Bad news - we are way past our 'extinct by' date

So, let's be done with the Introductions and get down to brass tacks. The alleged 'Bad News' is that we're way past our 'extinct by' date, right? So we should worry about becoming 'extinct', right?

Well, I'm a pragmatist, among other things. What, me worry about 'extinction' of the human race, when the end of my life is 'just around the corner' - relatively speaking!

What about worrying about the end of our earthly life, for starters? Maybe even worry about getting drafted and dying in Iraq or Iran - or in the next tsunami, earthquake or 9-11 attack?

Did God create humanity just to then wipe us out like a bunch of dinosaurs?

I betcha He has a much better plan for humanity :) His plan is available for those interested ;)

That expectation is not built on sand - it is based on the rock-solid 'logic' and evidence of grace?
 
GodSend said:
So, let's be done with the Introductions and get down to brass tacks. The alleged 'Bad News' is that we're way past our 'extinct by' date, right? So we should worry about becoming 'extinct', right?
Nope - no one at any point has said anything about worrying - you are making assumptions.

GS said:
Well, I'm a pragmatist, among other things. What, me worry about 'extinction' of the human race, when the end of my life is 'just around the corner' - relatively speaking!

What about worrying about the end of our earthly life, for starters? Maybe even worry about getting drafted and dying in Iraq or Iran - or in the next tsunami, earthquake or 9-11 attack?

Did God create humanity just to then wipe us out like a bunch of dinosaurs?

I betcha He has a much better plan for humanity :) His plan is available for those interested ;)

That expectation is not built on sand - it is based on the rock-solid 'logic' and evidence of grace?
Thank you for clarifying your position. This forum is clearly not for you.
 
GodSend said:
I betcha He has a much better plan for humanity :) His plan is available for those interested ;)

That expectation is not built on sand - it is based on the rock-solid 'logic' and evidence of grace?
Hmm, looks like an advertisement to me.
Hey pal. There are lots of really nice and extremely patient people here. But do yourself a favor - go elsewhere. Unless you have an agenda that you just want to justify in your mind. In this case, we've seen this scenario countless times. It's also have a pretty predictable ending. Want to guess which ending it is?
 
GodSend said:
Well, I'm a pragmatist, among other things. What, me worry about 'extinction' of the human race, when the end of my life is 'just around the corner' - relatively speaking. What about worrying about the end of our earthly life, for starters?...That expectation... is based on the rock-solid 'logic'...
There's a lot of "rock-solid logic" in the very article in question ("Forget About Global Warming: We're One Step From Extinction"). So is it really all that "pragmatic" to assume that the "extinction of the human race" is certain to occur after you complete those apparently-guaranteed 75 years of your "earthly life"?

GodSend said:
Maybe even worry about getting drafted and dying in Iraq or Iran - or in the next tsunami, earthquake or 9-11 attack?
That comment reveals that you haven't discovered the vast collection of insightful, compassionate articles on this site exposing exploitation by current political forces; or those pertaining to "earth changes"; or those many, many pertaining to 9/11. You're in for a treat.

Most definitely, there's a "better plan for humanity" than may be readily apparent by all this talk of "extinction." And it is definitely "available for those interested." Why don't you take a few months and explore it all (Site Index
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/site_map_qfg.htm).

Two phrases you'll run into a lot around sum it up pretty well:

"Learning is fun" and "Knowledge protects"
 
GodSend said:
So, let's be done with the Introductions and get down to brass tacks. The alleged 'Bad News' is that we're way past our 'extinct by' date, right? So we should worry about becoming 'extinct', right?
Based on Laura, Ark, and the SOTT team's research.... Yes.

GodSend said:
Well, I'm a pragmatist, among other things. What, me worry about 'extinction' of the human race, when the end of my life is 'just around the corner' - relatively speaking!
See above. The end of your life may be exactly coincident with the extinction of the human race.

GodSend said:
What about worrying about the end of our earthly life, for starters? Maybe even worry about getting drafted and dying in Iraq or Iran - or in the next tsunami, earthquake or 9-11 attack?
See previous paragraph.

GodSend said:
Did God create humanity just to then wipe us out like a bunch of dinosaurs?
If you're thinking of the same "God" I'm thinking of, then probably..... Yes.

GodSend said:
I betcha He has a much better plan for humanity :)
I betcha he don't! :)

GodSend said:
His plan is available for those interested ;)
Sorry. Not interested. I have a better plan.

GodSend said:
That expectation is not built on sand - it is based on the rock-solid 'logic' and evidence of grace?
Evidence? Like the "Virgin" Mary's image in a grilled cheese sandwich? ;)
 
GodSend said:
Well, I'm a pragmatist, among other things. What, me worry about 'extinction' of the human race, when the end of my life is 'just around the corner' - relatively speaking!
For a pragmatist, you're not being very pragmatic at all. You can do nothing to prevent your inevitable death, and worrying about the fact that you will one day expire is not very practical. But you can do a lot to help humanity (including yourself) prepare for the very probable near-extinction in the near future. So to be pragmatic, as in, do what is practical and effective, you need data that tells you what the current reality is, and where it is heading. Without this data and the understanding it leads to, your actions are of very little practical usefulness to anyone. The data says that most of the human race will not survive the next 5 to 10 years. What does a pragmatist do? Deny the data in favor of wishful thinking that God won't allow this to happen? Which religion would you be reading for this idea? For example, you'd be hard pressed to find a more violent, bloodthirsty, and compulsively cataclysmic "god" than the Biblical one.

GodSend said:
What about worrying about the end of our earthly life, for starters? Maybe even worry about getting drafted and dying in Iraq or Iran - or in the next tsunami, earthquake or 9-11 attack?
Or worrying that you'll be run over by a car tomorrow as you attempt to cross the street? You can worry about everything, or nothing at all. But of course, it is of little consequence whether you worry or not - what you do is what matters. Some things are inevitable - like your eventual death. Others are not and therefore can be avoided if you know how. Worrying about something does not help in this regard. What do you usually do to avoid getting hit by a car? Look both ways before crossing. This does not guarantee anything, but definitely increases your chances of survival. What do you do to avoid being drafted and dying in Iraq? Or avoid a tsunami, earthquake, or 911? All of these have different probabilities of occurance and different reasons, some being related. There are practical things you can do, and there are useless things. This forum deals with practical actions, by seeking to understand the true nature of our current predicament, which allows us to understand which actions are most likely to be useful and effective, and which are not - this is true for everything. And our actions are all geared around increasing our knowledge and helping others do the same.

Besides your list above, there is a virtually unlimited number of things that can happen in the near and long-term future. But we have a limited amount of energy, resources, and time. This forces us to choose, based on all available data, what is the most practical and efficient use of our energy, resources, and time. The more we know, the more likely that our choices will have a higher chance of success in their intentions. And again, our intentions are to increase our knowledge and help others do the same. And knowledge protects.

GodSend said:
Did God create humanity just to then wipe us out like a bunch of dinosaurs?
You could ask the same thing about the dinosaurs or millions of other races that are already extinct, and go extinct every day. Apparently God created all those races just to wipe them all out again. So God has no problem creating something and then wiping it out completely. Now the question is, what makes you think that humans are an exception? You think maybe if we go extinct that God won't be able to create new "intelligent" species? Do you think humanity is going to be around forever and ever?

GodSend said:
I betcha He has a much better plan for humanity :) His plan is available for those interested ;)
Yes, it is available, as the Bible says - through My works shall you know me. In other words, pay attention to the signs of the times, to all the data - understand the universe by using the brain we were given and our ability to study ourselves and things around us - all being God's works. And my review of his plan leads me to the conclusion, based on all the available data, that Earth is in for a shake-up and that most of us will die very soon. Whether you believe me or not is irrelevant, and whether you think it won't happen is irrelevant - all that matters is the data, because this is the only thing we have that allows us to make intelligent and effective choices. Those who make their choices based on wishful thinking and assumptions are inevitably forced to go back to the drawing board. Again, it is through God's works that you Know him, not your own idea of what his works should be and will be. The sooner you learn this, the better off you'll be.

GodSend said:
That expectation is not built on sand - it is based on the rock-solid 'logic' and evidence of grace?
What logic and evidence would that be? Is it the same rock-solid logic that made you call yourself a pragmatist despite the proof in your above statements that you are anything but? Many people believed that God wouldn't allow a world war either, but they had to go back to the drawing board a couple of times...
 
I tend to believe in the electric universe so a lot of this uranium/lead dating and kow-towing to "scientists" is obsolete science and no longer authoratative to me.

They are speculating and trying to frighten the sheeple.

The humans who colonized Australia 40 to 80 thousand years ago used to keep the women and young in camp at night by making bizarre sounds in the bush. It helped keep them out of men's business.

Just more of the same!
 
fungusfitzjuggler said:
The humans who colonized Australia 40 to 80 thousand years ago used to keep the women and young in camp at night by making bizarre sounds in the bush. It helped keep them out of men's business.
How did you find out what people in Australia 40 to 80 thousand years ago did? What are your sources. Are you sure it wasn't 20 to 30 thousand years ago? Do you know why they stopped?
 
Hi again, I have done a bit more scratching around regarding the putative "dark star". I am staggered by the content and scope of the SoTT-QFG-Cassiopaea enterprise. The Signs meteor supplement was my spring board and lead my to various interesting destinations. I first came across the idea of Planet X or Nibiru from reading about Sitchin's ideas, though not his books. I was reading Robert Bauval/Graham Hancock at the time (some 10 years ago). Sitchin was a step I didn't take.

Anyway, I'm interested in whether or not such a thing can be out there. According to what I found, some serious people think there is reasonable chance and if true, it will soon have nowhere left to hide as our range of perception increases.

A certain J. J. Matess of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette published a paper called "Cometary evidence of a massive body in the outer Oort cloud" in the Icarus Journal 141 in 1999 that can be found here:

"http:(ss)www(d)ucs(d)louisiana.edu/~jjm9638/MS7292.pdf"

He finds that a "brown dwarf" of approximately 3 Jupiter masses and distance of around 25000 AU is feasibly causing comets to leave the Oort cloud and enter into orbits that pass through the inner solar system. He states that such an object would not have been detected in the IRAS (Infrared Astronomy Satellite) database but should be detectable in the next generation of planet/brown dwarf searches including SIRFT (Space Infrared Telescope Facility) - info here:

"http:(ss)www(d)spitzer(d)caltech(d)edu/about/index.shtml"

I don't understand the maths but the words are interesting. He discusses its orbit - near polar (but with respect to what pole? its beyond me), likely origins (capture from outside solar system or accreted at slower rate than sun within greater solar system) and delectability.

A sister article is an attempt to relate periodic Galactic tides or density distribution change (WAVES?) influences on the Oort cloud to the 36 my spikes in cratering on Earth here "http:(ss)www(d)ucs(d)louisiana(d)edu/~jjm9638/assl.pdf".

Another interesting concept I came across on my trawl was the concept that if the sun did have a sizeable companion, then they would have an orbital centre and the motion of the sun through space would include a component related to its motion about the orbital centre. They were suggesting that this was a possible explanation for the procession of the equinoxes. I'm not convinced. Would there not be retrograde phases, accelerations, decelerations rather than a progression? Or is the smooth progression that seems to be accepted the result of too short a period of observation?

On another tack entirely, you reproduced this

Q: (L) Does this brown or dark star have planetary bodies of its own, other than sharing planets with Sol?
A: No. ... What we are saying is the sun is a proton and its twin is an electron!
This suggests something entirely different, something OPPOSITE to the sun, a truly Dark companion. This triggered memories of a description of a solar eclipse given in David Ovason's "The Zelator". I can't immediately find the place but it is put that the presence of Dark Star is keenly felt (by those with the equipment to feel such things) when the influence of it's solar opposite is removed.

I hope you didn't mind me sharing some thoughts with you.
 
The recent SOTT Focus republishing of Has Nibiru/Planet X been sighted? had a reader comment that linked to a publication by Richard A. Muller from August 1, 1984. Evidence for a Solar Companion Star. So, he sat on this until 2005? I understand it's a lab publication under DoE Contract No. AC03-76SF00098 which funds research for as varied purposes as mapping genomes to developing software. I just think it's suspect that this paper comes out (and is confidential and not available to the public) about the same time that the whole Stargate and Niburu programs come online. I believe it's entirely possible that this Richard Muller may be the father of Niburu and the COINTELPRO developed over the last 20 years to support it.
 
WhiteBear said:
The recent SOTT Focus republishing of Has Nibiru/Planet X been sighted? had a reader comment that linked to a publication by Richard A. Muller from August 1, 1984. Evidence for a Solar Companion Star. So, he sat on this until 2005? I understand it's a lab publication under DoE Contract No. AC03-76SF00098 which funds research for as varied purposes as mapping genomes to developing software. I just think it's suspect that this paper comes out (and is confidential and not available to the public) about the same time that the whole Stargate and Niburu programs come online. I believe it's entirely possible that this Richard Muller may be the father of Niburu and the COINTELPRO developed over the last 20 years to support it.

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?query_id=3&page=0&osti_id=6496864&Row=4

It is actually an excellent paper that pretty much proves the existence of the sun's companion star through impact crater ages and the periodicity of mass extinctions.

I did not notice at first that this paper is THAT old - 1984 - I would be surprised to see companion star research like this published even today.
 
Back
Top Bottom