A candidate for a 4D game

carlise said:
What I mean is that they could just blatantly do things such as take this forum down, destroy works by people like Gurdjieff or make it that they never happened, and just kill people who are getting too close to the truth. Therefore it seems they have rules they must play by too.

When you start thinking along those lines, it might be interesting to consider that they have - that they've removed or destroyed hundreds of thousands (if not more) of other stores of Truth and modes of development and that what we have available today is just a faint shadow of what we would have available if they were not constantly interfering 'outside' of linear time on an ongoing basis. I do get your point, though, that there do appear to be 'rules' and that we, as a species, do have more power and ability than we think, it's the learning to access it that is the struggle, in such a controlled 'experiment'.
 
Interesting thing. I've only heard of NxN chess instead of using standard 8x8 chess boards which represents an extension to infinity, but not expansion to further dimensions.
I will google that. Whether anyone has ever implemented this idea utilising several chess engines simultaneously?

4D STS is probably playing “3D chess”, that is our world. :(
 
anart said:
When you start thinking along those lines, it might be interesting to consider that they have - that they've removed or destroyed hundreds of thousands (if not more) of other stores of Truth and modes of development and that what we have available today is just a faint shadow of what we would have available if they were not constantly interfering 'outside' of linear time on an ongoing basis. I do get your point, though, that there do appear to be 'rules' and that we, as a species, do have more power and ability than we think, it's the learning to access it that is the struggle, in such a controlled 'experiment'.

Yes I see. In a game of sport the home team usually has an advantage, but the away team can still win. Currently we are in the home of STS who have a huge advantage. They can make it extremely difficult but there must be a small chance for us to succeed/escape, in the form of a long and difficult quest. It feels just intrinsically wrong that we would be placed in a game where we have no chance of winning at all. Then again I have nothing to base this belief on it could just be another program, it just doesn't feel like it fits in with the universe very well.
 
I have read some of the Wave. It's a lot of reading, don'tcha know.
Somehow, the plans they have are getting upset and I sense a blunder has been committed. The Wave approaches (still not very clear on all that implies) and awareness increases. The advantage they have, as others have implied, is being able to see the whole board(s) in 3D and 4D. As our own knowledge increases, the playing field get more level.
Strategy and Tactics are 2 different things, and you might say densities. For a long time, they have had both as superior advantages. Once exposed, thier tactics begin to not work out so good for them. Strategy is never exposed until the very last, being that thier tactics have enjoyed 300,000 years or so worth of overwhelming success.
So, they may be superior tacticians due to thier use of 4D and technology, but that says nothing about how good thier Strategy is. Bad has never been known to be the possessor of strategy beyond immediate gain. Have a look at the criminal mind.
We will see.
 
RobertB said:
I have read some of the Wave. It's a lot of reading, don'tcha know.
Somehow, the plans they have are getting upset and I sense a blunder has been committed. The Wave approaches (still not very clear on all that implies) and awareness increases. The advantage they have, as others have implied, is being able to see the whole board(s) in 3D and 4D. As our own knowledge increases, the playing field get more level.
Strategy and Tactics are 2 different things, and you might say densities. For a long time, they have had both as superior advantages. Once exposed, thier tactics begin to not work out so good for them. Strategy is never exposed until the very last, being that thier tactics have enjoyed 300,000 years or so worth of overwhelming success.
So, they may be superior tacticians due to thier use of 4D and technology, but that says nothing about how good thier Strategy is. Bad has never been known to be the possessor of strategy beyond immediate gain. Have a look at the criminal mind.
We will see.

You may be extrapolating our own thinking to a level where it is no longer valid. Strategy and tactics are not akin to different densities. A dog or another 2D animal has very little conception of a 3D human thinking - of strategy, tactics or otherwise. That model may be a more logical candidate for extrapolation to understand our relationship as 3D beings to the 4D.
 
So, they may be superior tacticians due to thier use of 4D and technology, but that says nothing about how good thier Strategy is.

To me it seems it's working just fine, same old things and programs running. My advice:Do never underestimate your opponent especially when it has greater intelligence and consciousness of 4D and knows you better then you know yourself because our mind is more, less their mind, maybe just without fear like ours, not mentioning psychopaths with who we have difficulties dealing with and they are only 3D.
 
Oh for a day to sit down face to face, heart to heart.
Networking has it's limitations, but it is better than no communication at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom