Black Hawk military helicopter collides into American Airlines flight landing at Reagan Airport in Washington, DC

I do not believe transgenderism leads to kamikaze behavior.
I think it might in some cases. They are delusional about themselves and objective reality in general AND full of artificial hormones and god knows what else drugs they take to maintain their illusion and/or fight depression, etc. Not a good combo.


In this case, according to the community notes on X, i.e. here, he is alive and wasn´t the pilot, as per his post on FB:
Some craziness has happened on the internet and I’m being named as one of the pilots of the DC crash. Please report any accounts or posts you see. It’s insulting to the victims and families of those lost and they deserve better than this BS from the bots and trolls of the internet.
 
I was reading the below short essay, in addition to other things on twitter, etc, and was thinking to myself that it just doesn't make senses that this happened. The last thing I felt the same way about was the ship running into and collapsing the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore in March of last year. With that I was sure their was some kind of foul play or larger conspiracy.


The recent crash of a military helicopter into American Airlines flight 5342 is sparking a lot of doubts about the idea that it was simply a tragic air accident:

Wild conspiracy theorists are pushing unsubstantiated claims that the deadly crash that saw a Army Black Hawk helicopter collide with a passenger jet was deliberate. American Airlines Flight 5342 was approaching Washington’s Reagan National Airport around 9pm Wednesday when the military chopper and plane collided in mid-air, before both falling into the Potomac River. The airplane held four crew members and 60 passengers, and the helicopter carrying three soldiers on a ‘training flight’.

Officials have not said how many people died in the accident but the bodies of 30 people reported to have been recovered so far. Authorities have suggested that there may be no survivors.

The Army and Defense Department has launched an investigation into the crash as many question how a plane with modern collision-avoidance technology and nearby traffic controllers could collide with a military aircraft over the nation’s capital. Conspiracy theorists have rushed to social media to place uncorroborated blame on the US government, suggesting the collision must have been intentional because ‘military helicopters don’t fly into planes’. Some allege the helicopter appeared to ‘chase’ the Bombadier plane as it approached for landing, comparing the scene to a ‘1970s-style assassination’.
Among those “wild conspiracy theorists” is the Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces, the 47th President of the United States.

The airplane was on a perfect and routine line of approach to the airport. The helicopter was going straight at the airplane for an extended period of time. It is a CLEAR NIGHT, the lights on the plane were blazing, why didn’t the helicopter go up or down, or turn. Why didn’t the control tower tell the helicopter what to do instead of asking if they saw the plane. This is a bad situation that looks like it should have been prevented. NOT GOOD!!!

Fortunately, with President Trump in charge, there is at least a chance that the investigation into the crash will be a legitimate one. And the vital question may not be who was on the plane, but rather, who was on the helicopter.

The Blackhawk apparently did NOT have its transponder on, and was designated as a “PAT” (Priority Air Transport) which means that there was a very high ranking Military Official on board the helicopter.


Here is the exchange with the C's about the bridge accident where 4D bleed through was the cause and there was symbolism related to it.

27 April 2024 said:
Q: (L) Did we ask about the ship that hit the Francis Scott Key Bridge?

(Niall) No.

(A Jay) Was the steering of the ship into the Francis Scott Key Bridge deliberate and premeditated?

A: No

Q: (A Jay) If not, what caused the power failure of the ship?

A: Power failure had nothing to do with impact. Was side effect of bleedthrough of 4D energies.

Q: (Niall) That was your idea.

(L) I already thought about that. Why don't you just ask me? I'd have told you! I mean, it's like they said they described in - what was it? New Mexico, where you're driving and it looks like the road is straight, but it's really curving, or it's curving and it's really straight.

(Joe) Right. So, the driver, the captain, or whatever, just kind of, like, got confuddled about where he was going.

(L) And I bet he's still freaking out! He was sure he was going in the right direction.

(Joe) So, there were some symbolic aspects to it. It was the Francis Scott Key bridge.

(L) Were there symbolic aspects to it?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And is that because of the 4D energies that there's some information involved in it?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And was there any bleedthrough aspect to that event in London the other day with the horses and Big Ben?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Is there anything to be read intelligently in symbolism of these events, or is it just associated with the place that it is? Or is it predictive?

A: You have been doing well analyzing things when you network.

Q: (Joe) Cool.

Maybe 4D bleed through should be considered as a reason for what looks like something that just could not or should not have happened in terms of this crash. Maybe there isn't a larger conspiracy. I figure, with the Pentagon being a deep cover place with 4D areas, etc and Washington DC being the capital of the US, which is 4D STS central, and 4D bleed through with Wave stuff starting to be more common as per what I remember from more recent sessions, we should maybe start putting it near the top of the list to consider when things don't add up.

The symbolism might be America starting to crash (American Airlines) with Trump acting like a bull in the China shop, which looks like it could continue for some time and with such as things as floating the idea again yesterday about slapping 100% tariffs on BRICS countries... and we are entering a period where Continuity of Government may be enacted as things deteriorate and get crazier (helicopter was on a COG training mission). Trumps actions overall and actions against the Deep State and the overall evil apparatus built in the US over decades will lead to Continuity of Government as America crashes?
 
Missed the time allotted to do an added edit.

Another thing to try to figure out is the symbolism of all the figure skaters, to include Russians, that died in the crash. With the possible crash of the US mentioned above, it will be choreographed to some extent between the powers of the world, but mostly with the US and Russia, and all will be on thin ice with many passing away?
 
Missed the time allotted to do an added edit.

Another thing to try to figure out is the symbolism of all the figure skaters, to include Russians, that died in the crash. With the possible crash of the US mentioned above, it will be choreographed to some extent between the powers of the world, but mostly with the US and Russia, and all will be on thin ice with many passing away?
What symbolism? It is too much of it and too intricate and practically incoherent to even make a movie out of it, nevermind to plan a sequence of circumstances and quick succession events that unraveled precisely (with the exception of the previous day) culminating in a triple suicide and a mass murder? Like Sully was saying, at least one of the pilots should have seen the other craft. Nothing makes sense, though, and the recordings will explain at least the comms with the tower and between aircrafts.
 
If it was a inside-job, no government in the world would admit to that. The official explanation would be incompetence or accident, neither of which is likely. It takes a lot of competence to direct a helicopter into a flying plane. It wasn't foggy so the pilots, if they were not in an induced coma or already dead, had a full visual and the time to correct course, unless they lost the commands of the helicopter to remote-control, in which case the question would be why didn't they eject.
 
I was reading the below short essay, in addition to other things on twitter, etc, and was thinking to myself that it just doesn't make senses that this happened
My mind went in similar directions as yours when I first heard about crash. But I think first we should try to rule out human error before going into woo woo. One piece of data that might lead to it being pilot error is that the pilot was in communication with ATC not long before the crash. The pilot would likely communicate that they don't have control over the heli, if it was in fact remote-controlled.

So how could this happen in the case of the pilot just not seeing the aircraft? I found one explanation on Twitter:

Former Blackhawk pilot here. I’ll try to describe it for you. Imagine you are looking at the world through toilet paper tubes, and everything is just different shades of green and black, with stars and ground lights hard to differentiate and aircraft lights that look the same as those.

Then you have 3 different radio frequencies going off in your ears. Then you’re trying to navigate without any peripheral vision. And you’re trying to keep the aircraft under control.

And you are trying to keep watch for all traffic, not just one plane. Because there are several in the sky at once and you’re tying to mentally keep track of all of them. And you get distracted for like 5 seconds or your focus goes elsewhere, like you instructor pilot asking you a question about airspace regulations.

Boom. You’re all dead. Flying these machines is really tough, and the airspace and NVGs make it a heck of a lot tougher.
We do need more info about the situation in the heli, like whether the pilot was using night vision goggles and why the heli was flying above 200 feet in such a congested and sensitive airspace. Another explanation by a former pilot about the way ATC communicated with the pilot:

Finally, the role of air traffic controllers will be a major focus of any investigation.

One of the things that I did not like hearing on the recordings of the air traffic control conversation in this accident is that the Reagan National Tower asked the Black Hawk pilots if they simply saw the other aircraft, just moments before the collision.

That's not a helpful instruction from the perspective of a pilot, because they wouldn't know where to look. Perhaps, the Black Hawk pilots did identify what they thought was the aircraft in question – but it was another plane taking off at the same time.

As a pilot, I would want to hear, for instance: Do you see the aircraft three miles away off your 11 o'clock and flying at a hundred feet?

I would want a direction, altitude and a distance. It appears that these Black Hawk pilots did not get that information.

You can also hear air traffic control giving the Black Hawk permission to 'go behind' the approaching aircraft, but if the Black Hawk didn't see that aircraft, they wouldn't know where to go.
So while I initially thought CIA as the culprit, I think it's not such a slam dunk at the moment. And certainly, as Mike alluded to, there could have been some paranormal stuff going on similar to what happened in Baltimore at the Key Bridge incident.
 
That’s my bet too: It was a message/warning towards Trump and/or his team that this can happen to them too if they don’t “behave“.

The possibility is very high, gives also a taste of Germanwings crash in 2015, though different in this one.

Of course, I'm not a pilot, but when entering an airport area, there should be several security measures a pilot has to be aware of. Checking radar, radio of flight control, visual sight, height and so on. And an airplane also switches on its headlights.
 
Former Blackhawk pilot here. I’ll try to describe it for you. Imagine you are looking at the world through toilet paper tubes, and everything is just different shades of green and black, with stars and ground lights hard to differentiate and aircraft lights that look the same as those.

Then you have 3 different radio frequencies going off in your ears. Then you’re trying to navigate without any peripheral vision. And you’re trying to keep the aircraft under control.

And you are trying to keep watch for all traffic, not just one plane. Because there are several in the sky at once and you’re tying to mentally keep track of all of them. And you get distracted for like 5 seconds or your focus goes elsewhere, like you instructor pilot asking you a question about airspace regulations.

Boom. You’re all dead. Flying these machines is really tough, and the airspace and NVGs make it a heck of a lot tougher.

The way he describes it, it's surprising these things aren't crashing into other aircraft all the time.
 
A preliminary internal Federal Aviation Administration safety report on the collision that was reviewed by The New York Times says that the staffing of the air traffic control tower at Ronald Reagan National Airport ‘was not normal for the time of day and volume of traffic’, and according to The Washington Post, the day before the tragedy, i.e. Tuesday, another plane was forced to abort a landing at Ronald Reagan National Airport because of the presence of a military helicopter in its path.
Here are new camera angles before the collision and you can see how the helicopter is vectoring towards the moving target, so in my opinion it does not look like an accident.

 
If it was a inside-job, no government in the world would admit to that. The official explanation would be incompetence or accident, neither of which is likely. It takes a lot of competence to direct a helicopter into a flying plane. It wasn't foggy so the pilots, if they were not in an induced coma or already dead, had a full visual and the time to correct course, unless they lost the commands of the helicopter to remote-control, in which case the question would be why didn't they eject.
Can pilots eject from helicopters?

Separately, video with decent visuals:


If this was a "message" to Trump, I don't think he is listening or cares about the message!
 
Can pilots eject from helicopters?
I meant something like opening the doors and jump, plenty of time. I was once in a car going down a frozen mountain road and we had the doors open in case the driver lost control of the car, ready to jump. I imagine military people with parachutes in a helicopter would be prepared to do something like that in case of an emergency?
 
unless they lost the commands of the helicopter to remote-control, in which case the question would be why didn't they eject.

Even if they lost the commands, I'm not sure the option to jump out would be taken lightly, unless they were absolutely certain they had no option. A 200ft+ drop into icy waters at night wouldn't be pleasant. And that's probably not high enough for safe parachute deployment, if they even had them, which I think on such a training flight might be unlikely.

On that point, the guy in the video below says that the 30 seconds before the crash, the heli rose from 200ft (where it had been and should have stayed there as per regulations) to 350feet immediately after which it impacted the plane. It's possible then that no one in the heli actually saw the plane because it was above them, and upwards visibility isn't the best in helicopters. So that leaves open the possibility of a major mistake by the heli pilots, although doesn't rule out remote control either.

 
It's possible then that no one in the heli actually saw the plane because it was above them, and upwards visibility isn't the best in helicopters. So that leaves open the possibility of a major mistake by the heli pilots, although doesn't rule out remote control either.
Good breakdown here by aviation YouTuber blancolirio. You can see in his breakdown that it's entirely possible the heli pilot saw the lights from the plane behind flight 5342 which was also descending and planning to land. Pete Hegseth confirmed that the heli pilot was wearing night vision goggles, which makes vision even worse. Still no explanation why the heli rose over a 100 feet when that whole area is at 200 feet max. That might be the biggest indicator of remote controlling. I do wonder if it's possible to switch on the remote control as it's in the air.

But it's clear from this video that the heli was on its designated route aside from the change in altitude. Also, the change in the runway that was supposed to be used by flight 5342 would make planning this in advance pretty difficult. If you planned to remotely crash into the plane, then the guidance would send it on the original path, which was to runway 1. Seems like a very complicated thing to do on the fly.

 
Last edited:
The way he describes it, it's surprising these things aren't crashing into other aircraft all the time.
Back in my Army days these were referred to as crash-hawks.
 
Back
Top Bottom