things, like putting together just what is commented above with the excerpts will do. I think the problem needs a lot more attention and maybe we can get the ball rolling? Alan's point is a VERY good one! And the link to the Netherlands? Yup. When I was exposing the previous owners of godlikeproductions.com people for some pretty creepy pedophile and sexual perversion connections, I received email threats from the Netherlands and they pointed out that they weren't so far away that they couldn't get to me. I wouldn't be surprised if many bloggers and online trolls - heck, even types like Vincent Bridges and Jay Weidner - aren't being controlled by some dark secrets!
 
I emailed my two newspaper friends. Haven't heard back from one and the other is not interested.

I don't think I really know know how to go at something like this. I have experience with academic research, but I don't have any journalism experience. Usually when I'm researching something I start with Google or Amazon, start typing in names or questions related to the topic I'm researching and then pull on any threads I turn up. If I try the same thing with this I'll just end up with endless lists of child porn sites, which is not what I want. :barf:

Could someone give me a few pointers, or point me to the "Journalism for Dummies" guide? I'm not looking for handholding, just a push in the right direction.

I poked around a little bit and found a statistics page: _http://www.safefamilies.org/sfStats.php. I'm afraid its pretty upsetting. :(

http://www.safefamilies.org/sfStats.php said:
PORNOGRAPHY ADDICTION AND INDUSTRY STATISTICS

As of 2003, there were 1.3 million pornographic websites; 260 million pages (N2H2, 2003).

The total porn industry revenue for 2006: $13.3 billion in the United States; $97 billion worldwide (Internet Filter Review).

U.S. adult DVD/video rentals in 2005: almost 1 billion (Adult Video News).
Hotel viewership for adult films: 55% (cbsnews.com).

Unique worldwide users visiting adult web sites monthly: 72 million (Internet Filter Review).

Number of hardcore pornography titles released in 2005 (U.S.): 13,588 (Internet Filter Review).

Adults admitting to Internet sexual addiction: 10%; 28% of those are women (Internet Filter Review).

More than 70% of men from 18 to 34 visit a pornographic site in a typical month (comScore Media Metrix).

More than 20,000 images of child pornography posted online every week (National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, 10/8/03).

Approximately 20% of all Internet pornography involves children (National Center for Mission & Exploited Children).

100,000 websites offer illegal child pornography (U.S. Customs Service estimate).

As of December 2005, child pornography was a $3 billion annual industry (Internet Filter Review).


"At a 2003 meeting of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, two thirds of the 350 divorce lawyers who attended said the Internet played a significant role in the divorces in the past year, with excessive interest in online porn contributing to more than half such cases. Pornography had an almost non-existent role in divorce just seven or eight years ago." (Divorcewizards.com)

[...]

STATISTICS ON CHILD PORNOGRAPHY USE

9 out of 10 children aged between the ages of 8 and 16 have viewed pornography on the Internet, in most cases unintentionally (London School of Economics January 2002).

Average age of first Internet exposure to pornography: 11 years old (Internet Filter Review).

Largest consumer of Internet pornography: 12 - 17 year-old age group (various sources, as of 2007).

Adult industry says traffic is 20-30% children (NRC Report 2002, 3.3).

Youth with significant exposure to sexuality in the media were shown to be significantly more likely to have had intercourse at ages 14 to 16 (Report in Pediatrics, April, 2006).

"Never before in the history of telecommunications media in the United States has so much indecent (and obscene) material been so easily accessible by so many minors in so many American homes with so few restrictions."
- U.S. Department of Justice, Post Hearing Memorandum of Points and Authorities, at l, ACLU v. Reno, 929 F. Supp. 824 (1996).

STATISTICS ON ONLINE PERPETRATORS

1 in 7 children who use the internet have been sexually solicated - 2005. (Internet Filter Review)

1 in 4 kids participate in Real Time Chat. (FamilyPC Survey, 2000).

1 in 5 children (10 to 17 years old) receives unwanted sexual solicitations online (Youth Internet Safety Survey, U.S. Department of Justice, 2001).

2 in 5 abductions of children ages 15-17 are due to Internet contact (San Diego Police Dept.).

76% of victims in Net-initiated sexual exploitation cases were 13-15, 75% were girls. "Most cases progressed to sexual encounters" - 93% of the face-to-face meetings involved illegal sex (Journal of Adolescent Health, November 2004).

I also found a declassified government document about Operation Flicker available here. Its 94 pages long and names have been blacked out, but maybe there's some clues in there. I'll skim through it this weekend.


Apparently the Pentagon is trying to do some damage control:

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2011/01/top_pentagon_of.html said:
Top Pentagon official vows 'all-out pursuit' of child porn suspects

By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff

WASHINGTON _ The Pentagon's top investigator is vowing an "all-out pursuit" of any employees who may have downloaded child pornography after his agency acknowledged that 1,700 potential suspects who were referred to military investigators four years ago were never screened.

Gordon S. Heddell, the Department of Defense's Inspector General, said in a statement to the Globe today that his office, which oversees the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, is working aggressively to correct the mishandling of the cases and pursue any remaining suspects.

"I can assure those with questions that my office is conducting an aggressive pursuit of anyone implicated in Operation Flicker and that it is a key investigative priority," Heddell said in his first public statement on the matter.

"The sexual exploitation of any child is a tragedy," he added. "We are reviewing each and every Operation Flicker referral DCIS has received so as to ensure action is taken regarding allegations involving individuals with connections to the Department of Defense."

The Pentagon agency has come under fierce criticism in recent months for its role in the child pornography investigation that was spearheaded by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, which has jurisdiction for such federal crimes under its customs mandate.

The Globe reported earlier this week the Pentagon checked only 3,500 out of 5,200 individuals who were suspected of downloading child pornography.

The partial screening, which was conducted in 2007, identified 302 individuals who were either military personnel, civilian employees, or private contractors. Some of those held high-level security clearances and worked at sensitive intelligence agencies such as the National Security Agency, which eavesdrops on enemy communications. Several also accessed the images on their work computers, a separate violation.

Out of the 302 cases, 70 were eventually pursued, while only a handful resulted in prosecutions. The agency said that many cases were dropped for lack of evidence, but also acknowledged that child pornography was not treated as one of the agency's investigative priorities at the time, when it was under different leadership.

"However," Heddell said today, "our re-investigative efforts are focused on determining the exact number" of Pentagon workers who may have been involved.

Sen. Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican and senior member of the Judiciary Committee, has disparaged the agency's approach to the matter since the cases were first reported by the Globe last summer. In addition to the potential exploitation of minors, Grassley has also expressed concern that individuals with access to secret information could be blackmailed or otherwise compromised by American enemies if they are in possession of child pornography, a crime that could bring up to 20 years imprisonment.

"We want a change in behavior in the Defense Department where things of this criminal nature are a top priority, even more than government employees at other agencies because of the national security connections," Grassley told the Globe in an interview earlier this week.

It was in response to Grassley's inquiries that officials reported late last year that the Pentagon had never followed up on all the individuals referred to the agency in the first place.

A spokesman for the Defense Criminal Investigative Service could not predict how many of the remaining names might have military connections, nor when the review would be complete.

Heddell said his office is working with ICE, along with investigators from the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, the Army's Criminal Investigative Division, and the Air Force Office of Special Investigations.

Grassley said that the statute of limitations has probably expired for criminal charges to be brought against any violators but said he would press for administrative punishment for anyone who is implicated.


Most of the other articles I'm finding on this all say the same thing, and they mostly focus on people in the US who have been arrested and don't say much about where child porn is being made. This article mentions Australia, Belarus and the Ukraine:

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/global-child-porn-ring-busted/story-e6frfku0-1225963817011 said:
Global child porn ring busted
From: AAP
December 01, 2010

POLICE say they expect more arrests after busting an international network of child exploitation websites which sold sickening images of youngsters as young as three being abused.
A global taskforce of detectives brought down the 230 websites as part of a wider operation which has led to 30,000 customers being identified in 132 countries and hundreds of arrests.
Some of the child exploitation images were likely to have been made in Australia, federal police assistant commissioner Neil Gaughan said today.
Some of the website customers are also likely to live in Australia, he added.
"What we saw with this particular investigation was the bringing down of a sophisticated organised crime group that was responsible for pay-per-view child abuse images being distributed globally," Mr Gaughan said today.
The investigation led by a group of international police forces working under the banner of the Virtual Global Taskforce stemmed from a 2006 investigation in the US, called Operation Flicker.

Hundreds of convictions were recorded in the US after the initial investigation.
There were a further 11 arrests in Belarus in 2008 followed by a second phase of the investigation, Operation Basket - involving the Australian Federal Police - which led to five further arrests in the Ukraine in January this year.
Mr Gaughan said it was likely further arrests would be made and the investigation was ongoing.
Police are now targeting customers who used the websites.
Luis Alvarez, Department of Homeland Security, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement said the websites involved were highly sophisticated.
"It took down a serious organisation worldwide," he said.


Thats all I've got for now.


*Edited to remove author's email address from Boston Globe quote
 
I thought it was odd when I heard about it. My gut tells me it's a cleaning house thing where TPTB are getting rid of employees they don't like.

I don't believe for a minute 5,000 dudes are surfing kiddie porn at work on some of the most guarded and monitored computers in the world.

It doesn't add up at all. Somebody is firing a shot across somebodies bow.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom