Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

I saw that interview. Basically W.W. was speculating that there is going to be a psyop to label the right wing America first people who are against the war as domestic terrorist labeling them extreme right, anti semitic or something. It was an idea she loosely had but hadn't really thought all the way through like she would have had she written about it. In that scenario, Joe Kent could act as a catalyst whether consciously or not.

Anyway, as always we can keep an eye on that possibility. I'm not completely sold on the guy myself. Finkelstein was funny pointing out the similarity to Clark Kent :lol:

I think Whitney Webb thinks herself into Pretzels here (she has a tendency to go full "4D chess conspiracy"). Her argument, if I follow it (not always easy), seems to be: the domestic terror apparatus was set up so that it targets antisemitism on the right. So they sent out Joe Kent as an agent provocateur to fuel the fire, thereby creating a violent Fed-Mob à la Proud Boys, so that the government can then crush it. Oh, and it also leads to conflating Jews with Zionists, which is unfair.

Sorry, but this doesn't pass the vibe test. Antisemitism seems to be growing quite organically, and it's no mystery why. And while Joe Kent does say some silly things, overall Occam's razor applies here: the guy has followed things on the internet, has some (probably limited) inside observations on the Trump admin, was fed up with Israel/the Deep State, and (somewhat naively) thinks he can influence things from the outside.
 
Plus they haven't rolled out Bibi's dead body yet - they're still pretending he's alive, and they probably can't for much longer :lol:. I bet they're banking on outrage there too! Maybe even to cover up the slaughter happening in the Middle East?
On the question of Netanyahu's whereabouts, he turned up for the Knesset vote on the 'Death Penalty Law', which passed in a vote on Sunday.

He can be seen in both video footage and in photos from the event.


Note the file in his left hand as he turns away to walk up the steps, which you also see here:

460404.jpg


So, unless this is a 'body double', and one which fools Israeli politicians, he lives.

Note what Israeli MK Limor Son Har-Melech says to him as he walks away:

"Mr. Prime Minister, I want to tell you personally that this is something I will never forget. I know what it required of you. Thank you very much."
This may well be his first (real) public appearance since March 12th or so, and it could perhaps be inferred from what she said that it took significant effort on his part to attend.
 
So, unless this is a 'body double', and one which fools Israeli politicians, he lives.

Note what Israeli MK Limor Son Har-Melech says to him as he walks away:

This may well be his first (real) public appearance since March 12th or so, and it could perhaps be inferred from what she said that it took significant effort on his part to attend.

Now thinking that he was just simply ill (or injured) and in need of special treatment and/or surgery and recovery for several days a couple of weeks ago. His health has been on the wan for the last few years as we know. And if this is true then he's probably just still on the mend - and the reason he's not presenting with much of his usual pathological vitality.
 
A worldwide energy shutdown may be real reason for the events unfolding in the Middle East right now.

Surely the occult global chess players must have realized that there can be no 'Eretz Israel' in the real world.
(Israel gambled for 'Eretz Israel' and lost)

Israel's usefulness for the PTB has worn out as the coming global reset will probably not allow the U.S. to further support the tiny country with billions of dollars and military protection not least since aircraft carriers won't do the trick anymore, and their adversary's missile technologies prove to be well advanced.

The petro dollar ("we buy your oil and you reinvest in our treasuries") cannot survive.

The Zio Arab family dictatorships created by the British Empire following 1917 will go down not least because they are Sunni lording it over Shia majority populations.

Dubai (consisting of 90% foreigners) which some say is more of a hotel than a country is based on debts and loans, was built on slave labor.
Until hostilities started the world's rich and the beautiful were there living it up until 99% of them realized it was time to leave (irrespective of millions of dollars of automobiles).

What will the Persian Gulf area look like in two years? What is the PTB's plan? Will China and Iran control the place?
 
An interesting part of Shiite Islam is their practice of taqiyya, which is a form of strategic dishonesty or concealment of intent and purpose in dangerous times

Strategic enclosure

Isn’t that in a way a form of ”strategic enclosure” the Iranians are practicing ?
The fast description in Wikipedia made me think of that what we at the forum, channeled through the C:s have said many times.

Wikipedia:
In Islam, taqiyya is a concept that refers to a Muslim concealing their faith or religious identity to protect themselves from danger. Although the term stems mainly from discrimination against the minority Shiite tradition, it is also considered a legitimate practice under certain conditions in Sunni sources.
The practice of concealing one's beliefs has existed since the early days of Islam; early Muslims did so to avoid persecution or violence by non-Muslim governments or individuals.
The use of taqiyya has varied in recent history, especially between Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims. Sunni Muslims gained political supremacy over time and therefore only occasionally found the need to practice taqiyya. On the other hand, Shia Muslims, as well as Sufi Muslims developed taqiyya as a method of self-preservation and protection in hostile environments
 
I think Whitney Webb thinks herself into Pretzels here (she has a tendency to go full "4D chess conspiracy"). Her argument, if I follow it (not always easy), seems to be: the domestic terror apparatus was set up so that it targets antisemitism on the right. So they sent out Joe Kent as an agent provocateur to fuel the fire, thereby creating a violent Fed-Mob à la Proud Boys, so that the government can then crush it. Oh, and it also leads to conflating Jews with Zionists, which is unfair.

Sorry, but this doesn't pass the vibe test. Antisemitism seems to be growing quite organically, and it's no mystery why. And while Joe Kent does say some silly things, overall Occam's razor applies here: the guy has followed things on the internet, has some (probably limited) inside observations on the Trump admin, was fed up with Israel/the Deep State, and (somewhat naively) thinks he can influence things from the outside.
Yes, I agree, I doubt the people in control of media and promoting the sponsored narrative have anything as sophisticated as this planned. I think it’s all become a diabological mess with the PTB media and PR crowd being reactive to developments in the people’s perception. There is widespread cognitive dissonance amongst conservatives who are holding onto the idea that the war against Iran is a fight against evil.

Previous trusted conservative sources are waking up to the Christian-Zionist agenda, with Meghan Kelly the latest to be red-pilled. The problems in the narrative are that the war is a product of the Democrat-liberal think tank, contradicted by the fact that liberals by and large have supported the Palestinians and are against the war with Iran.
The conservative right public has to try and reconcile the flip-flopping of Trumps original anti-war stance with his getting onboard with the Obama-Democrat-liberal planned Iran war, which is actually aligned with the conservative Christian-Zionists of the Republican Party. But, the Jewish-Zionists have always been huge sponsors of liberal causes.

The hanging in there Trump supporters minds are blowing up because they still are assessing events by their face value. The only way to really understand what is happening is by ‘Seeing’ that the battle between good and evil is orthogonally opposed to the tension between democrats and republicans, (also known as the misnomer liberal and conservative). This requires a more in-depth assessment taking account of the entire history dating back to the Levites of Judaism. Then factoring in the development of both Christianity and Islam, and the existence of hyperdimensional lizards gods pulling all the strings.

No wonder peoples brains are blowing up. I’ll bet those damned gods are relying on people not being able to fathom how freaking ridiculous this reality is.
 
Now thinking that he was just simply ill (or injured) and in need of special treatment and/or surgery and recovery for several days a couple of weeks ago. His health has been on the wan for the last few years as we know. And if this is true then he's probably just still on the mend - and the reason he's not presenting with much of his usual pathological vitality.
Look at the colour of his hands. It could just be the light but they look pale and yellow.
 
A russian work colleague told me yesterday (without me priming) that on the Russian side there is a lot of talk about nuclear escalation. Then I said to her that the following wouldn’t surprise me (and that it might be possible): that the US/Israel could drop one nuclear bomb on Iran. Then she said „that’s exactly what they (the russian side) is talking about now“. Now, I’m not sure what her sources are and if it is russian news per se and/or russian social media where that talk comes from? But as you see in the quotes above I have noticed something very similar on official Russian outlet RT.

So, I‘m continuing to wonder what is going on exactly. It almost sounds to me like the Russian population is being prepared/primed toward something nuclear happening (soon?). Also, one wonders, how much of what is going on is “scripted“ at some level and if those “in the know“ already know what will likely happen next through “backroom“ knowledge and/or talks?

It is evident that Russia acts as an advisor and provides intelligence to Iran, a role reinforced by its membership in the BRICS (?). With this statement by Medvedev—though his statements are always controversial—he makes it clear that Iran possesses nuclear weapons and that it will use them with the tacit and passive consent of Russia: oil prices rise, gas competition in the Gulf is destroyed, and the West’s attention is fragmented. For politically correct reasons, the Iranians will deny having had these weapons and could then acquire them legally" (?) in any case, Iran is within its rights to cancel any treaty with Israel-USA through a formal withdrawal that would free Iran from international restrictions and obligations, and from the control of Arab states and Israeli-American forces that can use their weapons with impunity against them. I would venture to say that this scenario of escalation is unlikely but not impossible; from an economic standpoint, “everyone loses” and some, like Blackrock, win.
Iran weighing possible withdrawal from Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
On the US social media company X, Tehran Deputy Malek Shariati said an "emergency plan to support the nuclear rights" of Iran has three main areas.
These include a declaration of withdrawal from the NPT, the cancellation of the countermeasure law in implementing the 2014 Iran nuclear deal, and support for a new international agreement with like-minded countries for the development of peaceful nuclear technologies, including Shanghai and the BRICS bloc of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and others.
"What is the benefit of joining a treaty in which bullying parties at the international level not only do not allow us to benefit from its rights but also attack our nuclear facilities?" Baghaei said, adding that Tehran would respect the treaty as long as it is a member.

Russia and China advocate for a reconfiguration of international law (order) in order to establish themselves and legitimize their status as major powers and take the lead in these political organizations. They are not going to come to anyone’s rescue, as many naively believe; they have no reason to, and that is their policy: “The door is open to those who are willing to set aside their whims and present a clear vision of what they propose.”
Lavrov explains the power struggle, describing them as an emerging new world order. I see that all parties are trying to destroy any diplomatic dialogue so that the military-financial establishment can prevail and “overthrow the old order.”

Old world order coming apart, ceasefire in Iran: Lavrov’s statements
MOSCOW, March 31. /TASS/. We're in the midst of a complete "teardown" of the old world order, with an intense struggle underway for global leadership, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said at a meeting of the Russian International Affairs Council.
Russia’s top diplomat stressed that Moscow calls for an immediate end to US and Israeli aggression against Iran, described the use of military force against civilians and civilian infrastructure as unacceptable, and noted that some countries today have "lost their bearings," declaring rights to territories without any legal basis.

"We are in the midst of a restructuring of the global order, which we hope will lead to the establishment of a sustainable and just multipolar world. But for now, this transformation looks more like a teardown in every sense of the word."
(...)"The struggle for leading positions in the new world is extremely intense - it is a matter of life and death. We see this almost every day," the foreign minister added.
Today, international law continues to be trampled on: "The restraining factors that have ensured a relatively stable order for decades are becoming increasingly scarce."
Some countries are laying claim to territories without any legal basis: "Some countries have lost their bearings and are openly declaring rights to certain territories without providing even the least bit of legal justification for their plans."
 
This may well be his first (real) public appearance since March 12th or so, and it could perhaps be inferred from what she said that it took significant effort on his part to attend.
I caught that too, felt it was odd or overtly thankful.

Funny that the tweet says "there's deep sickness here" which it refers to the fact that they're celebrating death penalty to Palestinians, but also what's happening to Bibi could be a debilitating disease
 
More cannon fodder by inexperienced soldiers facing the New Hybrid War coming from Nevada! 🍔☠️

Hezbollah starts targeting Israeli armored vehicles with FPV drones.

Russian Truth Substack Video
The new video shows strikes on two infantry fighting vehicles and a Humvee in the southern Lebanese city of Al-Bayada, which Israeli forces have invaded

Nevada Air National Guard deploys airmen in support of Operation Epic Fury
By Las Vegas Sun Staff (contact) Tuesday, March 31, 2026 | 3:42 p.m.
Airmen from the Nevada Air National Guard are being deployed to the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility in support of Operation Epic Fury, Gov. Joe Lombardo’s office said in a news release.


“Nevada is praying for the brave members of the Nevada National Guard at this time,” Lombardo said in a statement. “Our state’s guardsmen are truly the best in the nation and have received extensive training in the mission sets included in this callup. Throughout its 79-year history, the Nevada Air National Guard has deployed troops around the world in defense of our nation.”

The Reno-based airlift wing, known as the “High Rollers,” typically conducts rapid global mobility airlift, fire suppression in support of the U.S. Forest Service and expeditionary mission support, according to the news release..

The Nevada National Guard said it would not be releasing details about the mobilization, citing operational security and the safety of deployed personnel.

“The Nevada Air National Guard and our soldiers overseas are trained, ready and equipped to answer the nation’s call,” said Maj. Gen. D. Rodger Waters, Nevada Adjutant General, in a statement.

⛽🤔
German gas stations will now only be able to raise pump prices once a day as costs spiral for motorists. Meanwhile, an umbrella group for German cities says skilled Syrian workers should be welcome to stay. DW has more.
What you need to know

Gasoline stations in Germany will only be allowed to raise prices at the pump once a day

The aim is to curb price fluctuations and allow greater market transparency

An umbrella group for German cities says many Syrians who fled their home country should be allowed to stay

The comments come after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said 80% of Syrian migrants to Germany should return in the next three years
Here are the main headlines from and about Germany on Wednesday, April 1:

1 hour ago1 hour ago :pinocchio:

Iran war slows Germany’s economic growth outlook
Germany's economic outlook has weakened as the Iran war continues to weigh on growth, leading institutes have said.

Gross domestic product (GDP) growth for 2026 was revised down to 0.6% from a previous forecast of 1.3%.

The institutes expect only a modest recovery, with growth projected at 0.9% in 2027 — also below earlier expectations.

The assessment comes from the joint economic report by several groups, such as the Ifo Institute and the German Institute for Economic Research.

Ifo's head of economic forecasting, Timo Wollmershäuser, said the "energy price shock" linked to the Iran war was hitting the recovery hard, while government spending was helping stabilize domestic demand.

Inflation is also expected to rise. The institutes forecast consumer prices to increase by 2.8% in 2026 and 2.9% in 2027, higher than earlier projections. Rising gas prices are pushing up costs for fertilizers, food, production, and transport, feeding through to broader inflation and dampening private consumption.

Since the conflict began, oil and gas prices have surged, with shipping through the Strait of Hormuz largely disrupted due to security risks and threats of Iranian attacks. It remains unclear when safe passage will resume.

American freelance journalist Shelly Kittleson was abducted by unidentified individuals in the Iraqi capital, Baghdad, on March 31, the country’s Interior Ministry said.

In a statement addressing the incident, the ministry announced that an operation was launched immediately based on what it called “precise intelligence.” It added that authorities had intercepted a vehicle believed to belong to the abductors that flipped over as they tried to flee. One suspected kidnapper was arrested.

However, Kittleson was not in the vehicle. Iraqi media reports indicated she was taken near the Baghdad Hotel on Saadoun Street.

The journalist reported from Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria in the past. She wrote for publications including Al Monitor and New Lines magazine.

Officials in the administration of United States President Donald Trump confirmed to Al-Monitor that they were aware of the threat against Kittleson and had advised against travel to Iraq.

One of the officials told the news outlet that the State Department is aware of her kidnapping and working with the Iraqi government to secure her release.

The kidnapping came just over a month into the American-Israeli war on Iran, which led to speculations that the journalist was taken by one of the Iraqi armed factions backed by the Islamic Republic, like Kataib Hezbollah. There is still no evidence confirming this, however.

Just a day earlier, the Israeli Knesset passed a highly controversial law mandating the death penalty for West Bank Palestinians convicted of carrying out “deadly terror attacks”.

Following the move, Abu Ubaida, the military spokesman for the Hamas Movement, called on Lebanon’s Hezbollah to “intensify their efforts” to kidnap Israeli soldiers in Lebanon, saying it was in order to “liberate” Palestinian and Arab prisoners.
“Our people’s struggle against the Zionists has proven that the shortest path to liberating prisoners is through resistance,” Ubaida claimed, urging Hezbollah to “complete the mission” that Hamas started in Gaza. “We are certain that God will not forsake our free prisoners and will grant them relief and a way out of their predicament.”
The kidnapping of Kittleson may be the first response from the Iran-led “Axis of Resistance” to the Israeli decision to allow the execution of Palestinian prisoners.

The Trump administration has been extremely supportive of Israel, and has faced much criticism at home and abroad over the issue since the start of the war on Iran.

Strikes To Begin Today: Iran Warns Tech Firms Over US' Killing Of Leaders' The Guards said that they would target leading US technology firms, listing the names of 18 companies it alleged were complicit in the "targeted assassination" of officials.
Edited by: Anushree JonkoWorld News Apr 01, 2026 00:30 am IST

Summary is AI-generated, newsroom-reviewed

Iran's Revolutionary Guards said that they would target 18 leading US technology firms such as Apple, Google, Meta, IBM, Tesla and Boeing starting April 1. In a statement on Tuesday, the Guards alleged that the companies were complicit in the “targeted assassination” of officials.

"These companies, starting from 8:00 pm (1630 GMT) Tehran time on Wednesday, April 1, should expect the destruction of their relevant units in exchange for every assassination in Iran," the statement read.

In a warning to the employees, it added, "We advise the employees of these institutions to immediately leave their workplaces to preserve their lives."

The companies include -- Apple, Meta, Google, Microsoft, Intel, IBM, Dell, Tesla, Nvidia, Boeing, HP, Cisco, Oracle, Planter, J.P. Morgan, GE, Spire Solutions and G42.

They labelled the firms as "terrorist companies" in the statement and asked residents living around these firms to leave the area "within a one-kilometre radius" and to move to a safer place.

The threat comes as President Donald Trump says he is conducting diplomacy aimed at putting an end to the conflict while also threatening to amplify the US-Israeli campaign against the Islamic republic.

The Guards' statement said the US government and tech giants had "ignored our repeated warnings regarding the necessity" of halting operations targeting top Iranian officials, alleging that the tech firms are the "main element in designing and tracking assassination targets".

Supreme leader Ali Khamenei and Revolutionary Guards commander-in-chief Mohammad Pakpour were killed on the first day of the war on February 28, with the US and Israel seeking to kill an entire echelon of the Iranian leadership.

The Islamic republic's powerful security chief, Ali Larijani, has also been killed, as have many other prominent figures.

Screenshot 2026-04-01 at 03-02-57 Iran Threatens Major US Tech Firms Shared Grok Conversation.png
 
I think Whitney Webb thinks herself into Pretzels here (she has a tendency to go full "4D chess conspiracy"). Her argument, if I follow it (not always easy), seems to be: the domestic terror apparatus was set up so that it targets antisemitism on the right. So they sent out Joe Kent as an agent provocateur to fuel the fire, thereby creating a violent Fed-Mob à la Proud Boys, so that the government can then crush it. Oh, and it also leads to conflating Jews with Zionists, which is unfair.

Sorry, but this doesn't pass the vibe test. Antisemitism seems to be growing quite organically, and it's no mystery why. And while Joe Kent does say some silly things, overall Occam's razor applies here: the guy has followed things on the internet, has some (probably limited) inside observations on the Trump admin, was fed up with Israel/the Deep State, and (somewhat naively) thinks he can influence things from the outside.

Whitney Webb has a history of making up wild conspiracies.

From a Glenn Greenwald tweet a couple months ago:

What a bizarre and outright misleading tale @_whitneywebb told here about my supposed refusal to debate her. That claim, by itself, is just false. (It's such a waste of time and energy to have explain all this, because it's ultimately trivial and the actual topic to be debated is of interest only to a tiny number of people), but since she's falsely pretending I refused to debate on her Epstein, I feel compelled to respond (ironically, it's Whitney who refuses to debate Micahel Tracey about Epstein; I'm not the one dodging debates).

To be clear: I was the only one of the two of us who was willing -- indeed eager -- to quickly schedule a debate with Whitney about the critiques I expressed of several articles she wrote from 2013=15. This all happened back in August. And I remain 100% willing to debate Whitney about it.

Whitney is the one who back in August was reluctant to accept my suggestion that we debate. Pressured to debate by her own audience, said finally relented and essentially said: yeah, fine: I'll debate him, but not until several months from now.

The only reason any of this even came up at all is because, back in August of 2025, a viewer of mine asked during our live weekly Q-and-A show that we did at System Update: What do you think of Whitney Webb?

In response, I said: she seems to do some good work, INCLUDING ON EPSTEIN, but my view of her is permanently contaminated by the fact that back in 2013-15, she wrote multiple articles about the founding of the Intercept and the Snowden files that contained wild conspiracy theories that I knew for certain are false (I knew for certain because most if not all centrally included factually false claims about me and my actions).

Thus: despite her false assertions today and her weird, manipulative attempt to somehow include Michael Tracey in her tweet so as to imply that we're supposed to debate the Epstein files (something she dishonestly implied for obvious reasons), the differences that Whitney and I were supposed to debate DO NOT PERTAIN IN ANY WAY TO THE EPSTEIN FILES. I never once uttered a critique of Whitney's work on Epstein, so this debate would have nothing to do at all with Epstein.

Instead, the sole, narrow topic we were supposed to debate is relatively trivial: namely, her articles from 11-13 years ago about the Intercept and Snowden. I doubt many people have a strong interest now in hearing us debate 13-year old articles in MintPress about the Intercept (especially a debate months after it first it was discussed). But the topic is not trivial to me, so I was and am happy to debate her on it (see the video clip below from that Q-and-A exchange where I was asked about Webb: I believe it's the first time in many, many years that I mentioned her, or the first time in many, many years where I expressed criticisms of her.

For the sake of clarity: it is true that when Whitney was finally willing to schedule this debate -- in November -- our agreed-to moderator @briebriejoy messaged me to try to set up possible dates. But when Bri contacted me, I was very occupied going into the end of 2025 with various matters, and then again in January with our move to Substack. So I wasn't able to give it much attention.

Had she just sent me a message asking if I'm still willing to debate, I would have said: of course. How about March. But she likes these sorts of attention-generation melodramatics where she's the center character being disappointed and mistreated by others.

To be clear, what Whitney did in today' tweet -- creating a totally false picture that I decided not to debate her, purposely misleading people into thinking this debate is about the Epstein Files and Michael Tracey, etc. -- is the kind of behavior that shaped those 2013-15 articles that I objected to because they were full of falsehoods. That said, I also continue to think she does quite good work on many topics, as I said when asked.

Again, I don't think many people care about THIS debate, on THIS very narrow, parochial and old topic. But even if very few people care, I'm still willing to schedule a debate with Whitney for March. Let's schedule it.

Edit: This is the kind of thing that makes me question the validity of the claims in her wildly conspiratorial two volume Epstein book.
 
Last edited:
Just a thought

perhaps worth to keep in mind as well. I am not sure how good / skilled Whitney was back in 2013-15, which Greenwald repeatedly is referring to. He may or may not have a point.

Yet remember that she (and anyone who presumably honestly digs deep into the rabbit holes - surely gotten better skilled after 11-14 years. Especially given her still young age, i think she has in the more past years showed the world what goes on behind the curtains and under the carpets.

That should count for something, no ?

We all learn
 
Famine will generate overall violent mindset in society

Pre- April 2025 I was force subjected to starvation, increased stress for years. Critical brain nutrients were low: I developed violent anti-social thoughts, on a couple occasions minimal pushy behavior in supermarkets, softly, but noticeably bouncing into people while walking around them fast. Seeing general mechanical behavior of others reflexively I reacted imagining psychological violence in my mind. To even small things as source of upset. Despite efforts to conscious The Work control.

After months of filling my belly with critically important nutrients for the brain the internal psychological upheaval decreased significantly.

Expect previously calm people to behave violently during World Hunger. Not because people are evil, but because they are starving.

Famine auto-generates aggression in the brain, I think. Probably to activate an ancient hunter-gatherer reflex to get food, to hunt animals better.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom