Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

They also have a Fatwa (legal/scholarly interpretation of Islamic law) on nuclear weapons, so they have to overcome that too.

It's not a coincidence that the one country in the Middle East that Israel wants to dominate/control that has heaps of resources is the one country that everyone is supposed to get up in arms about gaining nuclear weapons. The hypocricy is astounding.

It's almost like the reason any of these people give for going to war is never real. It's only an excuse to aquire another country or people's land and/or resources.

An interesting part of Shiite Islam is their practice of taqiyya, which is a form of strategic dishonesty or concealment of intent and purpose in dangerous times. I can't remember where I first read about it, but apparently a number PTB schizoid think-tank creatures have claimed that Iran's fatwah on nukes was a ruse - which was recently confirmed by the C's. So the schizoids were right in a way.

It's quite possible that Mossad/CIA types have long known that Iran has had nukes. It may be that the details were shared with Trump and Vance, and that this is why they are all hot and bothered about nukes in backpacks - they were given real, credible intel on Iran's offensive nuclear capability, plus some understanding of taqiyya... but then to spice things up, the intel spooks added the BS about how the Iranians are all a pack of mad terrorists who like backpack bombs.
 
An interesting part of Shiite Islam is their practice of taqiyya, which is a form of strategic dishonesty or concealment of intent and purpose in dangerous times. I can't remember where I first read about it, but apparently a number PTB schizoid think-tank creatures have claimed that Iran's fatwah on nukes was a ruse - which was recently confirmed by the C's. So the schizoids were right in a way.
Well thank goodness that the Jews don't do this..... Oh wait, they do! Must be a form of what Christians would call Satanism, but I'm probably thinking that most religions would be corrupted in some way and they'd all go around pointing the finger at the other as the problem, when really all they want to do is maintain power and take it away from others.

Well, someone put a fatwah on nukes and it wasn't necessarily done for strategic dishonesty reasons, but it can surely be used by others in that manner, even people practicing taqiyya.
 
The first thought apart from it being utter BS, was that he was perhaps "preparing" the grounds for a false flag event similar in magnitude to 9/11 in terms of trauma and hysterization.
Yeah, it's like the universe has an irony law that you have to make things at least ironic.

Because, "you don't want the worse people to have a nuclear weapon" is a laughable statement when they are actively protecting Israel's nuclear programs and are now considering, according to Bloomberg, to give it to the saudis.

Which come to think of it, perhaps one of the reasons why the saudis are getting a nuclear program sponsored by the US is so that they don't forego the Petrodollar, because after what has transpired, what reason is there to use the dollar to sell oil? Iran has all the cards now or a lot more than they had a month ago.

Specially since they (Iran) seem determined now to begin charging a fee for anyone transiting the strait of hormuz. Funny enough, they've just provided Teheran a new way to make money, to ensure their economy is stable, two months ago or so, there were "protests" on the streets because of the state of the economy, they just found a brand new source of revenue which will be maintained by all the countries suffering energy shortages this week.

Talk about things backfiring, not only did they fail to weaken Iran, they've strengthen their position both internally and abroad.
 
Oh but a ‘sacrifice’ of some military personnel (with spouses, children, parents and humanitarian heartstring stories go along with each) certainly helps sway public opinion…
Many more US casualties usually sway the public opinion in the other direction in the US - in this case less support for Trump and even more likely lost mid-term elections.
 
I would like to repost in this thread the information that was shared in the discussion thread regarding the session of March 21, 2026. Here is the information that was shared:

So, I did some research because I wanted to find the source of its authenticity regarding the map from JP Morgan. Using Claude AI, it was able to find the map on two different websites, namely "Core Insights" - JP Morgan Lays Out Persian Gulf Oil Cut-off; Catastrophe Begins April 1. and on "Supply Status" - JP Morgan Maps Global Oil Shockwave from Hormuz Closure - Global Supply Crisis Timeline. And it confirmed to me that this map is authentic and would come from a confidential report for JP Morgan subscribed members.

Even ChatGPT confirmed this to me regarding the map:


✔️ Conclusion claire​

  • ✔️ Ton image vient bien d’un rapport réel identifié (mars 2026)
  • ✔️ Le numéro du document est connu
  • ❌ Le PDF complet n’est pas accessible publiquement
  • ✔️ On peut seulement retrouver :
    • des extraits
    • ou des analyses dérivées

It is certain that the information raised in the last article on the "Supply Status" website has already been brought up as information in this discussion thread regarding the impacts of oil supply.

However, for those who have not yet read much information on what JP Morgan is forecasting for the month of April based on the map regarding the oil crisis, I will copy the article I mentioned.

Supply Status Article:
JPMorgan commodity strategist Natasha Kaneva published a landmark report on March 26, 2026, outlining a detailed roadmap of how the Strait of Hormuz closure is triggering a progressive, region-by-region oil supply shock across the planet. The analysis reveals that the global oil system has shifted from a sudden flow disruption into a slow-burning inventory depletion crisis, with timing now becoming the central variable driving economic damage.

The report establishes that the last commercial tanker exited the Strait of Hormuz on February 28, the same day US and Israeli forces launched military operations against Iran. Since that date, vessel traffic through the waterway has dropped by more than 95 percent, with only a trickle of Iranian-controlled shipments passing through under tightly restricted conditions. JPMorgan estimates the initial gross supply shock at approximately 16 million barrels per day, gradually easing toward 10 million barrels per day by April as bypass routes and emergency reserves absorb part of the blow.

The shockwave is spreading from east to west, dictated by maritime shipping distances from the Persian Gulf. Asia, which absorbs over 80 percent of crude oil transiting Hormuz in normal conditions, is already under acute stress. Shipments loaded before the closure have now been consumed, and inventories across the region are shrinking rapidly. India was the first major economy to feel the squeeze, followed by Northeast Asian importers such as China, Japan, and South Korea. JPMorgan projects that Southeast Asian oil demand will contract by roughly 300,000 barrels per day in April. If strategic reserve releases remain limited to individual country efforts, those losses could exceed 2 million barrels per day in May and approach 3 million barrels per day by June.

The Philippines became the first country in the world to formally declare a national energy emergency. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. signed Executive Order 110 on March 24, citing an imminent danger to the country's energy supply.
The Philippines imports 98 percent of its oil from the Middle East and had approximately 45 days of fuel reserves remaining as of March 20, down from 55 to 57 days when the war started. The government released 20 billion pesos from the Malampaya gas fund and authorized fuel imports from alternative suppliers including Russia. State-owned Petron Corporation ordered 700,000 barrels of Russian crude under a temporary US sanctions waiver.

Across the wider Asia-Pacific region, governments are implementing emergency conservation measures. South Korea has urged citizens to take shorter showers and charge electronic devices during daylight hours to reduce electricity consumption. On March 27, the country imposed a full ban on naphtha exports for five months, requiring refiners to redirect all volumes to the domestic market in order to protect petrochemical manufacturing. Japan announced its largest-ever release of strategic oil reserves and reassured citizens that consumer goods hoarding was unnecessary. China has restricted overseas shipments of fuel and other materials to protect domestic inventory. Roughly 5 percent of global ethylene production capacity in Japan, South Korea, and China has already been shut down due to naphtha and LPG shortages, directly impacting plastics manufacturing.

Africa is next in the shockwave sequence. JPMorgan analysts expect the impact to become visible in early April,
particularly in nations with low inland inventories and heavy dependence on imported petroleum products. Oil demand losses across the continent could reach 250,000 barrels per day in April if stockpiles run thin.

Europe is projected to feel the pressure by mid-April, though the nature of the shock differs from Asia. European exposure is driven more by rising costs and intensified competition with Asian buyers for non-Gulf crude, rather than direct physical shortages. Having already pivoted away from Russian pipeline gas and crude since 2022, Europe now finds that its alternative Gulf suppliers are constrained or being outbid. The continent has fewer alternative supply routes and less strategic petroleum reserve depth than its Asian competitors. European natural gas prices have jumped to around 55 to 58 euros per megawatt-hour, and airlines operating in Europe face severe pressure from surging jet fuel costs.

North America is the last major region in the shockwave timeline, with most Gulf oil shipments expected to stop arriving around April 15.
However, JPMorgan analysts assess that the United States is unlikely to face direct physical shortages in the near term thanks to its massive domestic crude production capacity. The impact on the US economy will manifest primarily through rising fuel prices and dislocations in the refined products market. US benchmark WTI crude has surged over 40 percent in March but remains roughly 10 dollars below the global Brent benchmark, which closed at 108.01 dollars per barrel on March 27.

Gulf producers are attempting to reroute supply through alternative infrastructure. Saudi Arabia has ramped up exports through its East-West pipeline to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, increasing flows from 0.8 million barrels per day to 3.3 million barrels per day, with potential to reach 4.7 million barrels per day by April. The UAE has raised throughput on its Fujairah bypass pipeline from 1.1 to 1.6 million barrels per day. Despite these efforts, the workarounds replace only a fraction of the lost capacity, as the existing infrastructure was never designed to handle a simultaneous outage of this scale.

The International Energy Agency announced a coordinated release of 400 million barrels of oil from strategic reserves across its 32 member nations, the largest such release in the organization's history. IEA chief Fatih Birol described the current disruption as the biggest threat to energy security in history, worse than the two oil shocks of the 1970s and the Russia-Ukraine war combined. The US administration is contributing nearly half of the planned IEA release from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

On March 26, President Donald Trump announced a 10-day extension of his pause on strikes against Iranian energy infrastructure, pushing the deadline to April 6 at 20:00 Eastern Time. The move was framed as a response to an Iranian government request and as a window for ongoing negotiations. Trump also claimed that Iran had allowed 10 oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz as a goodwill gesture. Iran, however, denied that formal negotiations were taking place and stated it was awaiting a US response to its own counter-proposals.

Macquarie Group strategists, led by Vikas Dwivedi, assigned a 40 percent probability to a scenario in which the conflict extends through June. Under that scenario, Brent crude could surge above 200 dollars per barrel and US retail gasoline prices could reach approximately 7 dollars per gallon, levels that would destroy a historically large amount of global oil demand. Macquarie raised its year-end Brent forecast to 89 dollars per barrel but noted that the Brent futures curve, stretching from around 110 dollars down to the 80-dollar range, suggests the market is still pricing in a relatively short conflict resolution.

Energy research firm Wood Mackenzie warned that an average Brent price of 125 dollars per barrel sustained throughout 2026 would be sufficient to trigger a global recession. The conflict has already produced cascading effects across multiple sectors. Aviation is under severe pressure as jet fuel costs account for more than 20 percent of airline operating expenses. Diesel shortages are constraining agriculture, construction, and heavy transport, sectors with no rapid substitution options. Several Southeast Asian countries have implemented emergency measures including work-from-home mandates, reduced speed limits, and license plate-based driving restrictions to curb fuel consumption.

The crisis has also reshaped geopolitical energy dynamics. Russia's land-based export corridors have gained relative attractiveness as maritime risk premiums surge, strengthening Moscow's bargaining position in Asian energy markets. US LNG is emerging as the only supply source that is both scalable and politically reliable for both Asia and Europe, reinforcing American dominance in global energy trade.

Here is the enlarged map released by JP Morgan

1774925647686.png

 
Many more US casualties usually sway the public opinion in the other direction in the US - in this case less support for Trump and even more likely lost mid-term elections.
May be true, may be that’s what they want! Plus a nice little false flag on USA soil in conjunction to rile everyone up even more… this all seems like it could be an intentional operation to make he world hate the USA/Israel… a preparation for the arrival of our saviour may be🤔 👽
 
May be true, may be that’s what they want! Plus a nice little false flag on USA soil in conjunction to rile everyone up even more… this all seems like it could be an intentional operation to make he world hate the USA/Israel… a preparation for the arrival of our saviour may be🤔 👽
Plus they haven't rolled out Bibi's dead body yet - they're still pretending he's alive, and they probably can't for much longer :lol:. I bet they're banking on outrage there too! Maybe even to cover up the slaughter happening in the Middle East?

Errm, slight problem with anything occuring on USA soil, now ..... they can't control things as much as they'd like to.... I mean, look what happened in the Charlie Kirk case. Catastrophic! Everyone's looking at their 'deceptive' arses sideways....
 
Plus they haven't rolled out Bibi's dead body yet - they're still pretending he's alive, and they probably can't for much longer :lol:. I bet they're banking on outrage there too! Maybe even to cover up the slaughter happening in the Middle East?

Errm, slight problem with anything occuring on USA soil, now ..... they can't control things as much as they'd like to.... I mean, look what happened in the Charlie Kirk case. Catastrophic! Everyone's looking at their 'deceptive' arses sideways....
That’s the point, everyone is suspicious, even here in sleepy Oz the narrative has changed (for the most part, I still know a few peeps who are up to their 8th covid shot) so why not do some really stupid things that kill a heap of people, or at least change their lives forever, knowing that they’re onto you, and then when all trust is gone, everyone is confused about their existence and desperate for answers… then enter stage the saviours, all of them.

cross posting from the imminent alien discoloured thread, it ties in so good with what’s going on in this thread, peeps will be begging for their saviour when they notice how severely deranged their leaders are.

Post in thread 'Imminent Alien Disclosure?'
Imminent Alien Disclosure?

 
Last edited:
A russian work colleague told me yesterday (without me priming) that on the Russian side there is a lot of talk about nuclear escalation. Then I said to her that the following wouldn’t surprise me (and that it might be possible): that the US/Israel could drop one nuclear bomb on Iran. Then she said „that’s exactly what they (the russian side) is talking about now“. Now, I’m not sure what her sources are and if it is russian news per se and/or russian social media where that talk comes from? But as you see in the quotes above I have noticed something very similar on official Russian outlet RT.

So, I‘m continuing to wonder what is going on exactly. It almost sounds to me like the Russian population is being prepared/primed toward something nuclear happening (soon?). Also, one wonders, how much of what is going on is “scripted“ at some level and if those “in the know“ already know what will likely happen next through “backroom“ knowledge and/or talks?
It could be simpler in some ways. News outlets there don't have the same Western restrictions and can speak more openly about these issues or speculate about them.

Every time a conflict erupts and at least one of the parties has nuclear weapons, the issue of a nuclear strike is immediately brought up. Furthermore, it's known that Israel has nuclear weapons and that it's a small country running out of options.

Also, lately, due to their actions, they've been portrayed as genocidal, religiously fanatical, and unscrupulous liars, so the entire Israeli clique is perceived as madmen who wouldn't hesitate to launch a nuclear attack if they ran out of options.

Al Jazeera was talking about the Samson option a week ago, so we can get an idea of the perception surrounding this issue.

Related to this topic, former CIA agent John Kyriakou (reminder that he was sentenced to prison for exposing Al Qaeda's torture program for prisoners) has said that Israel has been pressuring US presidents to bomb Iran and that all had refused until Trump came along. The nuclear issue comes up in relation to Netanyahu allegedly threatening Trump with such an attack on Iran if he did not intervene.

He cites several sources linked to Congress, so we can give it a chance that the threat was real:

Well, we didn’t bomb Iran until Donald Trump. And I have friends at the White House. I have friends in the administration. And they all tell me the same thing. They say that Trump agreed to bomb Iran because Benjamin Netanyahu threatened him and told him, “If you don’t bomb Iran, we’re going to use nuclear weapons against Iran.” Of course, the Israelis have never admitted that they have a nuclear program, but analysts believe that they have between 80 and 200 nuclear warheads.

(minute 25, he also talks about Epstein and how the undeclassified files on Kennedy's assassination all point to Israel because of its opposition to its nuclear program)


If this is true and comes to fruition, the truth will be revealed more openly: the US bases in allied countries located in the Middle East were primarily intended to protect Israel:

Moving the Fleet: Israel’s Astonishing Proposal to Host US Military Bases
Israel has reportedly proposed a massive strategic shift that would see major U.S. military bases relocated from the Persian Gulf to Israeli territory to ensure regional stability.
In a move that could fundamentally reshape the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East, Israel is reportedly in early-stage discussions with Washington regarding the relocation of major U.S. military bases to Israeli soil. According to reports from Channel 12, the proposal suggests moving key logistics hubs and operational assets from countries like Qatar, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates to Israel. The logic behind the "surprise push" stems from the perceived vulnerability of Gulf bases to Iranian missile and drone strikes, which have intensified throughout the current war. By inviting the U.S. to move its presence to Israel, officials hope to create a more stable and secure environment for American forces while deepening the already robust military cooperation between the two nations.
The Israeli proposal includes an offer to host parts of major installations, such as the Al Udeid base in Qatar, the Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain, and the Al Dhafra base in the UAE. Israel is also offering to share its advanced air defense systems, including THAAD, Patriot batteries, and cutting-edge laser interceptors, to protect these new American hubs. Furthermore, the plan suggests the use of the War Reserves Stockpile Allies – Israel (WRSA-I) as a primary logistics center, allowing for a more efficient maintenance of fighter aircraft and weapons systems. Israeli officials believe this move would provide the U.S. with a secure, high-tech Mediterranean base of operations without requiring the deployment of additional troops to the region.

While the discussions are in their infancy, the strategic advantages for both sides are clear. For the United States, relocating to Israel offers a more defensible position and a partner with matching intelligence capabilities. For Israel, a permanent American basing presence would serve as the ultimate deterrent against regional aggression. Sources indicate that this "rare opportunity" is being viewed as a way to capitalize on the current massing of U.S. forces in the region. By creating a unified logistics and defense hub, the two allies could ensure that the U.S. military remains a stabilizing force in the Middle East while operating from a location that is significantly more difficult for the Iranian regime to threaten directly.
 
You trying to use reason with a psychopath? They have no choice but to destroy themselves (eventually), and before they do that, everyone else.
I don't, of course. This is impossible. Just to say, that the nuclear weapon does not help them to destroy Iran, although it would be a terrible tragedy. But all people in the world could see, that they are the psychopaths, and the states-terrorists should be disbanded. How? I don't know. I don't mean, that should be killed the population, I mean something about "denazification".
 
I don't, of course. This is impossible. Just to say, that the nuclear weapon does not help them to destroy Iran, although it would be a terrible tragedy. But all people in the world could see, that they are the psychopaths, and the states-terrorists should be disbanded. How? I don't know. I don't mean, that should be killed the population, I mean something about "denazification".
The only way you can stop a psychopath from taking power is not to let them get power in the first place. And by that, I mean all psychopaths - and I include companies, organisations and governments in that too. These entities are only as good at the people that run or control them, otherwise, they're bad news.
 
I don't, of course. This is impossible. Just to say, that the nuclear weapon does not help them to destroy Iran, although it would be a terrible tragedy. But all people in the world could see, that they are the psychopaths, and the states-terrorists should be disbanded. How? I don't know. I don't mean, that should be killed the population, I mean something about "denazification".

The C’s said recently that “there are certifiable people in positions in power”. They are quite literally mentally insane.

So that pretty much eliminates any kind of reasoning about why one should or should not do something.
 
Back
Top Bottom