These two are legit.
Couldn't find anything about these allegedly "breaking" stories.
This was from last year, so it's not exactly breaking news either.
I hate X. Too much BS flying around at any given moment.
Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel
- Thread starter Ocean
- Start date
These two are legit.
Couldn't find anything about these allegedly "breaking" stories.
This was from last year, so it's not exactly breaking news either.
I hate X. Too much BS flying around at any given moment.
Pentagon Tells Trump It Needs More Time To Prepare For War With Iran
"According to The Telegraph, "Trump has been warned that the US military needs more time to prepare for strikes against Iran." Military commanders in the Middle East stated they need to "consolidate US military positions and prepare defenses" in anticipation of an Iranian retaliatory attack."
Pentagon Tells Trump It Needs More Time To Prepare For War With Iran | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
ApotheosisMMC.
Dagobah Resident
We know that today the Pentagon is involved in armed confrontations with agents and radicals created by the CIA (and Mossad) in the Middle East; let's see who Trump listens to or who puts the most pressure on him.Pentagon Tells Trump It Needs More Time To Prepare For War With Iran
"According to The Telegraph, "Trump has been warned that the US military needs more time to prepare for strikes against Iran." Military commanders in the Middle East stated they need to "consolidate US military positions and prepare defenses" in anticipation of an Iranian retaliatory attack."
Pentagon Tells Trump It Needs More Time To Prepare For War With Iran | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Liliea
The Living Force
Trump's battles on different fronts. Everything looks very murky.
Trump will launch an attack on Iran by the end of the week
+ Israeli Channel 14 analyst Tamer Morag believes that US President Donald Trump will attack Iran in the coming days. He also says it will be a strong and wide-ranging strike aimed at "toppling the regime," not a symbolic or limited attack.
+US Senators warn bombing Iran may backfire, doubt it would achieve intended goals
Republican Senator Rand Paul voiced skepticism about the effectiveness of military action against Iran, saying on ABC News that he was unsure bombing the country would achieve its intended goals. Paul, along with Democratic Senator Mark Warner, warned that a strike could backfire by unifying Iranians against an external threat rather than weakening the ruling system
Speaking on "Fox News Sunday," Warner cautioned that an attack on Iran could rally the population against the US "in a way that the regime has not been able to."
+From the presidential plane, Trump says Iranian leaders called him yesterday and "they want to negotiate... a meeting is being set up, but we may have to act because of what's happening, before the meeting."
abcnews.go.com
www.theguardian.com
Trump will launch an attack on Iran by the end of the week
+ Israeli Channel 14 analyst Tamer Morag believes that US President Donald Trump will attack Iran in the coming days. He also says it will be a strong and wide-ranging strike aimed at "toppling the regime," not a symbolic or limited attack.
+US Senators warn bombing Iran may backfire, doubt it would achieve intended goals
Republican Senator Rand Paul voiced skepticism about the effectiveness of military action against Iran, saying on ABC News that he was unsure bombing the country would achieve its intended goals. Paul, along with Democratic Senator Mark Warner, warned that a strike could backfire by unifying Iranians against an external threat rather than weakening the ruling system
Speaking on "Fox News Sunday," Warner cautioned that an attack on Iran could rally the population against the US "in a way that the regime has not been able to."
+From the presidential plane, Trump says Iranian leaders called him yesterday and "they want to negotiate... a meeting is being set up, but we may have to act because of what's happening, before the meeting."
Video ‘It's not just about Venezuela’: Sen. Paul on Senate War Powers Resolution
ABC News’ Martha Raddatz interviews Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on “This Week.”
Iran says it is open to talks with US amid protest crackdown
Foreign minister says talks only possible on basis of respect after Trump threatened ‘very strong’ military response
palestine
Dagobah Resident
There's an event that has remained unresolved in my mind; or rather, something about Iran that is now considered "ancient history"—but isn't for me.
When the Iranian president's helicopter was shot down some time ago, and the president died, the attack was blamed on Israel, thanks to the C's.
We also saw a similar pattern in Syria, and in that case, too, we can assume Israel was behind it.
I also remember the Lebanese pagers.
All in all, it seems to me that Israel has extensively infiltrated countries in the Middle East, with the aim of destabilizing them and seizing power.
If I was to be respectful of "the motion of the day" (Israel) — an Iran, seeing its leader assassinated, and then a new, 100% Iranian president — becomes an exception and goes against "logic".
Intellectual hygiene discourages the idea that Israel could not have installed a puppet.
Is my hypothesis plausible, please?
And then—do you think this is the case, or that Iran has managed to remain independent?
Thank you!
When the Iranian president's helicopter was shot down some time ago, and the president died, the attack was blamed on Israel, thanks to the C's.
We also saw a similar pattern in Syria, and in that case, too, we can assume Israel was behind it.
I also remember the Lebanese pagers.
All in all, it seems to me that Israel has extensively infiltrated countries in the Middle East, with the aim of destabilizing them and seizing power.
If I was to be respectful of "the motion of the day" (Israel) — an Iran, seeing its leader assassinated, and then a new, 100% Iranian president — becomes an exception and goes against "logic".
Intellectual hygiene discourages the idea that Israel could not have installed a puppet.
Is my hypothesis plausible, please?
And then—do you think this is the case, or that Iran has managed to remain independent?
Thank you!
Forbes confirms the news of Starlink's shutdown.
We have not seen this before. Iran’s digital blackout has now deployed military jammers to shut down access to Starlink. This is a game-changer for Plan-B connectivity for protesters and anti-regime activists when domestic internet plugs are pulled.
“Despite reports that tens of thousands of Starlink units are operating inside Iran,” Iran Wire reports, “the blackout has also reached satellite connections.” It is reported that about 30 per cent of Starlink’s uplink and downlink traffic was (initially) disrupted," quickly rising “to more than 80 per cent” within hours.
We have not seen this before. Iran’s digital blackout has now deployed military jammers to shut down access to Starlink. This is a game-changer for Plan-B connectivity for protesters and anti-regime activists when domestic internet plugs are pulled.
“Despite reports that tens of thousands of Starlink units are operating inside Iran,” Iran Wire reports, “the blackout has also reached satellite connections.” It is reported that about 30 per cent of Starlink’s uplink and downlink traffic was (initially) disrupted," quickly rising “to more than 80 per cent” within hours.
I think the current riots pretty much answer these questions, no?
Forum, I don't know about you but I have been feeling this very deeply angry energy around especially today.
It's probably the moderately high solar flares today:
https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/solar-activity/solar-flares.html
And the astronomical alignments which I think I am becoming more sensitive to.
After I posted that clip of Aaron Russo's account of Nick Rockefeller telling Aaron that the deep state/Israel is going to take over Afghanistan, then Iraq, Venezuela and, now, finally Iran it just had me thinking. Why overthrow these particular 4 countries and why does it have to be, in the psychopathic mind, these particular countries need to fall in order to establish some world domination. It is also not heartening to think that perhaps these psychopaths are just taking orders from 4D STS. Does 4D STS just say, ok go into this country first, second, third and fourth? I know that the Cs have said the goal is to eliminate the semites from the gene pool. Certainly, that ethnic cleansing has been accomplished and is ongoing.
What is the connection to the RFID chip and the fall of these countries? It was just haunting for me to listen to that clip again and 25 yrs later it is exactly what is happening now.
palestine
Dagobah Resident
Yes - it shows a Persian President still upright. (I did not catch up on the recent riot phenomenon. Thank you)
@candasiri, Iran is probably going to be trickier to overthrow because it's armed, which may be why it wasn't first on the list.
A few more thoughts:
So far, we can say that, (based on the C's) (1) Trump did a backroom deal with the Iranians to assassinate Soleimani, to keep Israel and the Deep State happy, (2) 'Midnight Hammer' (US' attack on nuclear facilities) in June last year was probably mostly for show; and (3) (based on the C's) Trump is being threatened by Israel. Based on this, I think most of what Trump says is for show, it's to please both the Deep State and Israel. If there'll be an attack, given his track record then it'll feed the beast but in the most benign way available to him. Maybe that's just my cope and it's difficult to say what he'll do under a lot of pressure from warmongers. But I think Trump has some influence and that influence seems to be tempering the most destructive impulses of pretty literal demons so he can make better deals.
A few more thoughts:
So far, we can say that, (based on the C's) (1) Trump did a backroom deal with the Iranians to assassinate Soleimani, to keep Israel and the Deep State happy, (2) 'Midnight Hammer' (US' attack on nuclear facilities) in June last year was probably mostly for show; and (3) (based on the C's) Trump is being threatened by Israel. Based on this, I think most of what Trump says is for show, it's to please both the Deep State and Israel. If there'll be an attack, given his track record then it'll feed the beast but in the most benign way available to him. Maybe that's just my cope and it's difficult to say what he'll do under a lot of pressure from warmongers. But I think Trump has some influence and that influence seems to be tempering the most destructive impulses of pretty literal demons so he can make better deals.
Do you watch NewsReal? If not, I recommend it. That's pretty much what gets discussed every show.
The gist is those countries are vital because of their locations and resources. The Empire needs to control them in order to contain Russia and, more importantly, China.
EmeraldR
The Living Force
well put- yes I know of several Iranians who moved back to Iran - and on the other side of the coin a few others who were totallymind controlled by the mainstream BS- programmed completely ...
According to Alex Kreiner, a geopolitical analyst I follow, the IRCG and the mullahs are opposed to each other. Allegedly the IRCG is aided/ manipulated by the British intelligence services with the aim to topple the mullahs and to form a government more aligned with Western interests. Hence the assassination of Suleimani (with the approval of the mullahs) who was becoming too powerful (what the Cs have confirmed).
The above video may be behind a paywall - if so, my apologies.
Not sure if any of the above is true, but I thought that was an interesting idea.
So it looks like it might happen soon. We have this:
I saw on social media that Axios is reporting that Trump will decide on an attack tomorrow (which is the 13th - just saying.)
I saw on social media that Axios is reporting that Trump will decide on an attack tomorrow (which is the 13th - just saying.)
