Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

[Macrocosm]

Israelis are agents of chaos so it serves their needs to seed confusion and open as many fronts as possible. Portraying the Iranians as hostile belligerents who would hit anyone and everyone without rhyme or reason would surely benefit them in removing the spotlight from themselves.

Meanwhile, their wishful thinking of their 'assured victory' has some of them jump ahead of themselves and think about who's next. RT has published this article recently.

Türkiye has entered Israel’s threat narrative. What’s next?

Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett recently made a bold statement regarding Türkiye and its President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, effectively labeling Ankara a new strategic threat to Israeli security. Bennett accused Türkiye of supporting not only Iran but also several groups in the Middle East that Israel classifies as terrorist organizations.

In an interview, Bennett described Erdogan as a “sophisticated and dangerous adversary who wants to encircle Israel.” He urged Israel and its allies not to “turn a blind eye” to Ankara’s actions and develop a comprehensive policy of containment. He emphasized that the strategy should address not just Tehran; systemic measures must also be taken in regard to Türkiye. While Bennett did not specify particular pressure tactics, his rhetoric implied that Israel needs to formally recognize Türkiye as a hostile nation.

Bennett’s assertion about the emergence of what he termed a “monstrous axis” of Islamic political forces deserves special attention. He claimed that Qatar and Türkiye, acting in Syria and Gaza, are bolstering networks linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. He also hinted at Doha’s financial and political influence over certain Israeli officials, adding an additional domestic political layer to his statements

 

[Aeneas]

This reminds me of this proverb.

Vinash kale vipreet buddhi (विनाशकाले विपरीतबुद्धिः) is a Sanskrit proverb that translates to "When destruction is near, intelligence becomes distorted" or "Adversity kills intelligence".

Yes, I can see how this can apply in that it can paralyze a person from thinking logically. On the other hand, I am reminded of what Laura once quoted from Samuel Johnson:

When a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully.

So it depends on the situation but also on the level of knowledge of the person. More knowledge leads to greater choices and to not be paralyzed in a sudden crisis. So the knowledge for example shared by the C's, Laura and the network is a certain protection from succumbing to paralysis if destruction is near. To be able to stare death in the eye without flinching. Khamenei probably acted in such a stoic way knowing what could happen, given what Israel and the US already had shown themselves capable of doing, like in Gaza or the bombing of the negotiators in Qatar etc.

 

[JEEP]

There are reports that that drone was not Iranian

Turkey, Cyprus, Azerbaijan and Saudi Arabia have been hit. That points to that someone would like them to join on the side of the Epstein coalition.

"By deception thou shalt do war"

No surprise there.

 

[sToRmR1dR]

Iran's Army and the IRGC say they destroyed seven Hermes and MQ-9 drones in western and southwestern regions, and claimed their air defenses shot down a US F-15E Strike Eagle near the country's southwestern border.

 

[Benjamin]

Best thing I heard, Kim Jong Un:

We can send Iran rockets if they ask. Although only one would be sufficient . . .

This is quite clever, actually. The Chinese are saying the Iranians don't have a nuke.

 

[Gaby]

I think He was in a pickle. Is this related to "April Dead line" date? This reminds me of this proverb.

Vinash kale vipreet buddhi (विनाशकाले विपरीतबुद्धिः) is a Sanskrit proverb that translates to "When destruction is near, intelligence becomes distorted" or "Adversity kills intelligence".

Related to the above, hearing the stuff that comes out from leaders of the West makes me think of this concept that comes up at least three times during the sessions:

March 13th, 2021

Q: (Pierre) ...Years ago, you referred to a triple bad day for the Rockefellers. In light of the recent revelation about pandemics and the real plague, that for those like the Rockefellers it will be a triple bad day: health-wise (real plague), finance-wise (real crisis), and social-wise (because they'll be hunted by the people when they finally figure out what is being done to them). Is it the meaning of Triple Bad Day?

A: Close. But, not only. Frequency mismatch will lead to many "smashing" events.

Q: (L) In other words, the frequency, the cosmic ray environment, or the frequency of the planet and our area of space-time is changing and they'll have like soul smashing events because they no longer fit?

A: Close.

May 29, 2021

(Pierre) During a previous session, they talked about a "triple-bad day" for Rockefellers, health-related, and economy-related, and socially-related. The Cs said that there was FRV in the question as well. So my question is: Are the current geomagnetic changes going to affect the way those people (Rockefeller types for example) connect with the information field?

A: Yes!!

July 17th, 2021

(Pierre) I have a question about FRV. In reference to the Triple Bad Day, the C's added FRV also on top of pandemics, social unrest, and financial crisis. Is it because these people resonate only at low frequencies with the information field and because of the geomagnetic field weakening, their connection will be altered or severed?

A: Close.

 

[Oxajil]

The White House tweeted an image from what appears to be a Pokemon game with the text "make america great again". Are they trying to manipulate young minds? If yes, they're failing hilariously if you look at the amount of memes posted ridiculing them. I thought this one was pretty good :

https://twitter.com/x/status/2029568156138656076

 

[Ellipse]

French journalist Pierre Jovanovic think that the closure of the strait of Hormuz will make a big difference in the plan. He explain why.

PEKING HAS LOST ITS OIL SOURCES​

From March 3 to March 7, 2026

Readers have pointed out that I have always maintained that everything will spiral out of control once the Strait of Hormuz is closed. And it is precisely at that moment that serious developments will begin.

The last time this was mentioned was on June 25, 2025, but well before January 11, 2016: "Keep a close watch on the Strait of Hormuz. For years I have been saying here and on the radio that the Strait of Hormuz will be the starting point of hostilities." Or even earlier, on November 22, 2010, in what was my most important analysis:

"They are ready to launch an assault on Iran to steal its oil... This will be the most audacious robbery attempt ever launched against an entire country! The only problem is that once China gets involved, it will turn into a disaster."​

Indeed, after losing its oil imports from Venezuela, China now also loses its supply from Iran—and even from other countries—due to the blockade of the strait.

Without exaggeration, this constitutes a genuine strangulation of the Chinese economy through its two "stealth" suppliers—a classic method used by mafia-style operators, especially considering that Trump has always behaved like a mobster (he once hired actual New York mobsters to manage his construction sites, as a reminder).

Officially, China imports oil from 80 countries (lol—half of which serve as money-laundering channels for Iranian and Venezuelan crude), except officially from Iran, Russia, and Venezuela, which are under U.S. sanctions (and therefore not declared). In reality, however, these three countries remain the top suppliers, followed by the other 80 nations.

Thus: Hormuz is blocked, Iran is blocked, and Venezuela is blocked. Beijing now has only Russian oil left—but that will not be enough to sustain its economy, which requires a minimum of 500 million tons of crude annually.

The American threat is of unprecedented violence and places China in literal danger. This will mechanically drive China to increasingly oppose Trump and push it to support Tehran in order to preserve this supply source, at least as a means to counter Washington.

In any case: Hormuz must not remain closed for more than 25 days; otherwise, the price of gasoline will triple or quadruple, triggering "Yellow Vest"-style uprisings in all importing countries.

Source (French)

 

[Aeneas]

PEKING HAS LOST ITS OIL SOURCES

At this moment it is not totally true. Iran has stopped passage of tanker from unfriendly countries but are still letting some through some Chinese tankers. Iran is not out to hurt Chinese interests and they do have strategic cooperation. That doesn't mean that the Epstein coalition will not try to stop China from having access. And we are still in the early days of the war.

 

[Aeneas]

Related to the above, hearing the stuff that comes out from leaders of the West makes me think of this concept that comes up at least three times during the sessions

Thanks for that, Gaby.

Rockefeller was mentioned above and obviously he is not the only one. In that context a billionaire from the UAE has just written a very angry open letter addressed to Trump which I think fits the above mention of a triple bad day.

It is from Pepe Escobar's TG channel:

Prominent UAE billionaire Khalaf Ahmad Al Habtoor just published an open letter to Trump. It's brutal.

"Who gave you the authority to drag our region into a war with Iran? Who gave you permission to turn our region into a battlefield?"

Al Habtoor's a major figure: billionaire, former diplomat, outspoken political voice in the Gulf. When he talks, UAE leadership's listening.

His questions:

* Was this your decision or Netanyahu's pressure?
* Did you calculate collateral damage before firing?
* You placed GCC countries at the heart of danger they didn't choose
* Your "Board of Peace" initiatives were funded by Gulf states. Now we're getting attacked. Where did that money go?
* You promised no wars. You've conducted operations in 7 countries: Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, Nigeria, Syria, Iran, Venezuela
* 658 airstrikes in your first year back = Biden's entire term (which you criticized)
* War costs $40-65 billion for operations, possibly $210 billion total
* Your approval rating's down 9% in 400 days
* Americans were promised peace. They're getting war funded by their taxes

The sharpest line: "Before the ink has dried on your Board of Peace initiative, we find ourselves facing military escalation that endangers the entire region. So where did those initiatives go?"

Al Habtoor's not some random critic. He's establishment. Connected. When UAE elites start publicly questioning Trump's decision-making, that's America's closest Arab allies saying "we didn't sign up for this."

The letter ends: "True leadership is not measured by war decisions, but by wisdom, respect for others, and pushing toward achieving peace."

@KhalafAlHabtoor

 

[Ellipse]

At this moment it is not totally true. Iran has stopped passage of tanker from unfriendly countries but are still letting some through some Chinese tankers. Iran is not out to hurt Chinese interests and they do have strategic cooperation. That doesn't mean that the Epstein coalition will not try to stop China from having access. And we are still in the early days of the war.

Yeah but if you look at the situation from above, the risk of losing total access have greatly jump. Boats, extraction capacity and shipping are at great risk. And eventually US will take the control. So I think it's really concerning for China.

 

[Aeneas]

And eventually US will take the control. So I think it's really concerning for China.

It is possible but one should not underestimate China particularly because as you mention they have a big interest in Iran. As the saying goes "Still waters run deep" which is often used about China. Taking the expression more literally, the depth of the Hormuz strait is between 60-100 meters.