Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

For obvious reasons (Israel is the affected party) this news is not yet official:

March, 1: day two​

No1
Mar 02, 2026

The desalination plants. Reports circulated that Sorek - Israel’s largest desalination facility, supplying roughly 20% of the country’s drinking water - was struck. This is not confirmed by Israeli officials, and Israeli military censorship laws make it nearly impossible to get independent verification of strategic infrastructure hits. But the report comes from multiple sources.

Why this matters beyond the immediate headlines is that Israel operates only five major desalination plants along the Mediterranean coast - Sorek, Sorek B, Ashkelon, Hadera, and Palmachim. Together they supply approximately 80% of Israel’s drinking water. They are, in a very real sense, the only reason Israel functions as a modern state in this semi-arid region. If Iran can reach one, it can reach all five. And that’s the message, whether Sorek was actually struck or not: the target list is existential, not tactical. A country that loses its water supply… It stops existing.
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/x/status/2027911216601972795

 
❗️🇮🇷 Iran’s IRGC says its latest missile attack targeted the Netanyahu’s office and the location of the Israeli Air Force commander in a “surprise” strike.

It claims Netanyahu's fate is “unclear” following the attack.


🔵 Military Summary
📱 Новости России | Военные сводки
t.me

Military Summary

❗️🇮🇷 Iran’s IRGC says its latest missile attack targeted the Netanyahu’s office and the location of the Israeli Air Force commander in a “surprise” strike. It claims Netanyahu's fate is “unclear” following the attack. 🔵 Military Summary 📱 Новости России | Военные сводки
t.me t.me
 
A video has emerged showing an Iranian missile striking a US Navy ship, RTVI reports.

t.me

AntiFakeNews

A video has emerged showing an Iranian missile striking a US Navy ship, RTVI reports.
t.me t.me
 
Alma.Innovadora said:
It sounds great, but unlike these cases, they do not make me see Iran as the best example.

They sacrifice someone to reassure the beast that now wants to eat them. It is difficult for me to see Iran with "honor" at this moment or so spiritual, when they play the same with their executioners at their own games according to what I read in this transcript, am I misinterpreting something?

I am very black and white about it because if they publicly showed themselves furious and promised revenge for the death of Soleimani but it happens that they themselves wanted to get rid of him.

A: Now now! Don't judge a book...

Was Soleimani not so "good" and Ayatollah if they were the "good guys" despite looking like the bad guys on this occasion?

It bothers me a lot this kind of situations where those who are screaming out for justice today, have made deals with their enemies in the past behind people's backs and so they want them to defend them.

Why were they afraid of Soleimani enough to get to that point of making those kind of deals? where can I read about it?

I don't know, for me, in my degree of ignorance about it, it seems to me that they are also reaping what they have sown, unless Soleimani was aware of that sacrifice for the common good, which was also his decision.
Click to expand...

I think it's quite difficult to find all-around good guys in politics. It's a ruthless game with many moving pieces and opposing forces. I suppose that's why the C's encouraged us to think less in black and white, and to focus more on the big picture. Let the drama play out and the pawns play out their roles.

Even inside the Jaffari Shia community, not everyone is a fan. Some even accused him of playing a hand in the death of Mohammed Ridha al-Shirazi (a religious scholar).

From Wikipedia:

"Al-Shirazi was found dead in the kitchen of his home in Qom, in the early hours of Sunday, 1 June 2008 ... His death was sudden and considered to be due to a chronic disease. However, no death certificate was issued.

Murder Allegation

Followers of al-Shirazi denied his death to be of natural cause or a chronic disease, rather they believe he was murdered.[16] al-Shirazi had carried out some medical tests a week before his passing, and showed no signs of concern. He had no previous known illnesses, except for a slipped disc, and was arguably leading a relatively healthy life.

His family found him on the floor, with nothing surrounding him close enough, to hit him on his way down to the floor. They had seen bruises and dark marks across his face, head and neck. The marks can be seen in the pictures[17] and videos[18] of his corpse, that were released briefly after his burial. It is also claimed that a death certificate was not issued from the hospital, despite it being unlawful in Iran for a corpse to leave a hospital without a death certificate. On Wednesday, 3 June, the corpse was sent to Karbala to be buried, and in Karbala, those responsible for the burial had to change his shroud, because the original from Qom, was stained with blood streaming from the three areas on his face where the marks can be seen.[19]

A source alleged that al-Shirazi's blood was tested for chemicals in a lab in Baghdad, and the result came in positive for a strange chemical substance.[20]"
 
I saw this infographic without finding the original. According to Grok, then the style fits the UAE's defense ministry.
1772447808317.png


A very high tech system with very expensive missiles, each costing $12.6 million. Money is not a problem for the UAE as such, but what is a problem is the number of missiles they have at hand. The yearly production has until now been just 96 missiles per year though there are plans to increase it to 400 per year. Iran has likely calculated how many missiles or drones are needed before the UAE airdefence missiles are spent. The same goes for the other countries in the Middle East relying on airdefence equipment from the Epstein coalition.

Anyway, I am sure the people in UAE feel reassured by this infographic. :rolleyes:
 
Alma.Innovadora said:
This part caught my attention since it also surprised me that all those countries have not responded having the possibility of covering up Iran but maybe the possibility that they do not know exactly, at least not them, whether Iran can launch its big nuclear cucumber or not? (laughs) it's strange that these troublemakers haven't acted yet.
Click to expand...

Thank you. Indeed, those Western countries act without reflection. Hmmm what if Trump is being blackmailed and that he does not have the "odds"? France, UK and others may see this. They may be thinking "hey wait that's non-strategical - and he is taking us in it".

Hmmm if Trump is being blackmailed - are those too?

Or - did the blackmailer provide those insurance on standing with Trump?! Is this a big scheme, aimed to take Trump down, hit Iran, and much more? So - this raises the question of those Euro countries belonging, or "team".
 
🚨 Mosaic defense: the IRGC ‘death by a thousand cuts’ strategy designed to bleed US dry

“Bombings in our capital have no impact on our ability to conduct war. Decentralized Mosaic Defense enables us to decide when – and how – war will end,” Iran’s foreign minister said Sunday, stressing that Iran had decades to study and draw conclusions from America’s failed wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

What is Mosaic Defense?

🔶 Created in 2005 at the height of the War on Terror - when Iran faced threats of US aggression from both east and west, Defa-e Mozaik became the IRGC’s flexible, asymmetric defense posture, with no centralized command, designed specifically to take on a conventionally superior adversary.

🔶 Mosaic Defense stipulates the IRGC’s division into 31 operational units – with the commander of each given free rein to act independently if central command is wiped out.

👉 When US-Israeli bombings killed IRGC chief Pakpour and other IRGC and Armed Forces commanders, it had no impact on Iran’s retaliatory response, which began immediately thanks to Mosaic Defense.

🔶 In fact, the intensity, scale and unpredictability of Iran’s retaliation has arguably proven more dangerous for enemies than if more cautious central command structures been left intact.

👉 Along with the expected missile and drone attacks on US bases and Israel, IRGC targeting included pinpoint strikes on undeclared US military and CIA sites in Gulf countries, local energy infrastructure, and even the Hormuz Strait, which has reportedly been closed on the initiative of local commanders.

Other key tenets of Mosaic Defense:

🔶 Radio and comms silence, designed to neutralize America’s powerful EW capabilities.

🔶 Deployment of Basij volunteer militias (450k+ personnel) for internal security, plus ‘stay behind’ and defense in depth guerrilla warfare roles in the event of a (suicidal) enemy ground incursion.

🔶 Equipment of each regional unit with everything needed for modern warfare, from missiles and drones to fast attack boats, coastal defense batteries and mines for the IRGC Navy.

🔶 Decentralized integrated air defense posture allowing individual batteries to function as local air defense hubs (more details here).


👍 US-Israel-Iran war | @geopolitics_prime
 
Interrogation of mine: why aren't we able to clearly understand all those things that happen today?!

The Epstein thread saw a burst of focus. A recent declassification of files left me personally very perplex as to what to do with it, and so, of course, overall how to consider the whole "case". That's because there are new elements, and those are susceptible to shed light and achieve a better understanding - if not an understanding at all - of the "case", "Epstein".

It appeared to be not that easy to do - while many medias felt it was all simple.

Several posts here on this thread mention "4D chess".

Before going to it; I know about "psychopathology", which is the perfect befuddler: when psychopathology is present in an equation, that's something that des not exactly belong to the world of "normal humans": the psychopathological element will thus act as a sort of scrambler, as long as we don't have precise knowledge & experience about it. Result is that we will not be able to really adress anything, since there's a something really unknown and unknowable yet, acting actively.

The Epstein ring was full of it: at every corner, I suppose we would find disturbed individuals, performing disturbed activities. When we stare at the case, it feels like "evil", a sort of impenetrable cloaking, right? That would be in part, psychopathology. We would try to approach it with our "ways" and words - but it doe snot provide the best results. That's because we need to approach it with the know that there is the "thing". And the thing is very specific - it is of a special nature etc etc.

Now that I stare at Trump, attacking Iran, because they pose a treat - I feel there is a sort of psychopathology. One does not simply attack Iran like that. Even Colin Powell had to justify the Iraq attack. When he did so, he had a little branding etc. They then devastated Iraq. Both elements are psychopathological because normal adults don't behave like that. Somehow it does not pertain to the area of normal people. So we may think of irrationality if we don't understand psychopathology. Technically speaking, there seems to be psychopathology. But if we look at some people forcing Trump to attack, those would be the carriers of the "psychopathological bit". Ultimately, what we see is "Trump attacks Iran for no good reason kills Khamenei". So - the "bit" manifests itself, and in order to get the big picture we need to factor "psychopathology" in.

And then - 4D chess.

When I think of 4D chess, it's "4D" - a density with specific "laws" and motions, that I am not used to.

What if I am conflating psychopathology with 4D principles? I think I am trying to make sense of the impossibility of understanding the situation clearly. I already know of "psychopathology" which is a big scrambler. 4D seems very eligible too! But it would be because of a different reason. While psychopathology scrambles the normal mind - 4D chess is located above our usual sphere. The motion opf scrambling is different (eh why not both at the same time?).

Military people would tell us about 5G warfare, asymetric warfare - but it may be a catch-all way, similar to applying the word "quantum": "a new revolutionary technique! Quantum fractality plasmic ...". Nobody would ever dare to question this. It can be that there is such thing than 5G warfare - but that ultimately it's all about 4D processes and that's what those mil writers have been trying to stick their fingers on.

So I am wondering what's the best angle to approach those things. 4D-chess seems right, but how does it work? I mean - does it work like 3D? "Protagonists", "elements", etc?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom