Another Hit for the Cassiopaeans? - Brown Dwarf Companion Star

Laura

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Hopefully, some of ya'll can see what else you can find out about this on the net.


G1.9 Confirmed a Binary Red Dwarf Star.
http://www.nowpublic.com/tech-biz/g1-9-confirmed-binary-red-dwarf-star-6

Better images here: http://nwolibrary.com/news/space/618-dwarf-sun

Spanish Astronomers Claim Dwarf Sun Beyond Pluto

The idea of a new planet being discovered in our Solar System is pretty exciting. Even more so because of the many theories about "planet-x" or "Nibiru" being associated with space aliens and the doomsday prophecies of 2012. Scientists at places like NASA and famous observatories have deflected inquiries about the discovery for a few years now, mainly because they feared being associated with these "fringe" theories. But like it or not -- it has happened. Well... According to a team of Spanish astronomers who call themselves the StarViewer Team.

The group made the rounds of all the news web sites in the past two weeks, claiming they discovered something very significant. It's almost twice the size of Jupiter and just beyond our furthest planetoid, Pluto. Although it's not a planet, it appears to have planets or large satellites encircling it. It's what astronomers call a "brown dwarf star" and its official name is "G1.9". . . .

Nemesis

The theory of a companion sun is not new. It has often been described as Nemesis, after the Greek figure in mythology. The mythological Nemesis was the spirit of divine retribution against those who succumb to hubris, vengeful fate personified as a remorseless goddess. The name Nemesis is related to the Greek word meaning "to give what is due".

Nemesis is now often used as a term to describe one's worst enemy, normally someone or something that is the exact opposite of oneself but is also somehow similar. For example, Professor Moriarty is frequently described as the nemesis of Sherlock Holmes. "Opposite yet similar" is the perfect description for a companion to our Sun. But the name Nemesis also implies a sinister nature. Will this new Nemesis be beneficial or harmful to our lives?

Many suns that we observe in the galaxy are part of binary systems or double stars. There is debate about how two suns form from a single condensed cloud of matter. Some believe that they both form at the same time; others believe they split following the creation of one huge sun.

Sometimes both spheres are capable of fusion and both suns shine brightly, encircling each other around an imaginary point call the barycenter. Sometimes only one sun attains 13MJ and ignites, while its smaller companion, the brown dwarf, glows dimly and radiates heat. Astronomers usually can only see the brightest of the two, but because they both circle around a common barycenter, the wobble reveals the mass of the unseen companion.

We are close to our Sun and within its gravitational influence. So as we are travel through space, it appears to us that the G1.9 is moving in an elipse between our furthest planetoid, Pluto, and the edge of our Solar system, near the Oort Cloud.

The newly discovered brown dwarf is reported to be located just about 60 to 66 AU (1 AU=the distance from the Sun to Earth) from us (its parigee), currently in the direction of the constellation Sagittarius. Because of periodic gravitational disturbances in areas of space further out, specifically in the Oort Cloud, the Spanish group of astronomers believe G1.9 travels in an elliptical orbit extending possibly hundreds of AU beyond the furthest known planets (its apogee). Its position just beyond Pluto suggests it is at its closest approach to the Sun and Earth.

Space appears relatively free of debris [www.binaryresearchinstitute.com] inside the planetary orbits. This is because the gravitational pull of each planet (a large mass) effectively collects the interplanetary debris (small mass). But there are exceptions.

Belts of Debris

Between Mars and Jupiter you will see a ring of debris called The Asteroid Belt. It is believed that a planet once orbited in this area before it was pulverized by some type of impact. Many theorists believe this was caused by a rogue planet that entered the Solar System -- again hinting at the existence of some unknown member of our planetary system.

Beyond the furthest planetoid, Pluto, there is a large ring of debris called the Kuiper Belt. While the asteroid belt is composed primarily of rock and metal, the Kuiper belt objects are composed largely of frozen volatiles (termed "ices"), such as methane, ammonia and water.

As we get to the edge of the Solar System we enter another debris zone, the Oort Cloud. The Oort is not a band of debris but rather a spherical shell that surrounds the Solar System and extends out to the edge of the Sun's gravitational field. This region is thought to contain frozen clumps of water, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide. It's also the birth place of comets. However, the discovery of the object 1996-PW, an asteroid in an orbit more typical of a long-period comet, suggests that the cloud may also be home to rocky objects.

Debris "fly-paper"

Jupiter and Saturn are extremely massive and have such strong gravity that they attract meteors and comets entering the planetary zone of our Solar System. They protect smaller planets like our Earth from impacts, acting like a fly-paper for meteors, comets and asteroids.

In August of 2009, Jupiter captured a large asteroid that entered the planetary zone unexpectedly, despite the efforts of astronomers to track these dangerous objects. It is believed that this asteroid was perturbed by the trajectory of G1.9, which until now, was not recognized and accounted for.

How it was discovered... the controversy

You might well ask why astronomers have never detected this object before. In fact they did. G1.9 was first identified as a "supernova remnant" in 1984 by Dave Green of the University of Cambridge and later studied in greater detail with NRAO's Very Large Array radio telescope in 1985. Because it was unusually small for a supernova it was thought to be young -- less than about 1000 years old.

But in 2007, X-ray observations made with NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory revealed that the object was much larger than the last time it was observed! It had grown in size by 16%. Puzzled by this observation, the Very Large Array repeated its observations of 23 years ago and verified that it had increased in size considerably. Knowing that supernova do not expand this quickly, unless they have just exploded, they explained that G1.9 must be a "very young" supernova -- perhaps not more than 150 years old. But no record of a visible supernova has been found corresponding to that historical period (about the time of the American Civil War).

Spanish astronomers have tracked this object with great interest because they were anticipating its appearance. Gravitational anomalies have been appearing in the Oort Cloud for some time, suggesting the perturbations were caused by a nearby object with considerable mass. The announcement that G1.9 had increased in size was no mystery to them. It is exactly what they would expect as the object moved closer to Earth.

The object, G1.9 [above right] is currently located in the direction of our Galaxy's center, Sagittarius, which glows bright in this infrared spectrum image. Because of the bright background G1.9 is not visible in normal light wavelengths.

Of course there is controversy. The Spanish asrtonomers, who call themselves the "Starviewer Team" must still convince the scientific community that G.19 is not a supernova, but rather a brown dwarf star inside our Solar System. This is not an easy task. But we asked them to do just that for this article.

The image [above] shows the evidence that the object has increased in size over the 23 years that it has been observed. On the left, the blue spherical shape was recorded in radio wavelengths in 1985 by the Very Large Array. The image on the right shows the same view taken in 2008. It is obvious that the object is larger, but critics say that this is not because the object is closer, but rather that the residual "shell" from the exploding star has advanced out from its origin. They note the shape is not spherical but consistent with the type of remnants usually seen with supernova.

In this image [above] we see the original 1985 radio emission image from VLA compared to the 2007 x-ray image taken by the Chandra Observatory.

Colleen Tomas here: Note the blackness at the center of the above four photos of G1.9. This is expected (by me) of any star that has phonons on the outside instead of on the inside like our Sun (Personal theory based on physics: matter and antimatter pick a magnetic zone to quadrant of in. Local space ambient ion charge determines which type of matter will go inside and which goes outside). Phonons can be 100% efficient at absorbing light. Earthlings have only just begun to learn about phonons as they play with crystals for electronics and other applications. Crystals will emit harmonic phonons until you squeeze them, at which time they emit photons instead of harmonic phonons (owing to making magnetic transverse waves taller and closer together thus more energetic into the light emitting range).

Since NASA scientists have never heard of phonons they foolishly believe this dwarf star is a supernova that is enlarging, not because it is drawing closer but because it is expanding in an explosion. While that theory may seem plausible is does not hold up when we consider ancient historical accounts of the binary star that regularly orbits our Sun [1]. Besides, solar system changes are consistent with an approaching object that is emitting a great deal of antimatter cosmic rays that in the link there NASA admits is coming from a near by source! Antimatter is dark matter, positrons and antiprotons are phonons, cool bodies of subtle transverse waves that have intense magnetic force. Magnetic force is strongest where thermal output is lowest. Phonons are the inverse twin of photons. Together photons and phonons are the husband and wife of creation, all matter is built from matter-antimatter pairs. Together these inverse ion entities form a bar magnate with north and south poles. Matter, antimatter Ion beams are now observable in Earth's atmosphere, they are way beautiful too. Before I add the links to them know the physics first (that is my price for admission).

In the videos you will see a matter-antimatter cloud form from ion beams [NASA admits these antimatter streams are coming from a near object here) that will begin to swirl in one another's magnetic fields (sometimes they shoot apart and come back together [1, 2]). As emerging phonon tubes form they swirl draging ions around to form a flat spiral in the sky, a very large one. When the ions ground to Earth you can see the toroidal magnetic field light up in a lovely blue transverse wave spiral. When the incoming phonon tube that caused all of this to begin with finally punches trough our atmosphere you see a black hole evolve. These plasma ion-phonon-magnetic structures have been filmed all over the world. Apparently only I can explain the physics for these since I studied phonon physics. Lots of sincere but wrongheaded explanations out to there to explain these structures but they are just guesses and even cover ups 1, 2, 3, 4.

I predicted these plasma structures and others that fit ancient art of various types of plasma effects to Dave Talbott months ago, well before the first spiral over Norway was filmed. I based my prediction on the fact that we were about to enter into the same cosmological situation that inspired the myth makers long ago. Mythological archetypes are Dave's area of expertise. The spiral is a commonly represented form in ancient art. Here you go folks the plasma phonon phenomenon I described the physics for 1, 2, 3, 4. There are more than these four on youtube, these are just my favorites. You will see one of these yourself soon, trust me, they will be frightfully common, only now you know not to be frightened. These are natural plasma entities (they do emit x-ray and gamma radiation so if one evolves over your head get under cover please).

Ok, now the Russians weigh in on G1.9 with not very kind words for NASA

Russia Prepares For Asteroid Strike As New Comet Nears Sun
Russian scientists are reporting today that our Sun’s worst Deep Solar Minimum in 100-years has been broken by a newly discovered comet currently plunging towards its surface that has increased this past months Sunspot Number to 15.7, the highest it has been in Solar Cycle 24 since March, 2008, and has caused a massive eruption of C-Class flares for the past 16 days.

Solar physicist David Hathaway of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center had previously declared in 2008 about Solar Cycle 24 that it was “the blankest year of the space age”, a declaration he revised in 2009 when he stated “This is the quietest sun we’ve seen in almost a century”.

So powerful has this Deep Solar Minimum been during this cycle that scientists have reported a 50-year low in solar wind pressure, a 55-year low in solar radio emissions, and, most importantly, a 12-year low in solar “irradiance”; the sun’s brightness which has dropped by 0.02% at visible wavelengths and 6% at extreme UV wavelengths since the solar minimum of 1996.

The critical danger to our Earth with the dropping of our Sun’s brightness lies in its “irradiance” levels being long associated with periods of Global cooling, including the catastrophic period between the 16th and 19th centuries named the Little Ice Age, a fact which American scientists have been accused of hiding from the public so as to further advance their now discredited theories of Planetary warming.

But to the greatest danger facing our World it is not from the horrific effects a massive Global Cooling event would have upon us, warn Russian scientists, but rather it is from the rising potential of our Earth being struck by, or “electrically interacting” with, a comet emanating from the currently destabilizing Oort Cloud from which these ‘space missiles’ are being increasingly hurled into our Solar System.

One such “electrical interaction” between these Oort Cloud “space missiles” plunging into our inner Solar System towards the Sun is occurring now, and offering further evidence supporting these Russian scientists claims after its discovery this week by Australian amateur astronomer Alan Watson who found this ‘new comet’ while inspecting images obtained by NASA’s STEREO-A’s Hemispheric Imager.

Important to note at this point are that Russian scientists stand adamantly opposed to their American counterparts over what constitutes a comet and defines their interactions in space. Where the American scientists state in their theories that comets are ‘dirty snowballs’ whose tails are formed by the ejection of an icy mass, Russian scientists ascribe to the theory of their being made of iron, and other such metals, and whose tails are formed by the electromagnetic interaction between them and the Sun. This is known as the Electric Comet Theory.

The comet currently plunging into the Sun whose arrival was ‘announced’ over a fortnight ago with the breaking of the Deep Solar Minimum and the mass ejection of solar flares supports the Russian scientist’s theories beyond all doubt, a fact, however, which the Americans will not acknowledge as their theories have never been designed for truth, but rather for the social engineering of their public to keep them as unaware as possible to what the future holds for our Earth.

And to what the American scientists fear above all else is their public becoming aware of the giant planetary body named G1.9 that is heading towards us and is now just 60 AU’s [1 AU=the distance from the Sun to Earth] from our Planet and growing in size.

Though not known to the American people about G1.9 is that since its discovery NASA has continued to maintain that it is the remnant of a supernova explosion that occurred about 140 years ago, an explanation deemed “absurd” by Russian scientists who point out, correctly, that for a supernova to have exploded in our own Solar System in the mid 1800’s it would have been not only visible to the entire Earth, it would have been extensively documented too.

Supporting these Russian scientists who state that G1.9 was never a supernova but either a new planet to our Solar System or a brown dwarf sun are their Spanish astrophysicist counterparts whose findings we can read:

“G1.9 was first identified as a “supernova remnant” in 1984 by Dave Green of the University of Cambridge and later studied in greater detail with NRAO’s Very Large Array radio telescope in 1985. Because it was unusually small for a supernova it was thought to be young — less than about 1000 years old. But in 2007, X-ray observations made with NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory revealed that the object was much larger than the last time it was observed! It had grown in size by 16%. Puzzled by this observation, the Very Large Array repeated its observations of 23 years ago and verified that it had increased in size considerably. Knowing that supernova do not expand this quickly, unless they have just exploded, they explained that G1.9 must be a “very young” supernova — perhaps not more than 150 years old. But no record of a visible supernova has been found corresponding to that historical period (about the time of the American Civil War). Spanish astronomers have tracked this object with great interest because they were anticipating its appearance. Gravitational anomalies have been appearing in the Oort Cloud for some time, suggesting the perturbations were caused by a nearby object with considerable mass. The announcement that G1.9 had increased in size was no mystery to them. It is exactly what they would expect as the object moved closer to Earth.”

To the potential catastrophic danger posed to our Earth by G1.9 was evidenced in July, 2009, when the Planet Jupiter was hit by a large comet that entered its planetary zone unexpectedly, despite the efforts of astronomers to track these dangerous objects. Russian and Spanish astronomers contend that the comet that struck Jupiter was perturbed by the trajectory of G1.9, which until now, was not recognized and accounted for.

Though the Americans contend, also, that G1.9 has reached its closest approach to Earth in its orbit, Russian scientists couldn’t disagree more and point to the fact that NASA has so ‘continually failed’ in their explanations for this giant, and growing, “as yet unknown” space object as to have lost all credibility in any discussion of it. (emphasis added)

And so alarmed have these Russian scientists become that this past week that Anatoly Perminov, head of Russia’s space agency, told Voice of Russia radio that they were ‘gearing up’ to protect our Earth from these ‘space missiles’, including the Apophis asteroid many believe could strike our Planet in the 2030’s.

In the reporting of these events it is also important to note that the ancient peoples of our Earth spoke many times about a G1.9 type object in our solar system (Marduk, Nibiru, Planet X) and warned that when it approached our inner Solar System chaos and catastrophe always ensued.

Note from Colleen here again. Nibiru is not G1.9, Nibiru is a planet, G1.9 is a small star. G1.9 is on a 24,000 year orbit like Sedna, Nibiru has a much shorter period 3,600 years. G1.9, Sedna, Planet X etc are all in retrograde orbits together, they just are at differing distances from the Sun. The Sun is king, everything is revolving around it but in two differing planes (East-West, South-North). G1.9 pulls us up and down the galactic equator subjecting our area of the system to a shift is electrical and magnetic polarities. Every 6,000 years (approx) we change magnetic field direction, every 12,000 years we change electrical polarity. When both happen together the effects are very severe to life on earth but there is no such thing as an eventfuless crossing or shifting event when you look at Earth history.
 

1984

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Here's something from NASA - it's supposedly a hoax:


Question:
I read on the internet that G1.9 is brown dwarf star and also perhaps a supernova remnant. If this is a brown dwarf star, how close is this thing going to get to earth? I read that Spanish artronomers who call themselves the StarViewer Team, claim they discovered a brown dwarf almost twice the size of Jupiter and just beyond our furthest planetoid, Pluto. Although it's not a planet, it appears to have planets or large satellites encircling it. I have a 3 year old son and this article really scares me. Please let me know what this thing is and how close it going to become to earth.

Answer:
You appear to have fallen for a hoax. The story about a group of Spanish astronomers discovering something twice the size of Jupiter in the solar system just beyond Pluto is pure fiction, without any core of truth. If there were any such object, astronomers would have discovered it decades ago in both infrared and visible sky surveys. Astronomers do discover planetary objects in the outer solar system (such as Eris, Sedna, and Quaoar), but these are as small or smaller than Pluto, and none are on orbits that bring them into the inner solar system [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Neptunian_object#Discovery_of_other_trans-Neptunian_objects]. There is also a real supernova remnant called G1.9+0.3, but that is about 25,000 light years from Earth [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova_remnant_G1.9%2B0.3]. The story you tell about G1.9 being a brown dwarf within the solar system is a lie, just one more effort to cash in on the fear of Nibiru (which is also a lie). Please don’t be concerned, and also note that you could have determined what G1.9 is easily by looking it up in Wikipedia. There is no reason for you or anyone to be frightened of such crazy stories, which are easily exposed as parts of the current doomsday hoax.

David Morrison
Astrobiology Senior Scientist
July 19, 2010
 

EmeraldHope

The Living Force
Here is the information from The Chandra Observatory stating it is a supernova:

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2008/g19/

The expanding remains of a supernova explosion in the Milky Way are shown in this composite image, on the left, of the supernova remnant G1.9+0.3. NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory image obtained in early 2007 is shown in orange and the radio image from NRAO's Very Large Array (VLA) from 1985 is in blue. The difference in size between the two images gives clear evidence for expansion, allowing the time since the original supernova explosion (about 140 years) to be estimated.

This makes the original explosion the most recent supernova in the Galaxy, as measured in Earth's time-frame (referring to when events are observable at Earth). Equivalently, this is the youngest known supernova remnant in the Galaxy (140 years old), easily beating the previous record of about 330 years for Cassiopeia A. The rapid expansion and young age for G1.9+0.3 was recently confirmed by a new VLA image obtained in early 2008.

The original supernova explosion was not seen in optical light about 140 years ago because it occurred close to the center of the Galaxy, and is embedded in a dense field of gas and dust. This made the supernova about a trillion times fainter, in optical light, than if it had been unobscured. However, X-rays and radio waves from the resulting supernova remnant easily penetrate this dust and gas.

On the right is an infrared image from the Two Micron All Sky survey (2MASS), where the colors represent different infrared wavelengths. The center of the galaxy is the bright red spot in the upper right and the location of G1.9+0.3 is shown by the box in the lower left, less than two degrees away (corresponding to about a thousand light years at the distance of the galactic center). More stars are visible in this 2MASS image than in an optical image, where obscuration by dust and gas is more prominent. Also, note the difference in orientation: in the close-up view of G1.9+0.3, north is up and east is to the left, while in the 2MASS image north is to the left and east is down.

Supernova remnants are caused when the debris thrown outwards by the explosion crashes into surrounding material, generating a shell of hot gas and high-energy particles that glows brightly in X-rays, radio waves and other wavelengths for thousands of years. In the case of G1.9+0.3 the material is expanding outwards at almost 35 million miles per hour, or about 5% the speed of light, an unprecedented expansion speed for a supernova remnant. Another superlative for G1.9+0.3 is that it has generated the most energetic electrons ever seen in a supernova remnant.


Fast Facts for G1.9+0.3:
Credit X-ray (NASA/CXC/NCSU/S.Reynolds et al.); Radio (NSF/NRAO/VLA/Cambridge/D.Green et al.); Infrared (2MASS/UMass/IPAC-Caltech/NASA/NSF/CfA/E.Bressert)
Scale Left panel is 5 arcmin across.
Category Supernovas & Supernova Remnants
Coordinates (J2000) RA 17h 48m 45s | Dec -27° 10' 00"
Constellation Sagittarius
Observation Dates 2 pointings between 02/10/2007 & 03/03/2007
Observation Time 14 hours
Obs. IDs 6708, 8521
Color Code X-ray (orange); Radio (blue); Infrared (yellow/white stars)
Instrument ACIS
References Reynolds, S. et al. 2008, ApJ Letters (Accepted)
Distance Estimate 25,000 light years
Release Date May 14, 2008
 

T.C.

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
How can there be such a massive difference between distances? One group are saying it's not that far from us, while others are saying it's at the centre of the galaxy?

:huh:
 

EmeraldHope

The Living Force
Link to Spanish Astrophysicists PDF File on G1.9+0.3 : https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0BwdLVHZJ-yB8ZmI2MzE5MTctYzYzOC00OTI0LTk0ZGQtYjRlNDNhZTYxNjFm&hl=es&pli=1 ( it's in Spanish)


Here is the translated version of their (The Starviewerteam) website into English:

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://starviewerteam.org/&ei=C3ZYTOiPEob4tQPy8My5Bg&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBoQ7gEwAQ&prev=/search%3Fq%3DStarViewer%2BTeam%26hl%3Den
 

Richs

Dagobah Resident
So far as I can see today there is nothing further about the twin sun topic other than discussions about it and re-posting of the article at various sites with some commentary. The media does not appear to have picked it up at all at this time in the dozen or so places I have checked.
 

EmeraldHope

The Living Force
Richard S said:
So far as I can see today there is nothing further about the twin sun topic other than discussions about it and re-posting of the article at various sites with some commentary. The media does not appear to have picked it up at all at this time in the dozen or so places I have checked.

The article was from June 15th, so I don't think we are looking for news articles from today, necessarily.
 

Approaching Infinity

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
1984 said:
Here's something from NASA - it's supposedly a hoax:


Question:
I read on the internet that G1.9 is brown dwarf star and also perhaps a supernova remnant. If this is a brown dwarf star, how close is this thing going to get to earth? I read that Spanish artronomers who call themselves the StarViewer Team, claim they discovered a brown dwarf almost twice the size of Jupiter and just beyond our furthest planetoid, Pluto. Although it's not a planet, it appears to have planets or large satellites encircling it. I have a 3 year old son and this article really scares me. Please let me know what this thing is and how close it going to become to earth.

Answer:
You appear to have fallen for a hoax. The story about a group of Spanish astronomers discovering something twice the size of Jupiter in the solar system just beyond Pluto is pure fiction, without any core of truth. If there were any such object, astronomers would have discovered it decades ago in both infrared and visible sky surveys. Astronomers do discover planetary objects in the outer solar system (such as Eris, Sedna, and Quaoar), but these are as small or smaller than Pluto, and none are on orbits that bring them into the inner solar system [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Neptunian_object#Discovery_of_other_trans-Neptunian_objects]. There is also a real supernova remnant called G1.9+0.3, but that is about 25,000 light years from Earth [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova_remnant_G1.9%2B0.3]. The story you tell about G1.9 being a brown dwarf within the solar system is a lie, just one more effort to cash in on the fear of Nibiru (which is also a lie). Please don’t be concerned, and also note that you could have determined what G1.9 is easily by looking it up in Wikipedia. There is no reason for you or anyone to be frightened of such crazy stories, which are easily exposed as parts of the current doomsday hoax.

David Morrison
Astrobiology Senior Scientist
July 19, 2010

Maybe, but Morrison writes as if he's selling pulp fiction. He basically doesn't say anything in the above, yet he manages to use emotion-laden language, innuendo, false logic.
 

Laurentien2

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
EmeraldHope said:
Link to Spanish Astrophysicists PDF File on G1.9+0.3 : https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0BwdLVHZJ-yB8ZmI2MzE5MTctYzYzOC00OTI0LTk0ZGQtYjRlNDNhZTYxNjFm&hl=es&pli=1 ( it's in Spanish)


Here is the translated version of their (The Starviewerteam) website into English:

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://starviewerteam.org/&ei=C3ZYTOiPEob4tQPy8My5Bg&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBoQ7gEwAQ&prev=/search%3Fq%3DStarViewer%2BTeam%26hl%3Den

Here I found this that look interesting with the link that you provided EmeraldHope;
A report by Dr. Matese, could have found a giant planet in the outer solar system.
Link;http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://starviewer.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/un-informe-del-dr-matese-podria-haber-encontrado-un-planeta-gigante-en-la-zona-exterior-del-sistema-solar/&prev=/search%3Fq%3DStarViewer%2BTeam%26hl%3Den&rurl=translate.google.com&usg=ALkJrhjFR127sVOw5RJ7ZjxXbxyJ2JJ4Ww

and from this link this one;http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1004.4584v1&prev=/search%3Fq%3DStarViewer%2BTeam%26hl%3Den&rurl=translate.google.com&usg=ALkJrhiSnZBfa6jpf5ttCXiRgzaOfQCAAg

Evidence of a Jovian Persistent Solar Mass Companion in the Oort Cloud
Authors: John J. Authors: John J. Matese , Daniel P. Matese , Daniel P. Whitmire Whitmire
(Submitted on 26 Apr 2010) (Submitted on April 26, 2010)

Abstract: We present an updated dynamical and statistical analysis of outer Oort cloud cometary evidence suggesting the sun has a wide-binary Jovian mass companion. The results support a conjecture that there exists a companion of mass ~ 1-4 M_Jup orbiting in the innermost region of the outer Oort cloud. Abstract: We present an updated statistical and dynamical analysis of outer Oort cloud cometary Evidence suggesting the sun has a wide-Jovian mass binary companion. The results support a conjecture That There exists a companion of mass ~ 1-4 M_Jup orbiting in the innermost region of the outer Oort cloud. Our most restrictive prediction is that the orientation angles of the orbit normal in galactic coordinates are centered on the galactic longitude of the ascending node Omega = 319 degree and the galactic inclination i = 103 degree (or the opposite direction) with an uncertainty in the normal direction subtending ~ 2% of the sky. Our prediction is Restrictive MOST That the orientation angles of the normal orbit in galactic coordinates galactic Are centered on the longitude of the ascending node Omega = 319 ° and the galactic inclination i = 103 degree (or the Opposite direction) with an Uncertainty in the normal direction subtending ~ 2% of the sky. A Bayesian statistical analysis suggests that the probability of the companion hypothesis is comparable to or greater than the probability of the null hypothesis of a statistical fluke. A Bayesian statistical analysis Suggests That the probability of the companion hypothesis is comparable to or greater Than the probability of the null hypothesis of a statistical fluke. Such a companion could also have produced the detached Kuiper Belt object Sedna. Such a companion Could Also Have Produced the Kuiper Belt object Sedna detached. The putative companion could be easily detected by the recently launched Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE). The putative companion Easily Could Be Launched recently detected by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE).
 

1984

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Approaching Infinity said:
1984 said:
Here's something from NASA - it's supposedly a hoax:

Question:
I read on the internet that G1.9 is brown dwarf star and also perhaps a supernova remnant. If this is a brown dwarf star, how close is this thing going to get to earth? I read that Spanish artronomers who call themselves the StarViewer Team, claim they discovered a brown dwarf almost twice the size of Jupiter and just beyond our furthest planetoid, Pluto. Although it's not a planet, it appears to have planets or large satellites encircling it. I have a 3 year old son and this article really scares me. Please let me know what this thing is and how close it going to become to earth.

Answer:
You appear to have fallen for a hoax. The story about a group of Spanish astronomers discovering something twice the size of Jupiter in the solar system just beyond Pluto is pure fiction, without any core of truth. If there were any such object, astronomers would have discovered it decades ago in both infrared and visible sky surveys. Astronomers do discover planetary objects in the outer solar system (such as Eris, Sedna, and Quaoar), but these are as small or smaller than Pluto, and none are on orbits that bring them into the inner solar system [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Neptunian_object#Discovery_of_other_trans-Neptunian_objects]. There is also a real supernova remnant called G1.9+0.3, but that is about 25,000 light years from Earth [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova_remnant_G1.9%2B0.3]. The story you tell about G1.9 being a brown dwarf within the solar system is a lie, just one more effort to cash in on the fear of Nibiru (which is also a lie). Please don’t be concerned, and also note that you could have determined what G1.9 is easily by looking it up in Wikipedia. There is no reason for you or anyone to be frightened of such crazy stories, which are easily exposed as parts of the current doomsday hoax.

David Morrison
Astrobiology Senior Scientist
July 19, 2010

Maybe, but Morrison writes as if he's selling pulp fiction. He basically doesn't say anything in the above, yet he manages to use emotion-laden language, innuendo, false logic.

I agree - it is a very 'calming' reply. Still digging for more.
 

Laurentien2

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
It seem that Dr. Maltese and Whitmire have been looking for planet X or companion star for some time still, from this link they seem to be on a parallel view that something is periodically disturbing the orbs cloud and cause a cometaries bombardment trough the solar system.


http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_v127/ai_3607051/

Another entry has just been added in the contest to devise an astronomical theory explaining the periodic showers of comets that are trought by many to wipe out life forms on earth every 26 million years or so (SN: 10/11/83, p. 212). Astrophysicist Daniel P. Whitmire and John J. Matese at the University of Southwestern Louisiana in Lafayette created the new theory by merging two ideas that were proposed in the past for reasons totally unrelated to periodic comet impacts and mass extinctions: a tenth planet, dubbed Planet X and envisioned to reside beyond the orbit of Pluto; and a disk or belt of comets throught to lie in the plane of the solar system beyond Neptune.
 

LQB

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Regardless of whether the source is disinfo or not, the basics fit very well with some results of research I did years ago. I think IRAS-B did actually "discover" or verify Nemesis based on a quickly suppressed and "unconfirmed" announcement back in 1985. Also I found part of a primary school textbook that described a major role of the voyager and pioneer spacecraft (their trajectories in and out of plane) as the detection and location of Nemesis through analysis of their trajectories over the long haul.

If the basics of the story are true, but the source is shown to be disinfo, then we might have a last ditch attempt here to divert attention. FWIW
 

go2

Dagobah Resident
Rafael Lopez-Guerreo PhD, is the director of the scientific journal, Starviewerteam. I am not qualified to comment on this material, however I will forward this thread to a friend who works for NRAO for his thoughts. In the meantime, it sure seems as if the ET contact and disclosure meme is getting a lot of attention.

http://www.etcontactconference.com/en/speakers/20-rafael-lopez-guerrero.html said:
Rafael Lopez-Guerrero PhD, is an independent scientific researcher who constitutes a world reference in the study of the logic of conscience and its relation with Extraterrestrial Intelligence. He is an expert in Advanced Quantic Radiofrequence and in Logic of the König-Guerrero Differential, as well as in patterns of plate tectonic movements.

Rafael Lopez-Guerrero PhD, is an independent scientific researcher who, together with Michael Konig and Dr.Dieter Broers, constitutes a world reference in the study of the logic of conscience and its relation with Extraterrestrial Intelligence.

He is a PhD in Engineering and Business Administration, an expert in Advanced Quantic Radiofrequence and in Logic of the König-Guerrero Differential, as well as in patterns of plate tectonic movements.

Rafael López-Guerrero meets both the requirements of an international size scientist and a true light being. From his researches in the field of radio frequency he concludes that in his reality science and conscience converge. He currently develops the scientific foundations of the connection of human beings with cosmos and those of Quantic Canalization, as well as the foundations of our extraterrestrial genetics and the ionogenomatic relation, that is, the morphogenetic fields around our bodies which are invisible to our senses, but constitute our field of conscience, and therefore regulate and control our bodies.

Rafael is currently Research Director and cofounder of IRCAI ((International Institute for Advanced Quantum Radio Frequency) and director of the scientific journal Starviewerteam. He invented the WIRRSIP protocol (which enables internet access through standard radio frequencies) and is the author of the Convergence White Paper on Telecommunications.

Rafael Lopez-Guerrero directs the Research Group on IP convergence named "Web Convergence and IP Protocols," composed by over 25 internationally-acclaimed professionals in the field of IP Convergence, and among other relevant institutions, he is also member of the Project Management Institute (PMI). In his career, he was in charge of the project through which Internet was introduced in Spain (Infovía), having held various senior-level positions in the telecommunications field (Cibernos, Esin Consultants, B-Ingenia).

He collaborates with Onda Cero Radio and Radio Libertad.
 

RyanX

The Living Force
What strikes me as interesting are the image comparisons done on this viewzone article by Gary Vey here:

_http://www.viewzone.com/browndwarf2.html

Here is the microwave image of G1.9 compared with a known brown dwarf Gilese 229A:

bd.glowcapture.jpg


As the author Gary Vey states:

The image above was provided by the Starviewer Team. It shows the object G1.9 on the left and a known brown dwarf, Gilese 229A on the right. We are looking at microwave band emissions which indicate the radiated heat from each source. The dark red areas are the hottest. We note that G1.9 has a solid heat emission similar to Gilese 229A. The Starviewer Team seems to suggest that if G1.9 were really a supernova, we might expect that the spherical area would be cool, since the hot gas and ejecta from the exploding star would have been concentrated in the surrounding shell.

Then he shows a microwave image of a known supernova, the Cygnus-Loop supernova here:

cygnus-loop.jpg


Vey doesn't state the visual differences here, but they seem striking enough to me. The Brown dwarf, along with the G1.9 seem to have a central "hot" core, where as the heat on Cygnus-Loop appears more "scattered". Then again, I'm not astronomy expert and there could be a wide range of supernova microwave images out there that could look similar to a brown dwarf that he's not showing.

Of course, then Vey goes on to state:

When we previewed this article to the Starviewer Team, we asked them to send us a rebuttal. We think we have focused on the Achillies Heel of their assertions. We waited for an answer and received the following statement, which was translated for us:

1.-Some self-motivated International committee of astronomers, by their own innitiative, are presently calculating the exact orbit for the Brown Dwarf Sagitarius-Oort-Kuiper perturbation, using the StarViewerTeam's work sheets based on Lissauer, Murray and Matese's original drafts. A final report, will be published by Feb 2010.

2.-There are huge scientific evidences concerning to the fact that Cosmic causes and Brown Dwarf are the real causes of Climate change. On July the 10th, Dr.Paul Clark, published on Science.com an article concerning to this matter, and almost 700 scientists signed the minority Report on climate change.

It appears the evidence is inferential and based on mathematics. So we must wait until February. I give this a validity rating (from 1 to 10) of 4.

********

UPDATE FEBRUARY 19, 2010
: -- We patiently waited and monitored the StarViewer Team's web site for the "proof" that claimed would be forthcoming. Needless to say, it never materialized. Also, the initial popularity of their claim appears to have been nothing more than a way to attract a large viewership. The web site now is full of ridiculous claims, including some satirical stories taken from "the onion" (a very funny site) which the SV Team promoted as "real." There is no mention of the mathematical validation that was expected with regards to the G1.9 object. Perhaps the validation disproved their theory... perhaps it was never going to be validated by anyone... I think it is safe to take this theory of object G1.9 being a brown dwarf down to ZERO possibility!

Or perhaps somebody got to them? So just because they don't supply him "proof", he's willing to contend that the whole idea is bunk?!? In other words, move along folks, nothing to see here. :huh:

I'm not fluent enough in Spanish to judge the content of the Star Viewer Team's website. It's possible that this is an elaborate hoax. In which case, it only serves to muddy the waters and to further discredit the claim that the sun has a companion star. It seems just as likely, given the sensitive nature of this material, that somebody could have co-opted the Star View Team website, driving it further to the fringes. I find it amazing how close this description from the nowpublic article matches the C's elaboration of the sun's companion and its oort cloud comet hurling capabilities. I also find it interesting that NASA's own article describes this G1.9 "supernova" as behaving (i.e. expanding) like no supernova they've ever observed before:

_http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/news/08-062.html

"No other object in the galaxy has properties like this," Reynolds said. "This find is extremely important for learning more about how some stars explode and what happens in the aftermath."

This, along with the images above, and the recent Pioneer gravitational anomalies, makes me wonder...
 

EmeraldHope

The Living Force
RyanX said:
I'm not fluent enough in Spanish to judge the content of the Star Viewer Team's website. It's possible that this is an elaborate hoax. In which case, it only serves to muddy the waters and to further discredit the claim that the sun has a companion star. It seems just as likely, given the sensitive nature of this material, that somebody could have co-opted the Star View Team website, driving it further to the fringes. I find it amazing how close this description from the nowpublic article matches the C's elaboration of the sun's companion and its oort cloud comet hurling capabilities. I also find it interesting that NASA's own article describes this G1.9 "supernova" as behaving (i.e. expanding) like no supernova they've ever observed before:

_http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/news/08-062.html

"No other object in the galaxy has properties like this," Reynolds said. "This find is extremely important for learning more about how some stars explode and what happens in the aftermath."

This, along with the images above, and the recent Pioneer gravitational anomalies, makes me wonder...

Ryanx- in case you missed my post above-

Here is the translated version of their (The Starviewerteam) website into English:

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://starviewerteam.org/&ei=C3ZYTOiPEob4tQPy8My5Bg&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBoQ7gEwAQ&prev=/search%3Fq%3DStarViewer%2BTeam%26hl%3Den
 
Top Bottom