Acoustic Levitation - from Baalbek to Tibet

sandokhan

A Disturbance in the Force
An analysis of the 1939 event described in H. Kjellson's work (http://www.nilsolof.se/ljudkraft.htm )

antigravitywg106.gif



http://www.nilsolof.se/ljudkraft.htm

Animation gif for the levitation:

http://www.igeawagu.com/news/ancient...118681113.html (click on image)

Tibetan Monks levitate stones by using an acoustic levitation technique with the aid of drums in this 1939 sketch by Swedish aircraft designer Henry Kjellson.




The following extracts are translations taken from the German article: 'We know from the priests of the far east that they were able to lift heavy boulders up high mountains with the help of groups of various sounds... the knowledge of the various vibrations in the audio range demonstrates to a scientist of physics that a vibrating and condensed sound field can nullify the power of gravitation. Swedish engineer Olaf Alexanderson wrote about this phenomenon in the publication.


The following report is based on observations which were made only 20 years ago in Tibet. I have this report from civil engineer and flight manager, Henry Kjelson, a friend of mine. He later on included this report in his book, The Lost Techniques. This is his report:


A Swedish doctor, Dr Jarl, a friend of Kjelsons, studied at Oxford. During those times he became friends with a young Tibetan student. A couple of years later, it was 1939, Dr Jarl made a journey to Egypt for the English Scientific Society. There he was seen by a messenger of his Tibetan friend, and urgently requested to come to Tibet to treat a high Lama.


After Dr Jarl got the leave he followed the messenger and arrived after a long journey by plane and Yak caravans, at the monastery, where the old Lama and his friend who was now holding a high position were now living.


Dr Jarl stayed there for some time, and because of his friendship with the Tibetans he learned a lot of things that other foreigners had no chance to hear about, or observe.


One day his friend took him to a place in the neighborhood of the monastery and showed him a sloping meadow which was surrounded in the north west by high cliffs. In one of the rock walls, at a height of about 250 meters was a big hole which looked like the entrance to a cave. In front of this hole there was a platform on which the monks were building a rock wall. The only access to this platform was from the top of the cliff and the monks lowered themselves down with the help of ropes.


In the middle of the meadow, about 250 meters from the cliff, was a polished slab of rock with a bowl like cavity in the centre. The bowl had a diameter of one meter and a depth of 15 centimeters. A block of stone was maneuvered into this cavity by Yak oxen. The block was one meter wide and one and one-half meters long. Then 19 musical instruments were set in an arc of 90 degrees at a distance of 63 meters from the stone slab. The radius of 63 meters was measured out accurately. The musical instruments consisted of 13 drums and six trumpets.


Eight drums had a cross-section of one meter, and a length of one and one-half meters. Four drums were medium size with a cross-section of 0.7 meter and a length of one meter. The only small drum had a cross-section of 0.2 meters and a length of 0.3 meters. All the trumpets were the same size. They had a length of 3.12 meters and an opening of 0.3 meters. The big drums and all the trumpets were fixed on mounts which could be adjusted with staffs in the direction of the slab of stone.

The big drums were made of 3mm thick sheet iron, and had a weight of 150 kg. They were built in five sections. All the drums were open at one end, while the other end had a bottom of metal, on which the monks beat with big leather clubs. Behind each instrument was a row of monks. The situation is demonstrated in the following diagram:

antigravitywg108.gif


When the stone was in position the monk behind the small drum gave a signal to start the concert. The small drum had a very sharp sound, and could be heard even with the other instruments making a terrible din. All the monks were singing and chanting a prayer, slowly increasing the tempo of this unbelievable noise. During the first four minutes nothing happened, then as the speed of the drumming, and the noise, increased, the big stone block started to rock and sway, and suddenly it took off into the air with an increasing speed in the direction of the platform in front of the cave hole 250 meters high. After three minutes of ascent it landed on the platform.


Continuously they brought new blocks to the meadow, and the monks using this method, transported 5 to 6 blocks per hour on a parabolic flight track approximately 500 meters long and 250 meters high. From time to time a stone split, and the monks moved the split stones away. Quite an unbelievable task.


Dr Jarl knew about the hurling of the stones. Tibetan experts like Linaver, Spalding and Hue had spoken about it, but they had never seen it. So Dr Jarl was the first foreigner who had the opportunity to see this remarkable spectacle. Because he had the opinion in the beginning that he was the victim of mass-psychosis he made two films of the incident. The films showed exactly the same things that he had witnessed.


The English Society for which Dr Jarl was working confiscated the two films and declared them classified.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/antigravityworldgrid/ciencia_antigravityworldgrid08.htm


http://web.archive.org/web/20060306044903/http://www.ianlawton.com/sl2.htm

Rudolf von Linauer, tibetan levitation:

http://ufoarchives.blogspot.ro/2013/07/rudolf-von-linauer-and-tibetan-mystery.html

UPDATE ON R. V. LINAUER:

http://ufoarchives.blogspot.ro/2013/10/rudolf-von-linauer-and-tibet.html

http://ufoarchives.blogspot.ro/2013/09/new-data-on-rudolf-von-linauer.html



Until now, no one has even attempted to explain this carefully documented levitation of the block of stone (the author the article, B. Cathie, does not seem to understand the fact, that during the levitation itself, the block was not subject to any gravitational force, and therefore had the Earth been orbiting the Sun at a speed of 107,000 km/hr or some 29 km/s, it would have disappared instantly from the sight of the monks and the witnesses, not to mention the speed of the rotating Earth).




63.5 meters distance = 100 sacred cubits (1 sc = 0.6356 meters)


1 sacred inch = 0.02542 m = 2,542 cm

180 monks - OM chanting - OM frequency = 136.1 Hz


6 trumpets = 53,4 Hz (length of each trumpet = 3.178 m = 6 sc)


8 drums = 106.6 Hz


4 drums = 160 Hz


1 drum = 534,3 Hz




Speed of sound = OM frequency x 2.5


Speed of sound/distance = frequency of the 6 trumpets


534.3 x 1 sc = speed of sound


Dimensions of the cavity resonator: 6 sacred inches height , 40 sacred inches diameter




Gizeh Pyramid


Distance from Campbell's chamber apex to top = 63.5 meters


It is obvious that the monks did not have at their disposal a trumpet with a length of 6.36 meters, that is why their doubled the first three frequencies, which should have measured 26.66 , 53,4 , 80 Hz respectively, to match the measurements of the heights of the chambers of the Gizeh Pyramid.



Matter has a sound aspect, and when a vibration is caused it generates an acoustical wave which travels through the air working with it concurrently and resulting in oscillations of particles in the air and this causes the intermolecular space of the air to rise in vibrations and causes the atoms to eventually work into the first state of the ether.


Let us take a look at the distance: the stone was placed at precisely 254 meters from the edge of the cliff.

The monks used the telluric current with a period of 1017 meters (one sacred inch = 0.025424 meters, one sacred cubit = 0.63566 meters).

254.24 x 4 = 1017 meters

This was the first telluric current which could pass over the edge of the cliff, and place the stone precisely at the target.



Analysis of the acoustic levitation (D. Davidson):

If we assume that each monk with his instrument produced one half this much sound energy (which is highly unlikely) and we make the further gross assumption that this is the amount if power that reaches the stone (actually sound dissipates rapidly over distance), we would have about 0.04 watts (i.e., (19 instruments + 19 x 4 monks) x 0.000094) hitting the huge stone block.

This is an astoundingly small amount of energy actually hitting the 1.5 cubic meter stone to produce the effect.

To lift the stone 250 meters takes a prodigious amount of energy. Rocks such as granite and limestone have weights in the neighborhood of 150-175 pounds per cubic foot.

If we assume a nominal value of 160 pounds per cubic foot then the 1.5 cubic meter stones weighed around 8475 pounds (i.e., over 4 tons!!!). To lift the 8475 pounds 250 meters would require about 7 million ft-pounds of work (i.e., 8475 pounds X 250 meters / 0.30408 meters/foot = 6,968,035).

Since this was done over a 3 minute period then about 70 horsepower was produced (i.e., 7 x 106 foot-pounds / 180 seconds / 550 horsepower/foot-pound/second = 70.384). This is equivalent to 52 kilowatts (i.e., 70.384 X 0.74570 kilowatts/horsepower = 52.5).

The over unity power factor we obtain is 5,250,000 over unity (i.e., 52,500 watts/0.01 watts).


The design of the tibetan levitation is similar to that of the Ptah/Osiris/Horus staff:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/42/Relief_of_Ptah.jpg/397px-Relief_of_Ptah.jpg


Tibetan water droplets levitation video:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/must-see-tibetan-singing-bowls-levitate-water/

Denis Terwagne of the University of Liège in Belgium and John Bush, a mathematician at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have come up with quite an interesting finding concerning a ceremonial instrument used by generations of Tibetans.



Now, we can understand exactly how the blocks of granite from Baalbek were moved from one place to another.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a2/Baalbek-stoneofpregnantwoman.jpg/800px-Baalbek-stoneofpregnantwoman.jpg


Baalbek-old-photo.jpg


baalbek_3.jpg


Three blocks, weight 1000 tons each


Seven blocks, each weighing 400 tons


Fourteen blocks, each weighing 300 tons

http://www.eridu.co.uk/Author/Mysteries_of_the_World/Baalbek/Baalbek6/baalbek6.html

Here is a fascinating question. Why did the builders of the Trilithon struggle with 800-ton weights when it would have been far easier to split the giant monoliths into smaller blocks? Why not use 4 x 200-ton stones rather than a cumbersome 800-tonner?


According to my engineer-friends, it was very risky to use 800-ton blocks in the way seen at Baalbek. This is because any vertical defects running lengthwise through the stone might have led to a critical structural weakness. In contrast, a similar fault in a smaller block would not have affected the overall construction. Either the builder was incompetent and just plain lucky or he was competent and supremely confident in his materials.



The colossal dimensions of the Baalbek monoliths:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JElDe5co5W8


In order to fully understand the significance of the sacred cubit in relation to the laevorotatory subquarks please read my messages:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1570956#msg1570956


Gizeh Pyramid Advanced Calculus, based on the sacred cubit:

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1573684#msg1573684 (part I)

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1573998#msg1573998 (part II)



Full model of the atom (from baryons to subquarks):

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1401101#msg1401101
 
Hi sandokhan,
Welcome to the forum. We encourage new members to post an introduction in the newbies board, telling us a little bit about themselves, how they found this forum etc. You can have a look at some threads in the newbies board to see how others have done it if you like.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom