Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

[Huila]

Iran’s latest LEGO animation called ‘Propaganda Video’

It’s not the first time this thought has been tossed around, watching this gave me a feeling that we are really getting played into choosing sides, looking at who’s in the right whose in the wrong, burning up our emotional and mental energies, hoping for a certain outcome thinking that outcome changes the narrative… what if the narrative is that all of the sides involved are controlled by the same narrator for a purpose that has nothing to do with territory, oil, currency, but the ultimate control under a One World Order, a preparation for when Earth starts to really vibrate in fourth density. What if the players are all the same character wearing different masks?
What if that character has a green snout and a long tail that sticks out of the back of his trousers and is sitting in his office pulling levers and pushing buttons to animate the different masks. Hm, what if.

Iran has gone all out with its AI War Propaganda; having a distributed- decentralized multiple production of studios. Kim Iversen compiled their most recent releases.

 

[Ben]

The only thing I can imagine with this mini-invasion is that the US are counting on the idea that Iran won’t obliterate their special forces simply because they’re US special forces and you’re just not allowed to do that.

All I can think regarding this move is, “Oh my God they’re all going to die.”

I can’t stop thinking about it.

Brings to mind this from Lobaczewski:

“Thus, the biological, psychological, moral and economic destruction of the majority of normal people becomes, for the pathocrats, a ‘biological’ necessity. Many means serve this end, starting with concentration camps and including warfare with an obstinate, well-armed foe who will devastate and debilitate the human power thrown at him, namely the very power jeopardizing pathocrats rule: the sons of normal man sent out to fight for an illusionary ‘noble cause.’ Once safely dead, the soldiers will then be decreed heroes to be revered in paeans, useful for raising a new generation faithful to the pathocracy and ever willing to go to their deaths to protect it,”

Invading any of the islands is such a crazy idea from a military perspective, but there's another possibility described here:

Landing at a naval base on the coast of the mainland has several advantages in terms of air cover, terrain, approach routes and above all the possibility of the local Baluch people becoming involved (or being less hostile to your presence at least).

But it's only slightly less insane because you still have to bring boats within range of all kinds of Iranian assets.

 

[Huila]

The US and Israel have damaged or destroyed more than 85,000 civilian structures in Iran since late February, including 64,583 homes, 600 schools and 281 medical facilities, the head of the Iranian Red Crescent Society said on Wednesday. Pir-Hossein Kolivand, president of Iran’s Red Crescent Society, said missiles had also hit 17 rescue points and 12 rescue vehicles. He described the US and Israel’s actions as “war crimes”.The figures come after the official death toll in Iran passed 1,500.

The vast majority of the casualties have been civilians, including the roughly 170 schoolchildren whom the US killed in Minab on the first day of the war. Amnesty International called the Minab attack a ”serious breach of international humanitarian law”. Kolivand referenced a US-Israeli strike against a Red Crescent ambulance in the city of Lar, southern Iran, earlier this month. "Nothing at all was left of the ambulance while they were transporting injured people," he said in a video. -Novara Media

The nature of the targets- can't help but remind one of the destruction of Al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory in Sudan by US missile strikes. The factory was known to provide the population with cheaper and affordable medication.

 

[Mari]

All I can think regarding this move is, “Oh my God they’re all going to die.”

Same.

Ask any teenager who played any Fortnite-like games about such a military tactic, and every kid will tell you it´s a no-go option. I don´t know anything about a military strategies and I think it´s insane, and it all reminds me of the meme:

Are we seeing here only a wishful thinking or is here some "humiliation ritual" going on or the Devil is so strong that blinds all rational mind or what? I really don´t understand. Perhaps it´s simply as you´ve said: the hubris - they wont dare to strike us. Which is equally absurd as any other reason.

 

[Tomiro]

I don't see what they hope to accomplish with such a small force. Ok, so they might be able to capture an island or two, or establish a beachhead, but then what? It's not likely going to open the Strait of Hormuz.

Neocon Think Tank documents, like Which Path to Persia, from 2009, about an invasion of Iran talk about 250 000 soldiers, and I'm not sure if that would be enough.

Iran also successfully fought off the invasion from Iraq in 1980, consisting of some 200 000 soldiers, in a war that lasted 8 years, with millions of casualties.

 

[Chu]

There are ways to make the Tether funds anonymous, such as decentralized exchanges and 'mixer' services. Iran seems to be using those to make it difficult to identify its funds, though some did get blacklisted and blocked by Tether.

There is also a time lag in blacklisting Tether addresses, so that using new addresses, quickly moving received funds and anonymizing them can get around the slower blacklisting process.

Yes. And that kind of transaction has been in use for several years now, to avoid sanctions (Russia did it too, AFAIK). Try buying anything from sanctioned countries. That's how they have to do it! But it doesn't say much about a "deep state", and more about how to use their system against them. We're talking about money staying in cryptos for minutes, not long-term. Then, it's soon transferred into the country's local currency. Ultimately, this allows anyone using this system to bypass transactions in dollars. Seeing a big conspiracy or deep state coordination is a step too far, IMHO.

 

[seek10]

 

[unkl brws]

The only thing I can imagine with this mini-invasion is that the US are counting on the idea that Iran won’t obliterate their special forces simply because they’re US special forces and you’re just not allowed to do that.

All I can think regarding this move is, “Oh my God they’re all going to die.”

I can’t stop thinking about it.

It's wishful thinking writ large (imo). I heard of this planned mini invasion yesterday when by chance I came across this note from a Substack page called "Green Beret Nap Time". This is his take on the situation and he seems to think it should be successful (osit).

What we are seeing right now with a large element of Special Operations Forces pushing to the Middle East is not just routine military movement. It is a deliberate positioning of capability, and more importantly, decision making power, at the highest level.

The surge of at least 35 C-17 flights from key installations across the United States into Israel and Jordan strongly indicates the potential formation of a Special Operations Joint Task Force (SOJTF) or, if allied partners are involved, a Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force (CJSOTF).

That distinction matters, but the implication is the same. This is not a conventional buildup. This is the architecture required to execute decisive operations.

Special Operations Forces operate fundamentally differently than conventional military units. A traditional force buildup of brigades, divisions, armored units, signals preparation for large scale, sustained ground combat.

That is not what this is.

A SOJTF or CJSOTF is designed for precision, speed, and strategic impact. It brings together elite elements from across the services: Army Special Forces, Rangers, Navy SEALs, Air Force Special Tactics, under a unified command structure that can execute complex missions with minimal footprint but maximum effect.

These formations are built to dismantle networks, eliminate remaining high value targets, enable partner forces, and create cascading operational advantages without requiring a massive ground invasion.

The inclusion of the 82nd Airborne Division in this movement is also telling. The 82nd is not being positioned as the main effort, but rather as an uplift and contingency force.

Their role is to provide rapid reinforcement, secure key terrain, respond to escalation, and enable the freedom of maneuver for special operations elements. They are there to support and stabilize, not to lead a conventional campaign.

This combination gives the President something critically important: options.

A SOJTF or CJSOTF provides the ability to act quickly without committing to a large scale war, apply precise force where it matters most, scale operations up or down based on conditions, and achieve strategic objectives without the political and human cost of a full conventional deployment.

Most importantly, it creates a pathway to victory without a massive ground footprint.

Victory in this context does not mean occupying terrain with large formations. It means achieving decisive outcomes: neutralizing threats, collapsing hostile networks, and shaping the environment through targeted, intelligence driven operations.

That is exactly what Special Operations Forces are built to do.

If the objective is to finish the job, this is the most effective way to do it. A SOJTF or CJSOTF allows the United States to bring its most capable and adaptable forces to bear, while avoiding the risks and long term commitments associated with conventional boots on the ground warfare.

This is not escalation for its own sake. It is precision positioning for decisive action, and anyone saying any different is either doing so out of ignorance or because they want to use any force movement into the Middle East as a club against the President.

 

[T.C.]

It's wishful thinking writ large (imo). I heard of this planned mini invasion yesterday when by chance I came across this note from a Substack page called "Green Beret Nap Time". This is his take on the situation and he seems to think it should be successful (osit).

The question is, what should be successful?

He says this is the most successful way to finish the job. What job?