Ennio said:
1.) There's always been mass migration to Europe, mainly for economic reasons.
2.) Two thirds of the migrants are not coming from an Arab Spring country or conflict zone.
I would contest those claims as well, here is what I posted elsewhere:
He says that only 20% of refugees are from Syria. But that's because he does not consider the numbers for 2015, which he could find here:
_http://data.unhcr.org/mediterranean/regional.html
UNHCR says that 53% of the asylum seeking people in 2015 are coming from Syria, so he uses the argument to reinforce the notion that no such refugee crisis exist.
In his second point, mentioning that 2/3 of the inmigrants/refugees come to Europe for economic reasons, he is partially right, but not convincingly right, at least to back up his claims in that way. I checked
Eurostat (his own source) and found that the top countries of origin of people asking for asylum are:
- Syria
- Afghanistan
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244/99)
- Eritrea
- Serbia
- Pakistan
- Iraq
You can download an Excel file with the info
from here.
These 7 countries constitute 50% of the asylum-seeking people for 2013 and 2014 (no data yet for 2015). Most of them are war-torn countries, if we consider that Kosovo and Serbia's refugee situation came from a war situation.
And although Eritrea is not officially at war with anyone, is just as bad. Decades-long force conscription make people run away to Europe, and in a way they fall into the refugee category too. So my conclusion is that these people don't want to go to Europe only on economic basis as he tries to point out.
My 2 cents.