asselineau

[SunEterna]

what's their word on him? :)
peace.

 

[Keit]

What are your own observations about him?

 

[SunEterna]

I find him righteous. Hearing him, i think he is not using populism like others. He believe in the representative democracy, and this is his difference of opinion with Étienne Chouard (i compare them because they believe in the constitution and the pedagogy of the people concerning the politics that rule the country). He is right, yes, i feel he is right, like i felt Hugo Chavez was right when i listened to him. For comparison, Mélenchon is really really more negative, always yelling. I think Mélenchon is a good user of populism technique to sell himself.

I do not wait for the C's to give me the light about this human. I just had a curiosity. He is human, i believe he has some imperfections. But yes, he doesn't mean he will do less a good choice. With the medias, we tend to wait from people to be perfect! What is to be perfect? And on the other hand, we tend to defend people who should not clearly defended (Fillon and other politicians who cheated).

Peace.

 

[Adaryn]

Well, he's apparently the only truly independent candidate. He's not funded by bankers, other countries or shady organisations - only by donations from members of his party or supporters. I agree that he sounds and looks "clean", and he certainly tells a lot of truths – and not only recently: he's been consistent in his speech / stance for quite a few years now.

 

[SunEterna]

Quite true dude, quite true! A part of me think he can not reach the top of the pyramid. Well, i don't know it is possible or not (maybe it is, maybe it is not because the system is controlled). Well, everybody says that he is a "conspiros", but he, believes it is possible to reach the top by the direct suffrage. I believe it can be true, yes, why not (i don't really know if everything is the matrix and that he is a robot or a pawn of the system if he can present himself to the elections). :)

 

[Bastian]

what's their word on him? :)

What a poorly written question !

So, SunEterna refered probably to the French politician François Asselineau, creator (in 2007) and president (since 2007) of the party "UPR" ("Union Populaire Républicaine" or Popular Republican Union).

François Asselineau - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Popular Republican Union (2007) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

He's famous in France for being a partisan of sovereignty / national independence, advocating :
- exit from the EU (European Union), also known as "Frexit" (French exit) ;
- exit from the Euro (€) area ;
- exit from NATO.

Frexit - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

He was candidate in the presidential election in 2017, officialy earning 0.92% of the votes, thus being eliminated in the first round. (It was discussed in the Cs session of May 13, 2017.)
In 2012 and 2022 too, he failed to secure the necessary 500 sponsorships from elected officials in order to run the presidential elections.

Now he is running for the EU parliament (paradoxically !).

 

[Olivierlejardinier]

what's their word on him? :)

Here's the follow-up of your question, from session-13-may-2017 :

(Pierre) What were the results of the first round of the French election? They want to know about Asselineau on the forum.

(Joe) How much did Asselineau get in the first round? He got less than 1% officially, but unofficially?

A: 29

Q: (Pierre) And Le Pen in the first round?

A: 61

Q: [Exclamations of disbelief all around] (Niall) She would have been president automatically!

(Pierre) But together combined it's 90 percent!

(Niall) The two real anti-establishment candidates almost took everything.

(Chu) And she should have been president...

(Pierre) After only the first round! So they moved the figures not by 20% like with Segolene in 2007, but by 40%! They dropped Le Pen from 61% to 21%...

(Niall) They have a situation now in the country where 90% of the people didn't vote for the guy who just became president.

(Pierre) That's a powder keg.

(Joe) Well, they didn't...

(Chu) How can you have 48% voting Macron when in the beginning she had 61%?

(L) Because they reduced the choices.

(Chu) But she had 61% before...

(Pierre) First round they vote Le Pen, but then in the second round they often vote differently. But just to confirm, Macron got 48% in the second round?

A: Yes

Q: (Pierre) Well, so it's that. People got scared. That's a documented thing. The first leaks from Macron's servers was those documents from a NATO/CIA-sponsored foundation in France that was pushing for a lot of migration and a lot of mosques and stuff. I was wondering if his main mission is to bring in migrants and stir things up to lead towards a civil war?

A: US wishes to destabilize EU similar to Syria so that they can come in and "fix" things. i.e. rule and control resources and trade the "American way". Everyone will speak English!

Q: [laughter] (Pierre) They sure have a sense of humor, but I'm not sure that will be the only consequence...

(L) So basically, some kind of cabal in the deep state of the US is at the bottom of some kind of One World Order plan to really basically bit by bit take the entire planet under its control. Is that it either overtly or covertly?

A: Covertly at present, but overtly eventually.

Q: (Joe) That's been the goal for a long time.

(L) That means that Trump is a real thorn in their flesh because he's kind of an isolationist and a nationalist. He wants to go the opposite way, and that's why they wanted to get rid of Le Pen. And anybody else who's a nationalist is basically a "bad guy". The only good guys are the ones who do what the US says. Do they really realize how weak they are? I mean, their own country is falling apart. Their own infrastructure is going to the dogs. The education of their people is deplorable. The health of their people is deplorable. The death rate... They're not paying attention to ANY of those things, and yet they're trying to rule the world? That's not a very good example to set.

A: Psychopaths are "reality blind".

Q: (Joe) The funny thing is that one of the major ways that they attempt to achieve this is through rigging elections. That's basically a really bad idea because eventually they'll push it too far. Even the people who have no clue are gonna go, "Really?!" It happened already in Scotland. The vast majority of Scottish people are highly suspicious about that last referendum. Everyone was saying "Yes independence, yes independence!" and then the result was "NO"?! And then they go around and ask each other, and it's like, "I can't find anybody who voted no..." Eventually, the cat's gonna come out of the bag. You can't keep rigging elections in a way that puts someone in power that NOBODY voted for. You can't do that forever and not expect people to eventually go...

(Niall) They're gonna try the UK next. That's coming up. It'll be interesting. Nobody wants to vote for the Tories.

(Pierre) After the French elections, there was a French journalist who went around to interview who voted for Macron - to understand why. He didn't find anybody!

(L) He couldn't find anybody who voted for him?

(Pierre) How much did Macron get in the first round?

A: 12 percent.

Q: (Joe) Well, it couldn't have been 12 percent...

(Chu) Uh, that's impossible. We already had 90%.

(Pierre) Asselineau 29%, Le Pen 61%, so there's only 10% left...

(PoB) Maybe there were more votes than voting people. It happens.

(Chu) Did they mean 1.2%?

(Pierre) So, let's recapitulate: Asselineau, 29% in the first round?

A: Close

Q: (Pierre) Okay, so these are approximations. So, roughly.

(L) Well, Le Pen could have just got 50%.

A: Yes

Q: (L) So it's an approximation.

(Pierre) Okay.

Noting that even if it's an approximation, 29 % at the first round, might give an idea of his suppport by french people.
As a personnal note, I'd say Asselineau's maybe the only one I see fit as an official representative in France for a post-SHTF/financial crisis/NATO conflict scenario. The way he is "quieted" in mainstream media is another clue that his ideas/views on things are a source of concern for the PTB.

 

[Bastian]

Here's the follow-up of your question, from session-13-may-2017 :
(...)

Noting that even if it's an approximation, 29 % at the first round, might give an idea of his support by french people.

I don't think so. These numbers were quite doubtful, and discussed in the commentaries of this session thread.
I'm not sure that 29% of the French adult citizen have really heard about him and understood his proposals. So agreeing and supporting him... probably less !

The way he is "quieted" in mainstream media is another clue that his ideas/views on things are a source of concern for the PTB.

Well, their plan was to create EU, or the "US of Europe" (sponsored by the USA) in order to more easily control Europe peoples... and as a step towards the world government.

So disagreeing/opposing that plan is taboo...

 

[Goemon_]

I don't think so. These numbers were quite doubtful, and discussed in the commentaries of this session thread.
I'm not sure that 29% of the French adult citizen have really heard about him and understood his proposals. So agreeing and supporting him... probably less !

I think this comment from the session thread stand out:

I must say some of these conclusions that there was something wrong with the session, as Dakota pointed out, are truly interesting. I mean, just think of what the C's have said so far about aliens, UFOs, 4D controllers, religion, people being food, the PTB, you name it. And yet people believed it all despite there being little tangible and observable evidence of it.

But when the percentages of the French elections are reported to be waaaaay different from the official results, well, that is just really hard to believe! No way!

 

[SunEterna]

What a poorly written question ! :hum:

Call this botching, experimental inter language poetry or both.
In any case, thank you for your return, as it gives me the will to better myself.
It gave me the wish to be more conscious and conscientious.