Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

- Trump likes to be unpredictable and justifiably/rightfully so.

- A good deal maker will always try to be ahead of the curve by being the first person to make an offer that is as high as possible (sometimes rediculously high). In order to arrive at the best position possible.

- Trump was always a showman and he more or less uses that also in what he is doing on the political stage.

- Unpredictability and a naive and bombastic character creates confusion and chaos also in Trumps enemies.
I wonder how Trump would behave if he had no leverage. Has he ever been in a position without power?
 
- How come that Trump still can make almost everyone crazy, hyped up and worked up about things even though he has done that now quite a number of times? While pretty much every time Trump’s actual ACTIONS and RESULTS looked much different and quite a bit more positive than the states big words. Trump seems “masterful“ in creating/fueling knee-jerk reactions in people.

One thing about Trump is that he's not necessarily the master strategist some people think he is, nor is he even "the greatest deal maker" or the greatest businessman. If you look at his career before and during politics, it's clear that the one thing he's an absolute master at is PR: he has made it by creating a real-life soap opera, a celebrity brand. He plays the media like a fiddle and drives narratives.

Which is kind of infuriating, since the resulting discourse seems so childish, stupid and ridiculous. Which it frankly is on many levels. But Western politics has been about PR for a long time, the media basically driving politics rather than the other way around. So in that sense Trump is perfect for the role, blowing smoke left and right, dominating the culture and the discourse as he does. I mean, just those phrases he comes up with/adopts, like "the wall", "the Big Beautiful Bill", the "12-day war", "Fake News", "Too Big To Rig", "Lock Her Up", "Rocket Man" etc. This translates to actual policy proposals (whether serious or not) - it's always something catchy, infuriating, funny, crazy... It's probably the only way to play the game in the US these days to have half a chance of getting anything done. He's a trash TV star above else, and Western politics today is a trash TV show, so there you go.

This obviously has its downsides, and all of this smoke and mirrors creates a lot of confusion in people and may derail many from looking at the world objectively. It certainly keeps things more "open" though as opposed to the technocratic puppet show with centralized talking points we've seen pre-Trump.
 
Last edited:
The 'deep state'/Israelis have compromat on Trump, probably extra marital affairs, but I don't think that's so significant, since he's already been accused of that. He would like to avoid exposure of that, but it's not a 'trump card'.
Is there evidence for this? I think it is just as likely that Trump simply made a deal with the Zionists: "You help me get elected and control Congress and I will be the best friend Israel ever had", or something like that.

The thing is, Trump probably has more than enough and much more serious kompromat on the Zionists (Epstein, 9/11, etc.). It would seem that it is Trump who can destroy the Zionists with 'kompromat' and not really the other way around.
 
Is there evidence for this? I think it is just as likely that Trump simply made a deal with the Zionists: "You help me get elected and control Congress and I will be the best friend Israel ever had", or something like that.

The thing is, Trump probably has more than enough and much more serious kompromat on the Zionists (Epstein, 9/11, etc.). It would seem that it is Trump who can destroy the Zionists with 'kompromat' and not really the other way around.
At best , i see it as a Mexican standoff , at least with regards to the mossad / zionists part of it , transcripts state that Trump is somewhat trying to leverage Epstein op. knowledge , however those same critters were at least responsible for one of the attempted assassinations , but stuff like 911 ( and who knows what else ) would probably have far more reaching consequences than merely one sided implications / scandals.
 
I watched a significant portion of the BIBI Files and found it pretty lame. “Taking gifts illegally“ is surely the most important crime you could charge Netanyahu and others like him with. :umm:
I watched the whole thing. Aside from wishing I could hit his wife upside the head with a brick, I almost felt sorry for the guy, what with his balls rolling around that shrew’s purse. Worse really are BenGvir, Smotrich, and that devil’s spawn kid of his. The whole family is an asteroid strike in the making. Hope it doesn’t miss.

Not that I am emotionally invested…
 
A new development.

1751436052773.png
 
Just had a thought about Trump and Iran. We suspect that there was a plan to blame Iran after his assassination and take some military action against Iran as revenge. This is clearly the Israeli agenda for a long time, but it's hard and harder to separate out the Israelis from the 'deep state' within the US. At this point they seem to be one and the same, and may have been so for a long time.

Anyway, it's interesting that an attack on Iran after Trump's assassination was the plan, but that plan was nixed, but within 6 months of Trump becoming POTUS he launches an attack on Iran.

The best we can say about this scenario is that Trump being POTUS at least allowed for a less aggressive attack on Iran that probably would have transpired if they were allowed to assassinate him. So the whole abridging of free will was perhaps not limited to just his assassination but what would have come afterwards, i.e. serious war with Iran and major destruction and chaos.
 
Back
Top Bottom