Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

[Benjamin]

Not trying on purpose to dissect this latest video in detail („to find AI errors“): IMO especially how Satanyahu talks and behaves sounds and looks very much like him. So maybe it it is real. If it is AI, on the surface, it looks very convincing.

If it is AI it is very convincing. But I noticed something starting at 0:49. I was specifically looking for the ring on his hand. It's hard to see because it's a lower rez video, but it is there. Now, at the mentioned time, Netanyahu has crossed his hands, right on top of left, and you can see that he plays with the ring. It's really subtle, and appears involuntary, more a habitual movement. I'm not sure if AI can be scripted that finely. I could be wrong.

 

[Cosmos]

Another possibility in regards to the “AI“ discussion and whether Satanyahu is dead/injured or not:

Mossad is doing what it does best; being deceptive. On top of that comes a rather serious war on many fronts now caused by them, and generally speaking, in most if not all wars each side is trying to confuse the enemy as much as possible (which in mossads case is likely not limited to the region alone but large portions of the global population everywhere). So, in that light, publishing AI stuff mixed with real stuff might be a way for them to confuse the enemy/public and perhaps even making fun of them and “how stupid they are“.

 

[Asa]

As we're grasping more and more, we're all pawns in this cosmic game/battle.

Are we really?

Isn't it the case that it's 'both/and' as opposed to 'either/or', because we ARE pawns in a theological drama, but CAN choose which force works through us?

 

[Cosmos]

Here is the latest Video that was published on Satanyahu‘s official account on X:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2034021266861003258

Notice not only what he says at the beginning „I‘m here with (this or that Israeli official)“ but also what the tweet and Satanyahu says at the end: „We are watching from above“.

First, this reminds me of Satanyahu‘s attempt right after the Kirk assassination to tell the public “it wasn’t us“, thereby revealing that it was likely them for most sane thinking people. And perhaps now trying to convince everyone „that they are still alive“.

Second, what he says at the end again makes me think that they might be mocking/confusing/deceiving the public right now (parts of the public that think/suspect that he is dead), as thought about above (while he possibly is still alive):

Another possibility in regards to the “AI“ discussion and whether Satanyahu is dead/injured or not:

Mossad is doing what it does best; being deceptive. On top of that comes a rather serious war on many fronts now caused by them, and generally speaking, in most if not all wars each side is trying to confuse the enemy as much as possible (which in mossads case is likely not limited to the region alone but large portions of the global population everywhere). So, in that light, publishing AI stuff mixed with real stuff might be a way for them to confuse the enemy/public and perhaps even making fun of them and “how stupid they are“.

 

[undistinguished]

As I only understood half of the text so I asked AI to explain it. It's a bit more digestible. For those who does want to read an AI text just skip.

On the substance, I already heard that the Illuminati wanted to reset the financial system to impose something more controlled, some full digital money. So would collapsing Iran part of this plan? And are ties between Iran and the City of London real? Really don't know. But it' true that historically UK (and others) intervened in Iran destiny.

"In 1941, Reza Shah declared Iran's neutrality and refused the expulsion of German nationals, while Britain controlled Iran's oil. The British and Soviet forces invaded Iran and forced Reza Shah to abdicate in favor of his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi."​

Yeah, that post I shared was, umm,, a bit hard to understand, because of all the business lingo and whatnot illuminati references, but it kind of makes sense, if you look at the world assuming that there are several different groups of elites at the top of the world, living their separate reality from the rest of us. Playing their powerhungry cardgames in the shadows so to speak. In the World of the Elite, countries don't exist the same way they do in our lower world.

Elites have these.. hmm.. so called network-states, not countries. One bloodline wealthy family could hold influence in a sphere that expands from -lets say- City of London to Iran, completely ignoring the normal world country borders. There has been speculation and wonder about the current leaders of Iran being of UK descent, but I don't know how true that is as I haven't looked into it myself.

But for example, the City of London is factually a different entity from England, like a country within a country, and it is a main hub in the business / stock world. Main precious metal exchanges are located in London, and the price of Gold , and many other assets, are set in the LBMA, London market.

As I understood that text, the person who originally posted it was claiming, that this war is not just about Israel/USA vs Iran, as it seems on the surface level, but it is actually a war between the "OLD MONEY" Elite group, that monetarily benefits from Iran's past/present situation, and the "NEW MONEY" technocrats, who want to disable the system that the "OLD MONEY" is using in Iran.

Original Poster was suggesting, that these "NEW MONEY" technocrats want to cause a global financial reset, and then force the masses to use electronic money that they have created. The "OLD MONEY" is the anti-crypto faction, and they need to be cut off from their resources, so that they too will have to submit to this new electro-money system. Is it just a power-struggle between different 4D-STS-influenced factions? Maybe? Not a "Good vs Bad" fight, but just another EVIL VS EVIL war???

It's kind of hard to put these pieces together, but if you embrace the tinfoil and assume that these secret elite groups have equal influence in the Global politics as any other superpower (CHINA, USA, RUSSIA...) does, then it might be plausible, that.... There are indeed other things guiding/directing this war, and more players in the game, than what is officially shown.

This is just speculation, hard to prove, and mostly comes from the research of individual questionable tinfoilers,,, but hey - at least one thing is certain, and that is that the public is NEVER told what is actually happening.

It's a fun world we live in isn't it : )

 

[Asa]

Been thinking about some form of possession as well. The demonic (or spirit, or whatever we may call it) needs some entry point, some blind spot/character flaw/"sin" etc. and Lord knows Trump has plenty of those as an entry point. Yet he also had many redeeming qualities, but now something seems to have shifted - he shows almost a sadistic delight to toy with and hurt his followers even when it's unnecessary. Also complete incoherence and madness that goes well beyond what we have seen before (although there was always some). Spirit possession? Dunno. As you say, hard to makes sense of this madness!

Trump is a certain kind of 'mega-alpha'. I think those kind of men are incapable of presenting any public face but a big, brash and bullish one, even when manipulated into a course of action. I think he's basically incapable of anything else, so even when he's painted into a corner somehow, he's gonna want to 'own' it and project power regardless of the background circumstances.

 

[Ruth]

Notice not only what he says at the beginning „I‘m here with (this or that Israeli official)“ but also what the tweet and Satanyahu says at the end: „We are watching from above“.

I'm very sad to report that AI has failed it's tailoring class. Netanyahu is wearing a suit with a lapel on only one side. Oops! Well, I suppose at least they got his head on straight and not back-to-front, or even worse, some other person sitting there There are also weird things going on in the background. They need to do some funny memes with this.

 

[Aeneas]

Sott put up an article, which goes into the effects of the conflict in the Middle East and it concerns the ingredients for food production. Modern agriculture relies on artifical fertilisers and it has been estimated that it contributes roughly 50% to the food production and that the carrying capacity of the Earth without it would be more like 4 billion people.

He says that while there are strategic reserves for fossil fuels, there are practically no strategic reserves for the ingredients which underpin the global population.

Here are a few excerpts: The Strait of Hormuz and the Nitrogen Trap

UNCTAD estimates that roughly one-third of global seaborne fertilizer trade passes through Hormuz. The Fertilizer Institute separately estimates that exporters exposed directly or indirectly to the conflict account for nearly 49 percent of global urea exports, nearly 30 percent of global ammonia exports, and nearly half of global sulfur trade.

And the spring planting clock is ticking toward a deadline that no diplomatic breakthrough can extend, because seeds do not negotiate, soil chemistry does not pause for geopolitics, and the quadratic yield response curve of cereal crops does not bend to the will of men who have never planted a field.

The Gulf states possess the world's cheapest natural gas, the feedstock that simultaneously provides the hydrogen atoms and the thermal energy for ammonia synthesis. This cost advantage has made the region a dominant center of global nitrogen fertilizer production.

But the nitrogen dependency is only the first layer. Beneath it lies a second, deeper vulnerability that most analysts have failed to map: sulfur. The Persian Gulf refines vast quantities of sour crude oil and natural gas, and the desulfurization process generates elemental sulfur as a necessary byproduct.

He goes on to map out the consequences for agriculture where planting seasons with the need for fertiliser is a reality. What is important is that the relationship between fertiliser and crop yields is not linear. In other words it is not like if there is a 10% reduction in the amount of fertiliser put on, then it leads only to a 10% drop in yields. The drop in yields is much higher.

The developing world is particularly impacted by this and he mentions Asia and Africa where this could cause acute problems. As we know hungry people can lead to unrest.

Too much information to put here, so those interested can go and skim the article.

The globalist like to use any crisis as an opportunity to further their goals and whether this coming food crisis was considered beforehand or not, it might fit into to STS agenda of culling the herd. It could also well become a major miscalculation.