Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

It is striking that UK, an oddly calm player, appears, like that, on the scene... I believe they are much involved and participating in this.

Let us notice their "apparition". Some discrete British flegm - too bad that it's not relating to the good ol' flegmatic Brits, but to MI6 warfare strategy.

"Oh yeah - yes we stand with the West, so we have to send some troops & support the war efforts"

While they are most probably coordinating all & everything.
 
palestine said:
It is striking that UK, an oddly calm player, appears, like that, on the scene... I believe they are much involved and participating in this.

Let us notice their "apparition". Some discrete British flegm - too bad that it's not relating to the good ol' flegmatic Brits, but to MI6 warfare strategy.

"Oh yeah - yes we stand with the West, so we have to send some troops & support the war efforts"

While they are most probably coordinating all & everything.
Click to expand...
I think MI6, like the CIA, is a law unto itself, which is beholden ultimately to the Illuminati. MI6 have been around a lot longer than the CIA and the Middle East was their stamping ground long before the CIA became involved there. Indeed, it is my understanding that they created the Muslim Brotherhood and have exercised behind the scenes control over that organisation ever since. The British Empire may be long gone but old habits die hard where MI6 are concerned.​
 
MJF said:
My brother has just informed me that the Iranians have hit the USS Gerald R Ford aircraft carrier. If true, this will be a major coup for the Iranians.
Click to expand...
Apologies to everyone. My brother misunderstood the news item. It was really about the USS Abraham Lincoln coming under attack from four Iranian ballistic missiles. The Iranians claim they hit the ship but the US Navy has vehemently denied this.

BTW: I have just seen an interview with Scott Ritter in which he got very impassioned over the strike on the girls school in Tehran. He still carries guilt over from the Gulf War where he was responsible for sanctioning a missile strike on an underground Iraqi command bunker in which it turned out that over 400 Iraqi women and children were sheltering (which at the time was passed off simply as "collateral damage") contrary to the US intelligence reports he had relied on saying it was empty. He holds Donald Trump directly responsible for the schoolgirls' deaths. He has also gone on record saying that the US has already lost this war as they do not have the logistics in place to resupply the missiles they are expending in shooting down Iranian drones and missiles. Once they are gone they are gone.​
 
Alma.Innovadora said:
Don't say it too loud... that the dagger is not so far away.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2028149011828347022
Click to expand...

He just couldn't resist insulting Biden 😂

By his logic, America should be obliterated for assassinating "a leader or close to a leader" then? 🧐

Obliteration seems to hint at nukes? Does he want people to go down that line?! Unless he is talking tactical nuclear bombs, strategic nukes will wreak havoc across the whole region and possibly beyond.

In another news, there have been reports that Former President Ahmadinejad was killed, but no official verification (an anonymous advisor denied the news).
 
Along with the UK authorizing the US to use its bases abroad to attack Iran, there was the announcement by the E3 about being ready to "defend" themselves from Iran.

It's funny and I suppose predictable that when Trump dances to the tune of the Deep State, that they back him up despite positioning themselves with hatred against him on previous occasions.

E3 leaders are appalled by the indiscriminate and disproportionate missile attacks launched by Iran against countries in the region, including those who were not involved in initial US and Israeli military operations. Iran’s reckless attacks have targeted our close allies and are threatening our service personnel and our civilians across the region.

We call on Iran to stop these reckless attacks immediately. We will take steps to defend our interests and those of our allies in the region, potentially through enabling necessary and proportionate defensive action to destroy Iran’s capability to fire missiles and drones at their source.

We have agreed to work together with the US and allies in the region on this matter.
Click to expand...
 
And it starts:

1000008320.png
 
When I was a young man back in the late 1970's I became engrossed in the prophecies of Michel Nostradamus. This was in the days of the Cold War when a conflict between the Soviet Union and NATO was still a very real prospect and many interpreted some of his quatrains to be relevant to that current period of time. Remember here that the C's said that Nostradamus did have a genuine ability to see into the future by using the Akashic records:
​

Q: (L) Was Nostradamus getting his information from the Akashic records?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So, Nostradamus' quatrains, if interpreted correctly, would actually be valid.

A: Interpretation is the key.

Q: (L) If we were to hold a series of sessions about the quatrains of Nostradamus, would you be able to help us interpret them?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Would that be a worthwhile project for us?

A: Up to you.
Click to expand...

One quatrain that always intrigued me was one he made about a fleet being sunk in the Gulf. It can be found in Century 6, Quatrain 44:
​
By night the Rainbow will appear for Nantes,
By marine arts they will stir up rain:
In the Gulf of Arabia a great fleet will plunge to the bottom,
In Saxony a monster will be born of a bear and a sow.​
Click to expand...

To my knowledge, no great fleet has been sunk in the Gulf since he made this prophecy but I stand to be corrected.

I came across this short 2009 YouTube video, which looks at the prophecy in detail, although it is narrated by an awful electronic AI voice unfortunately - see: Nostramus prophecy of a fleet being sunk in the Gulf - Search Videos

The video suggests that a fleet in the Arabian/Persian Gulf could be destroyed by a nuclear explosion, which is not so far fetched given that the C's said in June 2025 that the Iranians have nuclear weapons but did not at that time have the delivery systems to utilise them:
​
Session 28 June 2025:
​
(Joe) In the previous session we asked about nukes and they said that Iran had more nukes than Israel. Does Iran have effective missile delivery means for its nukes?

A: Not yet.
Click to expand...

I wonder if they now have an effective delivery system? If so, could they be holding such a development back pending what happens in the next few days/weeks? Could this prophecy of Nostradamus soon be fulfilled I wonder?​
 
French TV report: <==see short video from correspondent emerging from a bunker in Israel, which is under attack from Iranian missile strikes..
Translation:
- "We're going to get back to Israel, where Raphaël Jérusalmy is waiting for us."
- "Raphaël, is there concern in Israel that the dome may ultimately be vulnerable [permeable]?"
- "Excuse me, I just got back from the shelter, need to settle down."
- "The Iron Dome is part of an array [panoply], an arsenal of anti-aircraft defenses."
It is not sufficient on its own to deal with the threat and, above all, as we have been told, with ballistic missiles. As I speak to you, we have just suffered a large barrage [salvo] of missiles on Israel. I went down into the shelter, I'm a little out of breath, I just climbed back up.

- "The problem is also the lack of ammunition for the Americans and Israelis, who are very careful to conserve their ammunition."»
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom