Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

[Ruth]

You are forgetting about karma and 'bad juju' (C's words) from disregarding free will decisions of others. That whole fundamental system seems to favor STO and is only really a problem for STS.

Many in the 3D STS power structures seem to be unaware of it or do not believe that karma exists, except probably those at the higher levels of the cabal.

I think this is a manifestation of free will. It doesn't favor STO, it just gives people a choice. The irony here is that most people have chosen to live in an environment controlled by STS. I'm assuming here, that it's because of the "short wave cycle". It speeds up learning by creating suffering and friction. Reincarnation and karma may be an important part of that. However if they are linked, then OPs can't take part in that particular part of it, so their 'reason for being here' might be something different.

 

[Fluffy]

It's ok for me. Anyone else?

Good for me, I don’t have an X account

 

[axj]

I think this is a manifestation of free will. It doesn't favor STO, it just gives people a choice.

The nature of STO is to respect free will decisions of others and karma comes into play for those who do not do that.

So it does seem that the fundamental free will and karma systems "favor STO" - or are mostly an issue for STS beings.

 

[Ricardo]

fwiw , like gravity , in a fractal and repeating "open loop" lies beget lies ... that endure further on in more lies ....

 

[Liliea]

This is an analysis of Trump: a man of contradictions—I don’t think he’s schizophrenic. So when he tells us, on the one hand, that he’s deploying U.S. troops on the ground, while, on the other hand, in another social media post, he claims that the United States is close to concluding the “successful” war, consider that for him, the business of war lines his pockets and gives him security amid the fear of running out of money when people turn against him because he’s dragging the domestic and global economy through the mud and it promises to be much worse than COVID if we permit it.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2035124223253848249

https://twitter.com/x/status/2035045618259783892

https://www.iea.org/news/new-iea-report-highlights-options-to-ease-oil-price-pressures-on-consumers-in-response-to-middle-east-supply-disruptions

 

[Ruth]

It's ok for me. Anyone else?

Not working for me. Maybe because I'm (currently) using a VPN with the USA as my location?

No, not working for Edinburgh, Barcelona, Vienna, Brazil, Tokyo, Malaysia, Poland or Hanoi.... and I got sick of trying after that. I'm using Nord VPN btw.

Is this censorship? Could be, I suppose.

 

[Ruth]

Good for me, I don’t have an X account

Not good for me and I don't.

 

[MJF]

But then, there's a heck of a lot of those rocks out there too! And something people might not be aware of is..... if they hit..... are there going to be more than one? (probably?) Especially after the Kantekians left such a mess of their planet....

Incidentally, when the C's were asked "When did Kantek blow up?" , they said 80,000 years ago. Also when asked when did Venus come into our solar system, it was also 80,000 years ago. I don't have the exact quotes, so sorry about that, but I do remember that number popped up twice. It's quite a coincidence.

Yes, it was quite a coincidence of timing, one which led Laura to query whether Venus had been involved in some way with the explosion that destroyed Kantek. However, the C's negated this idea:​

Session 16 November 1994:

Q: (L) When did Venus enter the solar system?

A: 80000 years approximately.

Q: (L) How many close passes to the earth did Venus make?

A: Seven.

Q: (L) Was Venus involved with the planet Kantek which you said exploded due to psychic energies generated by its inhabitants?

A: No.

 

[gottathink]

It's ok for me. Anyone else?

I get black screen page not supported also

 

[JEEP]

Not working for me.

@Joe - Still not working for me and I do not have an X account either.

[screenshot]

I can see tweets from @Liliea post #2855:

[screenshot]

Joe, can you post a screenshot of your tweet that we might see it as it doesn't appear this is going to be corrected soon, if at all? Was it controversial?

 

[mabar]

@Joe - Still not working for me and I do not have an X account either.

It worked for me by cliking at the X logo, not at the link of the article (in blue). Not X account either.

 

[JEEP]

It worked for me by cliking at the X logo, not at the link of the article (in blue).

Yep, that did it for me, too. It also worked when I went to highlight the blue parts to copy, but still not when I click on them. Weird.

 

[Sylvia]

The link shared by @Joe worked for me, so I do a print screen for those who didn't have access.

 

[John G]

Yep, that did it for me, too. It also worked when I went to highlight the blue parts to copy, but still not when I click on them. Weird.

The "copy link" option worked too but clicking the blue link didn't work for me either.

 

[Macrocosm]

The "copy link" option worked too but clicking the blue link didn't work for me either.

I think the issue might have to do with the link shortening url "https: //t.co/M262BTgogs" posted in the tweet. It doesn't seem to link correctly to the target link. Clicking the X takes you directly to the original.

Edit: including this as a link should solve the issue. Perhaps this being an article makes embedding it challenging.