Hi Expedition26,
There is this old article on the French Sott, about the tetanus vaccine.
It gives some facts like for example:
"Tetanus is a non-immunizing disease, no anti-tetanus antibodies are found in an individual cured of tetanus. This should make us wonder. How can the vaccine immunise if the disease itself cannot? "
And also immunological explanations to explain these facts:
"The tetanus bacillus or Nicolaïer bacillus is found in the intestinal tract of many animals which evacuate it in their excrement. It then ends up in the soil where it takes the form of a spore in order to survive for a long time in the soil. We know that this bacillus must be in a totally anaerobic atmosphere, i.e. deprived of oxygen, for it to germinate and become Clostridium tetanii, the germ responsible for the disease. It is a STRICT ANAEROBIC: in the presence of an oxygen molecule it dies. "
This article also reviews the history of this vaccine and its consequences, and ends by giving other possibilities to cure it:
"In case of declared tetanus, various homeopathic treatments can be recommended, as well as a consequent intake of vitamin C. But the ultimate remedy is magnesium chloride. This product was used successfully by Dr Auguste NEVEU in the 1930s, both on humans and animals, in cases of tetanus, diphtheria and polio. Dr NEVEU, through the intermediary of Professor Pierre DELBET, a surgeon of great renown at the time, had sent a report to the Academy of Medicine setting out all the virtues of magnesium chloride in the treatment of diphtheria. But the Academy despised this report and sent a letter to Professor DELBET in 1944, saying that it refused to publish this communication on the pretext that by making known a new treatment for diphtheria, vaccinations would be prevented and that the interest was to generalise these vaccinations. The use of the plural corresponds to the tetanus/diphtheria vaccinations that were done together at the time. This is how the officials boycotted this natural remedy, which is cheap, very accessible and without side effects (if used reasonably), in favour of vaccination. This is how independent researchers who can bring great relief to humanity are silenced. "
And finally, this same article, from a book, begins with:
"Who has not shuddered at the spectre of tetanus after a wound, a rosebush prick, or a burn? The medical authorities, for as long as there has been a vaccine, have hammered so much fear into our minds by painting a very black picture of the disease and persuading us that only vaccination is life-saving, that very few of us take the time to think and consider with common sense the reality of the facts."
DeepL.
Tétanos, une propagande vaccinale supplémentaire -- Sott.net
The vaccines are defined as follows:
