Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System

Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System

911 truth will never make it regardless of the research, professional opinions, inconsistent news reporting, etc. Why? There is no physical evidence. Period. At this point it's like theorizing on how the dinosaurs went extinct. It's theory and nothing more can be proven. It will likely fall by the wayside just as JFK, Pearl Harbor and the Disclosure Project. Seeing how these people work is simple. The entire Western world is patterned after their thinking. I contend that regardless of experts willing to testify, without physical evidence there is no case. They know this. They can do whatever they like. They are not worried or afraid. If you committed a murder and destroyed the body and weapon in a high powered acid, then dumped the acid in the ocean 10 miles out, would you be nervous or afraid of being brought to justice? The fact is, you could not be convicted unless there were some strong eyewitnesses or audio/video of you actually speaking about details of the crime. Sure, in the case of 911 there are some big pieces of circumstantial evidence that could be addressed. However, they don't implicate anyone. Do they implicate an entity? Which one? Individuals? Who? Obviously, when your only hope is congressional investigation, you may as well move on and try not to get fooled again. I believe it could happen again tomorrow and nothing would come of it. I'm sure the people that did it feel the same way. It seems at this point 911 is becoming just another knife to divide and further the conquest against organized social structures.
 
The thing that has me thinking is that now, the U.S. is planted in the middle east and the American public as well as the populaces of other nations are becoming increasingly disagreeable to this position. With the 2008 election campaigns just around the corner, can "they" afford to have candidates campaigning on the shoulders of leaving the middle east? How will that be prevented? If something to quell opinion is in the works, it must occur before the end of this year.
 
Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System

crazy croc said:
The thing that has me thinking is that now, the U.S. is planted in the middle east and the American public as well as the populaces of other nations are becoming increasingly disagreeable to this position. With the 2008 election campaigns just around the corner, can "they" afford to have candidates campaigning on the shoulders of leaving the middle east? How will that be prevented? If something to quell opinion is in the works, it must occur before the end of this year.
Hmm, me thinks you are a bit behind the times here, Insane Lizzard.... :)

All 'they' need to do is to be able to CONTROL the politicians. And that's already happened. They've been doing it for years. Peoples opinions don't matter to them - never have. And people simply aren't aware that these people are in control...

Still, doing nothing and saying nothing and assuming politics is the 'be all and end all' of change, changes nothing. Indeed, resistance isn't futile because it can change some small things. And those things do count.
 
Certainly, campaign promises have a history of being broken but I feel as things stand, pulling out of the middle east is sure to be a focus for candidates. Ya, it could be promised then back paddled later but I feel that this is a focus that really should be avoided in the campaign altogether. If the plan is to expand, imagine how much ground could be lost if the campaign takes this focus and brings it to a feverish pitch.
 
Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System

Expanding a bit further on this, yes, small things do matter. In a small way. The idea that they can just do these things completely against mass cooperation of the populace is not exactly true. In that respect, the awarness 911 truth brings into the public psyche as to inspiring people to question what is happening and developing suspicious and critical thinking is a small victory. I don't believe basing the 2008 presidential campaign on pulling out of the middle east is a small thing. People in the states will stand up against expansion or a prolonged exposure to the conflict if it is promised then forgotten. Without people willing to join the service and go off to die for a cause, their middle east plans will come to a grinding hault. As it stands, this is beginning to happen internally within the military. Months and months of presidential candidates spewing off on the tele about pulling out would be a big deal. I hope it happens. I would love to see the troops come home and perhaps a new chapter begin to be written in this tale. The next year will be a testing of the metal regarding this issue.
 
Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System

Sorry if we've got a little off topic here, and moved to the the US's political autopilot 'system'... which also has been hijacked, by the way. :(

crazy croc said:
Months and months of presidential candidates spewing off on the tele about pulling out would be a big deal. I hope it happens.
Has it happened yet, and when are the elections due? I wish it would happen too, but I don't think it will. If it does, candidates will stay canditates. Election fraud will occur as has happened already and nothing changes. I wonder who is really in control of this particular 'plane'...

crazy croc said:
I would love to see the troops come home and perhaps a new chapter begin to be written in this tale. The next year will be a testing of the metal regarding this issue.
Perhaps for the people, but the politicians need the support of the "Powers that Be" in order to get elected and to have a 'hassel free' term in office. If there's any likelyhood at all that they cannot be 'controlled' (properly) then they will not get the support of these very powerful individuals and in some cases, organisations.

I don't think the 'metal' is stong enough, sadly. It hasn't been, to support the weight of the truth, and it won't be to support the weight of change. Naturally, I hope this doesn't happen even if I think it will.
 
Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System

crazy croc said:
911 truth will never make it regardless of the research, professional opinions, inconsistent news reporting, etc. Why? There is no physical evidence. Period. At this point it's like theorizing on how the dinosaurs went extinct. It's theory and nothing more can be proven. It will likely fall by the wayside just as JFK, Pearl Harbor and the Disclosure Project. Seeing how these people work is simple. The entire Western world is patterned after their thinking. I contend that regardless of experts willing to testify, without physical evidence there is no case. They know this. They can do whatever they like. They are not worried or afraid. If you committed a murder and destroyed the body and weapon in a high powered acid, then dumped the acid in the ocean 10 miles out, would you be nervous or afraid of being brought to justice? The fact is, you could not be convicted unless there were some strong eyewitnesses or audio/video of you actually speaking about details of the crime.
For those who know what this visual evidence shows, as related to a "detail of the crime", this one image is more than enough to justify a new investigation.

corefacesexploding.jpg


If you don't know, then be silent and let the visual evidence be fairly evaluated by those who might.
 
Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System

crazy croc said:
911 truth will never make it regardless of the research, professional opinions, inconsistent news reporting, etc. Why? There is no physical evidence. Period.
No that is not true. Period. What can be said is that 911 truth (maybe) will never make it because the available data (evidence) have been flooded with massive amounts of false conclusions, wrong tracks, and a general information overkill which is often emotionally loaded. At a certain threshold point most people will succumb (one sooner than the other) to the reflex of throwing EVERYthing from the table, also those data that directly contradict the official version. Is it possible that this also lies at the root of your definite statement? Maybe combined with an impression that your hands are being tied, and a general loss of hope ? This is just an educated guess, because I’ve also been close to this, and I had to use some effort NOT to throw out the baby with the dirty bathwater.

crazy croc said:
I believe it could happen again tomorrow and nothing would come of it. I'm sure the people that did it feel the same way. It seems at this point 911 is becoming just another knife to divide and further the conquest against organized social structures.
Yes, to this I tend to agree.

Sometimes the impression even creeps up on me that the contradictions and holes of the entire crime scene were intentionally "leaked" for the world populace to CONsume. Divide and conquer, you know.
 
Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System

crazy croc said:
911 truth will never make it regardless of the research, professional opinions, inconsistent news reporting, etc. Why? There is no physical evidence. Period.
Charles said:
No that is not true. Period. What can be said is that 911 truth (maybe) will never make it because the available data (evidence) have been flooded with massive amounts of false conclusions, wrong tracks, and a general information overkill which is often emotionally loaded.
Right on. Physical evidence is not really needed when images of physical evidence exist that are conclusive. The only reasons the conclusions haven't been made by the appropriate experts is that they are a afraid and a part of the current system in a big way. They all have licenses issued by governmental agencies for example.

The emotional loading is most often provided by disinformationalists which use ridicule to dismiss information. People are much more afraid of social rejection than our society realizes consciously.

The overkill is intentional and very real. One of the major psyops tools. Pods, missles (at WTC) blue screen holograms, nukes, scalar weapons and remote control are examples. Not "leaks" per se, but chafe and perhaps presented as "leaks" to give them more credibility.

crazy croc said:
I believe it could happen again tomorrow and nothing would come of it. I'm sure the people that did it feel the same way. It seems at this point 911 is becoming just another knife to divide and further the conquest against organized social structures.
Charles said:
Yes, to this I tend to agree.
Sometimes the impression even creeps up on me that the contradictions and holes of the entire crime scene were intentionally "leaked" for the world populace to CONsume. Divide and conquer, you know.
Yes. The infiltrators of the US government would like very much to use 9-11 as a dividing tool, and to a degree have been successful. Underlying the success is religious fear. In other words IF those fearful religious consider they are wrong about 9-11, THEN something else exists which is even more fearful than being wrong about 9-11. That would be mind control, previously, fearfully labelled "OCCULT" and "verboten" "taboo" for the religious to consider in any way shape or form as it is and has been utilized by secret societies to propagate and protect their orders for many centuries.
 
Christophera said:
Yes. The infiltrators of the US government would like very much to use 9-11 as a dividing tool, and to a degree have been successful. Underlying the success is religious fear. In other words IF those fearful religious consider they are wrong about 9-11, THEN something else exists which is even more fearful than being wrong about 9-11. That would be mind control, previously, fearfully labelled "OCCULT" and "verboten" "taboo" for the religious to consider in any way shape or form as it is and has been utilized by secret societies to propagate and protect their orders for many centuries.
I agree, but I have the impression that you are seeking too far, and outside of those who would awake and realize they were wrong about 9-11. I have the impression that your reasoning implies a mind-controlled hijacker? Again, there is no proof for a mind-controlled hijacker. The most fearful thing and what will hurt most is the realisation that they themselves have been bamboozled, or, that they themselves have been subjected to a form of mind control. I also do not understand what it has to do with religious apart from the fact that religious fanatics happen to have a very stubborn and fixed mindset. Also non-religious people are subject to mind control and the resulting cognitive dissonance.

Going back to the "remote control" as opposed to "automated guidance", I see a scenario which does not need remote control, so that we can maybe skip the discussion as whether those Boeings were equipped with a remote control system or whether there was enough time available to install one.

Automated guidance was part and parcel of those Boeings, to this we have agreed.

………………………

A moving body always moves in relation to a certain reference frame.
Most of the time, I personally will use a reference frame that is fixed to the surface of the earth, as it best describes my human situation. But in essence I am than using a reference frame that is hurling at high speed through space as the earth circles the sun, and that rotates 360° around its own axis in 24 hours.

Airplanes use a similar reference frame, a GPS controlled 3D reference frame that is fixed to the surface of the earth. If one was able to move the reference frame the airplane might "think" that it is moving while the airplane is just standing on the tarmac.

How difficult is it to override the incoming GPS signal ?

The next link, wherein countermeasures are contemplated for such spoofing activities,

www(dot)globalsecurity.org/security/systems/gps_aviation.htm

demonstrates that all you need is a STRONGER signal.
And the countermeasures contemplated were definitely not implemented yet.

So, for an airplane that is flying a linear trajectory, the automatic pilot system will interpret a spoofed and continually changing reference frame as if the plane is taking a turn instead of flying in a straight line, and it will correct for this, making a turn the opposite way.

I am pretty confident that the military have thought about the (mis)use of such technology and that, in effect, they have implemented it by means of several of their many military satellites up there, so that they can (mis)use it themselves.

Heck, maybe such (mis)use was one of the many activities of the military drill that day.

Maybe this is one of the reasons why no information of the "black" boxes was allowed to see daylight, as it would show entirely different flight paths as the ones that were actually recorded by the outside radars ?
 
Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System

Christophera said:
Yes. The infiltrators of the US government would like very much to use 9-11 as a dividing tool, and to a degree have been successful. Underlying the success is religious fear. In other words IF those fearful religious consider they are wrong about 9-11, THEN something else exists which is even more fearful than being wrong about 9-11. That would be mind control, previously, fearfully labelled "OCCULT" and "verboten" "taboo" for the religious to consider in any way shape or form as it is and has been utilized by secret societies to propagate and protect their orders for many centuries.
Charles said:
I agree, but I have the impression that you are seeking too far, and outside of those who would awake and realize they were wrong about 9-11. I have the impression that your reasoning implies a mind-controlled hijacker? Again, there is no proof for a mind-controlled hijacker. The most fearful thing and what will hurt most is the realisation that they themselves have been bamboozled, or, that they themselves have been subjected to a form of mind control. I also do not understand what it has to do with religious apart from the fact that religious fanatics happen to have a very stubborn and fixed mindset. Also non-religious people are subject to mind control and the resulting cognitive dissonance.
I understand your concern about going "too far" for those who have yet to awaken to the serious inequities of the official story. And of course it is valid, the notion marginalizes the entire presentation which I believe is your concern. I'm fairly certain that the hijackers existed and that they were mind controlled and that US officials are also. So if there were not remotes, then the notion of mind control is justified.

When you say, "The most fearful thing and what will hurt most is the realisation that they themselves have been bamboozled, or, that they themselves have been subjected to a form of mind control." Do you mean the public?

There are invisible connections between church and state that control what people learn in the schools or what is easily accepted generally by the public in this society, and the public is not quite cognizant of the implications of that. Meaning that just about everybody, save a small percentage, experience the cognitive dissonance when it comes to mind control. Which, as far as I can tell, is exactly why the chuch/state connections have been made dominant over our society. It provides a "veil of credibility" which operations can be conducted behind with virtual invisibility because no one can believe that such invisible control exists.

Charles said:
Going back to the "remote control" as opposed to "automated guidance", I see a scenario which does not need remote control, so that we can maybe skip the discussion as whether those Boeings were equipped with a remote control system or whether there was enough time available to install one.

Automated guidance was part and parcel of those Boeings, to this we have agreed.

………………………

A moving body always moves in relation to a certain reference frame.
Most of the time, I personally will use a reference frame that is fixed to the surface of the earth, as it best describes my human situation. But in essence I am than using a reference frame that is hurling at high speed through space as the earth circles the sun, and that rotates 360° around its own axis in 24 hours.

Airplanes use a similar reference frame, a GPS controlled 3D reference frame that is fixed to the surface of the earth. If one was able to move the reference frame the airplane might "think" that it is moving while the airplane is just standing on the tarmac.

How difficult is it to override the incoming GPS signal ?

The next link, wherein countermeasures are contemplated for such spoofing activities,

www(dot)globalsecurity.org/security/systems/gps_aviation.htm

demonstrates that all you need is a STRONGER signal.
And the countermeasures contemplated were definitely not implemented yet.

So, for an airplane that is flying a linear trajectory, the automatic pilot system will interpret a spoofed and continually changing reference frame as if the plane is taking a turn instead of flying in a straight line, and it will correct for this, making a turn the opposite way.

I am pretty confident that the military have thought about the (mis)use of such technology and that, in effect, they have implemented it by means of several of their many military satellites up there, so that they can (mis)use it themselves.

Heck, maybe such (mis)use was one of the many activities of the military drill that day.

Maybe this is one of the reasons why no information of the "black" boxes was allowed to see daylight, as it would show entirely different flight paths as the ones that were actually recorded by the outside radars ?
That, is a remarkable perspective of how to alter the function of automatic guidence and virtually turn it into remote control which might be possible if the reference frame consists of only the onboard reciever of the GPS signals. Why the logical inconsistencies of impact/fall sequence exist would still unexplained however. And, ..... they are major detractors to the credibility of the ruse.
 
To my knowledge, the 757 and the 767 did not have GPS install as a standard feature. It was installed as a modification on the later 757/767 that were rolled out of the factory. Existing in-service 757 and 767 had to be re-fitted with an GPS receiver and basically a mod was carried out to allow the on board navigation systems to use the GPS signals. Otherwise, the airplanes used the older IRS (Inertia Reference Systems) for navigation. Were the 2 aircraft fitted with GPS receivers? My own conclusion is that yes, both the aircraft were fitted or upgraded with GPS receivers although I have no prove to offer.
 
I am listening to the following segment of Redacted show with Dan Hanley from 911 pilots.org, a pilot serving as director and international public spokesperson of a global grassroots effort called '9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers' talking about the existence of "the uninterruptible autopilot" system which allow to electronically hijacked and remote control an aircraft.

NB. This is likely a replay / refresh which was broadcasted during the latest 911 week celebration few months ago, thus sorry if it was already posted, did a forum search for 911pilots.org and got not results.

Few elements:
- remote control technology is available since awhile since 1944 and refined over the years
- further example, in 1984 NASA & FAA conducted a joined crash test experiment using remote control technology
- the alleged hijackers did not have the technical skills
- pilots were not allowed to testify for the 911 commission

source: 911 Pilots.org

spokesperson of a global grassroots effort called ‘9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers’, whose purpose is to show that there were no Muslim hijackers at the controls of the 9/11 aircraft but that they were electronically hijacked through employment of a system called the uninterruptible autopilot that enables a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot and flight management computer and guide it to its target destination. Once engaged, the pilots cannot disconnect the system.

With the latest exposure / revelations going on with JFK files ... I guess, if the JFK files are released and public perception about "conspiracy theories" is shifting, then hopefully 911 questioning may come back under scrutiny ...

Will relisten to this later during the day just to go more carefully in the details, though interesting times ahead ...


PS. attached the auto-generated text transcripts from the video.
 

Attachments

Back
Top Bottom