palestine
Dagobah Resident
@MJF I was thinking along the same lines (don't know if it is profitable)
Recap: at the time, a "program change" took place, because anthropocosmic plague was announced. There was too much trouble at the time and STS attracted sufficient imbalance for a cosmic "reset".
C's said: "instead of carrying on the plague, we performed a program change because we prefer a fine road".
And then, STS had to get along with a less-than-optimal (for them) allowance of troubles.
This overall portrayed STS as "not really in charge of themselves", bound to the compulsion of damaging activities, slaves to their passions - in a word, "me-wants-attack-blood".
Since that time, I keep in mind this sort of "model" - as if, somewhere, an impulsive and impatient STS representative, would be constantly bugging STO, ie:
"Hey - can I? Hey, can I kill X?"
"No"
"Please"
"No"
"And ... stealing Putin?"
"No"
(...)
I am not sure the above is representative of reality. But the various C exchanges show something not that far.
And then, "Trump", "war on Iran", "terrorist acts", "killing Charlie Kirk" - all those things would have ties to STS and their compulsion. I don't know if C's sometimes let be, even if STS does too wrong within this perspective (ie no "green light").
Just some thoughts and @MJF mentioned this "principle". Does it play out here?
EDIT: it makes me deeply sad to learn they killed Khamenei. He wasn't a bad figure, and he was an important BRICS representative. Overall, he was cristallizing much of "new positive Earth".
Recap: at the time, a "program change" took place, because anthropocosmic plague was announced. There was too much trouble at the time and STS attracted sufficient imbalance for a cosmic "reset".
C's said: "instead of carrying on the plague, we performed a program change because we prefer a fine road".
And then, STS had to get along with a less-than-optimal (for them) allowance of troubles.
This overall portrayed STS as "not really in charge of themselves", bound to the compulsion of damaging activities, slaves to their passions - in a word, "me-wants-attack-blood".
Since that time, I keep in mind this sort of "model" - as if, somewhere, an impulsive and impatient STS representative, would be constantly bugging STO, ie:
"Hey - can I? Hey, can I kill X?"
"No"
"Please"
"No"
"And ... stealing Putin?"
"No"
(...)
I am not sure the above is representative of reality. But the various C exchanges show something not that far.
And then, "Trump", "war on Iran", "terrorist acts", "killing Charlie Kirk" - all those things would have ties to STS and their compulsion. I don't know if C's sometimes let be, even if STS does too wrong within this perspective (ie no "green light").
Just some thoughts and @MJF mentioned this "principle". Does it play out here?
EDIT: it makes me deeply sad to learn they killed Khamenei. He wasn't a bad figure, and he was an important BRICS representative. Overall, he was cristallizing much of "new positive Earth".
.